by Patrick ➕follow (59) 💰tip ignore
« First « Previous Comments 70 - 109 of 240 Next » Last » Search these comments
I always had a shaky view on humanity, it's 100x worse now than it was 2 years ago.
I have a positive view on humanity. I think most people want to succeed and want their fellow man to succeed.
It's the small percentage of sociopaths that want control, sadistic control, that ruin it for the rest of us.
richwicks says
I always had a shaky view on humanity, it's 100x worse now than it was 2 years ago.
I have a positive view on humanity. I think most people want to succeed and want their fellow man to succeed.
It's the small percentage of sociopaths that want control, sadistic control, that ruin it for the rest of us.
Have you ever worked at university or Texas DMV office?
Queensland GP Dr William Bay may lose his medical licence after calling out Chief Medical Officer Paul Kelly at a Australian Medical Association conference in Sydney.
In footage uploaded to social media, Dr Bay unleashes in a tirade flagging his concerns over the Covid-19 vaccine, urging his colleagues in attendance to join his protest.
"I am here today to ask you to join with the people of Australia and stop forcing these vaccines on people who are getting killed by them," Dr Bay shouts.
Arnie1974
@Arnie1974
·
18h
Dr. William Bay apologises for not speaking out sooner.
He was afraid of losing his livelihood if he spoke out sooner than he did re the mRNA vaccines.
It should have been sooner.
That would have been the more ‘ethical’ thing to do.
FIRST, DO NO HARM!!!!
In a series of passionate tweets, Ontario-based doctor Matt Strauss called on hospital CEOs to “pick up the phone and call everyone you fired over unethical, ineffective, unscientific vaccine mandates” as a way of combating the major staffing shortages hospitals are facing in the province.
“I spent the holiday weekend working in an Ontario ICU. It was completely full and there was ZERO Covid. The staffing problem is very real. Poor morale and high workloads form a vicious circle. Here’s how I would fix it if I were a hospital CEO,” opened Strauss in a social media post on Wednesday. ...
1/ Apologize. Pick up the phone and call everyone you fired over unethical, ineffective, unscientific vaccine mandates. Ask them to come back. Then apologize to everyone who is still at work but felt coerced.
2/ End the mask mandates. It’s been 2.5 years that HCW haven’t seen each other smile or had a non-muffled conversation. This takes a psychological toll. Hard to measure, but it’s real.
3/ End the punitive, mean-spirited visitor policies. Nothing burns HCWs out more than telling families they can’t see their loved ones, then getting yelled at by said families. These policies protect no one.
4/ Welcome back the volunteers, gift shop workers etc. Hospital lobbies used to be bustling places where the community met and pitched in.
5/ Stop the silly screening protocols. There is no scientific basis for treating the hospital entrance like a militarized border crossing. Everyone knows to stay home if sick. I don’t need someone to hand me a mask with salad tongs. Redeploy those workers to patient care.”
... As indicated by Strauss, while most of the COVID hysteria from the past two years has died down, Canada’s healthcare sector is still using disproven scientific rationale to hold on to many of their so-called pandemic measures.
In fact, despite COVID vaccine trials having never produced evidence that the shots stop infection or transmission, the province of British Columbia refused to allow unvaccinated medical staff back to work amid a shortage, and instead pledged $12 million to hire foreign nurses.
CommonSense MD
@CommonSenseMD1
23h
Last month, I saw a patient, 60 y.o. male, previously very healthy, sustain a dissecting aortic root aneurysm less than 3 weeks after his 4th mRNA, that required emergency repair and mechanical aortic valve replacement.
As a physician, I believe "there could be a connection."
Aug 11, 2022 · 5:47 PM UTC
While hesitant to speak out at that time, (I, like so many physicians in medicine, was an employed physician for a large healthcare organization and did not feel comfortable speaking my mind.) I felt it was my moral and civic duty to give my comments and opinion in this very public forum. With the strength and support provided by Ann and my good friend, Mattie Leto, I agreed to give my testimony that THE SCIENCE failed to support the use of masks as a deterrent to the spread of viral illnesses in a community setting. There were only two randomized clinical trials [10] dealing with this topic at that time (that I was aware of) and neither showed any statistically significant benefit of masks with regard to prevention of COVID-19 [11]. I also spoke of potential harms of masking healthy, low-risk, children. It is well documented that masking can lead to developmental, learning and speech delays in young children, and anxiety and depression in older children and teens. My comments received tremendous support from the parents, students, and citizens in attendance. A very telling sign of our community’s sentiment was that only 2 people in attendance wore a mask.
During this school board meeting, I also clearly stated that if anyone could show me objective scientific data that refuted my position, I would consider said evidence and potentially change my opinion and comments. To this day no one has presented me with any data to show that masks are effective and should be used in schools. The risk of serious illness, hospitalization and death in healthy school age students is almost zero. I have never seen or heard of a documented case in this group of people. The known potential harms of masking these students, however, are quite profound. Again, tremendous downside risk comes with masking children with no benefit.
Unfortunately, those public comments got me in very hot water. Someone in our community wrote a scathing letter to our hospital CEO calling for my termination. They stated that I was impairing the community’s effort at controlling the pandemic. Keep in mind, as a physician in a medically underserved, rural community (I was and am the only fulltime physician for our county), I provide healthcare services to an area in which I have grown up and raised my family. I was actively treating patients to prevent disease and its spread, using the best available unbiased scientific evidence. And someone with no medical knowledge or experience was trying to get me fired! This was mean spirited, ignorant, hurtful and difficult for me to understand. If I were fired, there would be no one to take my place and our community would suffer. This blatant attempt at censoring my opinion and stifling the free flow of medical thought and discussion is yet another example of the widespread coercive censorship that has occurred locally, nationally, and worldwide during the pandemic.
Not long thereafter, I received a formal letter of reprimand and was instructed not to speak publicly on any medical topic without prior approval.
Ann and I continued to treat our patients aggressively with multidrug protocols achieving great success. But, in early September of 2021, I received a phone call from a local pharmacist at a chain pharmacy. He was quite apologetic but told me that “corporate” had instructed their pharmacists to no longer fill prescriptions of Ivermectin for the treatment of COVID-19. All the other big box chain pharmacies in our area had already instituted this harmful and misguided policy. This reckless act by a large corporate pharmacy put hundreds of thousands of patients’ lives at risk. There is no telling how many lives could have been saved had Ivermectin, an age-old drug with multiple studies supporting its safety and efficacy, been made readily available to physicians across this country.
Dr. Aseem Malhotra promoted Covid-19 vaccine on TV, now says stop
calls for its immediate suspension
Dr. Malhotra’s realization that his father had just been vaccinated just prior to his cardiac arrest and death led him down the path of discovery.
Yes, I see no reason to doubt it.
To reject the hospital's authority makes doctors very angry.
Just to be clear - I'm not accusing Patrick but the hypothesized mindset of the doctors.
To reject the hospital's authority makes doctors very angry.
stereotomy says
Just to be clear - I'm not accusing Patrick but the hypothesized mindset of the doctors.
Well then why don't you take it up with the millions of Doctors and other health officials worldwide that were fired during the pandemic for not sharing a few hundred Administrator's Opinion on Science? Ask them if they think Patrick is just being a big fat meanie head.
I do my part to take it up one by one with every doctor I have the unpleasant experience to deal with. What are you doing?
I do my part to take it up one by one with every doctor I have the unpleasant experience to deal with. What are you doing?
THE GREAT HOAX
@NL1884
23h
Replying to @Empty_America
I never "trusted" doctors but did think they cared about my well-being.
How ridiculous that sounds now - they actually WILL harm me without a second thought if it benefits them in any fashion, especially monetarily.
They have NO qualm enjoying their booty at our expense.
John Priest
@JohnathonPriest
22h
Replying to @Empty_America
Every time I’ve been to a doctor and received “treatment”, I would have been better off doing nothing at all.
LadyBritta
@lady_britta
Sep 27
Replying to @Empty_America
Doctors are psychopaths. They were the earliest and deadliest Hitler enablers.
academic.oup.com/ije/article…
Commentary: The Third Reich—German physicians between resistance and participation
To evaluate the role of the medical profession in the Third Reich is a delicate and difficult task. Its participation in major atrocities was, to a large extent...
"Doctors joined the Nazi party in higher percentages than any other profession. About 45% of doctors were party members."
PARIS—A prominent French physician has won a stunning victory against charges that he denigrated official covid policies, with the French Order of Physicians holding that he was in fact obliged to speak out.
In its ruling, the French governing body for doctors found that Christian Perronne, 67, acted in the best interest of citizens and his profession in critiquing covid treatments and vaccines on social media, in national television interviews, and in a best-selling book. ...
In an announcement of Perronne’s “complete victory,” his attorney, Thomas Benages, hailed the tribunal’s finding that doctors are entitled to debate and criticize health policies.
“By these fundamental decisions, the Disciplinary Chamber has reaffirmed the freedom of expression enjoyed by university doctors,” Benages wrote, “while highlighting the preponderant role played by Professor Perronne during the health crisis by bringing contradiction to the government and having”—as the decision stated—“‘a discordant voice on a subject of general interest.’ ”
The tribunal’s finding did not specifically endorse Perronne’s views, but rather his right to speak them.
That is a right which doctors in California no longer have, in direction violation of the First Amendment.
Patrick says
That is a right which doctors in California no longer have, in direction violation of the First Amendment.
Wouldn't be hard to give them a platform to speak out anonymously, @Patrick.
Sure, I'd be delighted if they would speak here, but how do inform them that they can do that?
Is there some way to contact all doctors in California?
Russell Gonnering: A Profound Rotting Evil has entered medicine. Unless it is decisively and completely excised it will continue to destroy our profession. We now have so-called medical ethicists who proclaim publicly that it is a moral duty to refuse care to individuals who are not “vaccinated” even though we now know vaccination does not prevent infection or transmission.
« First « Previous Comments 70 - 109 of 240 Next » Last » Search these comments
patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,265,111 comments by 15,127 users - Blue, Kepi, RedStar, stfu, WookieMan online now