patrick.net

Look I know you guys want to hang on to your belief that Epochtimes is a beacon of truth in a sea of lies with dishonest journalism. And they are the closest thing to it, but they are also the pressure release valve to keep major revelations from blowing up and getting out of hand. It's so people like your Liberal uncle, inspite of all of the truth bombs, you may have tweeted him or texted him. Only to have him claim the information is invalid, because it came from a preordained Racist fake news website as deemed by the New York Times. So epoch times is there to at least report some of what you are telling uncle Lou, but then poo poo on all of the truth and research by giving the classic "Fact Checker" qualifier, like "The Epoch Times could not independently verify this statistic before press time."

When we on Patnet have verified it, at least 100 times over the year.

Can anyone that loves the Epoch Times, produce one single article where they snuck in a factcheck during a report where Liberals are on a deflection and projection rant, otherwise known as lying their fucking asses off? Where's the impendent verification of everything Fauci and crew say on a whim, that proves to be flat out false?

They don't report shit about right POV, until they absolutely have to. Then it's only to do damage control over what a Youtube video, Tweet, or Alt right News site gets the scoop.
Epoch never has the scoop. Everyone that asks me if I read what Epoch Times wrote, it's always a few days to a few weeks old. They are most always shocked by how much I can elaborate on the story, than what they gleaned from the Epoch Times article.

And now for the final evidence.

"Thought leaders" is a NPR, NYT, and Huffington post tagline. Thought leaders are biased as fuck.

You're mad because they wouldn't publish something they couldn't verify?

No I'm not mad, I'm just pointing out, that the normies think they are some kind of cutting edge in the know jouros, because they get the scoop first.
Nope! They report what the experts report, three days later to help Fucker Crapson and Con Hanity, sound they they broke the story, and are the pulse of America.

Those experts that give three shits, of course are the Hoft Brothers, and what few holdouts there are at Breitbart. They are about 1/3rd or less of the Breitbart operation, the senior editors that without them. .The New World Order new owners of BB, know they would lose 100% of the readers. So they tolerate a few real journos. Not many but a few.

Tenpoundbass says

and what few holdouts there are at Breitbart.

You were doing great in this thread till you drag out Breitbart as your better examples. I regularly sample the same news story from a variety of outlets with established and predictable patterns of bias, in my eternal quest to triangulate on "the facts." Breitbart has always been among the American Right/mainstream GOP Standard Candles. Trouble with Breitbart is, they are one of the WORST offenders when it comes to publishing headlines that make a specific concise talking point, which is then either unsupported or outright contradicted by the body text.

As for Epoch Times, I don't find them much use at all. They seem to have a vague, nondescript Republican and Christian face, just enough so that a wide variety of people from those demographics can identify with, but not feel excluded or relegated to another faction of by ever taking too specific of a stance or position.

Tenpoundbass says

https://www.theepochtimes.com/recordings-reveal-lockstep-covid-19-protocols-patient-isolation-by-hospitals_4073286.html?utm_source=patrick.net&utm_campaign=patrick.net&utm_medium=patrick.net


Since when has any Mainstream media ever stated,

That link takes me to their main page.

Do as I do - consider everything you read as bullshit, until you can verify it yourself.

I'm FULLY AWARE I'm exposed to propaganda, but I do remember who doesn't "make mistakes" over time. The Intercept was a Neocon rag except for Glenn Greenwald. One of the reasons I quit reading Zerohedge, is that it's impossible to mark who is credible because every fucker is Tyler Durden and those goddamned annoying graphs that they posted that only had the text of "this graph doesn't need to be explained" - the fuck it doesn't.

There's propaganda, nonsense and clickbait everywhere - and it's not going away. You have to learn to deal with it. You can't fight it.

BTW - going to the main page, yeah, they are worthless.



It's the National Enquirer from 1985. Look at all the hysteria over OMICRON.