by Patrick ➕follow (59) 💰tip ignore
« First « Previous Comments 261 - 268 of 268 Search these comments
Liberal Hollywood Star Michael Douglas Admits That Trump’s Republicans Are the ‘Party of the People’ While Dems Are ‘Elitists’
There’s a long ongoing saga of liberals trying to come to term with reality.
Besides mad leftists shaving their heads and freaking out on camera, there are also those who try to understand America’s moment using whatever mental faculties the TDS did not destroy.
It’s the case of Academy Award winner Michael Douglas.
The Hollywood star has allowed himself to admit – even if it was notably painful for him – that the GOP under President-elect Donald Trump is now the ‘party of the people’, while Douglas’ beloved Democrats are now seen as ‘elitist’.
The actor appeared Friday on Bill Maher’s Real Time , and the episode dealt primarily with Trump’s historic victory over Kamala Harris. ...
Douglas told Maher that the Democrats lost the election over the economy.
“’In 40 years, the stock market has increased 5,000 percent and real earning wages have increased 14 percent’, Douglas said, later adding that ordinary Americans ‘are going week to week with the inflation, it is killing them’.
‘And I think we really underestimated it, and the very fact now that we could talk about Republicans as being the people, the party for the people, and that we have this elitist party on the left, Democrats, is wild’.”
Social media has been buzzing for days about Joe Rogan’s interview of Marc Andreesen, a Silicon Valley entrepreneur, investor, software engineer, and influential ‘thought leader’ in tech and venture capital. He co-founded Netscape, predicted the rise of the Internet, and has been an early investor in some of the biggest startups in the Valley.
Andreesen is a pretty big deal, a former Democrat, and very persuasive in the tech sector. If you picked a single theme for his interview, it would be “weaponization of government.”
Based on Andreesen’s claims, in a sane, non-circus world, the interview would produce Congressional investigations and public hearings, forcing agency heads to either admit serial constitutional violations or else prove they haven’t happened.
If you have time or need a good travel listen, listen to the whole thing. Among many other astonishing tales, Marc testified from personal experience having been told by Biden Administration officials not to invest in AI, since the government planned to capture and control two or three “competitors” and tightly manage the entire industry. He also described a secret war against digital currency developers including widespread de-banking and nebulous, never-ending quasi-criminal prosecutions in the cryptocurrency sector.
On Christmas Eve, Fox News ran a prophetic story headlined, “DNC powerhouse fundraiser announces exit from Democratic Party following attacks: 'It's like leaving a cult’.” The sub-headline added, “Lindy Li said she was 'ostracized' from the party and labeled a 'wh—e’ after criticizing Kamala Harris.”
Lindy Li is a (now former) Democrat strategist, media talking head, and fundraiser to the progressive super-wealthy. She sat on the DNC’s national fundraising committee. Recently, after the election, Lindy grew frustrated at how bad the loss was. She made her first mistake by going on Fox News. She sealed her fate when she said, “Democrats have a stench of loser hanging over them.”
That’s when the fireworks really started. Li told Fox, "People have called me a wh—e, the ‘C-word.’ People are calling me a communist spy. They asked for me to be deported.”
By people Lindy meant Democrats. Her former friends.
Ms. Li was mostly frustrated at how the badly money she’d raised was misspent. “My initial disillusionment became clear,” Lindy explained “when I realized (the Harris campaign) essentially set $2.5 billion on fire. There’s been no accountability. We still haven’t gotten any answer as to why Oprah —a billionaire!— got $2.5 million dollars through her production company. Why couldn’t she pay for it? She’s an oligarch! Not to mention they spent $450,000 putting Kamala’s face on The Sphere. Now tell me how that would help her win? Obviously it was utter failure.”
Amidst Lindy’s laundry list of complaints about the money appeared one completely separate objection that stood out since it wasn’t like the others: “I want to be a part of the team that says men are men and women are women and men shouldn't play in women's sports.” It’s a good team. Lindy added, “I don't want to be a part of this craziness anymore. They're (democrats are) accelerating my rightward shift."
Well. I’m not sure Lindy is shifting rightwards, even though it might feel that way to her. We’ve returned to that cartoon Elon Musk made famous: the Democrats are sprinting leftwards, which leaves people like Lindy in the dust. When the dust clears, they discover they’re actually closer to conservatives than to the woke progressives.
Lindy’s journey reminded me of a clip making the rounds yesterday. It was from a recent “Genius Life” interview of Harvard professor Arthur Brooks, who studies happiness. Over ten years ago, Brooks published a controversial op-ed in the New York Times disclosing his research finding that conservative women were one of the happiest groups he studied.
In his recent podcast interview, Brooks reported that conservative women under 30 remain the group who self-reports being the happiest; if anything, their satisfaction is even more pronounced, with up to 40% describing feeling very happy or even “blissful.” But the most unhappy group is now white liberal women under 30, with an astounding sixty percent being clinically diagnosed with a mental illness.
My own theory is that progressivism (as distinct from classic liberalism) requires unhappiness as a signal of virtue. If you aren’t always mad and depressed at the woeful state of the world and all the hatred and injustice toward cross-dressers, how can you possibly call yourself a sensitive progressive? The torturous mental gymnastics needed to accept that being a good person also requires being unhappy produces mental illness. That’s my theory, anyway. What do you think explains all the unhappiness and lunacy among white liberal women?
Returning to Lindy Li, whose departure from the Democrat party could be better seen as a form of self-survival. After all, nobody who’s not in a cult wants to live that way.
Lindy’s leaving is twice as expensive as it looks. Every million she doesn’t raise for Democrats is a million she’ll be raising for someone else, summing to a net shift away from Democrats of two million dollars.
Lindy said she’d already been approached by Trump’s team. She’s thinking about it.
The question that should be dogging Democrat leadership (if there is any Democrat leadership) and keeping them awake at night, is the question of whether Lindy Li’s defection is an exception, or is she the Asian canary in the progressive coal mine?
« First « Previous Comments 261 - 268 of 268 Search these comments
patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,264,136 comments by 15,107 users - goofus, HeadSet online now