patrick.net

AmericanKulak says

Nooooooooooo!

Guy in funny looking costume trashes the USA for "irresponsible lifestyles" that contribute to the climate change crisis, but not *China.


From Breitbart (in part):

Curiously, Pope Francis has singled out the United States as particularly responsible for the climate “emergency” because of the “irresponsible lifestyle” of its citizens.

“If we consider that emissions per individual in the United States are about two times greater than those of individuals living in China, and about seven times greater than the average of the poorest countries, we can state that a broad change in the irresponsible lifestyle connected with the Western model would have a significant long-term impact,” the pope said last October.

The alert folks at The Pillar Catholic, an online Catholic news outlet, pointed out at the time that in fact “U.S. per capita emissions are less than 1.5 times that of China,” adding that China’s per capita emissions levels “are significantly higher than the global average.”

The pope also failed to mention that in aggregate, China’s emissions are more than double those of the United States, and America’s air is among the cleanest of any nation, while China’s air quality is among the poorest.

In his introduction to the Vatican summit, which will be held May 15-17, Francis states that climate change is “no longer a secondary or ideological question, but a drama that harms us all,” adding that climate change manifests “a tragic and striking example of structural sin.”

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2024/05/12/pope-francis-world-nearing-breaking-point-from-climate-change/

PS: * The Vatican recently announced that their 'deal' with the Chi-Coms has been renewed. The Vatican receives $2 Billion American annually from the Chi-Coms, in return, the Chi-Coms get to choose 'Catholic' Bishops and Clergy, while the Vatican agrees not to criticize any policies of the Communist Chinese, including the ongoing persecution of Christians in China.

Vatican is a country. What's their per-capita emissions?

https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/stormy-weather-saturday-may-18-2024

Is ‘climate change’ causing weather records to fall? Probably not, since CO2 doesn’t exist in space. I’ll put one theory out there, a theory that is extremely hard to find anywhere in corporate media, probably since it contradicts the lucrative manmade climate theory. ...

Earth is rapidly losing its magnetic shielding at an accelerating rate of five percent per decade...

It seems self-evidence that as the field weakens, more solar radiation will get through, causing changes on Earth. Things like worldwide aurora, for example. But don’t believe your lying eyes.

Last year, corporate media collectively began “debunking” the commonsense notion that a weaker magnetic field will lead to more violent and extreme Earth weather. It’s just a coincidence.

But as usual, the certainty in the headline was betrayed by the details. Scientists aren’t quite as sure as National Geographic’s headline writers are. ...

The faces get prettier, but the tits get smaller - how can you have porn without tits?

https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/deadly-force-wednesday-may-22-2024

Similarly, the data crunching on last week’s dramatic solar storms continues, and it looks like we weren’t over-selling its historic nature after all. ...

It was so unusual that they initially didn’t even consider the storms could cause strong deep-sea readings. But the same scientists will swear on a stack of Q’rans that all this extra solar energy has no effect on Earth’s climate, because science. Shut up! Don’t ruin it for everybody.

The sun's energy output varies, as does the type of rays emitted.

Let’s not forget that DEATH VALLEY is currently a massive LAKE!

https://metatron.substack.com/p/debunking-the-climate-change-hoax

The indomitable Douglas Brodie argues that climate change is a politically motivated hoax designed to impose totalitarian control and redistribute wealth through flawed science and data manipulation.

He traces its origins to anti-capitalist ideologies and figures like Maurice Strong, criticizes the scientific basis for CO2-induced warming, and highlights manipulation by influential figures and organizations.

Doug contends that Net Zero policies are economically damaging and futile, urging skepticism towards the establishment and advocating for voting against mainstream political parties supporting climate policies.

Shaman says

Let’s not forget that DEATH VALLEY is currently a massive LAKE!

Still? I thought I missed the opportunity to see it.

Patrick says

https://metatron.substack.com/p/debunking-the-climate-change-hoax

The indomitable Douglas Brodie argues that climate change is a politically motivated hoax designed to impose totalitarian control and redistribute wealth through flawed science and data manipulation.

He traces its origins to anti-capitalist ideologies and figures like Maurice Strong, criticizes the scientific basis for CO2-induced warming, and highlights manipulation by influential figures and organizations.

Doug contends that Net Zero policies are economically damaging and futile, urging skepticism towards the establishment and advocating for voting against mainstream political parties supporting climate policies.

The cars are already unaffordable to most because of the stupid "globull worming mitigation" regulations.

Patrick says

Dear Britons, the famous anti-utopian novel by one of your compatriots was intended as a warning, NOT A FUCKING MANUAL!!!

"The uncertainty about the benefits is larger than the uncertainty about the costs.”

https://www.worldscientific.com/doi/10.1142/S2010007823400031

https://nakedemperor.substack.com/p/schrodingers-climate-change

Similar to Schrodinger’s cat, that was both dead and alive, the UK climate in May was apparently both hot and cold.

To us mere mortals, May was bloody freezing. I still had the central heating on and even wore gloves when I went for a run at one point.

But to the climate change, weather forecasting overlords, it was hot. According to the UK’s Met Office, provisional figures show May and spring were the warmest on record.

“Whilst it may not have felt like it” is excellent gaslighting. I’d rather trust my own empirical observations rather than some ever-changing, ideologically biased climate change models.

And to me it was cold and therefore I declare that May was not warm.

https://wattsupwiththat.com/2024/06/04/almost-all-recent-global-warming-caused-by-green-air-policies-shock-revelation-from-nasa/

The world of climate science is in shock following extraordinary findings from a team of high-powered NASA scientists that suggest most of the recent global temperature increases are due to the introduction of draconian fuel shipping regulations designed to help prevent global warming. The fantasy world of Net Zero is of course full of unintended consequences, but it is claimed that the abrupt 80% cut in sulphur dioxide emissions from international shipping in 2020 has accounted for 80% of global warming since the turn of the decade. Although the extra heat is described as “transient”, the warming is extraordinary and is expected to rise during the 2020s at a rate of 0.24°C a decade, 20% higher than the claimed warming trend since 1980.

The news is likely to cause considerable concern among the mainstream climate hoaxers in media, academia and politics. They have had a field day of late by pointing to rises in temperature as evidence for their evidence-free prediction that the climate is in danger of imminent collapse. But the NASA scientists, working out of the Goddard Space Flight Centre, predict a trend of rising temperatures due to the IMO2020 regulations going forward, and state, “the 2023 record warmth is within the ranges of our expected trajectory”.

The science behind the NASA findings, which have been published in Nature, is simple. Fewer fuel particles injected into the atmosphere reduce cloud droplet density and this leads to clouds that reflect less solar radiation back into space. As the scientists note: “IMO2020 effectively represents a termination shock for the inadvertent geoengineering experiment through a reverse marine cloud dimming through reducing cloud droplet number concentration.” In the course of their work, the team calculated large particle reductions in major shipping routes in the North Atlantic, the Caribbean Sea and the South China Sea.

https://joannenova.com.au/2024/05/if-climate-change-is-making-turbulence-worse-pilots-and-planes-havent-noticed/

The European Space Agency even puts sensors on planes. With 40 million flights per year, tracked by radar and monitored by satellite, and reported by pilots as well, if there were trends in clear air turbulence on passenger planes, there would be a mountain of data, and we’d hear all about it. Instead all they have are modeled guesstimates and slightly worse conditions over the North Atlantic.

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajes.12579

Carbon dioxide and a warming climate are not problems
Andy May, Marcel Crok
First published: 29 May 2024

... Observations show no increase in damage or any danger to humanity today due to extreme weather or global warming (Crok & May, 2023, pp. 140–161; Scafetta, 2024). Climate change mitigation, according to AR6, means curtailing the use of fossil fuels, even though fossil fuels are still abundant and inexpensive. Since the current climate is arguably better than the pre-industrial climate and we have observed no increase in extreme weather or climate mortality, we conclude that we can plan to adapt to any future changes. Until a danger is identified, there is no need to eliminate fossil fuel use.

https://sandrews.substack.com/p/further-analysis-of-data-from-berkeley

Further analysis of data from Berkeley Earth clearly indicates that climate change in the period 1860 to 2020 is driven by the sun ...

This analysis provides further evidence that it is solar activity that is the dominant driver of the climate change seen during the period 1860 to 2020. The “fingerprint”, trend and influence of the 11 year solar cycle activity is obvious (Fig 1) and the monthly temperature anomaly variations (Fig 2 a & b) are clear evidence that the sun’s cycles and orientation are highly influential. My previous article highlighted the temperature changes over the entire period as attributable to the Milankovitch cycles. I had failed to identify that there are other solar cycles, specifically the 11 year cycle. The hypothesis offered by Professor Henrik Svensmark offers a plausible explanation of why these solar cycles are a key component of climate change. Factors that impact short term trends of the earth’s climate are probably far more complex than identified here.

In conducting a literature search on this subject, I came across an article from a NASA climate modeller (6). This article highlighted the various failures to find evidence in the temperature record of the 11 year solar cycles. Consequently, anthropogenic global warming was alive and well. Well, it turns out the solar cycle signal was loud and clear as they were just looking in the wrong way and the wrong place.

The good news for mankind is that the impact of carbon dioxide at the current levels, and therefore the burning of fossil fuels appears to be almost “nett zero”.

Where is Klaus Schwab?

https://notrickszone.com/2024/06/10/new-study-east-antarcticas-ice-sheet-thickening-gaining-mass-especially-since-the-1980s/

A collection of 85-year-old photographs reveal “growth and stability” of the East Antarctic ice sheet.

https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/the-blue-wall-wednesday-june-12-2024

In case you were wondering, since the temperature hasn’t been getting much coverage this summer, overall June has been cooler than last year. The Telegraph ran a muted story yesterday headlined, “June temperatures at half the level of this time last year.” They were hoping for something much hotter.

https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/trustworthy-friday-june-14-2024-c

The extreme weather is creating fertile ground for theories about the cause, since nobody’s offering a coherent explanation. Of course, they keep barking “climate,” but they aren’t even trying anymore to attach logic to the claim. I found the best example yet of what passes for science these days in one of the articles I reviewed:




See? No evidence, no problem! That is, so long as your theory is an approved narrative. So just remember to use the probable explanation exception the next time somebody tells you there was “no evidence” of widescale cheating in the 2020 elections.

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17477891.2023.2239807?scroll=top&needAccess=true

A similar pattern over time is exhibited by contemporaneous number of geophysical disasters – volcanoes, earthquakes, dry landslides – which, by their nature, are not significantly influenced by climate or anthropogenic factors. We conclude that the patterns observed are largely attributable to progressively better reporting of natural disaster events, with the EM-DAT dataset now regarded as relatively complete since ∼2000. The above result sits in marked contradiction to earlier analyses by two UN bodies (FAO andUNDRR), which predicts an increasing number of natural disasters and impacts in concert with global warming. Our analyses strongly refute this assertion as well as extrapolations published by UNDRR based on this claim.

https://boriquagato.substack.com/p/climate-catastrophism-as-big-business