patrick.net

The UK Does A NetZero U-Turn

"Was this the "Peak NetZero" moment for the British Isles?... Rishi Sunak takes axe to Tory net zero plans warning current 2030 target would cost families £15,000:

PM waters down ban on gas boilers and petrol and diesel cars, scraps plans for seven bins per home and says there will be no extra tax on flights or meat

The Prime Minister hosted a Downing Street press conference to confirm plans to delay a ban on new petrol and diesel car sales by five years to 2035. And about a fifth of all households will be covered by an ‘exemption’ from ever having to remove their gas boiler and replace it with a heat pump.

'We are not going to save the planet by bankrupting the British people.'" https://joannenova.com.au/2023/09/its-big-the-uk-does-a-netzero-u-turn-on-cars-heaters-and-promises-no-taxes-on-meat-or-flights/

https://clintel.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/WCD-version-081423.pdf



Includes two Nobel Prize winners.

https://slaynews.com/news/greenpeace-co-founder-climate-alarmism-100-untrue/

One of the co-founders of the global environmental group Greenpeace has blown the whistle to warn the public that “climate alarmism… is 100% untrue.”

Environmentalist Patrick Moore is the former president of Greenpeace Canada and helped found the international organization in 1971.

After leaving the group in 1986, Moore has tried to warn the public that environmental activism has been hijacked to push political agendas.

In a new interview with podcast host Dan Proft, Moore warns that the entire “climate crisis” narrative is a hoax.

Moore highlights how, in recent years, green agenda advocates have been using changes in the weather to suggest that the planet is being destroyed by global warming.

“They said it was the hottest year in the history of the earth the other day, and it’s not,” Moore told Proft on the “Counterculture” podcast.

“That’s just, period, a lie.

“The whole climate alarmism – ‘climate catastrophe’ – is 100% untrue,” Moore declared.

“We are not in a climate crisis.”

Moore told Proft that “there is nothing really that radical happening” with the climate.

https://notthebee.com/article/this-is-how-you-deal-with-climate-protesters-when-they-sit-their-little-entitled-bottoms-on-the-highway

RWSGFY says

I wonder if the frozen K-rations are still edible.

I couldn't find that one, but found this:

https://electroverse.info/lost-airbus-engine-found-under-greenland-ice/

HeadSet says

RWSGFY says

I wonder if the frozen K-rations are still edible.

I looked this up. The stupidity is they are going to try to recover it. WHY? It's just an old piece of garbage at this point, likely crushed. Why is some stupid government wasting money to try to recover it?

Apparently, they are going to create a tunnel to it, disassemble it, and return it part by part to the surface. A complete waste of money.

Industrial Left'

I haven't heard the term either. I hope they actually exist, too.

PedoIwog says

Conveniently the URL is cut offf.

Source source source fucking source. I fucking hate screenshots. I can make any screenshot I wish.

richwicks says

I can make any screenshot I wish.

Then make one. That way you will be happy

GasTheYoungTurks says

richwicks says

I can make any screenshot I wish.

Then make one. That way you will be happy

Screenshots are faked all the time. If you're making a claim that something showed up on a site, post the link always. Screenshots are optional, verification is not.

richwicks says

Screenshots are faked all the time. If you're making a claim that something showed up on a site, post the link always. Screenshots are optional, verification is not.

You are accusing me of posting fake screenshots.

Fuck you.

GasTheYoungTurks says

You are accusing me of posting fake screenshots

No. I'm pointing out screenshots are easily faked. Why not include the link? What do you think links are for?

There is so much propaganda on the net, it's tiresome and irritating that people don't provide links. I do.

The media lies about what was in the Mueller Report for years, but the never provided a quote from it, a link to it, or page numbers. Because they were lying about the contents

personal

GasTheYoungTurks says

richwicks says

Why not include the link? What do you think links are for?

Right now, just to piss you off.

During the amount of time you spent typing up your little tantrum, you could have looked up the tweet your fucking self.

Once again, I am perplexed by how you can function in life.

And this whining about no link comes from the guy who stated that any source can be found by 10-word snippet from it. (Which actually seems to be true.)

GasTheYoungTurks says

During the amount of time you spent typing up your little tantrum, you could have looked up the tweet your fucking self.

EVERYBODY has to look it up, because dipshits are too fucking dumb, and incompetent to include a link.

I'm tired of people being fucking lazy.

Eric Holder says

And this whining about no link comes from the guy who stated that any source can be found by 10-word snippet from it. (Which actually seems to be true.)

IF it's in a search engine.

richwicks says

GasTheYoungTurks says

During the amount of time you spent typing up your little tantrum, you could have looked up the tweet your fucking self.

EVERYBODY has to look it up, because dipshits are too fucking dumb, and incompetent to include a link.

I'm tired of people being fucking lazy.

Reeeeeeeee!

Eric Holder says

Reeeeeeeee!

If people are trying to share information, SHARE information.

You just troll and scream and shout, Eric - nothing you've ever said was useful, or interesting, so there's no reason to provide any links. I just ignore your nonsense.

richwicks says

Eric Holder says

Reeeeeeeee!

If people are trying to share information, SHARE information.

He did. But you still reeeeeed at him. And now you are reeeeeeeing at me. It's getting boring.

richwicks says

EVERYBODY has to look it up, because dipshits are too fucking dumb, and incompetent to include a link.

I'm tired of people being fucking lazy.

It is A FUCKING TWEET! If you want to look for it sooo fucking bad, why is it my job to it for you?

GasTheYoungTurks says

It is A FUCKING TWEET! If you want to look for it sooo fucking bad, why is it my job to it for you?

It's your job to accurately convey information. I do this and I cite sources.

Here's an example:

https://americandissident.substack.com/p/why-i-think-the-united-states-overthrew

That's my article. You'll find it's all hyperlinked. Do you know why I went through that trouble? So anybody else reading it doesn't have to go through that trouble. It's because I want to convince people I'm correct.

30 years ago, we invented hyperlinks. I remember being confused as to why "news" would never include fucking hyperlinks. NY Times, LA Times, didn't, nobody did.

You know why? They try to create dependency on their claims but they lie all the time. Allow people to verify. It's not a hard habit to get into.

richwicks says

If people are trying to share information, SHARE information.

First you say it is fake. Now you insist we share shit you declare to be fake.

richwicks says

If your job to accurately convey information. I do this when I cite sources.

What FUCKING PART of 'It is A FUCKING TWEET!' do you seem to not understand?

Amazing. Truly. How do you hold down a job?

GasTheYoungTurks says

First you say it is fake.

NO. I'm not saying it's fake.

I'm saying you should include links. Don't make people go through hoops to verify things.

I know "it's easy" to look stuff up, but it's a LOT easier if you don't even have to do that.

Take the Mueller Report, I have heard hundreds of people claim it proves this or that, but they never will include a link, because they didn't check themselves. They're not lying, they're ignorant, and they trust sources that ARE lying to them.

If the Mueller Report proves X, for example, it's pretty easy to point to that page and include the quote, so it can be independently verified - but if it DOESN'T prove X, you have to read the entire 700 pages of bullshit, and carefully, to discover it's not true.

Assume everything is false. This is the correct way to go about it. Just assume it's false. All the tools are there to make it TRIVIAL for you to prove it's true. I'm just asking you to make use of them.

richwicks says

I'm saying you should include links.

It is a fucking Tweet!
It is a fucking Tweet!
It is a fucking Tweet!