patrick.net

I do think there are "natural" gays but it's like maybe 0.1% of the population. Most gays are made, not born.

Yesterday, Colorado State Representative Scott Bottoms (R-D15) posted a video in which he described feeling intensely frustrated after a committee meeting with Colorado democrats, and in the process disclosed shocking inside intel that Colorado democrats oppose punishments for people who buy infants for sex.

Listen to the whole thing. But here is a shortened, slightly-edited (for clarity) transcript of Scott’s main comments:

These are the times that I am discouraged about my job as a representative and what happens here at the capitol. All day in committee we discussed whether or not to require jail time for somebody that buys little children — 2, 3, 4, 5 year old kids — for sex. Right now, most of the time they get off on probation after buying and raping a little child. We tried to get a bill through, (representative Bradley’s) to ensure these buyers do time, a minimum of 4 years.

But democrats voted a 100% against putting these pedophiles in jail. They defended the pedophiles! They came up with all kinds of reasons, including that these buyers are victims themselves.

This is evil stuff, truly dark forces, that we're dealing with. If you can come up here and testify for bills like this, please do so. Your voice is very important.

Since both ChatGPT and Grok easily answered the same question directly and unequivocally, Gemini was obviously programmed to talk this way by its groomer handlers at Google. Not only did Gemini refuse to say pedophilia was wrong, it followed its mealy-mouthed answer with a long essay packed with pro-pedophile propaganda.

The concept of Minor Attracted Persons — MAPs, for short — is a nifty bit of Neo-marxist rhetorical sleight-of-hand that we’ve seen before. Syntactically slicing a pedophile’s desires away from his actions is like definitionally-severing the twin concepts of sex and gender, which until about ten minutes ago used to be synonyms of each other (except ‘gender’ was more specific than the broader term, ‘sex’, which has alternate meanings).




The marxist goal to define MAPs as just being unfortunate people sexually attracted to “minors” (not children) is intended to grant them victim status, and to create a moral platform for demanding sympathy and special privileges. “They can’t help being born in the wrong body…” Oh wait, that was the previous bit of illogical nonsense. Let me start over. The new slogan is, “They can’t help who they’re attracted to.” So, the thinking goes, “We must be understanding and help MAPs manage their feelings so they don’t break the law.”

Why helping pedophiles enjoy their sexual preferences while avoiding breaking the law is our responsibility is a question no Neo-marxist would answer, and would obviously make us all complicit co-conspirators.

If Google bosses get away with this ruse, they’ll shortly be demanding MAPs have unlimited access to child sexual materials like visual media and dolls (“stop criminalizing a sexual preference!”). Once that beachhead is taken, we’ll have to cover our eyes for MAP parades, grind our teeth through MAP Pride month, and plug our ears during MAP Lives Matter protests.

And one day, as soon as they can get away with it, they’ll demand we accept pedophilia itself — in the name of love (“love is love!”).

We should’ve shut down the sex/gender rhetoric when it first crawled out of the sewers. Shame on us. But we have another chance; that is exactly what we should do with all this MAP nonsense. Shut it down. Pedophilia is not an identity.

If you wanted a reason to boycott Google and Gemini, that would be a good place to start. Shame on you, Google.

UPDATE: I first published Gemini’s awful MAP-forward answer on Twitter yesterday afternoon. Just now, before posting, I checked again, and the service has slightly changed how it phrases its answer:




Note that Gemini still won’t say pedophilia is wrong. It is deflecting, by saying it is “condemned” as wrong. In other words, other people say it’s wrong.

https://twitter.com/ReduxxMag/status/1762145549434720640



A middle-aged HIV-positive man is making a baby suck on his man boobs thanks to woke lactation experts in Canada.

I have thoughts. ...

He sounds like a good dad, doesn't he?

No, he sounds like a porn-addicted pervert who was able to obtain a baby. Well, I guess that's what you'd say if you're one of those bigots who don't think babies should get milk from male chests. ...

Yeah, I think we're not hating doctors enough now.

(No, I know, not all doctors. But any doctor that would enable this...)

Kentucky Democrat argues for child sex dolls to be available for "minor attracted persons" during committee meeting

Paedophilia Being Normalised by LGBTQ Paedophiles
MADRID - Spain - A recent LGBTQ parade included young underage children in lingerie, makeup and bondage gear. ...




The incessant march towards normalisation of paedophilia is all too evident in the clip below, with half-naked underage children being paraded in the streets wearing suspenders, make-up and waving LGBTQ rainbow flags.

The aim of normalising paedophilia is to add a ‘P’ to the end of LGBTQ (Lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, queer, paedophile). For a long time the LGBTQ community have been promoting paedophilia and are now desperately trying to be inclusive of the paedophile community.

Within the LGBTQ movement, there are many homosexual men who desire young boys for sex, and they seem to be frustrated that they are not fully represented in the ‘inclusive’ nature of the LGBTQ group. This is why they are now making an issue about it with parades of young children in bondage and lingerie gear.

They have pretty much normalised transexuals, therefore the next logical step for this section of society is to normalise paedophilia.

What if it could release a chemical that would make an opposing army's soldiers think more about the physical attributes of their comrades in arms than the threat posed by the enemy? And thus the "gay bomb" was born. Far from being the product of conspiracy theorists, documents released to a biological weapons watchdog in Austin, Texas confirm that the US military did investigate the idea. It was included in a CD-Rom produced by the US military in 2000 and submitted to the National Academy of Sciences in 2002. The documents show that $7.5m was requested to develop the weapon.

The documents released to the Sunshine Project under a freedom of information request titled "Harassing, Annoying and Bad Guy Identifying Chemicals" includes several proposals for the military use of chemicals that could be sprayed on to enemy positions. "One distasteful but non-lethal example would be strong aphrodisiacs, especially if the chemical also caused homosexual behaviour," says the proposal from the Air Force's Wright Laboratory in Dayton, Ohio.

The documents released to the Sunshine Project under a freedom of information request titled "Harassing, Annoying and Bad Guy Identifying Chemicals" includes several proposals for the military use of chemicals that could be sprayed on to enemy positions. "One distasteful but non-lethal example would be strong aphrodisiacs, especially if the chemical also caused homosexual behaviour," says the proposal from the Air Force's Wright Laboratory in Dayton, Ohio.

would be strong aphrodisiacs, especially if the chemical also caused homosexual behaviour

Patrick says

would be strong aphrodisiacs, especially if the chemical also caused homosexual behaviour

Perfect plan. Their wrists would be too limp to hold their weapons or throw grenades.

Monstrous.

American support for same-sex "marriage" is dropping for the first time in a decade and I don't think it's hard to figure out why ...

In about a decade the LGBT movement has gone from "Just let us get married" to "Let us confuse, corrupt, sexualize and irreparably damage your children."