« First « Previous Comments 2,647 - 2,686 of 4,272 Next » Last » Search these comments
During Pax Americana nation states did not go to war with each other for territory. That era has now ended.
Misc says
During Pax Americana nation states did not go to war with each other for territory. That era has now ended.
Iraq is owned by the United States, it's just not on a map.
Why do you trust official decrees? Why can't you see through this?
Does the UN have to tell you what to think? The US owns Iraq as much as it owns Japan, or Germany for that matter. These nations will not act in any way that they are not directed, by the United States, to act. Don't you realize that?
The US does not own Iraq.
We have put in place diplomatic treaties with Japan and Germany for mutual defense.
You'd murder me before you'd dispatch a traitor.
Why would I kill you? Maybe a military member would follow your diatribe and determine on his own that you are an enemy of the Constitution, then follow your advice and take you out.
Are you so far into anger that you cannot see that when an entity is granted the ability to use force, that entity need be kept on a leash? That is why the military does not determine the enemy and is kept under civilian control. Politicians determine who we go to war with, what weapons the miliary gets, and the rules of engagement. Judges determine who is not acting with the Constitution. Why can't you see that if every military member decided who was a domestic enemy, then generals would rule? Every senator would worry about some special forces commander declaring that senator "unconstitutional."
I wrote previously that you could use your 2nd Amendment rights to go after any politician you deemed a tyrant. You replied that you would get killed. I flew tankers but have some friends who flew F-111s. During the 1st Gulf War, those F-111 guys were told they would experience 25% casualties (did not happen, but nobody knew that ahead of time). The crews flew anyway, sometimes multiple sorties per day dodging anti-aircraft fire. Now think of the ground folks, like the tank drivers who had to drive through land that had to be cleared for mines to fight the 4rth largest army in the world that would hit them with tanks of their own, artillery, and attack helicopters. These guys also went into battle even when told to expect high casualties.
You seemed dismayed that a military man is not willing to take out who you deem an enemy of the Constitution, while you are too cowardly to do that job yourself. You better be glad that the military is disciplined to attack only when commanded by appointed authorities and nor free to attack who they please. Otherwise, you would just be some soldier's bitch.
The US does not own Iraq.
We have put in place diplomatic treaties with Japan and Germany for mutual defense.
I wrote previously that you could use your 2nd Amendment rights to go after any politician you deemed a tyrant. You replied that you would get killed.
I flew tankers but have some friends who flew F-111s. During the 1st Gulf War, those F-111 guys were told they would experience 25% casualties (did not happen, but nobody knew that ahead of time). The crews flew anyway, sometimes multiple sorties per day dodging anti-aircraft fire. Now think of the ground folks, like the tank drivers who had to drive through land that had to be cleared for mines to fight the 4rth largest army in the world that would hit them with tanks of their own, artillery, and attack helicopters. These guys also went into battle even when told to expect high casualties.
You seemed dismayed that a military man is not willing to take out who you deem an enemy of the Constitution,
while you are too cowardly to do that job yourself. You better be glad that the military is disciplined to attack only when commanded by appointed authorities and nor free to attack who they please. Otherwise, you would just be some soldier's bitch.
First of all, I wouldn't be so fucking stupid as to use a gun. I'd design a quad copter to drop in a lawn dart into their head. That's SIMPLE to do.
Your oath means nothing. I'm just telling you that, and in everything you wrote, you've not denied it. Isn't that interesting?
You assholes can kill me if you like, you can brutalize me, rape me, whatever. You are more of a threat to me than an Iraqi, an Afghani, a Syrian, a Libyan, a Somalian, or a Yemeni.
richwicks says
First of all, I wouldn't be so fucking stupid as to use a gun. I'd design a quad copter to drop in a lawn dart into their head. That's SIMPLE to do.
What is stopping you? You still condemn military for not taking out such a domestic enemy. I never said anything about you using a gun, and it does not have to be lethal. Fry a computer system, shut off power, or hack a broadcast to get some facts out. Again, what is stopping you?
You have an incredible lack of perception. I told you that it is not up to any military member to determine who the enemy is, and gave you detailed reasons why that discipline exists.
No military man is threat to you or any other civilian. In fact, a Marine would defend you from a mugger if he were walking by and saw it. You just pulled that military man as a personal threat out of your ass.
I am very likely to be killed by my government, because I openly oppose it, and I'm not kidding
Yeah, you can't make decisions on your own. You'd have been a good soldier under Stalin, Hitler, or Mao.
You are being a bit paranoid here, but if an agent of the government would kill you, it would not be a military man.
United States Marine Corps
Headset, I'm curious what made you join the military? Also, how many years have you been out now?
GNL says
Headset, I'm curious what made you join the military? Also, how many years have you been out now?
I joined because I liked the idea of military service and to fly jets. I got out in 1995.
Did you give any thought to whether or not you would be fighting on moral grounds?
I'd design a quad copter to drop in a lawn dart into their head. That's SIMPLE to do.
Really kid, simple? Please elaborate
How would you aim this "lawn dart?" How would you account for wind?
Yeah, tremendously simple and an infra-red camera. They are cheap.
By the way, if you could actually build that duck chaser, you could make a fortune selling it. Make a version that could chase geese off golf courses as well.
No toy camera is going to have the resolution to get 3x3 pixels on human sized objects 500 feet away. That would be a challenge for a $30,000 pro inspection camera.
Even if you had raided someone's Arduino project and acquired a cheap camera with sufficient resolution, exactly how would you build the interface between the camera and the servos? I already know how to build a tiny device that could take inputs from a small hobby barometer or accelerometer to actuate hobby servos, but reading from a camera is whole 'nother league.
Drones with mini nukes will solve this targeting problem.
At this point, even dildos could defeat Ukraine.
If the story was true. This is US "news" media after all
At this point, even dildos could defeat Ukraine.
All you need is a Peltier junction, cool it enough to pick up IR.
Just have a center target, go for the brightest point in the center.
It is clear you have no idea what you are talking about and are now making it up as you go along as an attempt to defend your initial boast. I presume any other blog readers with practical tech experience who read that arrogant boast just rolled their eyes at your obvious ignorance and moved on. You are a fraud who just likes to pretend and run his yap.
Congrats: you've discovered our resident ultracrepidarian. :D
Wow, you sidestepped the interface question with a vague generality on how you think a heat seeking missile works. You clearly do not understand the nature of IR light
« First « Previous Comments 2,647 - 2,686 of 4,272 Next » Last » Search these comments
https://twitter.com/HinchaPenta/status/1496700652084473857?s=20&t=T1inEM5Hv6ahmrL4nzNirQ&source=patrick.net