patrick.net

socal2 says

Per the report - Russian planners preparing for a long war?

LOL! Thought I'd throw y'all a bone.

The_Deplorable says

"Please explain: If Ukraine is wining, then how come they are losing territory? No answer!"

WookieMan says

"I really don't care what people think the outcome is."

You are not answering the question.

" If anyone here also thinks Ukraine still doesn't have nukes, keep being a retard."

You are dreaming. Where is your proof? No answer.

Can you guys not read? At no point did I, myself ever say Ukraine was winning this shit show. Never. Ever. Quote it or shut the fuck up and stop being gay.

You're a fucking idiot if you think Ukraine got rid of its nukes. Full blown retard. They had thousands. Nah, they didn't keep a couple dozen. They gave them all up. Lol. Like legit full retard. This thread is the definition of retardation at this point. Whatever. Russia is winning after 2 years of holding the land it already did. lol.

What's all this Ukraine business?

AmericanKulak says

What's all this Ukraine business?

I don't know. It's gays thinking that either side is winning. They just don't realize they're taking it up the ass...

Ukraine is so 2022-2023.

AmericanKulak says

Ukraine is so 2022-2023.

LOL! Call me when they have busted out the champagne after the partition party.

WookieMan says

at no point has a user here said Ukraine isn't fucked.

And now:

WookieMan says

At no point did I, myself ever say Ukraine was winning this shit show.

Look everyone! Watch how WookieMan changes his bullshit! He goes from saying at no point has a user here to claiming he was talking about just him! Amazing!

Oh, and then he accuses ppl of not knowing how to read as the problem.

I am sure that providing proof of ppl saying on PatNet that Ukraine was going to win has nothing to do with it.

How many lies have you told like this as a 'real estate expert' on this site as well, Wookie?

This fucked up shit is classic iwog, btw.

UkraineIsFucked says

^^^socal2 plz answer the question.

After you give me an estimate of Russian casualties and define what a Russian "win" is.

A Ukrainian "win" is kicking Russian occupiers out of their country.

socal2 says

After you give me an estimate of Russian casualties and define what a Russian "win" is.

A Ukrainian "win" is kicking Russian occupiers out of their country.

...which has nothing to do with Russian causalties, because Ukraine is fighting a war over territory while it is the Russians who are fighting a war of attrition...which the Ukeys are losing.

You seem to think the opposite is occurring.

Ukraine is fucked. That means -- by your own definition -- Russia can't lose. Despite what ever changing rants Wookie posts, only one ends up being a winner.

UkraineIsFucked says

WookieMan says

at no point has a user here said Ukraine isn't fucked.

And now:

WookieMan says

At no point did I, myself ever say Ukraine was winning this shit show.

Look everyone! Watch how WookieMan changes his bullshit! He goes from saying at no point has a user here to claiming he was talking about just him! Amazing!

I stand by my claim. I never said Ukraine would win. Socal as far as I recall never said that Ukraine would win. WFT are you talking about? You selectively quoted a comment. That's your trolling practice. I have not seen a user here saying Ukraine would "win" this war.

You're not understanding what this war is at all. There won't be a winner, yet you're hooked on defending Russia. All I've done is bash Ukraine. Technically I'm on your side. I'll bash Russia in the process though. I'll bash the US. This is a dumb war against two corrupt nations. Russia looks worse for it. They had Crimea and a bridge with rail. They now lost some of their most powerful ships in the Black Sea. That's not winning.

If this cannot be clearer I'm afraid there are issues in the cranium. I wish you luck in getting that checked out. This is two vodka drunk nations, fighting over a tiny amount of land that will be fought over for centuries because they're fucking idiots. You think Russia "winning" is gonna change that? Lol. I don't want the kool aid you're drinking.

UkraineIsFucked says

..which has nothing to do with Russian causalties, because Ukraine is fighting a war over territory while it is the Russians who are fighting a war of attrition...which the Ukeys are losing.

Ha ha!

You can't even wrap your mind around it. Russia is fighting a war of attrition? Like losing 20% of its Black Sea Fleet, destruction of Wagner, losing Crimean airfields and gaining 2 new NATO members on its borders?

Back to your programmed bot reply.

socal2 says

Like losing 20% of its Black Sea Fleet, destruction of Wagner, losing Crimean airfields and gaining 2 new NATO members on its borders?

1) Ukraine is a land war.
2) Wagner wasn't lost. It was absorbed into Russia's armed forces.
3) Crimea is still under Russian control. Didn't you say Ukraine needs to kick Rissia out of Ukey territory?
4) Two useless NATO members. Neither of which is going to save Ukraine.
.
And above all, you don't undesirable what a war of attrition is. It's the killing off of the enemy's fighting force. Ukraine conscription press gangs are grabbing men with Down's Syndrome, 60 year old and pregnant women now. Because Russia obliterated THREE ENTIRE Ukey armies.

Russian Arty sure does kill.

WookieMan says

I stand by my claim. I never said Ukraine would win

So you engage in magical claim changing to try to finagle your way out of being caught fucking lying?

So what. No amount of your iwog-tyle bullshit is going to get your ass out of it. Not this time.

statement WookieMan is lying about him never making

at no point has a user here said Ukraine isn't fucked.

All of the support for the hopeless Ukrainians reminds me of a conversation I had with a retired Army Tank Commander. It was during the start of America's 18 year war in Afghanistan. I told him that history proves that Afghanistan's terrain makes for a nightmare militarily. Beginning with Alexander the Great, to the ruthless Red Army, no one has ever successfully conquered Afghanistan. He laughed at that and said that I had no idea what kind of power U. S. Military possessed. He summed it up by saying it would be a 'cake walk.'

I recall at the start of the Ukrainian conflict that most of the media referred to the Russian military as being 'inept,' 'backward,' 'antiquated,' 'lacking leadership,' etc. Early on, the media made it appear that Ukraine was clearly winning and that it would be only a matter of time before Russia would negotiate a settlement and go home. What they never told you was that Russia was waging a LIMITED war, and that it was not using the overwhelming Military power that was available to them. Had they done so, Kiev would have disappeared off of the map within about 2 weeks.

Many military experts are estimating that over 500,000 Ukrainian soldiers have been killed. That is an awful big number for such a little country. Also, since the war began, millions of people have fled Ukraine, including large numbers of fighting age men.

Ukraine is a lost cause. It is nothing other than a money making scheme for the military industrial complex, the mega-banks, the crooked politicians (including in America) getting big money deposited in secret, off-shore accounts, etc. It's also a failure for the One World Government crowd that views Russia as an impediment to their nefarious plans.

The American people have been fooled and lied to. America's border is being invaded every single day. THAT is the real border dispute that we should be addressing, instead of the failed cause of Ukraine.

RayAmerica says

Many military experts are estimating that over 500,000 Ukrainian soldiers have been killed.

Show me one credible link supporting this death toll.

Everything I have read, suggests Ukraine has under 100,000 deaths and up to 300,000 casualties. Huge death/casualty toll for Ukraine for sure - but less than 1/3 of what you are claiming.
https://www.reuters.com/world/us-intelligence-assesses-ukraine-war-has-cost-russia-315000-casualties-source-2023-12-12/

In virtually every war in human history, attackers have 3X the death toll as the defenders. And we know that Russia doesn't value human life and has been sending meat waves like this one below getting their troops and tanks wiped out.

Ukraine knows they have a smaller military and has been much more conservative and cautious to not waste troops. One of the reasons why Ukraine pulled back on this Summer's counteroffensive because they could not run through human lives as Russia has.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XBPtbNTxLL4

RayAmerica says

I recall at the start of the Ukrainian conflict that most of the media referred to the Russian military as being 'inept,' 'backward,' 'antiquated,' 'lacking leadership,' etc. Early on, the media made it appear that Ukraine was clearly winning and that it would be only a matter of time before Russia would negotiate a settlement and go home.

Total history revisionism.

At the start of the war, NO ONE thought Ukraine would hold on. Let alone hold on to recapture lost land and still be in the fight 2 years later. Certainly not the Biden administration that was offering Zelensky a flight out of the country.

It wasn't until a few weeks later where Ukraine was able to hold on that the rest of the world started seeing the total crap-ass quality of the Russian military getting all their convoys and supply lines wiped out. That was when the narrative started to turn and Western countries started to line up to provide weapons.

socal2 says

"At the start of the war, NO ONE thought Ukraine would hold on."

Russia is not fighting Ukraine. Russia fought and defeated - massively and decisively - the US and NATO in Ukraine proving that we no longer live in a unipolar world.

The_Deplorable says

Russia is not fighting Ukraine. Russia fought and defeated - massively and decisively - the US and NATO in Ukraine proving that we no longer live in a unipolar world.

Russia had a massive and decisive victory but still occupies less land than then did 2 years ago? How does that work?

There are no NATO troops fighting Russia. Ukraine has been holding their own by using moth-balled and 3rd tier weapons systems from the US and NATO and Commercial communication from SpaceX.

Russia wouldn't last 2 days against advanced US and NATO military.

Russia's monumental fuckup in Ukraine has totally exposed Russia as nothing more than a drunk gas station country with some nukes.

socal2 says

Russia had a massive and decisive victory but still occupies less land than then did 2 years ago? How does that work?

It's more than it had before. It is comprised of mostly ethnic Russians. And at least 80% of Ukraine's total GDP value is produced there.

And, Ukraine isn't getting it back. Therefore by YOUR OWN DEFINITION of a Ukraine win, Ukraine is fucked.



socal2 says

There are no NATO troops fighting Russia. Ukraine has been holding their own by using moth-balled and 3rd tier weapons systems from the US and NATO and Commercial communication from SpaceX.

Even if true, Ukraine is fucked.

socal2 says

Russia wouldn't last 2 days against advanced US and NATO military.

Yes it would. Because it would use nukes. The Great Equalizer.

socal2 says

"Russia had a massive and decisive victory but still occupies less land than then did 2 years ago? How does that work?"

Nonsense. In this war the victor gained land (land that it is now part of Russia) and the defeated (The US, NATO and Ukraine) lost land. You are confusing strategy with tactics.

"Russia wouldn't last 2 days against advanced US and NATO military."

Ignoring reality does not change the facts.

Have a nice day.

UkraineIsFucked says

Yes it would. Because it would use nukes. The Great Equalizer.

Their mostly not functioning nukes don't scare me.

Booger says

Their mostly not functioning nukes don't scare me.

Who sez they don't work?

Zekensky is building his 4th army!

UkraineIsFucked says

Zekensky is building his 4th army!

When they give that guy a gun, he is as likely to shoot his commander as he is to shoot at Russians.

Patrick says

More Russia losing.

https://warnews247.gr/viaio-stratiotiko-chtypima-tis-rosias-kata-tou-kievou-dialythike-i-aeramyna-tis-oukranikis-protevousas-v-poutin-ola-vrazoun-mesa-mou-afti-ti-stigmi/

socal2 says

Russia had a massive and decisive victory but still occupies less land than then did 2 years ago? How does that work?

Socal2,
Please answer this question:

Do you honestly believe that Russia is conducting all out war? Do you believe that Russia could have leveled Kiev, using conventional weapons and air power, had they really wanted to? Yes or no?

socal2 says

Russia wouldn't last 2 days against advanced US and NATO military.

No hyperbole there socal2. Sounds very reminiscent of what Hitler said at the start of the German invasion of Russia: "All you have to do is kick the door in and the whole rotten mess collapses." He too was convinced that the Russians had poor equipment and weren't very good fighters. As I recall, the Russian invasion didn't work out all that well for the Germans.

Apparently your memory doesn't recall the USA running for their lives out of Afghanistan after 18 years. They couldn't even defeat the rag-tag Taliban, and they're going to defeat Russia in "2 days?"

RayAmerica says

Do you honestly believe that Russia is conducting all out war? Do you believe that Russia could have leveled Kiev, using conventional weapons and air power, had they really wanted to? Yes or no?

Of course Russia could nuke Kiev.

But Russia is throwing EVERY conventional weapon system at Ukraine (even rehabilitating 50+ year old weapons systems) and still haven't gained the ground they lost last year.

FFS - Russia is having to use munitions and rockets from Iran and North Korea now.

What a pathetic shit show Russia has shown the whole world.
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-67888793

RayAmerica says

No hyperbole there socal2. Sounds very reminiscent of what Hitler said at the start of the German invasion of Russia: "All you have to do is kick the door in and the whole rotten mess collapses." He too was convinced that the Russians had poor equipment and weren't very good fighters. As I recall, the Russian invasion didn't work out all that well for the Germans.

Apparently your memory doesn't recall the USA running for their lives out of Afghanistan after 18 years. They couldn't even defeat the rag-tag Taliban, and they're going to defeat Russia in "2 days?"

The difference is that we have had 2 year to watch Russia in action and their military performance has gotten worse and more pathetic as they have burned through their advanced weapons and experienced troops and now resorting to meat-wave attacks and using weapons from Iran and North Korea.

Russia still doesn't control the airspace despite Ukraine having really no functioning Airforce.......until the F16's come on line in a few weeks.

IRT - Afghanistan. The US Airforce and a handful of Special Forces and the CIA toppled the Taliban half a world away winning the conventional war in a few weeks. Ditto with Iraq (3rd largest army at the time).

Counterinsurgency and Occupation are much harder. Our troops were unable to keep Muslims from killing each other and Biden tragically threw it all away with his botched withdrawal.

Russia hasn't even gotten to the hard counterinsurgency phase yet. They planned on toppling Kiev inside a month and then installing Russian shills to run the place. How is that going to work out down the line?

socal2 says

Of course Russia could nuke Kiev.

Did I say anything about Russia nuking Kiev?

No wonder you are holding to your views. You're being misinformed by the likes of that Ministry of British Propaganda, aka, the BBC, the very same ministry that helped sell the Iraq War using the lie of 'weapons of mass destruction.' You're being played socal2, and you don't even realize it.

By the way socal2, why do you think it is that Ukraine's membership in NATO has been withheld?

Surely it isn't because that would automatically throw the USA & NATO into a direct confrontation with Russia, which, according to you, 'Russia wouldn't last two days.'

socal2,

Having read your #3343 post, I can say with a great deal of confidence, you will never be hired to give the POTUS his daily brief. We'll leave that up to the professionals and experts like Col. Douglas MacGregor.

By the way, how did that much vaunted 'Spring Offensive' go for Ukraine?

https://swentr.site/news/590145-pentagon-no-money-ukraine/
https://www.defense.gov/News/Transcripts/Transcript/Article/3631953/pentagon-press-secretary-maj-gen-pat-ryder-holds-a-press-briefing/

RayAmerica says

By the way, how did that much vaunted 'Spring Offensive' go for Ukraine?

About as well as the entire Russian invasion overall. Basically both are locked in stand still trench warfare.

Russians are needlessly getting thousands of their men killed just in the past 2 months throwing human meat-waves against entrenched Ukrainian troops in Avidvika.

socal2 says

The difference is that we have had 2 year to watch Russia in action and their military performance has gotten worse and more pathetic as they have burned through their advanced weapons and experienced troops and now resorting to meat-wave attacks and using weapons from Iran and North Korea.

All wrong. They outproduce the West in tanks, artillery and drones. Speaking of drones, they produce thousands of them with IR vision sensors...something they should not be able to produce let alone in large numbers.

It is the Ukeys who are engaging in meat wave attacks against Russian fixed positions. That's why their spring offensive produced nothing but dead and crippled Ukeys.

You spew nothing but Ukey/NATO propaganda.

socal2 says

Basically both are locked in stand still trench warfare.

Ukeys being slaughtered 10:1 by Russian arty isn't trench warfare.

It's dead and crippled Ukeys.

RayAmerica says

socal2 says

Russia wouldn't last 2 days against advanced US and NATO military.

No hyperbole there socal2. Sounds very reminiscent of what Hitler said at the start of the German invasion of Russia: "All you have to do is kick the door in and the whole rotten mess collapses." He too was convinced that the Russians had poor equipment and weren't very good fighters. As I recall, the Russian invasion didn't work out all that well for the Germans.

Apparently your memory doesn't recall the USA running for their lives out of Afghanistan after 18 years. They couldn't even defeat the rag-tag Taliban, and they're going to defeat Russia in "2 days?"

The Germans were the attackers. Russia had advanced notice on a land based attack and defenses put up. Russia has yet to ever even try an overseas attack on anyone because it can't. Cuba was overhyped by the media we all bash. The USSR is no different than what is in place now. It's failing and their dumb ass decision to start war with their neighbor is beyond stupid.

Our wars in Iraq and Afghanistan were stupid. Militarily we won them though. At this point Russia hasn't won anything and both sides are churning through men. By default Russia has lost. Ukraine was never going to "win" the body count and will be fucked for decades itself. Russia on the other hand might be screwed for upwards of a century. I don't really care about Ukraine.

100k job loss in the US is a big deal. We're talking 100k dead and probably another 300k maimed/wounded. As in they cannot work. Minimum. Russia cannot operate it's infrastructure without Western help. Now they don't even have the lackeys to do the dirty work. They have no engineers. People with a brain. Russia is fucked. So is Ukraine. This was already land Russia Quasi controlled anyway with planning and defensive positions in place. They've utterly failed as socal has pointed out.

Ukraine won't "win" but this has been an utter failure by Russia. The excuse making for Russia is laughable. They don't have advanced weapons. We took over two nations across the globe in months. You can hate the MIC all you want, at least be happy you have the best. We're witnessing a subpar military in real time.