« First « Previous Comments 3,392 - 3,431 of 4,264 Next » Last » Search these comments
Most of the world’s leading navies are getting bigger—a lot bigger—by one key metric: tonnage.
But not the Russian navy. It’s struggling to grow at all, and for one main reason. The Ukrainian navy, which has no large front-line ships, keeps sinking and blowing up Russian vessels.
Reddit-user Phoenix_jz annually aggregates, analyzes and publishes the total tonnage of the top 10 navies. Their most recent survey, published this week, should encourage advocates of a free Ukraine—and worry proponents of Russian aggression.
In 2023, the Russian navy added just 6,300 tons and ended the year with a total tonnage of 2,152,000. The Russians would have added 17,700 tons last year through the new construction of a new frigate, corvettes, a minesweeper and submarines, but the Ukrainians destroyed Black Sea Fleet vessels together weighing 11,400 tons.
In losing nearly as much tonnage as it built in 2023, the Russian navy joins an exclusive and embarrassing club of stagnant or shrinking navies. The 886,000-ton Royal Navy also shrank in 2023, which is nothing new for what once was the world’s greatest fleet but in recent decades steadily has withered under the mismanagement of successive governments.
The 356,000-ton Italian navy shrank, but that’s mostly due to a gap between the decommissioning of some older warships and the commissioning of their new, and much larger, replacements.
The Russian navy is the only navy that can’t manage to grow mostly because it keeps losing ships in combat. Over the last year the fleet’s “woes in the Black Sea have continued unabated,” Phoenix_jz wrote.
The Black Sea Fleet began Russia’s wider war on Ukraine with around 50 large warships including the missile-cruiser Moskva, several frigates and corvettes, a dozen or so landing ships, diesel-electric submarines and a large flotilla of patrol boats.
This against a Ukrainian fleet that had just one large warship, the frigate Hetman Sahaydachniy. The Ukrainians scuttled the frigate at her mooring in Odesa in the early hours of the initial Russian attack in February 2022. With Hetman Sahaydachniy on the seafloor, the Ukrainian navy became a new kind of navy—one that mostly fights with drones and missiles, with a big assist from the air force.
In 23 months of hard fighting, the Black Sea Fleet has lost—to Ukrainian drones and missiles—its cruiser, four amphibious ships, a submarine, a supply ship and several patrol boats and landing craft. In 2023 “the most dramatic loss by far was the destruction of the [submarine] Rostov-on-Don in drydock at Sevastopol,” Phoenix_jz wrote. The sub displaced 3,100 tons.
Any other fleet might be able to make good its wartime losses, but the Russian shipbuilding sector collapsed with the end of the Soviet Union. It doesn’t help that what remained of the industry relied on maritime engines it imported from Ukraine—engines Ukraine no longer is willing to sell to Russia, for obvious reasons.
Today, Russian shipyards still manage to build large submarines, but they struggle to build surface warships heavier than a few thousand tons.
So while the world’s leading navy, the U.S. Navy, last year grew by 32,000 tons to a new total of 7,393,000 tons; and the fast-growing Chinese navy added 50,000 tons to total 2,899,000 tons; the Russian fleet grew barely at all.
It’s all because of the Ukrainian navy. A fleet with no large ships keeps destroying as much tonnage as the Russians manage to build.
Most of the world’s leading navies are getting bigger—a lot bigger—by one key metric: tonnage.
But not the Russian navy. It’s struggling to grow at all, and for one main reason. The Ukrainian navy, which has no large front-line ships, keeps sinking and blowing up Russian vessels.
So? Ukraine is a LAND war.
L-A-N-D
Thought Putin decided to get hundreds of thousands of his men killed, in part because the need to protect his Black Sea fleet and naval facilities in Crimea? How did that work out?
https://twitter.com/DougAMacgregor/status/1746383889965207885
Forty year old outdated Bradley's taking out Russia's most advanced T90 tank.
https://twitter.com/NOELreports/status/1746149986188882246
"MacGregor is maybe one the dumbest people I’ve heard."
WookieMan says
"MacGregor is maybe one the dumbest people I’ve heard."
You call that an argument? This is an ad hominem attack against Douglas Macgregor and you are admitting in other words that you cannot reply to Douglas Macgregor's arguments.
Thank you for the feedback.
I believe we have a special thread dedicated to McGregor 🤡 being false prophet and a stupid cunt.
"I believe we have a special thread dedicated to McGregor 🤡 being a false prophet and a stupid cunt."
RWSGFY says
"I believe we have a special thread dedicated to McGregor 🤡 being a false prophet and a stupid cunt."
That is not an argument. Have a nice day.
NATO General Secretary Goes Rogue – Says No Threat of Russian Expansion Beyond Ukraine
The_Deplorable says
RWSGFY says
"I believe we have a special thread dedicated to McGregor 🤡 being a false prophet and a stupid cunt."
That is not an argument. Have a nice day.
#UkraineIsFucked
So is Russia. There’s no winner in this
"So is Russia. There’s no winner in this."
And one such consequence, in my thinking, is the collapse of NATO.
Mass demonstrations in Slovakia against the new Pro-Russian government. Demonstrations have been ongoing for over a week now and keep growing.
I figure it's either that or we are intentionally limiting weapons system to Ukraine due to supply constraints on the consumables (ammunition). It's not like Russia is doing any better in that department. They can't make stuff either and have to beg North Korea for stuff. At least north Koreans have food and oil now.
The US is working on a new strategy for Ukraine that would mark a departure, away from the offensives of 2023 and now toward frontline defense
« First « Previous Comments 3,392 - 3,431 of 4,264 Next » Last » Search these comments
https://twitter.com/HinchaPenta/status/1496700652084473857?s=20&t=T1inEM5Hv6ahmrL4nzNirQ&source=patrick.net