« First « Previous Comments 143 - 182 of 189 Next » Last » Search these comments
To be fair, at around that time, behemoths like Global Crossing, WorldCom, Lucent Technologies, etc, went into the toilet. The fact of the matter was the hi-speed access was too expensive as T3 lines were only affordable for big corporations.
Sure, some of today's mainstays have survived and even prospered, but do you want to be this person who bought Cisco at its peak ...
https://patrick.net/post/1341757?40#comment-1794348
Fidelity will reportedly start offering investors to add Bitcoin to their retirement 401(k) accounts later in 2022.
Why do the acolytes of Lord Satoshi preach the gospel with such passion? Because we know that in order to create circular self-sustaining pockets of economic action that use Bitcoin as the sole payment method, we must infect as many minds as possible with our memetic narrative.
This is especially important because of how successful Bitcoin has been from a price appreciation standpoint. The meteoric rise of Bitcoin from nothing to a $1 trillion dollar plus asset in the span of a decade created the HODL culture. HODLers will not sell their Bitcoin at any price. And these folks, myself included, spend fiat and save Bitcoin. Fiat depreciates in real terms year after year, while Bitcoin is the best performing asset EVER created.
However, Bitcoin– unlike gold– must be used to have value. Miners spend energy to maintain the Bitcoin network. To cover their costs, miners must receive payment in a token that is socially valuable. Bitcoin therefore must move, and movement between parties is the antithesis of HODL culture. HODL culture taken to its f(x): maxima would result in the complete destruction of Bitcoin. Once all bitcoin has been minted and miners no longer receive sufficient income from network rewards in the form of newly minted Bitcoin, they must rely on transaction fees instead. If no Bitcoin changes hands because we all sit smugly clutching our USB sticks, then there will be no hashpower supporting the network. No network … no value.
Therefore, as a loyal subject of Lord Satoshi, I must do my part to evangelise the good word, and hopefully they can influence their domestic policy makers to create a fertile environment that promotes a farm-to-table Bitcoin economy.
However, Bitcoin– unlike gold– must be used to have value
Patrick saysHowever, Bitcoin– unlike gold– must be used to have value
Sounds like a pump and dump scheme,
Bitcoin saysa reason why Bitcoin is bad
Transaction speed is slow.
notice how the chart doesnt have anything on transaction speed? cause it doesnt matter. I bought Bitcoin for 15k.....now its worth close to 40k.....i never transacted it once except when I moved it from the exchange to the cold storage (hardware wallet).
but at least for stocks buy and hold is done and won't see return. I expect similar for bitcorn
However, Bitcoin– unlike gold– must be used to have value.Bitcoin says
Its digital gold. Why do you need the transaction to be fast?
mell saysbut at least for stocks buy and hold is done and won't see return. I expect similar for bitcorn
Wait, you are saying for stocks, buying and holding long term is not a strategy anymore?
My strategy for stocks is dollar cost avg. basically buy into the dumps/falling knife.....but have a long term outlook, 2+ years
. Big tech is done for many years. Buy and hold is not a good strategy,
If people can’t make quick transactions in the digital age, then it is not the digital age. It is the Stone Age,
mell says. Big tech is done for many years. Buy and hold is not a good strategy,
get your point. What about index funds? you are specifically talking about individual stocks but DCA, buy and hold for index funds. do you think that strategy wont work either?
Bitcoin saysa reason why Bitcoin is bad
Transaction speed is slow.
transactions Are necessary per the article Patrick linked.
Why don't you take some gains though? I say that to people who are sitting on large stock gains as well. Once you make a double sell 25% at the minimum, of course these numbers can be adapted to individual strategies but at least for stocks buy and hold is done and won't see return. I expect similar for bitcorn
https://patrick.net/post/1344030?120#comment-1831934
Clearly you need to go back and read the bitcoin is for stupids thread.Bitcoin says
haters will laways make up stuffBitcoin says
You are like:
If you create a flip phone that doesnt allow you to take pictures and send email, its the stone age. So dont start and innovate
If your car doesnt drive by itself its the stone age. so dont start building a car and innovate.
If your tv wont allow you to connect to the internet its the stone age, dont start developing tv's.
Why can’t you accept that bitcorn is not for everyone and some people (perhaps the majority) think it is a scam?
Congrats Rin. What are you buying now?
To manage these risks, if the price of Bitcoin drops by a large margin, the borrower might be required to increase the collateral submitted to the bank. Failure to do this risks the loan being liquidated.
Getting back to the topic of trading, bear flag possible here.
« First « Previous Comments 143 - 182 of 189 Next » Last » Search these comments
Let me make a comparison to a more mature market.
The following is a multi-year chart of the EUR vs USD, with the 50 bar exponential moving average (EMA) as the indicator on the chart. As anyone can observe, when the spot price is above the 50 EMA, there are more bullish trading opportunities (in green) than below it. And when it's below the 50 EMA, bearish events (in red) tend to be more common.
Now, contrast the above with that of BITCOIN vs USD. Whenever the 50 EMA is tested, the bearish opportunities are sparse and really don't even given bonafide short sellers much time to maneuver w/o a near term rally taking 'em out.
All and all, that's a bullish market with a high amount of sentiment on the upside. So until we see a general overall market meltdown, I'm not calling curtains on the cryptos.