« First « Previous Comments 27 - 35 of 35 Search these comments
I’ll give you this that hypocrisy is a form of evil. But not that it’s the source of all evil. After all, a man who openly claims his evil deeds and promises more of the same is no less evil for being honest about it. Most people just use obfuscation because they have to. But others who feel protected from consequences are absolutely brazen about it. Like Hillary Clinton about her mail server or her smear of Trump as a Russian agent. She simply can’t be prosecuted so she doesn’t care.
PeopleUnited saysHmm not sure that this makes sense to me are you attempting to argue for relativism?
i think Pat has a point. hiw would something be good if we had no frame of reference? what makes good the good and evil the evil? its an interesting and complex topic
Fortwaynemobile saysPeopleUnited saysHmm not sure that this makes sense to me are you attempting to argue for relativism?
i think Pat has a point. hiw would something be good if we had no frame of reference? what makes good the good and evil the evil? its an interesting and complex topic
I agree we need context in order understand or judge between good and evil. Maybe that is what he meant?
Evil is what turns one away from god, from word of god
What color shirt I wear in the morning is of the same significance as if I slaughter a 1000 people in terms of the scale of universe.
« First « Previous Comments 27 - 35 of 35 Search these comments
Now to be clear, I’m not saying women are evil, nor that ignorance is evil. But false testimony is certainly evil and so her performance was a clear representation of the fact that she is under the influence of evil, if not wholly given over to that evil.
But it got me thinking, if we live in a world where Supreme Court nominees are giving false testimony (she knows damn well what a women is and therefore she is a liar of the most despicable type, lying about a universally known truth) and not dismissed immediately for their false testimony, then what other perversions are accepted in our culture? And in fact, if giving false testimony is acceptable, has the concept of evil lost its meaning just like the rainbow?
For those ignorant of the meaning of the rainbow, look it up. But we cannot continue as a nation or even as a species if we cannot define and reasonably agree on what evil is. Read the Declaration of Independence and our other founding documents and you will see evil defined, not like a dictionary definition but rather a clear set of shared values, things permitted and things prohibited in the interest of preserving life, liberty, and property.
But over time, indoctrination has changed peoples perception and understanding of what evil is, to the point that what was once universally understood as evil is now celebrated, and what was once valued as good is reviled.
Is anyone else noticing this? Is anyone even able to distinguish between good and evil anymore, and if not how can we continue as a culture or society?
What is evil? Can anyone give a reasonable defense and definition of the concept? Can you give real world examples? Who has wisdom here?
This is a challenge to anyone to speak to one of the most basic concepts of humanity. The concept of evil, what it is, what it isn’t, where it comes from is wrapped up in what it means to be a human and without the concept of evil I would argue that there can be no culture and no hope for the future. Without the concept of evil there is no need for society or culture or life itself because without evil, there is nothing wrong, nothing to weep over, and nothing to defend yourself or your society against. And if there is no definition of evil why do we need rules, wars, or judges? We need to get the concept of evil right or we are doomed.
Don’t you agree?