If Musk doesn't succeed twatter will fail, slowly but surely. Alternatives will eventually take over. Once it loses influence it's not worth much to tptb
It doesn't have to have any influence, it just has to APPEAR to have influence.
CNN has less than 1 million viewers at any given moment. How is that being funded? They have multiple hosts that make more than $1 million a year. Ae they really getting $10 out of every viewer on a yearly basis for the commercials to pay for it?
When the government was allowed to directly send money to CORPORATIONS, that was the end of the country. Government Motors.
I remember when Lee Iacocca went to the government for a loan for Chrysler and what a huge deal that was. He got it, but he got a LOAN, and not at 0% interest, and it was public.
Everybody was asleep with covid when the government purchased our entire fucking economy. We have NO IDEA where the money went.
* The Executives are super stupid morons who don't realize their often trust fund baby bored Wokie Millie employees are shitting them * The Executives know what they have to say, do/promise to stay in the Club that guarantees future employment.
I'm in the second camp. There's no way Disney Chapek and the Twitter Execs. Chapek started with Heinz and then multiple household brands with Thompson before joining Disney, he knows all about market research and knows that the people who want 50% LGBTQ Disney Characters are Full of Shit and way out of the mainstream. He also knows he's "Out of the Club" and "No longer in the Party" if he doesn't toe the line. The final proof is watching the video of the Disney Execs THEMSELVES talk about their kids in Private Leftist Schools in LA/SF saying half the kids are queer, about their Transkids, etc. etc.
If Musk doesn't succeed twatter will fail, slowly but surely. Alternatives will eventually take over. Once it loses influence it's not worth much to tptb
It doesn't have to have any influence, it just has to APPEAR to have influence.
CNN has less than 1 million viewers at any given moment. How is that being funded? They have multiple hosts that make more than $1 million a year. Ae they really getting $10 out of every viewer on a yearly basis for the commercials to pay for it?
When the government was allowed to directly send money to CORPORATIONS, that was the end of the country. Government Motors.
I remember when Lee Iacocca went to the government for a loan for Chrysler and what a huge deal that was. He got it, but he got a LOAN, and not at 0% interest, and it was public.
Everybody was asleep with covid when the government purchased our entire fucki...
No it does have to have influence otherwise it won't sway enough people and is useless to tptb. CNN is already circling in the toilet.
I remember when Lee Iacocca went to the government for a loan for Chrysler and what a huge deal that was. He got it, but he got a LOAN, and not at 0% interest, and it was public.
Yep. Now multi billion dollar bailouts for airlines (just to name one industry) are expected at least once a decade at least.
I remember when Lee Iacocca went to the government for a loan for Chrysler and what a huge deal that was. He got it, but he got a LOAN, and not at 0% interest, and it was public.
Yep. Now multi billion dollar bailouts for airlines (just to name one industry) are expected at least once a decade at least.
Iacocca wasn't wrong - he paid back his loan, the government took a risk on not being paid back - that was the ONLY risk.
Today, government owns industry and there's no oversight.
No it does have to have influence otherwise it won't sway enough people and is useless to tptb. CNN is already circling in the toilet.
Yes, Decentralization is key. We're in a race between MAGA and "Own nothing and be Happy" Human Hive.
Yes!!! Decentralization. Centralization leads to tyranny by the minority. The wealth/powerful minority. End all corporate charters. I know that is going to sound insane to many here but, just watch a documentary called "The Corporation".
Nation state as a fundamental unit of man's organized life has ceased to be the principal creative force: International banks and multinational corporations are acting and planning in terms that are far in advance of the political concepts of the nation-state. - Zbigniew Brzezinski, Between Two Ages: The Technetronic Era, 1971
The technetronic era involves the gradual appearance of a more controlled society. Such a society would be dominated by an elite, unrestrained by traditional values. Soon it will be possible to assert almost continuous surveillance over every citizen and maintain up-to-date complete files containing even the most personal information about the citizen. These files will be subject to instantaneous retrieval by the authorities.
No, that's from years ago. She was talking about Trump using Twitter I believe.
If people don't recognize what our "news" is at this point, I figure fuck em. It's so obvious, that people who still believe it's information are too stupid to realize it's just propaganda.
We are grateful to the Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost 40 years. … It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries. Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as ‘internationalists’ and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure, one world if you will. If that is the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.” - David Rockefeller at the Bilderberger Meeting, Baden Germany, June 1991
If people don't recognize what our "news" is at this point, I figure fuck em. It's so obvious, that people who still believe it's information are too stupid to realize it's just propaganda.
Got cable TV disconnected a decade back. Will never subscribe to cable tv again. Now our tv watching is down to 10 minutes through a $25 antenna. I can't tolerate television.
That’s Musk’s dream. And Trump’s. And Putin’s. And the dream of every dictator, strongman, demagogue and modern-day robber baron on Earth. For the rest of us, it would be a brave new nightmare (free speech). - Robert Reich
SO THIS POS IS IMPLYING THAT FREE SPEECH WOULD BE A NIGHTMARE!
Reintroducing free speech values on Twitter could produce “massive, life- and globe-altering consequences for just letting people run wild on the thing.” - Katy Tur, MSNBC
at t=~12:20 The host asks Elon "why make that offer? [to buy twitter]" Elon replies "umm....I think it's very important for.... uhhh... there to be.... uh.... an inclusive arena for.... FREE SPEECH" Before Elon finishes the last word, one can sense that leftists all around the world loudly reeeeeeeeee
Elon is using leftist strategies back against them by invoking inclusiveness. I think the pauses in his words may have been his very subtle way of emphasizing, taunting, and gloating.
He continues his strategy to use leftists arguments in his favor. For example, his emphasis that free speech is critical for democracy, as leftists have been screeching about "save our democracy from XYZ" for the past 5 years.
around t=18:00ish, Based Elon also injected Signal when he said: "... in the same way you would update linux or signal" Signal is an open-source, end-to-end encrypted chat app that is much preferable to using tyrannical big tech. IMO he clearly used it in his example as a way to advertise it and raise awareness of a preferable alternative.
t=21:00 "a good sign that we have free speech is when someone you dont like is allowed to say something you dont like" This draws similarities to the many memes making fun of leftists, like "how dare you not like what I like!?!" or making fun of how they use double standards when censoring, and emphasizing that the real deciding principal is whether or not they personally like the speech.
That's incredibly positive to see such a stat. This jives with richwicks recent assertions that the tides have turned, and the people have woken up to the media's corruptions.
Got cable TV disconnected a decade back. Will never subscribe to cable tv again. Now our tv watching is down to 10 minutes through a $25 antenna. I can't tolerate television.
The Hi-Def Antenna TV is has a lot of channels. I don't watch, but keeps older relatives entertained when they visit.
Love Boat, Murder She Wrote, 24-7 Weather, some religious programming, and lots of old 50s-80s flicks and sitcoms.
Gary Black, the Managing Partner of The Future Fund, said: “The $TWTR board’s interests aren’t aligned with TWTR shareholders.
“The board serves to represent shareholders.
“If they refuse to act in the best interest of SHs, they should be removed and replaced by new board members who understand their fiduciary obligations.
“Let me point out something obvious: If @elonmusk takes $TWTR private, the TWTR board members don’t have jobs anymore, which pays them $250K-$300K per year for what is a nice part-time job.
“That could explain a lot.”
Musk responded with a warning and a reminder there may be more at play here than meets the eye:
“Board salary will be $0 if my bid succeeds, so that’s ~$3M/year saved right there.”
Baroness Lane-Fox of Soho - "Since December 2017, Ms. Lane Fox has served as a member of the Joint Committee for National Security Strategy. Since May 2018" A video game and leisure travel exec, who for some reason is serving on the "Joint Committee for National Security Strategy", despite also being a Lord in the BRITISH Parliament and obviously a British National and a Politician CURRENTLY ACTIVELY serving in another country. She's also CHAIRWOMAN of OPEN UNIVERSITY.
Lots of Britons and Indians...
Patrick Pichette - The CFO of Google?! Isn't that sort of a competitor?
« First « Previous Comments 129 - 168 of 1,681 Next » Last » Search these comments
It doesn't have to have any influence, it just has to APPEAR to have influence.
CNN has less than 1 million viewers at any given moment. How is that being funded? They have multiple hosts that make more than $1 million a year. Ae they really getting $10 out of every viewer on a yearly basis for the commercials to pay for it?
When the government was allowed to directly send money to CORPORATIONS, that was the end of the country. Government Motors.
I remember when Lee Iacocca went to the government for a loan for Chrysler and what a huge deal that was. He got it, but he got a LOAN, and not at 0% interest, and it was public.
Everybody was asleep with covid when the government purchased our entire fucking economy. We have NO IDEA where the money went.
* The Executives are super stupid morons who don't realize their often trust fund baby bored Wokie Millie employees are shitting them
* The Executives know what they have to say, do/promise to stay in the Club that guarantees future employment.
I'm in the second camp. There's no way Disney Chapek and the Twitter Execs. Chapek started with Heinz and then multiple household brands with Thompson before joining Disney, he knows all about market research and knows that the people who want 50% LGBTQ Disney Characters are Full of Shit and way out of the mainstream. He also knows he's "Out of the Club" and "No longer in the Party" if he doesn't toe the line. The final proof is watching the video of the Disney Execs THEMSELVES talk about their kids in Private Leftist Schools in LA/SF saying half the kids are queer, about their Transkids, etc. etc.
No it does have to have influence otherwise it won't sway enough people and is useless to tptb. CNN is already circling in the toilet.
Yes, Decentralization is key. We're in a race between MAGA and "Own nothing and be Happy" Human Hive.
Yep. Now multi billion dollar bailouts for airlines (just to name one industry) are expected at least once a decade at least.
Iacocca wasn't wrong - he paid back his loan, the government took a risk on not being paid back - that was the ONLY risk.
Today, government owns industry and there's no oversight.
Yes!!! Decentralization. Centralization leads to tyranny by the minority. The wealth/powerful minority. End all corporate charters. I know that is going to sound insane to many here but, just watch a documentary called "The Corporation".
Here's a link...https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zpQYsk-8dWg&source=patrick.net
"he (Elon Musk) could take over the messaging and tell people what to think... that's our job."
https://nitter.pussthecat.org/mcbenis3/status/1515067405491449864?source=patrick.net#m
Scarborough is one strange dude.
Like what? Ive seen pre and aftermarket, but both are on days the stock market is open.
Example of why Elon needs to buy Twitter.
Along with the banning of Alex Berenstein, Dr. Malone, Trump, and many others.
You've been had. This is a video from a few years ago. They were not talking about Elon.
Same point though - they want to control the messaging.
Mika Brzezinski is the daughter of Zbigniew
- Zbigniew Brzezinski, Between Two Ages (1976)
No, that's from years ago. She was talking about Trump using Twitter I believe.
If people don't recognize what our "news" is at this point, I figure fuck em. It's so obvious, that people who still believe it's information are too stupid to realize it's just propaganda.
Source: https://www.aspentimes.com/news/beware-new-world-order/?source=patrick.net
Got cable TV disconnected a decade back. Will never subscribe to cable tv again. Now our tv watching is down to 10 minutes through a $25 antenna. I can't tolerate television.
https://nitter.net/ezralevant/status/1515445620257042433?source=patrick.net#m
https://rumble.com/v1148id-elon-musk-talks-twitter-tesla-and-the-future-live-at-ted2022.html?source=patrick.net
SO THIS POS IS IMPLYING THAT FREE SPEECH WOULD BE A NIGHTMARE!
at t=~12:20
The host asks Elon "why make that offer? [to buy twitter]"
Elon replies "umm....I think it's very important for.... uhhh... there to be.... uh.... an inclusive arena for.... FREE SPEECH"
Before Elon finishes the last word, one can sense that leftists all around the world loudly reeeeeeeeee
Elon is using leftist strategies back against them by invoking inclusiveness. I think the pauses in his words may have been his very subtle way of emphasizing, taunting, and gloating.
He continues his strategy to use leftists arguments in his favor. For example, his emphasis that free speech is critical for democracy, as leftists have been screeching about "save our democracy from XYZ" for the past 5 years.
around t=18:00ish,
Based Elon also injected Signal when he said: "... in the same way you would update linux or signal"
Signal is an open-source, end-to-end encrypted chat app that is much preferable to using tyrannical big tech. IMO he clearly used it in his example as a way to advertise it and raise awareness of a preferable alternative.
t=21:00
"a good sign that we have free speech is when someone you dont like is allowed to say something you dont like"
This draws similarities to the many memes making fun of leftists, like "how dare you not like what I like!?!" or making fun of how they use double standards when censoring, and emphasizing that the real deciding principal is whether or not they personally like the speech.
That's incredibly positive to see such a stat. This jives with richwicks recent assertions that the tides have turned, and the people have woken up to the media's corruptions.
The Hi-Def Antenna TV is has a lot of channels. I don't watch, but keeps older relatives entertained when they visit.
Love Boat, Murder She Wrote, 24-7 Weather, some religious programming, and lots of old 50s-80s flicks and sitcoms.
I'll have to check on who is the board.
Baroness Lane-Fox of Soho -
"Since December 2017, Ms. Lane Fox has served as a member of the Joint Committee for National Security Strategy. Since May 2018"
A video game and leisure travel exec, who for some reason is serving on the "Joint Committee for National Security Strategy", despite also being a Lord in the BRITISH Parliament and obviously a British National and a Politician CURRENTLY ACTIVELY serving in another country.
She's also CHAIRWOMAN of OPEN UNIVERSITY.
Lots of Britons and Indians...
Patrick Pichette - The CFO of Google?! Isn't that sort of a competitor?
Robert Zoellick, that bastard....
« First « Previous Comments 129 - 168 of 1,681 Next » Last » Search these comments