patrick.net

Everything in this ad is accurate. The Omnibus only needs a bare majority to pass.



Unlike Massie's "Muh Induhvidual Bills" that each require 60 in the Senate as well as a majority in the house. This won't realistically happen anytime soon, even if the Republicans have a good Midterm.

Massie's Job is to stop the good using to perfect to keep the Status Quo.

It's no accident that the Reid-era appointed Parliamentarian went right for the Medicaid restrictions to illegals. Even illegals and fakefugees won't work at Koch Industry prices without that medicaid.

With Chris LaCivitas running MAGAKentucky, Massie won't be able to fight on Retired (Koch Executive) donations alone from a safe seat.

Trump's warchest is $1.4B for 2026.

AmericanKulakMaximumTrumper says

Massie's Job is to stop the good using to perfect to keep the Status Quo.

Well said.

Massie in trouble among Republican Primary voters as he seeks reelection
For Immediate Release:

Thursday June 26th, 2025
Doug Kaplan, (407)-242-1870

Massie in trouble among Republican Primary voters as he seeks reelection Poll Results Kentucky04 GOP with write up

Kissimmee, Florida – With just under a year until the 2026 Republican Primary, incumbent
Congressman Thomas Massie appears to be in for a rough road ahead. When asked if voters
plan to vote to reelect Massie regardless of who runs against him, only 19% indicate support for
Massie while 47% indicate support for a challenger. Introducing the hypothetical of a Trump
endorsement of a challenger, Massie’s support falls to 14% and those supporting a challenger
rises to 59%.

As of the time the poll was in the field, there is one candidate, Registered Nurse Nicole Lee
Ethington, filed to challenge Massie in the Republican primary. In a head-to-head poll, Massie
trails Ethington 31%-19% with a majority of voters undecided. Massie’s 19% support matches
the pre-Trump endorsement ballot test against an unnamed opponent. With Massie continuing
to hit that 19% number, Ethington is likely the only one with significant room to grow in support
as her share of the vote is below the total number of voters that say they will at least “probably”
vote for a challenger to Massie.

https://kaplanstrategies.com/2025/06/30/massie-in-trouble-among-republican-primary-voters-as-he-seeks-reelection/
384 Likely Voters

LaCivitas at work.

I have so many small donors, I'm too legit to quit - Massie

Also Thomas Massie:

Thanks Big Money Elon!

TOTAL Trump Victory.

No WW3.
PP defunded
USAID defunded
Tax cuts permanent
Big Tip & Overtime deduction
ICE / DHS funding beefed up to levels necessary to deport millions.
YUGE Vietnam Trade deal

Panicans running scared.

debt growing, deficits growing, inflation will grow. bbb keeps Biden spending. you are going to have inflation and more companies go into strictly government tit.

we are positioning ourselves for bad, real bad. because we choose to indulge now at expense of next gen. that’s not america, that’s satanic.

we not in agreement on national direction. the only thing i do like is deportation funding, but let’s see how that carrot on a stick goes.

tip and overtime deduction is bullshit. great for government unions though.

https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/breaking-rep-massie-files-bill-to

Rep. Massie Files Bill to REPEAL the PREP Act and Strip Big Pharma of Legal Immunity

The PREP Repeal Act (H.R. 4388) would END liability protections for experimental pandemic countermeasures like mRNA injections — and restore the right to sue for injury.

“The PREP Act is medical malpractice martial law,” said Rep. Massie.

“The 2005 PREP Act prevents people from holding corporations accountable for the pain and suffering they cause during Presidentially declared emergencies. Americans deserve the right to seek justice when injured by government-mandated products. The PREP Repeal Act will restore that right.”

What the PREP Repeal Act Would Do:

Fully repeals Sections 319F–3 and 319F–4 of the Public Health Service Act — ending liability protections for pandemic countermeasures.
Restores the right to sue under federal and state law for injuries caused by drugs, biologics, or PREP Act–covered products.
Applies retroactively to pending lawsuits and appeals.
Rescinds unused federal funds from the PREP Act injury compensation fund.
Includes a severability clause to ensure the bill survives court challenges.

https://massie.house.gov/uploadedfiles/preprepeal.pdf

Cool -- make that retroactive.

Patrick says

The PREP Repeal Act (H.R. 4388)

The actual Resolution is at : https://massie.house.gov/uploadedfiles/preprepeal.pdf if anyone wants to read it. Oops, apologies to Patrick I see he already posted this link

I don't know, I see this kind of thing from congress critters (looking at you Rand Paul and MTG) all the time. It makes for great PR but what's the point of introducing legislation with only 1 co-sponsor and no chance of even being reviewed in committee? It's grand standing. Build a coalition of 30 to 40 house members and get it through committee and on to the floor and then I'll be impressed. This cost him nothing but paper and 30 minutes of a staffer's time.

https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/poly-something-wednesday-july-16

Prepare for new orders. I couldn’t find a single article reporting this outstanding news. We don’t hate the corporate media nearly enough. But yesterday, Representative Thomas Massie filed a short and sweet bill to repeal the PREP Act. It is exactly what the government needs to start rebuilding trust.



As regular readers are well aware, I am currently suing the federal government over the PREP Act, in Moms for America v. HHS (Northern District of Florida). So I know a little bit about it.

The PREP Act is a 2005 law, quietly passed in the wake of the Anthrax panic, and it provides the legal liability immunity to vaccine makers (and others) for any of their products used during a declared “pandemic.” Injured, disabled, or killed citizens cannot sue vaccine makers even if the vendors lied, but instead may only submit ‘claims’ to a useless and hyper-stingy black box called the “Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program” (CICP).

From what I’ve seen, you’d have better chances by mailing your claim to Wuhan, or stuffing it in Walmart’s suggestions box.

Nothing about PREP makes sense. If a product is “safe and effective,” then why does a manufacturer even need liability immunity? And if it’s not “safe and effective,” what right does the government have to mandate it in a free society?

It’s not exactly a recipe for trust. What national security objective is achieved by forcing citizens to take untested products, eroding trust in all our institutions and making us all outraged at our own government? Our enemies are taking victory laps.

Massie’s bill, which in a sane world should quickly pass and be signed into law (but of course, we’re not in a sane world), said it all in its short preamble:

(1) Liability shields granted under the PREP Act have undermined public trust and accountability during public health emergencies.
(2) The ability of citizens to seek redress for injury or harm is a fundamental principle of justice and due process. (Exactly what my lawsuit argues.)
(3) The PREP Act has enabled regulatory capture and legal immunity for pharmaceutical manufacturers at the expense of individual rights.

This might be the single most important bill since the Declaration of Independence was signed.

So far, Massie is standing alone (again) doing the unpleasant legislative work while others rack up clicks about Ukraine. If they are serious about health freedom, now’s the time to prove it. We don’t need any more soundbites. We need real accountability— and that starts with repealing the law that lets drug companies maim and kill with impunity, then walk away protected by statute.

Here’s the new operation: Mr. Massie needs some co-sponsors. Send your Representative and Senator a quick note of encouragement, if you feel agree. There are two ways, calling (best) or emailing.

Use House.gov to quickly find your representative’s phone number (put in your zip code at the top of the page).

https://www.house.gov/

Here’s the script, but feel free to improvise:

Hi, my name is [Your Name], and I’m a constituent from [City or ZIP]. I’m calling to urge Representative [Last Name] to co-sponsor Rep. Thomas Massie’s bill to repeal the PREP Act, HR  4388.
The PREP Act gives total legal immunity to pharmaceutical companies, even when people are harmed. That’s not acceptable. We need real accountability to rebuild public trust.
Please let the Representative know this is an important issue to me and others in our district.
Thank you.

If you prefer, use Democracy.io to quickly send emails to your own representatives based on your address.

https://democracy.io/#!/

Or do both! Here’s a handy email script:

Subject: Please Co-Sponsor Rep. Massie’s Bill to Repeal the PREP Act
I’m writing as your constituent to respectfully urge you to co-sponsor Rep. Thomas Massie’s bill to repeal the PREP Act, HR  4388.
The PREP Act grants pharmaceutical companies total immunity—even in cases of fraud or injury—while severely limiting recourse through the CICP. That’s not justice, and it’s certainly not freedom.
If the government truly wants to rebuild public trust in medical policy, accountability must return. HR  4388 accomplishes that by removing blanket immunity and restoring citizens’ ability to seek redress.
Please stand with your constituents—not the pharmaceutical lobby—and co-sponsor this essential legislation.
Thank you,
[Your Name], [Your ZIP Code]
If you joined in the fun, let everyone know in the comments. (And let us know if you remember our victorious 5-a-day calling army.)

Plus, actually repealing PREP would make my job as a lawyer much easier. Just saying.

OK, I did the democracy.io one.

Massie Declares that Reality is agitprop as Net Exports rose 5%, in opposition to Austrian Crankonomic claims that one-sided free trade is still better than fair trade.

"A priori is always eventually right; even if reality is wrong for long periods of time" said Massie

/s

Massie is the biggest Republican cock block in Congress

Massie is his own man - that's why a lot of people hate him. They have to make up their own minds; he's not going to suck their dicks or lie to them.

https://classythomasmassie.substack.com/p/thomas-massie-is-the-most-maga-member

Thomas Massie is the Most MAGA Member of Congress

He is more dedicated to upholding what the president and his movement promised than any other leader. ...

You might wonder how Massie could be more MAGA than even Trump, when Trump in the past has called for Massie to be thrown out of the Republican Party?

When Trump did that, it was because Massie refused to support a bill that added $4 trillion in new spending. Trump had once promised to reduce the national debt.

Massie intended to keep that promise. ...

Trump once vowed to end sending U.S. weapons and aid to Ukraine, and to end that war. That war continues, as does U.S. weapons and aid to Ukraine.

Massie has consistently opposed sending U.S. dollars to Ukraine to fuel a war America should not be involved in. ...

Then there’s the Epstein Files. Needless to say, Trump and his cabinet once said they would be transparent, and later said there was nothing to see.




Massie sides with Ultra-MAGA and is demanding that all evidence on Epstein - while still protecting the victims and hiding their names - to be released to the public. Massie is not alone in this effort, and that pressure has caused the Trump administration to make significant changes in their approach.

There is one constant for Massie: He is always going to side with MAGA, as in adhere the original reasons so many voted for Donald Trump in the first place.

No matter how it might cost him politically or how much heat it brings. He doesn’t care.

America elected Donald Trump again in 2024 for particular reasons. Particular promises and a particular agenda.

Hey Massie, where's your bill to CCW in DC?

Stop grandstanding and write a bill and maybe halfassed try to get it passed.

More bite, less woof

https://x.com/RepThomasMassie/status/1962869712099971308

am in DC and I will file the discharge petition today, Sept 2nd, at approximately 2pm when Congress officially returns from the August recess. At that point we can begin collecting the 218 signatures necessary to force a vote on binding legislation to release the Epstein files.

https://x.com/RepThomasMassie/status/1962887823477911645

Massie didn't get the votes he needed.

Epstein delayed some more.

Today is a good day to remind everyone who funds Thomas Massie, especially since one of his backers has ties to the Epstein family.

When President Trump calls out Massie & has a PAC set up to run ads against him, it's for good reason & not just because he's an obstructionist RINO. Granted, this was the catalyst, but it goes much deeper than that.

Topics covered in this thread:

1) The "not backed by AIPAC or Zionist money" is a ruse. He is backed by Jeffrey Yass who backs Club For Growth, an organization mostly full of Zionists & ironically, one of Massie's largest donor to date. If you still think Massie is not taking any Zionist money or doesnt have anytging similar to an "AIPAC Guy", well, I've got a beachfront property in Nebraska to sell to you.

1) He does not care about the Epstein victims; this is all about political points for him. He has taken money from Bill Gates, who used his son as a proxy. Bill always does this when he doesn't want to give money directly. He doesnt just use his son to do this, either. He also gave money to Rand Paul through the same means. Bill Gates was one of Epstein's most notorious clients. Thomas Massie also promised to launch an investigation into a potebtially massive scandal involving members of Congress. What happened to that?

3) Massie being the most conservative member of the House is also a ruse. He takes money from Leftist PACS, such as Masimo Corp. This PAC previously only backed Libertarian-leaning Conservative candidates. That all changed in 2024 when they backed Hakeem Jeffries, Jamaal "Fire Alarm Guy" Bowman & Ro Khanna. Does that last name ring a bell?

https://x.com/GoldenAgeTimes2/status/1963296613591302307

In 2007, the Club for Growth opposed protectionist policies against China. Senators Chuck Schumer of New York and Lindsey Graham of South Carolina had proposed a bill to apply large tariffs on Chinese imports if that country did not increase the value of its currency. In response, the Club sponsored a petition of 1,028 economists who stated their opposition to protectionist policies against China. The list of economists included Nobel Laureates Finn Kydland, Edward Prescott, Thomas Schelling, and Vernon Smith. The petition played off a similar petition that was also signed by 1,028 economists in 1930 that opposed the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act.[45]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Club_for_Growth

Massie attacks Trump on Social Media and votes with Democrats, but on the local campaign trail, he kisses Trump's ass and makes it seem him and Trump are buddies. Tries to take credit for the RFK Jr. pick, which everybody remembers was done live at a campaign event, nothing to do with Massie and he definitely wasn't consulted.

https://x.com/Holden_Culotta/status/1973747315534970914

Thomas Massie just exposed the three uniparty billionaires spending millions against him.

“One is Miriam Adelson.”

“The other two are hedge fund managers from West Palm Beach and New York City.”

“And one of them … is in Epstein’s black book.”

“They are mad at me because I will not vote for foreign aid. I believe we need to spend our money here in America.”

“They have all given to pro-abortion Democrats.”

“One of them did a fundraiser for Chuck Schumer.”

“One of them donated the max donation to Liz Cheney after she voted to impeach Donald Trump.”

“Why would three billionaires spend millions of dollars against a congressman in Kentucky?”

“Because I am changing the narrative in Washington, D.C.”

“These are the billionaires who aren’t really Republican or Democrat.
They’re part of the uniparty.”

“They have a lot of influence in Washington, D.C. But I don’t think … they’re going to have any influence here.”

“So I’m standing here not running against three other candidates. I’m standing here running against three billionaires.”

Rebecca Ramaley
@RebeccaRamaley
·
Oct 2
Let’s call that West Palm Beach “hedge fund manager” by name - Paul Singer

Massie angry that Fed Funds to private universities are coming with restrictions about men in women's bathrooms, having education sessions for incoming Foreign Students about US Civic/Values, etc.


Shouldn't conservative-libertarians be HAPPY that federal funds to private entities get more restrictions on them, so less funds get disbursed?



Informing Foreign Students about what America believes (not making it an elective class) and setting expectations of behavior should actually be required for the school to be eligible for any loans or grants at all.

Open Borders Massie is toast.



https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/115391855540856433

Not true:

This appears to stem from a misinterpretation or conflation of the administration's broader anti-DEI/transgender policies. Massie has a history of opposing federal mandates on transgender issues (e.g., voting against bills funding transing minors), but he supports private institutions like MIT making their own decisions. Context from Massie's Statements (Oct. 11, 2025): Massie tweeted congratulations to MIT for "turning down a bribe to let the executive branch dictate what happens on its campus," calling it "the world’s best technical school" and criticizing federal interference.

He doubled down on Oct. 12, clarifying: "I’m including my voting record on the topic of men in women’s sports" to preempt critics assuming his stance implies support for transgender policies.

No Bathroom Mention: Searches of his X posts and news coverage yield zero references to MIT bathrooms. The Trump proposal focused on sports, admissions, and anti-discrimination certifications (e.g., against "antisemitism," which Massie called Orwellian speech policing).

Massie's Broader Views: He has questioned transgender athletes in women's sports (e.g., a 2023 hearing clip) and opposed federal funding for gender-affirming care, aligning with conservative positions.

His MIT support is libertarian-leaning: Keep government out of private education.

The clown Massie was "only" $369 billion off for his prediction of the final deficit this year back in Fed when he voted with every dem against the GOP budget. And if you take his personal prediction of a $2.5 trillion deficit in Apr, 2025

"You did not vote for $2.5 trillion annual deficits for as far as the eye can see, unless you voted for Biden."

He was "only" $725 billion off on his prediction.

But you know keep believing the crap he spews.
https://x.com/unseen1_unseen/status/1978968344754819545

Patrick says

Massie has a history of opposing federal mandates on transgender issues (e.g., voting against bills funding transing minors), but he supports private institutions like MIT making their own decisions.

None of this refutes the important point that wanting federal money to go to MIT ... AT ALL... is small government.

And certainly giving it with restrictions curtails spending more than just giving it without them.

Massie meets with DSA-affiliate IPAC, run by Muslims, against Border Security and for Mass Dawa.


https://freebeacon.com/politics/strange-bedfellows-meet-the-pac-working-to-reelect-thomas-massie-and-partnering-with-the-dsa-to-fight-ice/

The IPAC page:

https://ipac7.org/media

The ignoring the Constitution bit is probably about Trump's strike on Iran without any threat to the US.