patrick.net

Lyndon Johnson's failed wars (Great Society and Vietnam) as well as the oil shock are reasons why interest rates increased from 1960s to 1981

When money is hard cold pure silver metal, it cannot easily be counterfeited in mass quantities. This prevents the cartel of private banks known as the Fed from enslaving everyone by constantly stealing their money.

Patrick says

...and in 1933, they confiscated that $20 dollar.

Patrick says

.

that one ounce gold coin can now buy 1000 gallons of gasoline

it was a smart investment choice to buy that $20 gold coin in 1932 and pass it on to your heirs

.

Patrick says

Yes. And NO PAPER for wages and salaries, the metal only.

Businesses and Banks are free to have "Gold Backed Paper". But are not allowed to pay wages, salaries, and contracts worth less than $2000 in paper

I visited Israel in 1985 when I was studying in Austria. I remember the inflation was insane, and everyone wanted dollars.

I switched the last of my dollars in an Armenian carpet shop, then went to buy my airline ticket back to Greece, where I could use my rail pass to get back to school. But they wouldn't sell me the ticket without proof I'd changed money legally. Shit. Had to go back to the shop and they gave me most of my money back, like 90%. Then I could buy only a standby ticket, but it worked out OK. Dunno what would have happened if I had not been able to leave.

Just use silver by weight, ounces not dollars.

Interest rates should be set by the market, not by a cartel of private bankers.

Patrick says

in 2024, only 4 gallons. inflation is increasing, that’s frightening. penny is gone, not worth making with inflation,

Fortwaye says

in 2024, only 4 gallons. inflation is increasing, that’s frightening. penny is gone, not worth making with inflation,

silver quarter has been equal to 1 gallon of gasoline for a long time, from what I've researched

compare quality of life and standard of living for blue collar worker in 1932 to one in 2025

they have to continue to squeeze them workers to get as much productivity gains in order to try to keep inflation in check ; think about what happens if the chicken egg workers start to slack off (or worse and also try to unionize), and how much that causes chicken egg prices to increase

I had a buddy who worked at York's air condition plant as a manager and they put pressure on him to cut costs by about 10% each year ; he ended up quitting and getting a cushy GS-13 level job as a 801 series (general engineer) for the federal guvmint

.

https://genesiustimes.com/breaking-the-federal-reserve-is-just-2-weeks-away-from-developing-a-nuclear-weapon-source/

Right now, the Bond market is pricing long dated treasuries at an historically high premium versus expected inflation rate. On top of that they are pricing MBS (mortgage backed securities) at a historically high rate versus the 10 year treasury note.

In the next month or so Trump is going to correct this mis-pricing. Anyone short long term treasuries or MBS is desirous of losing huge amounts of money.

https://rudy.substack.com/p/a-world-of-hurt

Ceffer says

I'm so confused... Ceffer, are you pro money printing or anti money printing?

This is something I am totally confused about. Trump is attacking Powell because Trump wants to print more money but Powell won't do it.

Other people are attacking Powell and the fed in general because they print too much money and devalue the dollar .. it seems like the hatred of Powell is coming from both sides but the two sides don't acknowledge that they are totally opposed to each other's objectives ..

Shall we replace Powell with someone who won't print any money? Or someone who will print more as Trump is asking him to?

AmericanKulakMaximumTrumper says

YAMS!!!

We all miss him ... Farewell AF

Interest rates are waaaaaaaaay too high based on historical precedent. The long bond is yielding 2.5% above the expected inflation rate, the 10 year 2% above the expected inflation rate, and the mortgage rates near a record high spread against the 10 year treasury. Yes. mortgage rates are more outtra kilter than they were during the Housing bust.

The Federal Reserve is supposed to not have interest rates this outta whack. The Federal Reserve is playing political games (they are 90% democrats). These super high rates are damaging the shit out of America from construction of houses to household formation rates.

Trump has gotta put an end to this Fed induced crap, and I think he will.

Misc says

Interest rates are waaaaaaaaay too high based on historical precedent.

Misc, does that mean you are in the "pro money printing camp"?

Misc says

Interest rates are waaaaaaaaay too high based on historical precedent. The long bond is yielding 2.5% above the expected inflation rate, the 10 year 2% above the expected inflation rate, and the mortgage rates near a record high spread against the 10 year treasury. Yes. mortgage rates are more outtra kilter than they were during the Housing bust.

The Federal Reserve is supposed to not have interest rates this outta whack. The Federal Reserve is playing political games (they are 90% democrats). These super high rates are damaging the shit out of America from construction of houses to household formation rates.

Trump has gotta put an end to this Fed induced crap, and I think he will.

This goes back to Andrew Jackson - the Fed will do what it can to wreck the economy and bring Trump under heel. We are actually in a depression that has been masked by 20 trillion dollars of spending in the last 4 years. All white collar high paying jobs are being destroyed. Blue collar is the future, especially if the rapefugees and illegals are thrown out to give our children a leg up in the job market.

I'm sure that at least 50% of white collar jobs are bullshit.

stereotomy says

We are actually in a depression

So you want more money printing too?

I really dont understand the 'End the Fed' people who want MORE money printing. Usually End the Fed means people want LESS money printing.

I think what you are actually saying is "End the independence of the fed and let the president print money when the president wants to?"

DeficitHawk says

stereotomy says

We are actually in a depression

So you want more money printing too?

I really dont understand the 'End the Fed' people who want MORE money printing. Usually End the Fed means people want LESS money printing.

I think what you are actually saying is "End the independence of the fed and let the president print money when the president wants to?"

I'm saying that the Triffin Dilemma will be resolved in our lifetimes. Money printing must end. Depressions are caused by banks who foreclose on loans that they injudiciously extended to borrowers. Money printing draws capital from the future to the present - it's like nuking a field with fertilizer for decades and getting bumper crops, only to have the field fail because the soil is exhausted.

Money printing is the crack/meth that gooses the "economy" and encourages completely unwholesome speculative economic activity.

Whatever happened to working, saving, building a life for your family, and creating things that last and can be passed down with pride?

stereotomy says

Money printing must end.

stereotomy says

the Fed will do what it can to wreck the economy and bring Trump under heel.

These two narratives are opposite to each other. I really dont understand what you want.

On the one hand, you are saying the Fed is wrecking the economy by not printing money and keeping interest rates high.
On the other hand, you are saying you want the money printing to end?

Which is it? I dont understand your position on this.

DeficitHawk says

stereotomy says

Money printing must end.

stereotomy says

the Fed will do what it can to wreck the economy and bring Trump under heel.

These two narratives are opposite to each other. I really dont understand what you want.

On the one hand, you are saying the Fed is wrecking the economy by not printing money and keeping interest rates high.
On the other hand, you are saying you want the money printing to end?

Which is it? I dont understand your position on this.

The growth of the money supply must be organic in nature; namely, to accommodate the financial needs of the natural persons living and breathing in this country so that they, through their collective industry, can acquire wealth and preserve that wealth with a stable currency or other store of value.

It's too bad you missed iTulip. There were some really deep economic discussions about how banks should function.

The banking system this country inherited from the English was a system based on short-term profits from sea trade. Banks would extend loans to finance the shipping trade and recoup their loans within a year. Later, in the US, the banks would extend credit to farmers to buy seed for spring, which would be paid back after harvest.

Now the banks speculate and drive up prices for commodities that squeeze the producers to the point of bankruptcy. This was illegal before the 1980's - only producers in a commodity area could trade futures in that commodity.

I'm pretty ignorant, but I'm learning - I suggest you do the same.

I am in the camp of "prices must make sense". Right now the young Americans are fucked because house/financing costs are too high. This is affecting household formation, thus the future of the country.

Historically mortgage rates would be about 4% given todays inflation expectations. There is a reason for the Federal Reserve. That is to be the buyer of last resort (ie when the markets are not functioning). Todays Fed is playing politics instead of buying long term treasuries and mortgage backed securities to bring them into line.

It doesn't matter whether money is being created as long as the amount of goods/services rise in proportion. We need more housing built. Interest rates are too high to support the increase in housing we need.

stereotomy says

The growth of the money supply must be organic in nature;

I still dont understand what you are advocating for. I will explain why I care:

I see President Trump attacking Jerome Powell and the Fed for holding interest rates too high. (i.e. Trump wants Powell to print more money so that we can have lower interest rates). Powell is resisting this, saying he does not want to cause inflation. This has caused a bunch of hatred towards Powell and the Fed for not supporting Trumps political initiative, which is to devalue the dollar by inflation.

Meanwhile, Patrick, and other sound money purists want to "End the Fed" because they dont want any entity to have the ability to print money, and they'd rather let the recessions/depressions happen with silver standard or some other fixed/deflationary money.

On the face of it, the two sides would seem to agree with each other that "The Fed Is BAD".. but actually these two sides are diametrically opposed in their objectives. One side wants to stop the politically-driven creation of new money and maintain a fixed (or slowly growing) sound money supply. The other side wants to remove the restrictions of political independence and allow the Executive unrestricted access to the money printing presses to meet political objectives and devalue the dollar.

So, I am frustrated that both sides are trying to scapegoat the fed and act like the fed is the villain, but actually you should be having the debate about whether to print more or less money. I want the fed's critics to be clear what they want. You seem to argue both sides but wont be clear which you are on. (Print, or don't print?)

I agree with the Fed's current policy, which is to target a fixed, low, inflation rate of ~2%. (I'd be fine with 1% too... but not 3+%.) I know we may be headed towards a recession, but I think recessions are sometimes needed to clear out the questionable business models and allow more robust models to grow. I don't want money printing to be used to prevent that economic rejuvenation process. I don't agree with Trump on this. I don't want the dollar devalued to avoid recession. I agree with Powell that keeping inflation down is important.

If you are going to scapegoat the Fed as a villain, you need to at least say what you want them to do... which side of this debate are you on?

Misc says

Right now the young Americans are fucked because house/financing costs are too high

The fed cant really fix all the problems in our economy. It has a VERY limited tool box. It can either buy bonds with cash it prints (lowering short term interest rates), or it can sell the bonds back to the market (raising short term interest rates).

That's pretty much all it can do. It cant control housing supply. It cant control economic output. It cant control long term interest rates or mortgage rates, these are set by the market expectations of future growth and inflation. Lowering near term rates too much will trigger long term inflation, and raise long term rates, and vice versa.

So, given the limited tool set.. it can either lower short term rates by printing money or raise them by not printing money... Which do you want them to do?

I want them to hold near term rates steady for now. IF inflation goes up, raise rates. If unemployment goes up, lower rates. If both go up (stagflation), well that sucks and they just have to hold steady.

DeficitHawk says

So, given the limited tool set.. it can either lower short term rates by printing money or raise them by not printing money... Which do you want them to do?

It sure can buy long term bonds and mortgage backed securities, thus reducing long term rates. It has in the past in situations where interest rates were less outta line than today. This would increase the buying power of young Americans with respect to houses.