by Patrick ➕follow (58) 💰tip ignore
« First « Previous Comments 13 - 45 of 45 Search these comments
What effect will it have on people's DNA? Does the study mention that?
GNL says
What effect will it have on people's DNA? Does the study mention that?
It appears, that once it's incorporated into your DNA, your body will produce it indefinitely. This would (possibly?) explain why your body would move over to IgG4 to neutralize it, rather than destroy the cells producing it.
I think. I hate biology and I suck at it as well.
Not ALL your cells, SOME of your cells. Potentially this could effect spermatozoa and eggs as well.
If this happened, and I'm saying IF it happened, I think trust in corporate medicine is dead forever.
I have permanently lost some respect for her especially when I tried to inform her...most didn't have people like us sounding the alarm early.
OK, my idea is that once the vaccinated population’s DNA is fully ‘transcribed’, we all get SPIKED by the Pod People through exchange of bodily fluids, saliva, sperm, mother’s milk, blood transfusion etc. etc.?
I want to move to a largely unvaxxed area using the county by county map on this page. Some counties are less than 20% ‘compliant’ which is very appealing to me regardless.
https://www.usnews.com/news/best-states/articles/these-states-have-the-lowest-covid-19-vaccination-rates
💉 The Journal of Proteomics Clinical Applications quietly published a new Italian study back in April blandly titled, “Detection of recombinant Spike protein in the blood of individuals vaccinated against SARS‐CoV‐2: Possible molecular mechanisms.”
You’ll well remember, I’m sure, all the saccharine promises by federal government officials that the covid shots’ mRNA stayed at the injection site and fully degraded within a few days. It is worth noting that it wasn’t so much Pfizer and Moderna who were making those claims — both companies were super careful to avoid public representations — it was taxpayer-funded officials from captured public agencies like the CDC, FDA, and NIH.
An then all the medical establishment’s grant-groveling, white-coated sock-puppets echoed those same lies in a cascading crescendo of brown-nosing amplification. And then the fact-checkers and social media giants shut down any heterodox doctor asking any inconvenient questions.
The chickens were bound to get back to the roost at some point.
Instead of parroting the tired old “safe and effective” line, the new April study bravely and openly described its purpose as questioning about the wisdom of continued booster campaigns:
mRNA vaccines … may represent a new standard of vaccination. However, it is the duty of the scientist not to neglect controls. Herein lies the importance of monitoring vaccine-induced Spike protein “PP” after a time period after vaccination in human biological samples. The presented method allows to assess the half-life of the Spike “PP” protein molecule and to consider the risks or benefits in continuing further booster doses of the SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine.
The researchers dubbed vaccine-induced spike protein as “PP”, based on the unique genetic characteristics distinguishing the jab version of spike from all the other natural types from the various viral variants. They created a test allowing other researchers to detect jab spikes in people (as distinct from any of the ‘natural’ spikes).
But the study’s secondary discoveries turned out to be the real story. First, the researchers found that some vaccinees had persistent jab-spike in their bodies — long after the original jabs.
In some cases, we found the PP-Spike marker in vaccinated individuals more than 30 days after the vaccine, indicating that it is possible to detect vaccine “Spike” protein even sometime after vaccination and in any organic tissue.
When the researchers said “more than 30 days,” they meant up to six months — the duration of the study. So they actually failed to detect the “half-life” of the mRNA spike, since there was no way to determine the upper limit. They also found PP in “any organic tissue.” Meaning — putting the lie to government guarantees — the mRNA spike does not stay after all in the injection site. It spreads throughout the body.
Nor, also contrary to what was promised, did the PP degrade within a few days.
It was beyond the scope of the study to figure out why the jab spike was hanging around so long. But the researchers offered three hypothesis, and their first idea was a doozy:
It is possible that the mRNA may be integrated or re-transcribed in some cells.
Wait, what? Of all the government’s many failed assurances and broken promises, the one that the government officials and their white-coated army of obsequious jab pushers have most grimly clung to was the often-repeated promise that there was no possible way that the mRNA could modify someone’s genes and get into human DNA.
But, as the researcher’s very first theory to explain PP persistence illustrated, this study provides evidence rebutting the government’s most critical and most important promise of all: that the jabs are perfectly innocuous and cannot possibly create permanent genetic modifications.
That essential promise is starting to look a lot like what we tell kids about the Tooth Fairy.
Here’s the link to the study: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/prca.202300048
The project that gave rise to the Moderna company itself [Darwinian Chemical Systems] was a project where they were specifically figuring out how to get mRNA to write itself into the genome of the whatever target they were going after ... And the fact of the matter is: Moderna was started on the back of having proven that mRNA can be transfected and write itself into the human genome.
In the previous article (which provides important context for the ideas laid forth in this one) I discussed the habitual tendency of science to reject observations which have no mechanism that could explain how they are happening. In turn, I argued this was problematic as it results in many critically important observations being dismissed since their “mechanism” lies outside the existing scientific paradigm.
One of the most common ways this happens is for logical arguments to be put together which assert the observation cannot be real. In some cases, the argument is quite compelling, while in others (provided you understand the subject) it’s actually ridiculous.
For example, since the mRNA vaccines were an experimental gene therapy, one of the immediate fears people had about them (myself included) was that they would permanently alter your DNA.
To address this, countless articles were written which ridiculed that notion. This was done by repeating a few logical arguments which sounded nice and were deemed to be “true” because the “experts” had espoused them (e.g. consider these frequently cited pronouncements by Paul Offit and Anthony Fauci). Those arguments were as follows:
1. The vaccines cannot enter the nucleus of the cell
2. mRNA from the vaccines breaks down rapidly in the cell, so it does not have time to enter the nucleus and change your DNA.
3. mRNA is not DNA, and hence believing mRNA can change DNA represents a fundamental lack of knowledge of biology.
On the surface, that train of logic effectively “refutes” the DNA alteration hypothesis. However, in reality, each of the above premises was false or highly misleading (e.g., the mRNA was designed to resist being broken down so it could remain active for a prolonged period).
Note: a more detailed explanation of why those premises were wrong can be found in my contribution to this article which discussed how mRNA spike protein vaccines alters DNA. Additionally, Robert Malone recently wrote a more detailed critique of Offit doubling down on a related claim (that DNA contaminants in the vaccines cannot affect our DNA). ...
I can’t say I was particularly surprised when independent research conducted long after the vaccine hit the market discovered the vaccine indeed can change the DNA of a cell. ...
Scientists Stunned by First Proofs of Contaminated DNA getting absorbed into Human Cells
"These cells did not merely interact with the vaccines but absorbed them, incorporating foreign DNA into their very structure"
In an explosive revelation a few days ago during a video conference with Medical Doctors for Covid Ethics International, Prof. Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi, former Chair of Medical Microbiology at the University of Mainz and a distinguished figure in the field, unveiled findings that have sent shockwaves through the scientific community.
The first experiments indicates that experimental COVID mRNA jabs, may have been integrating into human cells—raising the specter of genetic modification on an unprecedented scale. ...
Prof Bhakdi's colleagues immersed human cells in vaccines, unveiling a startling truth: These cells did not merely interact with the vaccines but absorbed them, incorporating foreign DNA into their very structure. "Our two lady scientists...found that the human cells immediately took up the vaccines, and the DNA, and the chromosomes," Bhakdi said, outlining a process where cells began producing the spike protein in massive quantities. What was once theoretical fear has now been manifested into tangible evidence, showing the potential for these vaccines to alter human genetics fundamentally.
Goddamn them, and God save us. Don't get sick, because a blood transfusion of spike-contaminated blood is a death sentence.
stereotomy says
Goddamn them, and God save us. Don't get sick, because a blood transfusion of spike-contaminated blood is a death sentence.
You don't think that's a bit over dramatic?
stereotomy says
Goddamn them, and God save us. Don't get sick, because a blood transfusion of spike-contaminated blood is a death sentence.
You don't think that's a bit over dramatic?
GNL says
stereotomy says
Goddamn them, and God save us. Don't get sick, because a blood transfusion of spike-contaminated blood is a death sentence.
You don't think that's a bit over dramatic?
No because the Spike Protein is either a death sentence or a lifelong debilitating injury.
That sounds over dramatic also.
The short version is a research group treated some ovarian cancer cells with several different covid vaccines (Pfizer, Moderna, etc). They separated out the cells that had been successfully “transfected” — meaning that the mRNA got into the cell as designed and started making spike protein. Then they let those transfected cells divide, to see what would happen in subsequent cell generations.
My first thought was geez, this test should have been done ages ago before the vaccines were ever approved for emergency use. How useless is the FDA? But I digress and ask silly questions.
Once researchers had their batches of divided cells, they sent the cells to Kevin McKernan’s lab in Boston, so that he could test for genetic integration or anything else interesting that he could find on an RNA/DNA level.
Kevin found evidence of integration. Specifically, he found some daughter cells had the DNA from contaminants in the vaccines, which is not supposed to happen. “What we found is, [contaminant] DNA that is getting transfected into ovarian cancer cell lines is replicating in the cells,” says McKernan, noting that the ratio of vaccine contaminant DNA to human cell DNA was even “higher than we expected.”
Jab defenders still argue it is “impossible” for mRNA or contaminant DNA to get into the cell nucleus. That would be called “integration,” and if it happens, then some real problems start. But pro-jabber “impossibility” arguments rest on a key flawed assumption. Jab defenders assume that the lipid nano-proteins delivering the mRNA (and the contaminant DNA) stay safely in the shoulder muscle, at the injection site. Their simplistic logic is that since muscle cells don’t divide in the first place, there’s no risk of cellular integration.
But of course, we have long known that the mRNA and its carrier lipid nano-proteins (LNPs) go everywhere. So the jab defender’s core assumption — that the LNPs stay in non-dividing muscle cells — is just factually wrong. It’s misinformation. ...
I think this is the most promising line of research going in terms of helping establish covid liability. If genetic integration is proven, it will bring the entire odious pharma crack house right down on their heads.
If genetic integration is proven, it will bring the entire odious pharma crack house right down on their heads.
Are we still expecting a Deagle sized depop?
Do you mean https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/
"That sounds over dramatic also."
"...the Spike Protein is either a death sentence or a lifelong debilitating injury."
GNL says
"That sounds over dramatic also."
It is not over dramatic. That is data - a fact - and in science we follow the data.
New Discovery Shows Human Cells Can Write RNA Sequences Into DNA – Challenges Central Principle in Biology
Remember, the jabs were definitely not gene therapies; that’s misinformation. But another new study poking a hole in that exhausted refrain appeared this month in the journal Methods and Protocols, titled “Methodological Considerations Regarding the Quantification of DNA Impurities in the COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine Comirnaty®.”
According to the researchers, it turns out that Pfizer may have slightly under-reported the amounts of DNA contamination in its magic spike protein elixirs. Behold my shocked face: 😑. And by slightly under-reported, I mean by orders of magnitude. Their conclusion included the alarming determination that contaminant DNA enters patients’ cells. In the study authors’ own words:
"The available information and data indicate that the ready-to-use mRNA vaccine Comirnaty contains DNA impurities that exceed the permitted limit value by several hundred times and, in some cases, even more than 500 times, and that this went unnoticed because the DNA quantification carried out as part of batch testing only at the active substance level appears to be methodologically inadequate when using qPCR.
Further, DNA impurities in Comirnaty® are apparently integrated into the lipid nanoparticles and are thus transported directly into the cells of a vaccinated person, just like the mRNA active ingredient. What this means for the safety risks, particularly the possible integration of this DNA into the human genome, i.e., the risk of insertional mutagenesis, should be a secondary focus of the discussion required, which must go far beyond what could have been considered years before the so unexpected introduction of mRNA pharmaceuticals into the global market."
Haha, “unexpected introduction of mRNA” into the global market. Nice one. Unexpected is one way of putting it.
See, what you really don’t want in a vaccine is a cellular delivery system for random bacterial DNA. What could go wrong? One thing that could go wrong is cancer, or ‘oncogenesis’ in public health’s dialect.
Our results indicate a fast up-take of BNT162b2 into human liver cell line Huh7, leading to changes in LINE-1 expression and distribution. We also show that BNT162b2 mRNA is reverse transcribed intracellularly into DNA in as fast as 6 h upon BNT162b2 exposure.
@P_McCulloughMD
Genomic Integration: Top Target for mRNA Censorship
Review of Alden et al has been a top target for instant censorship. Just had huge number of views/likes/reposts on @LinkedIn before it was vaporized. Reverse transcription of mRNA, inserting the foreign code into human DNA has been one of the greatest fears during the mass, indiscriminate vaccination campaign. @pfizer @moderna_tx
COVID-19 vaccination may be permanent for the vaccinated and their progeny. Considering the thought is intolerable for the Bio-Pharmaceutical Complex and unbearable those entranced in vaccine ideology.
« First « Previous Comments 13 - 45 of 45 Search these comments
patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,230,136 comments by 14,704 users - Ceffer, Undoctored online now