@Concerned_Eng20hDr Peter McCullough: Swedish study confirms that Pfizer does modify your DNA and causes your cells to produce the toxic spike protein #Pfizer #VaccineDeaths #VaccineInjuries
Comments 1 - 23 of 23 Search these comments
What effect will it have on people's DNA? Does the study mention that?
There was an earlier MIT study that showed the same thing. This is in vitro, of course, but troubling nonetheless. If it happens appreciably in vivo, rut roh.Now that the sequence for the spike protein has become part of your DNA through reverse transcription (RNA to DNA), your cells make the spike protein, pieces of which then get displayed on the surface of your cells, for example, your liver cells. T cells that have developed to recognize spike protein through vaccination, or through natural infection, which may have occured before or after vaccination, target and kill your cells, which appear to the T cells to be virally infected. Depending on where in the DNA these reverse transcribed sequences are inserted, cancer may result. Other than that, nothing to worry about.
I wonder in all the DARPA and NIH meetings that occurred in the last ten years on mRNA, did they ever consider reverse transcription? If the mRNA stays long enough in the cytosol and is not dissolved by enzymes, the human cell could find base pairs of nucleic acids and create a mirror image of the genetic code which could be brought into the nucleus of the cell for insertion into the human genome. This is such a giant consideration because genetic code for a damaging and lethal protein installed into our own cells permanently would be passed down to somatic daughter cells and from spermatocytes and oocytes to an embryo. Forever changing the human genome for future generations must have been a large part of the safety discussion in those DARPA and NIH transcripts—only investigation and release of documents will tell the story. In the meantime, Alden et al have demonstrated integration of the center 444 base pair amplicon or reporter region from the Pfizer vaccine into the human nucleus in a hepatoma cell line.[iii] This paper has not been challenged by any credible authority nor disproven by any other experiments.
Alden et al have demonstrated integration of the center 444 base pair amplicon or reporter region from the Pfizer vaccine into the human nucleus in a hepatoma cell line
What we really need to ask
Furthermore, a recent study showed that SARS-CoV-2 RNA can be reverse-transcribed and integrated into the genome of human cells. In this study, we investigated the effect of BNT162b2 on the human liver cell line Huh7 in vitro. Huh7 cells were exposed to BNT162b2, and quantitative PCR was performed on RNA extracted from the cells. We detected high levels of BNT162b2 in Huh7 cells and changes in gene expression of long interspersed nuclear element-1 (LINE-1), which is an endogenous reverse transcriptase. Immunohistochemistry using antibody binding to LINE-1 open reading frame-1 RNA-binding protein (ORFp1) on Huh7 cells treated with BNT162b2 indicated increased nucleus distribution of LINE-1. PCR on genomic DNA of Huh7 cells exposed to BNT162b2 amplified the DNA sequence unique to BNT162b2. Our results indicate a fast up-take of BNT162b2 into human liver cell line Huh7, leading to changes in LINE-1 expression and distribution. We also show that BNT162b2 mRNA is reverse transcribed intracellularly into DNA in as fast as 6 h upon BNT162b2 exposure.
mRNA from mRNA COVID gene injection vaccine platform is taken up by our human DNA! Yes, reversed transcribed back into DNA & implications are staggering! Not good! We were right when we screamed outWe also show that Pfizer (BNT162b2) mRNA is reverse transcribed intracellularly into DNA in 6 h upon Pfizer exposure; these people in pharma, CDC, NIH, FDA knew this, issue is they DON'T care!
Our results indicate a fast up-take of BNT162b2 into human liver cell line Huh7, leading to changes in LINE-1 expression and distribution. We also show that BNT162b2 mRNA is reverse transcribed intracellularly into DNA in as fast as 6 h upon BNT162b2 exposure.
What effect will it have on people's DNA? Does the study mention that?It appears, that once it's incorporated into your DNA, your body will produce it indefinitely. This would (possibly?) explain why your body would move over to IgG4 to neutralize it, rather than destroy the cells producing it.I think. I hate biology and I suck at it as well.Not ALL your cells, SOME of your cells. Potentially this could effect spermatozoa and eggs as well.If this happened, and I'm saying IF it happened, I think trust in corporate medicine is dead forever.
I have permanently lost some respect for her especially when I tried to inform her...most didn't have people like us sounding the alarm early.
OK, my idea is that once the vaccinated population’s DNA is fully ‘transcribed’, we all get SPIKED by the Pod People through exchange of bodily fluids, saliva, sperm, mother’s milk, blood transfusion etc. etc.? I want to move to a largely unvaxxed area using the county by county map on this page. Some counties are less than 20% ‘compliant’ which is very appealing to me regardless.https://www.usnews.com/news/best-states/articles/these-states-have-the-lowest-covid-19-vaccination-rates
💉 The Journal of Proteomics Clinical Applications quietly published a new Italian study back in April blandly titled, “Detection of recombinant Spike protein in the blood of individuals vaccinated against SARS‐CoV‐2: Possible molecular mechanisms.”You’ll well remember, I’m sure, all the saccharine promises by federal government officials that the covid shots’ mRNA stayed at the injection site and fully degraded within a few days. It is worth noting that it wasn’t so much Pfizer and Moderna who were making those claims — both companies were super careful to avoid public representations — it was taxpayer-funded officials from captured public agencies like the CDC, FDA, and NIH.An then all the medical establishment’s grant-groveling, white-coated sock-puppets echoed those same lies in a cascading crescendo of brown-nosing amplification. And then the fact-checkers and social media giants shut down any heterodox doctor asking any inconvenient questions.The chickens were bound to get back to the roost at some point.Instead of parroting the tired old “safe and effective” line, the new April study bravely and openly described its purpose as questioning about the wisdom of continued booster campaigns:mRNA vaccines … may represent a new standard of vaccination. However, it is the duty of the scientist not to neglect controls. Herein lies the importance of monitoring vaccine-induced Spike protein “PP” after a time period after vaccination in human biological samples. The presented method allows to assess the half-life of the Spike “PP” protein molecule and to consider the risks or benefits in continuing further booster doses of the SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine.The researchers dubbed vaccine-induced spike protein as “PP”, based on the unique genetic characteristics distinguishing the jab version of spike from all the other natural types from the various viral variants. They created a test allowing other researchers to detect jab spikes in people (as distinct from any of the ‘natural’ spikes).But the study’s secondary discoveries turned out to be the real story. First, the researchers found that some vaccinees had persistent jab-spike in their bodies — long after the original jabs.In some cases, we found the PP-Spike marker in vaccinated individuals more than 30 days after the vaccine, indicating that it is possible to detect vaccine “Spike” protein even sometime after vaccination and in any organic tissue.When the researchers said “more than 30 days,” they meant up to six months — the duration of the study. So they actually failed to detect the “half-life” of the mRNA spike, since there was no way to determine the upper limit. They also found PP in “any organic tissue.” Meaning — putting the lie to government guarantees — the mRNA spike does not stay after all in the injection site. It spreads throughout the body.Nor, also contrary to what was promised, did the PP degrade within a few days.It was beyond the scope of the study to figure out why the jab spike was hanging around so long. But the researchers offered three hypothesis, and their first idea was a doozy:It is possible that the mRNA may be integrated or re-transcribed in some cells.Wait, what? Of all the government’s many failed assurances and broken promises, the one that the government officials and their white-coated army of obsequious jab pushers have most grimly clung to was the often-repeated promise that there was no possible way that the mRNA could modify someone’s genes and get into human DNA.But, as the researcher’s very first theory to explain PP persistence illustrated, this study provides evidence rebutting the government’s most critical and most important promise of all: that the jabs are perfectly innocuous and cannot possibly create permanent genetic modifications.That essential promise is starting to look a lot like what we tell kids about the Tooth Fairy.Here’s the link to the study: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/prca.202300048
The project that gave rise to the Moderna company itself [Darwinian Chemical Systems] was a project where they were specifically figuring out how to get mRNA to write itself into the genome of the whatever target they were going after ... And the fact of the matter is: Moderna was started on the back of having proven that mRNA can be transfected and write itself into the human genome.
In the previous article (which provides important context for the ideas laid forth in this one) I discussed the habitual tendency of science to reject observations which have no mechanism that could explain how they are happening. In turn, I argued this was problematic as it results in many critically important observations being dismissed since their “mechanism” lies outside the existing scientific paradigm.One of the most common ways this happens is for logical arguments to be put together which assert the observation cannot be real. In some cases, the argument is quite compelling, while in others (provided you understand the subject) it’s actually ridiculous.For example, since the mRNA vaccines were an experimental gene therapy, one of the immediate fears people had about them (myself included) was that they would permanently alter your DNA.To address this, countless articles were written which ridiculed that notion. This was done by repeating a few logical arguments which sounded nice and were deemed to be “true” because the “experts” had espoused them (e.g. consider these frequently cited pronouncements by Paul Offit and Anthony Fauci). Those arguments were as follows: 1. The vaccines cannot enter the nucleus of the cell 2. mRNA from the vaccines breaks down rapidly in the cell, so it does not have time to enter the nucleus and change your DNA. 3. mRNA is not DNA, and hence believing mRNA can change DNA represents a fundamental lack of knowledge of biology.On the surface, that train of logic effectively “refutes” the DNA alteration hypothesis. However, in reality, each of the above premises was false or highly misleading (e.g., the mRNA was designed to resist being broken down so it could remain active for a prolonged period).Note: a more detailed explanation of why those premises were wrong can be found in my contribution to this article which discussed how mRNA spike protein vaccines alters DNA. Additionally, Robert Malone recently wrote a more detailed critique of Offit doubling down on a related claim (that DNA contaminants in the vaccines cannot affect our DNA). ...I can’t say I was particularly surprised when independent research conducted long after the vaccine hit the market discovered the vaccine indeed can change the DNA of a cell. ...