« First « Previous Comments 224 - 255 of 255 Search these comments
zzyzzx says
SoTex says
Or move the agency to Guam.
I don't understand that reference. Please explain.
Ongoing joke/troll directed at a former (I think) user. I do actually want to go to Guam. I think SoTex and I are the only ones that toss Guam out on threads. I honestly forget the reason. If I recall someone had a bad take and brought up Guam and we made fun of him. It was funny at the time.
That's right, there was a user who during the early hours of the 2016 election got very excited about IHLary flipping Guam. He disappeared eventually. Recently there have been discussions by the new admin to move federal agencies to Guam if they can't be disband/fired.
Depends so much on the state. MT has no sales tax. FL no income tax.
In FL they get you with insurance, in TX and IL they get you with property taxes, not sure how they get you in MT, but I'm not even sure what to do there if one is not a farmer or hunting/fishing guide.
The extra 50¢ increase in California gas tax brings the state excise tax to 59.6¢/gallon. The CARB-compliant "special blend" and anti-oil stance of the government do far more to raise prices. According to AAA, the national average is $3.12/gallon, but in California it's $4.45.
I'm irate to be honest about it. My tax nut for 2025 will be easily $120k between Federal, State, and Property. I know people don't like my swearing, but what in the flying fuck am I getting out of it???
You're not paying nearly enough. After all, there are reparations to be met.
The curve is skewed right so what is the optimum median or overall tax rate ? 18% ?
AD says
The curve is skewed right so what is the optimum median or overall tax rate ? 18% ?
It depends on the society and the situation.
For example, during war time the populace generally support higher taxes. I am talking US Civil War, WW1 & WW2 or Ukraine war time( for the Ruskies and Ukeys, not us), not Vietnam or Iraq or Afghanistan war time.
« First « Previous Comments 224 - 255 of 255 Search these comments
Until the 16th ammendment was passed in the early 1900's, we got by without fedetal income taxes. Tariffs did the trick. Of course, we were not yet the superpower we became, huge millitary and all, and there were not nearly the federally funded social programs we have today.
Frankly, I don't think your average American realizes how heavily they are taxed. Federal. State (with some excaptions) Property. School. Gas. Sales. Etc.
For most in the middle and upper middle class, federal income tax is the biggest share of taxes paid on a percentage basis.
In a modern captalist economy, it makes more sense to me to tax consumption rather than income.
So why not abolish the federal income tax, and instead have a federal tax on goods and services rendered. Better yet, couple it with a balanced budget amment so that the government can't spend money they don't have.
Taxing goods should be straightforward to implement. Buy a bag of rice, clothes, a house, a car, stock, etc. tax it at a nominal rate to raise sufficent revenue to keep the government running. Tax should apply to individuals and corporations alike. I have no idea what the rate would need to be to replace the lost income income revenue, but there must be a way for the been counters to figure that out.
Same holds for services. From your lawyer to your plumber to your accountant.. services rendered should also be taxed... possibly at a different rate than physical goods, since we are a "service based economy".
Just thinking out loud here.. In the 21st century there MUST be a better way to raise revenue than income tax and the various loopholes used to reduce or even avoid ones tax burden.