patrick.net

Patrick says

The police told him this is because it could be PERCEIVED as being "RACIALLY ABUSIVE." Disgusting.

And the policemen, like robots, are enforcing this nonsense!

https://x.com/FreshSummerWind/status/1959320113624105204

Baby Boudicca

Older than we think.

1950s


1960s

Britain is rapidly headed for a turning point.


Red-Green alliance is in full-effect
https://patrick.net/post/1385444/2025-08-26-assault-on-wolverhampton-uk-military

https://substack.com/home/post/p-171275977

On the United Kingdom, and 1989 Eastern Europe as Harbinger

A complete analysis of the turbulent near future of the regime which, for a short while longer, rules the United Kingdom, through the lens of the end of Communism in Eastern Europe in 1989.

Thirty-five years ago the Communist regimes of Eastern Europe collapsed overnight, something that nobody in the West had foreseen. It turned out, contrary to the firm conclusion of all our vaunted intelligence apparatuses, that every one of those regimes was a paper tiger. When faced with determined resistance from the population, their rulers simply folded their cards, rather than using force to retain power. That much is history, but it raises an important question—what does this imply for the most repressive totalitarian regime in the West, a lineal successor of those dead Communist regimes, today’s United Kingdom? ...

... the UK is a prototypical example of the usual governing system of the West’s modern regimes—a uniparty system masquerading as a parliamentary democracy. The structural mechanism used to maintain uniparty power, totally aside from the specifics of ideology, is something Carl Schmitt identified as an inevitable fatal defect of parliamentary democracies—the constant temptation of those in power to deny, by any means necessary, “equal chance” to any actual challenge to their power. The UK has a uniparty, the Labor-Tory alliance. And no matter how the indigenous population of Britain votes, the result is always the same—advancing the causes of the Left on every front.

This effect is most visible, again, in the millions of invading migrants ushered into the country by the UK regime over the past decade (though it began in the 1950s) in order to replace the indigenous population with reliable clients, at the same time advancing the bred-in-the-bone anti-white hatred of the modern Left. The Tories, for example, promised for fifteen years to reduce immigration to a few tens of thousands, and then gleefully invited millions of Third World parasites. ...

The Online Safety Act is a condensed symbol of everything about and everything bad about the regimes which rule the West. It is utterly mendacious, in that it claims to be directed against controlling child pornography, so that any opposition can be cast as being “against children,” but its real goal is censoring any activity, especially online activity, that might threaten the Regime’s desired narratives or allow opposition to the Regime to organize—especially any opposition to the migrant invasion. ...

The totalitarianism of today’s UK is more extensive than that of any Eastern European communist regime after the 1950s, and perhaps even compared to that decade. Any person in the UK not fully in agreement with the regime must constantly evaluate whether what he says, in any forum, including in private conversations, may lead to his arrest and imprisonment. ...

They rarely, and never for speech, threaten or arrest regime clients, such as the millions of Third World blacks and browns they have imported to Britain, who are encouraged to terrorize white Britons, the exclusive target of the regime. These police actions are rapidly increasing, and will doubtless explode as a result of the Online Safety Act, though exact numbers are carefully concealed by the government. ...

For a native Englishman opposed to the Regime, he must modify his life to comply with regime demands more than any Eastern European did in the 1970s or 1980s—even compared to a citizen of the more repressive Communist regimes, such as Rumania or Albania. ...

In the UK, what is, for now, openly called two-tier justice is the explicit policy of the state. (Hence the bitter nickname for the current Uniparty prime minister, Keir Starmer, “Two-Tier Keir.”) Last year the UK issued new criminal sentencing guidelines directing that harsher sentences be meted out to whites, especially men and Christians, for any and all crimes. The guidelines were temporarily suspended at the last minute, true, but you can be certain that in practice they are fully in effect, as an expression of the will of the ruling class, and you can also be certain that whites are always aggressively investigated and prosecuted while crimes, orders of magnitude greater per capita, by the regime’s shock troop blacks and browns are ignored. No better example exists than the Paki rape gangs, who exclusively rape white girls, which operate freely in many English cities...

In somewhat of a historical parallel, we can see that America is not going to play the role of the Soviet Union for the UK, at least under Trump or any Trumpist successor, which means, again, that the regimes of the totalitarian West are on their own, just like those of 1989 Eastern Europe.

How might the fall of the UK regime play out? In Eastern Europe, there was no single trigger, no one outrage, merely the accumulated unhappiness of the populace, combined with a growing feeling that matters could be made better (rising expectations always play a major role in such events). In the UK, by contrast, the regime continually offers outrages to its population in a manner that Eastern European regimes did not. After all, those regimes were run by people, for the most part, especially by the 1980s, who felt themselves part of the nation. While they were very focused on their own gain and comfort, it would never have occurred to them to take actions deliberately harmful to the people as a whole, such as import millions of aliens and encourage their crimes against the indigenous populace. ...

All repressive governments fear street protests, because they know, either from history or from instinct, that protests are extremely dangerous for their rule. This, not any of their stated reasons, is why the American Regime foamed at the mouth with rage, based in existential fear, against the heroes of the January 6th Electoral Justice Protest, and why the Canadian regime went into, and still engages in, spasms of panic in response to the extremely mild protests of the Freedom Convoy. ...

Thus if, for example, a hundred thousand people marched in London demanding an end to migrant outrages and the state replacement of indigenous Britons with foreigners, along with the deportation of all migrants by force, the regime will face a difficult choice, exactly analogous to 1989 Eastern Europe. It will be unable to ignore such an event, and will have to decide whether to use major force—that resulting in deaths—to suppress it. It cannot ignore the protest, because its very existence is a challenge to a weak regime’s legitimacy, and because at any moment it may turn to open rebellion. The regime’s initial reaction will be to use non-lethal violence to disperse crowds and then to arrest and imprison many of people involved; this has already been done recently with success against minor protests. But those tools will have very definite limits of effectiveness, especially because protests are always contagious, and will rapidly spread to other urban centers.

The UK has relatively few policemen (about seventy-five thousand), and of those, many are women, completely useless to the regime in any scenario involving violence. It has more secret police, but such men (and again many useless women) are bureaucrats at heart, whose organizations exist to inform the regime and execute its orders in the shadows, not fight in the streets. Secret police always evanesce, seeking their own survival, if the regime itself lacks the will to use force (in Hungary, the secret police kept spare uniforms of the regular police on hand for just such a contingency). And the UK’s military, the supposed final boss in situations of revolt, is both small, again filled with women, and, in the usual manner of Western militaries, any soldier with actual experience of violence likely would support, at least to some degree, the protestors. Aliens in the military might engage in freelance violence to support their co-ethnics against a perceived threat, but that would worsen the regime’s problems, not solve them. ...

They will instead, as did the Hungarian regime in 1956, croak the same empty slogans dictated by their ideology, attacking protestors with the same tired labels that nobody who matters will care about. Racist! White supremacist! Nativist! This would have zero effect...

Nor can they look for help from the Regime hegemon, America. The current American government would certainly not support the UK regime. Compelling images of the dead and dying killed by the regime would circulate freely outside of Britain, further undermining the regime (thanks to the breaking of worldwide online censorship resulting both from the freeing of X by Elon Musk and the ascension of Trump, though many platforms such as YouTube and Facebook would eagerly aid the UK ruling class). I would bet money that in this scenario those who make up the UK regime will simply leave their desks and head for the exits.

What happens if not? That is anybody’s guess. The UK might descend into civil war; this is probably the most likely scenario, given the extreme divisions within UK society combined with millions of aliens perching like vultures on British soil. Those divisions are much greater than those in 1989 Eastern Europe, because the UK regime has attempted to destroy the historic British people entirely. ...

What will likely worsen the conflict is that the UK regime has its back against the wall—its members cannot, in practice, emigrate except as beggars. Moreover, because of their great crimes, they correctly fear that if they relinquish power, unlike the Communists in Eastern Europe, they will be extremely lucky if loss of power and property is the worst that happens to them. They have no hope of dominating or profiting from a future regime. ...

It is certainly possible instead that none of this will happen, that Britain will simply sink beneath the waves and disappear, with the lands of Albion becoming a mere extension of the Third World. It would then become another of the very many countries of the world aptly characterized by Trump, with his gift for the felicitous phrase, as shitholes.

https://x.com/OtherMarySpeak/status/1960195490454098370

As of August 25, 2025, the case
involving the 14-year-old girl in Dundee,
Scotland, who was arrested for wielding a knife
and axe in self-defense, has seen significant
developments. The girl, initially charged with
possession of an offensive weapon, has been
released on bail pending further investigation.
The Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service
(COPFS) has stated that the case is under
review, with considerations for the
circumstances of self-defense being taken into
account. Public and legal pressure has
mounted, with several petitions circulating
online demanding the charges be dropped,
garnering over 150,000 signatures. The alleged
attacker, a 28-year-old man of migrant
background, has been charged with attempted
sexual assault and is currently in custody. The
case has reignited debates on self-defense
laws, youth protection, and immigration policies
in Scotland, with the Scottish Government
announcing a review of self-defense legislation
expected to conclude by early 2026. The
incident continues to be a focal point in
discussions on community safety and the role
of minors in self-defense scenarios.

MASS DEPORTATIONS NOW

Women fall in love with the invader who rapes them, because he has proven that he is more dominant than her current mate who failed to protect her.

"The pattern of women of defeated tribes quickly acquiescing to the ruler-ship
and sexual privilege of the conquering men who slew the women's brothers and
fathers and husbands is seen all over the world. It evolved to preserve the
female reproductive prerogative. Treacherous disloyalty of convenience is an
inseparable part of female psychology." - Heartiste

Most women have had rape fantasies. See the cover art of every romance novel.

Women love dominant men because the son of a dominant man is likely to spread her genes widely. When other men bow to her man, she knows she has a winner.

This page has video of the girl and the Paki who made it necessary for her to get a knife and hatchet:

https://boriquagato.substack.com/p/the-flower-of-scotland

the obvious questions here would seem to be:

why was this man interacting aggressively with girls this age to begin with, especially to the point where they are screaming “don’t touch us”?

what had happened just prior or in past interactions that this man knew the girl to be armed or that the girl felt a need to make it known that she was armed (again, while demanding not to be touched).

i’m sort of amazed by the number of epistemological edge lord lawyers online saying “well, we really need to wait and see what happened” as though this situation seems ambiguous and perhaps scotland is being terrorized by a plague of wee lassies bullying the innocent menfolk, but info is starting to leak out.

some reports are stating that:

“The apparent mother of one of the teens present at the scene claims that the man and another woman were sexually propositioning a young girl when she intervened. The migrants then allegedly attacked her and that is when the weapons came out.” ...

let’s be serious about the salients here:

“don’t touch my little sister, she’s f*cking 12!” is not exactly an extreme ask from a child to an adult male stranger.

and somehow she’s the criminal in this episode?

how is the first question not automatically “why would she feel a need to go about armed and scream such things?”




if the response of your society is to arrest this girl, who harmed no one, and to act as though the man following and harassing her is the victim here, then your society has ended.

you are not a real people anymore.

you are food.

worse, you are collaborators in serving yourself and your neighbors up as a predator buffet.

saying "well brandishing a weapon is a crime!" is the empty legalism of a slave, a showing of one's belly to the alpha. ...

Those two statements are both literally true.

Resistance taking many forms:

https://x.com/TPointUK/status/1961026913578958988

Patrick says

This demonstrates the imbecility of the Democrat party.

MolotovCocktail says

Did you.mean to post this in another thread, Patrick ?

Yes, thanks, moved it

https://x.com/sophiadahl1/status/1960510473323069938

https://x.com/benonwine/status/1960721809633923503

British Soccer Fans sick of Pedos


Donate to the Scots Girls
https://www.givesendgo.com/lolaandruby

Britain is under full Red-Green control.

Woman arrested for waving the British Flag outside the Epping Council Meeting
https://x.com/TheBritLad/status/1962233534111703345

https://open.substack.com/pub/anarchonomicon/p/the-civil-war-beginning-in-britain