4
0

I think Zuckerberg intentionally ratted out the FBI, as Facebook isn't even a colloquial term any more since the events that transpired between 2016 and 2020.


               
2022 Aug 30, 4:54pm   353 views  12 comments

by Tenpoundbass   follow (10)  

I think it was sour grapes, I could see Facebook going the way of AOL in the near future. They bet a lot on Meta, but I don't think that will ever take off. As people do all of their avatar internet visiting through gaming consoles playing games. There just isn't any reason to use Meta, why not make Roblox or Minecraft everything that Meta is trying to be?

Facebook the family and friend keep in touch platform, will never have the popularity that it once enjoyed. And they ruined it themselves trying to play King Maker. Now they want to blame the FBI.

https://thefederalist.com/2022/08/30/zuckerbergs-admission-of-fbi-meddling-in-2020-election-is-even-bigger-than-it-seems/

Comments 1 - 12 of 12        Search these comments

1   Hircus   2022 Aug 30, 5:26pm  

I do think zuck is scared his precious FB is failing, and probably feels distrust of FB is a big part of it.

He did throw the FBI under the bus, but he also pivoted hard into comparisons of how much better FB was vs twitter when handling this FBI request/mandate. If we want to give him the benefit of the doubt, maybe he was actually resisting the FBI in some small way. To be honest, I do recall the employee uprising at FB where tons of his senior NPC architects and devs banded together and threatened to all quit if zuck didn't censor bad orange man's "violent speech". Zuck was standing up to what sounded like a lot of pressure from the NPC rage mob, and he was resolute in saying censorship is wrong, which is quite laudable assuming the internal uprising was real.

If I recall right, this uprising transpired not long after zuck and his wife had a private dinner with Trump. Nobody knows what was said, but I always assumed Trump punked zuck and his bitch, explaining how he would crush them if he kept up the censorship. But, maybe threats weren't needed. Its possible zuck prefers free speech but has caved to immense pressure because hes a weak bitch, or because hes trying to be "pragmatic" or whatever. But its also possible he was only resisting his NPCs because he feared Trumps threats.

I'm sure glad zuck talked, and didn't stay quiet.
2   Misc   2022 Aug 30, 6:52pm  

The fuck used $350 million of his own money to help steal the election for Biden.

His little PR piece ain't gonna fly. He and his piece of shit company are damaged goods beyond repair.
3   Ceffer   2022 Aug 30, 7:25pm  

DARPA is in charge of FaceFuck, not Zuck. He is a store front and follows orders. If he acted as a messenger boy to relent and display some controlled opposition to the FBI, they either scripted him to or he is personally afraid for himself.

Maybe Trump just laid out his GITMO case, but Zuck didn't do it because he has any shred of conscience, just a healthy sense of self preservation. He's a dynastjc implant like Gates, and they probably already have his body double ready if they have to off the original Zuck. That's the standard contract with the Globalists.
4   Hircus   2022 Aug 30, 7:38pm  

Misc says

The fuck used $350 million of his own money to help steal the election for Biden.

His little PR piece ain't gonna fly. He and his piece of shit company are damaged goods beyond repair.


good point.
5   Patrick   2022 Aug 30, 9:15pm  

Misc says

The fuck used $350 million of his own money to help steal the election for Biden.


It was actually more than $400 million to undermine democracy and election integrity, but who's counting?

https://thefga.org/one-pagers/zuckerbucks/
6   Ceffer   2022 Aug 30, 10:56pm  

Misc says


The fuck used $350 million of his own money to help steal the election for Biden.

It was never his money. The DARPA program cost at least half a billion to develop, it wasn't just a college wise guy catapulting to fame. They picked Zuck to hand Facebook to (aka DARPA LifeLog) because he is in the dynastic club. They handed the operation to him to be their brand name. All the social network mythology is an intelligence legend. Facebook was always from ground up built to be a surveillance and spying tool, sucker punching people with their own social proclivities.

If you use common sense on the election fraud, you can see Facebook funded a sophisticated and elaborately planned intelligence operation with lots of players with Facebook money and Facebook brand name. Zuck doesn't have the chops or the pedigree to do such a thing on his own.
7   richwicks   2022 Aug 31, 12:13am  

Ceffer says


All the social network mythology is an intelligence legend. Facebook was always from ground up built to be a surveillance and spying tool, sucker punching people with their own social proclivities.


THIS^^

A company isn't worth a billion dollars because they advertise toothpaste, under-arm deodorant, and other crap and incidentally allow you to talk politics, communicate with your family, and express your viewpoints, and absorb other people's viewpoints.

These companies are designed to drive and control thinking and to monitor them. It's been an open secret in Silicon Valley for years. The reason that Google bought NEST was for surveillance capabilities. I have had an engineer that worked for them tell me that POINT BLANK. It's not for controlling your home's temperature.

These companies now OPENLY hire "retired" intelligence agents.

@Misc - Some people have been blowing the whistle for 2 decades or even more. You just don't believe us. I live and work here. There was chatter in the early 2000's, and it's blatantly obvious now. You don't get de-platformed from Facebook, or Twitter, or Youtube because you've threatened people, because you used curse words, because you did X or Y - it's because they don't want other people to see what you said. That's it.

This should be OBVIOUS by now. You don't get your comment or video removed because you violated terms of service, you have seen this over and over again. You get it removed because you said something that the government doesn't want other people to hear. This is why you see people "who support Ukraine" free to call for the murder of Russians and calls to violence. THAT'S a TOS violation, you know that, but it's not enforced because the TOS has NOTHING to do with it. You can see this directly.

These are not real companies, and people who invest in them, are investing in their own enslavement and their children's enslavement.

It's not "woke companies" pushing LGBTQIA+ (I think that's the current acronym) it's the government.
8   Ceffer   2022 Aug 31, 1:03am  

Milton William Cooper in "Behold a Pale Horse" states explicitly that from the inception of computer in the 50's, the 'Elite' saw the potential of AI to close the circle of their perennial dilemma of how to effectively and efficiently enslave the human race, and they set out to devise 'silent weapons' to disintegrate society and engage in genocide and democide to implement their visions of social conquest. Computers have from the beginning been supported as a control matrix for economics and society, not to improve life for the general population.

The insane megalomania of these so called transhumanist elites have been steering things for 70 years. Of course, the Rockefellers had to be in on the ground floor and have funded the AI vision of dominant control over the population with murderous intent since then. Silicon Valley is a viper's nest of implementing their programs, which they no longer even try to hide they are so confident and arrogant.

The elites are less an elite than a successful disease of the species social structures. The less symbiotic they become, the more they draw attention to themselves as predatory contagion, and the majority will turn on them. That is why they want to thin the herd down to manageable proportions. Their arbitrary figure of 500 million total population has nothing to do with sustainable resources. That is the number of human beings they believe allow 'sustainable centralized tyranny, slavery and livestocking'.
9   richwicks   2022 Aug 31, 1:26am  

Ceffer says

Computers have from the beginning been supported as a control matrix for economics and society, not to improve life for the general population.


I'd agree this is their aim, but I still think technology can liberate humanity, for those that want it.
10   Ceffer   2022 Aug 31, 1:48am  

I think they overestimated their ability to control information. Clearly, the parallel processing nature of human awareness combined with access to information is allowing a significant group to unmask them. Whether this is ultimately effective to counter their goal to impose absolute tyranny is TBD. They have decided it is easier just to kill who they perceive they can't control.

Human population behaviors and adaptations are too complex to control in the manner they envision. They are fairly simple minded predatory lunatics. They can create a lot of chaos, suffering, and death in the meanwhile, however.

If you have ever known really rich fucks, you know they tend toward superstition and unusual forms of gullibility. I think there are subspecies of psychopaths and predators who survive by goading the elite controlling predators into idiotic strategies based on fantasy. The elites are isolated because isolation allows them to 'preserve' their lines and dynasties, but it also means they are out of touch in their self referenced shell worlds, which is why dynasties wind up decaying.
11   Tenpoundbass   2022 Aug 31, 6:52am  

I wonder what financial pressures Zuck is starting to feel. You don't hear about him acquiring pristine Island beachfront property and building a mega mansion, or buying up huge luxury yachts, like has peppered the news in the last 15 years. Also Facebook has stopped acquiring new emerging tech companies like they always did in the past.

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   users   suggestions   gaiste