The art of red-pilling In the beginning, I would incoherently spurt out all the pent-up alternative media information I’d learned, coming across as a nutcase to any normal, well-adjusted person. Then as more conspiracy theories were validated as being true, some people would become more receptive to alternative sources of information and news.
Feeling like I was on a roll, I’d blast them with links in the same frequency as would be shared within my inner circle. That was a mistake. It was too much too soon and overwhelming for the old-world-viewers. They told me stop sending them links, that they wanted to get on with their lives. Relationships and friendships were strained, some irreparably broken, others hung by a thread.
The next stage of the gauntlet was carefully picking and choosing select links to share, only to be replied to with fact checks cited (or as Zuckerberg described his fact-checkers as having “protected opinion”). Add to that reply the observation (via google search engine and Wikipedia entries) that pretty much any link shared or expert was ‘right-wing’, a ‘misinformation quack’, ‘anti-government’ etc etc.
This was a tough old game to crack.
The current level of the playing field has molded your correspondent into a much calmer, more attentively active listener. Sparingly introducing no more than two pieces of new and emerging information into any given conversation with loved ones. Usually on the back of one of their off-the-cuff remarks.
For example, a few weeks back during the UK heatwave, someone told me how they’d read about an increase in heat strokes and heart attacks, resulting from the high temperatures (and inferring climate change). I was able to build upon their curiosity by explaining how the number one leading cause of death in the UK is ‘unknown cause of death’. Compared with ‘unknown cause of death’ previously being an insignificant figure for all cause mortality.
I added to this the media’s new phrases, SADS (sudden adult death syndrome), and SIDS (sudden infant death syndrome). The person in question quipped that I must think this is linked to the injections (obviously, I do think that). Yet for the sake of open discourse, I said that nobody knows what is causing it, but it is alarming.
We were in agreement. Days past and this person came back to me, troubled, having read / seen / heard / watched reports of young athletes dropping dead. They finally asked me if I thought it was related to the injections, and I was able to introduce them to other sources reinforcing and documenting the likelihood of this being true.
Those clinging to the narratives cannot think logically, or make reasonable deductions, as a result of the total menticide they have been subjected to. They will not look at data and figures. The applied behavioural psychological techniques employed by governments (UK SAGE, SPI-B) have preyed on their emotions.
Ergo, we must humanely appeal to their emotions, in order to break through the mass psychosis.
patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,299,183 comments by 15,472 users - clambo, Patrick, Tenpoundbass, zzyzzx online now