« First « Previous Comments 830 - 869 of 883 Next » Last » Search these comments
Said simply, causing harm and disease massively increases the size of the market for pharmaceutical products so that’s Big Pharma’s business model today.
If one actually cares about health, finding new uses for existing drugs that are no longer protected by patents is BY FAR the best use of research time and money.
Research into nutrition and non-pharmaceutical interventions also produces infinitely better outcomes for the public than biochemical research.
But there are almost no profits in these approaches.
Assemblymen Carl DeMaio (R-San Diego) and Bill Essayli (R-Riverside) announced Tuesday their intention to support the qualification of and passage of a Voter ID Initiative in California in the 2026 election.
A coalition of elected officials and campaign committees have also announced support, and released polling showing overwhelming bipartisan support for a Voter ID Initiative in California – with a super-majority of Republicans and Independents and a majority of even Democratic voters supporting the initiative.
National, regional or local polling always shows that a Voter ID requirement is popular with a majority of voters – as high as 8 in 10 voters, according to mainstream polling firm Gallup.
A poll conducted by Gallup in October 2024 found that 84% of Americans favor requiring all voters to provide photo identification at their polling place in order to vote. The poll also found that 83% of Americans favor requiring people who are registering to vote for the first time to provide proof of citizenship. ...
a majority of even Democratic voters supporting the initiative.
https://corbettreport.com/creating-parallel-societies/
From the depths of the scamdemic to the craziness of the trade wars, we've seen the economic destruction and disruption of our daily lives that can be caused by authoritarians who presume to rule over the world. But the society they are crafting is not the society we have to live in. Join James for this edition of #SolutionsWatch where he explores the concept of parallel societies and the steps that can be taken to create the building blocks for such societies to come about.
Idaho Medical Freedom Bill S1023 passed legislative vote!
Now awaiting ID governor signature.
Leslie Manookian of the Health Freedom Fund deserves credit and congratulations on the passage of this important bill. Our work is far from over, there are several more bills in progress in Idaho and other states.
What's S1023 All About?
S1023 modifies CHAPTER 5, TITLE 73, IDAHO CODE to be more generalized. Instead of focusing on "coronavirus" only, it applies to all "medical interventions."
This bill renames the "Coronavirus Stop Act" to the "Idaho Medical Freedom Act." It prohibits all forced medical interventions. It prohibits discrimination and other negative actions against anyone who refuses medical interventions.
Read the Bill: https://legislature.idaho.gov/sessioninfo/2025/legislation/S1023/
What S1023 Does (in a Nutshell)...
Removes the sections defining "Coronavirus" and "Coronavirus vaccination."
Adds definitions for "Medical intervention" and "School."
Prohibits MEDICAL MANDATES (not just coronavirus vaccination).
Changes references from "coronavirus vaccination" to the more general "medical intervention."
In Practical Terms, S1023...
Prevents businesses from requiring medical interventions (like vaccines) for service.
Stops schools from mandating medical procedures for students and employees.
Ensures that you can work, attend school, and participate in society without being forced into unwanted medical treatments.
Why We Need S1023...
After all the draconian human-rights trampling countermeasures that governmental and non-governmental organizations took during the COVID era, personal and medical rights must be codified into law so they cannot be taken away again.
Many people died or were permanently injured because medical freedom rights were denied and a one-size-fits-all solution was imposed upon them.
They were not given a choice.
They were fed a narrative dictated by government and organizations such as the WHO.
They were not allowed to hear dissenting views.
They were denied medical treatments.
They were forced to take experimental treatments without adequate informed consent.
They were isolated in hospitals, where they often died alone.
They lost their jobs.
They lost their benefits.
They were denied access to daily living venues such as schools, grocery stores, and other locations.
They could not go to school without taking mandated (and often harmful) medical treatments.
People literally were treated like prisoners, though they had committed no crimes.
Some of the above has not stopped yet! But people are finally waking up. They know what was done to them and their loved ones. They do not want it to happen again when the next group of “experts” is unleashed to handle a public health “emergency.” People have the right to know the truth, to be fully informed, and to make their own decisions about what happens to their bodies.
This bill MUST pass if we are to ensure personal and medical freedom for all citizens of Idaho. Say “YES” to S1023 as loudly as legislative decorum allows!
I had a meme recently about a woman who wanted to have babies who were never known to the government.
I kind of like this idea, just having no government registration or documentation whatsoever. Government wouldn't even know you exist.
Would be a problem if you wanted to get a job or a driver's license or passport though.
Petition in Opposition to Activist Judges
Judges should interpret laws as written, not rewrite them to fit their personal or political agendas.
By signing below, I'm rejecting the actions of activist judges who impose their own views and demanding a judiciary that respects its role—interpreting, not legislating.
A Crack in the PREP Act?
North Carolina Supreme Court decides that a family can sue over unwanted COVID-19 shot. [The dissenting opinion opens up the possibility of criminal charges.] ...
The North Carolina Supreme Court appears to have decided ONLY that the case should continue in the Appeals Court in regards to state constitution related issues, but upheld the PREP Act protection from lawsuit and liability in regards to medical battery. ...
HOWEVER, in her dissenting opinion, Justice Riggs seemed to open the door to CRIMINAL charges!!!
PREP Act immunity is one from civil suits and liability.
A person who violates a penal statute may still be charged and punished criminally because a prosecution is not in any sense a “claim for loss,” and our statutes already criminalize the unlawful administration and dispensation of medication, including to children. See, e.g., N.C.G.S. § 110-102.1A (2023) (criminalizing administration of medication without parental consent to children attending childcare facilities); N.C.G.S. § 90-85.40 (2023) (criminalizing violations of the North Carolina Pharmacy Practice Act).
Licensing discipline is likewise not preempted by the PREP Act. See Leonard, 61 F.4th 914–15 (noting that the argument the PREP Act precludes licensing discipline “stretches the text too far. The more natural reading of the statute is that covered persons are immunized from suits by plaintiffs trying to recover for the plaintiffs’ losses caused by covered persons, not suits by those seeking to impose a loss on the covered person.”).
Congress clearly weighed its need to encourage a fulsome response to nationwide medical emergencies against the possibility of wrongdoing, and it thus did not immunize covered persons from the comparatively greater punishments of deprivations of liberty and livelihood. (pages 68-69)
https://appellate.nccourts.org/opinions/?c=1&pdf=44644
It's a romantic idea, but you'd still have to interact with the Fed's economy of counterfeiting to get certain things, and that would make you dependent.
It's a romantic idea, but you'd still have to interact with the Fed's economy of counterfeiting to get certain things, and that would make you dependent.
It's a romantic idea, but you'd still have to interact with the Fed's economy of counterfeiting to get certain things, and that would make you dependent.
Examining the ramifications of Covid-19 public policy
Our vision is to be a beacon of hope by discovering truth through evidence for the purpose of preserving civil liberties and personal autonomy.
Collect
We gather Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests, legal court case filings, public database findings, and other materials.
Curate
Our team of curators reviews captured discovery, adding metadata so it can be easily searched, retrieved, and analyzed.
Review
Our experts in medicine, law, and research add relevant cross-references and material facts to the documents and records.
Share
We publish the curated, reviewed documentation and evidence in an accessible web-based search interface.
« First « Previous Comments 830 - 869 of 883 Next » Last » Search these comments
What else?