patrick.net

I'm proud of you .
Patrick says

Just made that myself.

https://eccentrik.substack.com/p/4-ways-to-convince-people-that-vaccines

It’s all about subtle psychological techniques, common sense approaches, and a little luck. While these strategies may fail with many people, they can and will allow some to see the light.

So let’s get right into ’em…

1) Reframe the Argument

The focus, the real concern of the vaccine-autism debate is over SEVERE cases. Let people know this. Before you even mention “vaccine,” show them videos of teenagers and adolescents who are self-injurious, howling and screaming in anguish as adults try unsuccessfully to console them. Communicate that there are ASD adults in diapers who are unable to perform basic tasks, who can’t speak, who are also plagued by other disorders, such as bipolar disorder in 7.8% of children and 15% of adults. ...

Again, it’s all about reframing the focus and letting people who take this as an ‘attack’ on eccentricity and neurodiversity know that it’s not about that at all.

And, if you want to sprinkle in a little extra, play stupid. Pontificate, if you will, why the all-so-trusted mainstream media doesn’t seem to relay these important statistics...

2) Empathize with Suffering
Speaking of parents, educators, and specialists being outraged, flip the script.

Think of any major issue where a ‘protected’ or ‘marginalized’ class or group is alleged to be under fire. Take, for instance, the issue at the United States’ southern border. How often do the people screaming racism and xenophobia talk about those who did it right? Those who crossed legally? Do these self-proclaimed guardians ever express sympathy for those who waited for years to become U.S. citizens?

Do they ever wonder what it must feel like to be lawful and respectful, only to look like suckers when line-cutters and fence-climbers can enter the country and receive perks that even the most beleaguered citizens cannot?

Now apply this to the vaccine-autism debate.

Rather than sympathize with parents of ‘spectrum’ kids who aren’t severely disabled, take the side of the parents who do have children with profound intellectual disabilities. Consider not only the emotional toll on family and friends (and the child) but the financial toll as well.

So if these guardians of the marginalized want to sit on their moral high horses, remind them exactly who is affected most by severe ASDs:

“Minority children were more severely affected. Black, Asian, and Hispanic children in the 2022 survey had higher overall ASD prevalence (3.66%, 3.82%, and 3.30%, respectively) than White children (2.77%), and were also more likely to have a more severe form of autism. Among Black, Asian, and Hispanic children, 78.9%, 66.5%, and 63.9%, respectively, had either severe or borderline ID, compared to 55.6% of Whites.”

Sometimes, it’s as simple as taking one’s beliefs and arguments and holding up a mirror.

Do they really mean what they purport to mean? Will they actually do something about it?

If so, give them a chance - if they’re not hypocrites from the start.

3) Neutralize Ad Hominem

... Remind people who are outraged at insinuations of vaccine-autism links that you yourself were vaccinated as a child. And even if you weren’t, let people know that the vast majority of adults today were vaccinated as children. The main difference, of course, is the amount of injections received.




Make it clear that to call you ‘anti-vax’ is a misnomer. Before you ever express how you really feel about so-called vaccines and their dangers, let people know that you went through the medical system like everyone else.

Try to find some common ground.

But also, don’t let people think because you received vaccines as a kid when it was your parents’ choice and not yours, that you support them. Take a nuanced approach. Express slight concern. Don’t immediately go into “jabs are bioweapons that increase mortality and morbidity of every kind!!” mode.

That approach may work on some, but for the vast majority of people, they’ll tune you out as soon as they hear it. Even if you don’t care what people think of you, if your goal is to get people considering the potential downsides of these injections, you need to take a more delicate approach.

Then speak on Big Pharma.

Again, find common ground. Situate yourself as being on their team, David vs Goliath. Ask the individual what incentive these companies have to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth given their sordid histories.

If the individual doesn’t want to believe you, then simply suggest that they ask the almighty and all-knowing ChatGPT:

$26 billion (2022): Involves Cardinal Health, McKesson, AmerisourceBergen, and Johnson & Johnson, addressing their roles in the opioid crisis through distribution and manufacturing practices.

$7.4 billion (2025): Purdue Pharma and the Sackler family settled for their role in the opioid crisis, specifically related to OxyContin marketing.

$3 billion (2012): GlaxoSmithKline for off-label promotion, failure to disclose safety data, and kickbacks involving drugs like Avandia and Paxil.

$2.3 billion (2009): Pfizer for off-label promotion and kickbacks related to Bextra, Geodon, Zyvox, and Lyrica.

$2.2 billion (2013): Johnson & Johnson for off-label promotion and kickbacks involving Risperdal, Invega, and Natrecor.

... Also, if possible, make a gentle reference toward those seemingly long-forgotten ‘COVID days.’ The trick here is to be casual.

Even if the person you’re talking to thinks the COVID vaccines are the greatest gift from God ever created, they can probably admit that the response to COVID through lockdowns and various draconian protocols, was not ideal.

Children born during pandemic have lower IQs, US study finds
Researchers blame lack of stimulation as parents balanced childcare with working from home

How about the fact that the 6-foot distancing and masking of children were seemingly made up out of whole cloth without supporting evidence?

Or again, how about the even more authoritarian overreaches across the world, such as in cases where armed patrolmen approached families sitting by themselves on beaches, or when people were barred from entering certain businesses if they didn’t have proof of vaccination?

Or ridiculous measures, like when kids were put in “individual bubbles” so they could do music rehearsal?

Ask people how, given these events and policies and protocols, the ‘experts’ could be unquestionably followed. Ask people if it’s conceivable that maybe, just maybe, these experts (who tout the 100% safety and efficacy of vaccines) could be wrong or misguided.

Whatever you say, it’s critical that you connect this to those crazy days of COVID-19. You can’t let them forget. You can’t let them memory-hole it.

People need to know what is going on, that it’s just rinse and repeat. They have to learn to appreciate the fact that you’re not a crazy person or conspiracy theorist for questioning the same people that came up with all this crap when it comes to vaccines.

Ad hominem attacks like ‘anti-vaxxer’ are just the failed rhetoric of people who want to control how you think and behave. If people can learn not to fear such empty labels, then they can feel more comfortable questioning things. Not all people can - some are fully committed and will never budge - but a good percentage of people are still open to a deeper explanation.

Just like how people were isolated and went along with the mass injections so they didn’t feel alone, they don’t want to feel alone in pushing back on the established Narrative. ...

4) Trust Science, Not Scientism
Last but certainly not least, is the actual science. Not The Science™, not Scientism, but the scientific method. Ya know, that forgotten little thing where things can’t be ‘settled’ when new contraindications are popping up everywhere, or when a preponderance of empirical evidence confirms significantly different hypotheses.

Anyway, this is where it gets tricky. You have to wade carefully if you want to get people to even begin to look into something, especially when decades of indoctrination have them reflexively rejecting all the evidence of their eyes and ears.

To start, try (as always) to find common ground.

Before you get into the minutiae of data, remind people that there’s nothing wrong with thinking vaccines are dangerous. Again, harken back to the absurdities of the COVID-19 years as this is the quickest inroad through someone’s conscious and subconscious barriers.

Let people know that it’s not abnormal to question the safety and efficacy of “vaccines” - or any biopharmaceutical product for that matter.

Once you’ve established that many people feel and think in a similar way - even if they’re afraid to voice it - become one of the braver voices. Heck, it might even help to have a sense of humor about it, especially since so many people are highly uncomfortable even broaching the subject.

You might even relate that you know people who were affected by the shots. Casually mention that you’ve heard stories of kids who developed conditions and were never the same after certain childhood vaccinations.

Matter-of-factly mention that they’re still recommending regular ‘updates’ through COVID vaccines. Although some people have literally received 11 COVID injections by now and will continue to receive ‘boosters’ as they do the annual flu shot, most people won’t, and will probably be surprised to hear these CDC guidances.

Then mention how even babies aged 6 months are getting the COVID vaccines per the latest Immunization Schedule. People will probably also be surprised by the number of other vaccines recommended, especially when compared to previous years.

Roughly 18 doses across 12 different vaccines in 2000 vs roughly 45 doses across 20 different vaccines in 2025.

You might wonder out loud, has anyone researched what kind of effect this significant dose increase has on young babies? What kind of impact does this have on the accumulation of vaccine adjuvants, preservatives, and excipients in the body?

Notice what we’re doing here. If you want to convince people of a possible link between vaccines and autism, you need to spend most of your time skating around the topic.

The key is not even to convince people of autism or any specific condition per se, but simply to seed some doubt in the concept of vaccines as a whole. We want a crack in the door so we can slowly but surely open it wider and wider.

And when it does come time to get into the granular data or present the various findings and implications of seminal research studies, there’s no need to shove it in people’s faces.

For most people - especially those in deep denial or ignorance - you don’t want to go too hard too soon. Rather than coming out of the gate swinging, whacking them in the face with fear-inducing facts, pitch them a trail of breadcrumbs.

Remember: nobody wants to be told what to think.

The key to convincing someone is not to tell them what to think, but to have them believe they thought it themselves.

So lead that horse to water… and see if it chooses to drink or die!

Once you’ve gotten a person to finally begin questioning their fundamental beliefs about vaccines, then you can drip drip drip the details.

Show them studies about aluminum in vaccines and aluminum at significantly higher levels in the brains of severely autistic individuals.

Show them studies about the inherent flaws in so-called placebo-controlled trials, where more often than not neutral saline is absent in favor of, you guessed it, more aluminum-based products!

Show them studies revealing the increasing prevalence of severe, easily discerned ASD, thereby calling into question arguments that it’s all due to changes in diagnostic awareness.

Show them how a growing trend toward undervaluing Bradford Hill’s Criteria has led to an inability to detect piercing safety signals.

Show them the known health complications stemming from vaccine adjuvants, and that genes only play a marginal role (when unadulterated by biopharmaceutical intervention).

While undoing a lifetime of brainwashing is no easy task, it can be done if you work artfully and consistently. But it’s not going to work on everyone. You’ve got to accept that some of the people closest to you may never come around. In certain cases - and sadly we’ve seen many - people will suffer the most immediate, obvious health events from vaccination, and still deny any connection.

Don’t lose hope. Stay the course with those who appear amenable, and adapt your approach. Encourage but don’t compel. Question but don’t accuse.

Because honestly? We need way more people on our side if we’re going to implement the kind of fundamental, systemic, and lasting change we want.

I took an old wifi router of mine and set the SSID to "The vaxx kills people!" So that's what it broadcasts and people will see it if looking for wifi hotspots.

Where can I put it for maximum visibility of that SSID? I suppose near a cafe or other such area would be good, just need to find an outlet.

Patrick says

Recommended petition by Elon:

https://petition.theamericapac.org/

Petition in Opposition to Activist Judges
Judges should interpret laws as written, not rewrite them to fit their personal or political agendas.

By signing below, I'm rejecting the actions of activist judges who impose their own views and demanding a judiciary that respects its role—interpreting, not legislating.

Looks like the start of something new in this administration as far as taking on law breaking activist judges

FBI director says Wisconsin judge arrested for allegedly obstructing ICE

https://www.cnn.com/2025/04/25/politics/fbi-director-wisconsin-judge-arrested/index.html

.

Each branch is trying to weaponize against the others. Ultimately, it's a question of which branch makes the most mistakes. Currently, there's all this hubub about the executive branch. What about judicial and legislative malfeasance and corruption?

https://vicparkpetition.substack.com/p/the-great-ratcheting

https://laurakasner.substack.com/p/tom-havilands-journey

I hope my readers find Tom Haviland’s story as inspirational as I do. ...

Tom, having the courage of his convictions sent an email to an Air Force 3-star general on October 13, 2021. He copied all 30,000 people that worked at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base. This email got him immediately fired from his $165,000 a year job as an independent contractor.

The verbiage from his email which was in response to an email from the Deputy Commander:
To My WPAFB, AFMC, and ACC Coworkers,

I write this and provide the attached document as encouragement to you. I want you to know that “you are not alone” if you feel that you have been wronged by not being allowed to make your own decision on whether to get the Covid-19 vaccines or not. The “mandate” is flat out wrong. The data does not support it, and it is also morally wrong. It is sinister of our government to insist that you get the vaccine or else lose your job and other civil rights.

I understand that many of you are “between a rock and a hard place.” You don’t want to get the vaccine, but you feel that you are in no position to say “no” because you really need your job to support you and your family. However, there comes a point when we need to make a stand against tyranny. Telling you that you MUST inject an experimental vaccine into your body is about as bad as it gets.

I encourage all of you to dig deep inside you and find that courage that is within all of us. I cannot make your decision for you, and I cannot guarantee that we will win. But I do know that if enough of us stand, then they will rescind this awful mandate. Some in leadership have tried to give the impression that almost everyone has no problems getting the vaccine and that you are “the odd ball out” if you are vaccine hesitant. Let me tell you right now that is the furthest thing from the truth.

How do I know this? Some of you at WPAFB may have seen me lately. I am the guy that spent my two-week vacation in September and the first two weekends in October at the stoplight on Fairfield Road by the Red Lobster just off I-675, holding the sign saying “NO VAX MANDATE.” For the eighteen days (over 100 hours) that I have been out there, I estimate that I have watched over 100,000 cars go by me.

Sure, many of the cars don’t do anything, and about 1% will give me a “middle finger” or say “F you.” But a significant number, about 20%, cheer wildly, honk their horns, or give me a “thumbs up.”

What is interesting is to see that when most of the cars are stopped at the light awaiting their turn to go, when the first car starts to honk it gives courage to the other drivers to start honking their horns. Soon, many cars are letting the entire intersection know exactly how they feel about this rotten mandate. Furthermore, every single day that I have been there, people (including doctors, nurses, teachers, clergy, firemen, etc.) have taken the time to park their car and walk down to the corner to shake my hand or offer me a bottle of water.

I know that the stated work policy of “not asking people about their vaccination status” has been to protect your medical privacy. But I think that it has also had the consequence of “isolating” each one of us so that we can never talk to our fellow coworkers about how we really feel about things like masks, social distancing, and vaccine mandates. We were never really allowed to talk about these things together, so we never really had the opportunity to start “honking our horns together” if we disagreed with any policy.

Again, for those of you who despise this vaccine mandate, I want you to know that you are not alone. As for me, I’d rather die on my feet than live on my knees.

Sincerely,

Tom Haviland (20 Year USAF Veteran, 16 Year Defense Contractor)

P.S. For Lt Gen Schaefer: You should be ashamed of yourself. You failed us. Instead of fighting for our right to choose for ourselves whether to get injected with an experimental vaccine, you spent your time trying to “guilt” us who are unvaccinated into getting the vaccine. Shame on you.

Looks like it's from a Russian kind of patrick.net:

https://www.anekdot.ru/

https://x.com/RadioGenoa/status/1921181185834713513

She got that right. Islam - the religion of rape. I'll add the religion of hate, slavery, murder, and lies.

Is Islam perhaps the true church of satan? It glorifies all that are the basest instincts in mankind - rape, murder, slavery, lies, hypocrasy. It's in the fucking Koran and the Hadith. It's one step away from roasting children alive in ovens as sacrifices to baal/baphomet like the phonecians used to do.

https://karenkingston.substack.com/p/nearly-100000-comments-were-sent

To everyone who submitted a comment to the FDA regarding the dangers of the COVID-19 injections and the immediate need to recall them from the market.

THANK YOU!

As of midnight on Friday May 23, 2025, nearly 100,000 public comments were submitted to the FDA. This may very well be a record.

Patrick says

"We cannot tolerate it, because we can’t keep letting our people die every day. Every day people die, every day there are adverse effects. And now we are getting more and more. What about the turbo cancer? We had spoken about this two months before the vaccine was launched. We debated 2 years ago, and 2 months before the vaccine was launched. They said 'oh no, just minor pain.' Now they are silent. Now AstraZeneca, Pfizer themselves admit that the vaccine has side effects. This is just now. We don’t know what will happen in another 5 years. We don’t know, and I suspect it could be worse. It could be worse,"

-Professor Dr. Mustafa Ali Mohd, former WHO Scientific Advisor and Professor of Medicine at the University of Malaya

https://www.aussie17.com/p/i-was-threatened-who-consultant-and

“I Was Threatened!”: WHO Consultant and Expert Toxicologist Exposes mRNA Vaccine Deceptions.

"The vaccine is fraud. Don’t trust it, it’s a scam, it’s not real" ...

He’s seen the WHO’s inner workings, and let’s just say it’s a tightly locked system. But when he tried to speak out, things got ugly fast. “Two or three months before the vaccine came out, I already told the media not to take this vaccine. We’re not sure yet,” he revealed, only to have “my mouth shut, and I was threatened in all sorts of ways.” Can you imagine a top scientist being gagged like that? It didn’t stop there. He also suggested, “Take ivermectin,” as an alternative, but that got him in even hotter water. “I was also suppressed, they gave another warning until I was almost arrested,” he said. Who’s got the power to silence a guy like this? It makes you wonder what they’re so afraid of him saying. ...

And don’t get him started on the FDA. “This FDA, if you go to any part of the world, doctors will believe whatever if its FDA approved,” he’s said, but he’s skeptical of how emergency approvals were used to fast-track things while alternatives like ivermectin were swept under the rug. “We had ivermectin at that time. But if you mentioned ivermectin, your place would be in jail.”

The Vaccine is Fraud

“The vaccine is fraud. Don’t trust it, it’s a scam, it’s not real,” he’s declared, echoing what many of us skeptics have been shouting from the rooftops.