by AD ➕follow (1) 💰tip ignore
Comments 1 - 6 of 6 Search these comments
I do not give a shit about Ukraine. I would not be able to find it on a map. How would life be significantly different for the average Ukrainian if Russia took over? Why are we risking nuclear Armageddon over this?
I do not give a shit about Ukraine. I would not be able to find it on a map. How would life be significantly different for the average Ukrainian if Russia took over? Why are we risking nuclear Armageddon over this?
Something tells me one doesn't exactly start "Speshual Military Opereyshun" against an adversary armed with 2400 nukes, so the whole covfefe would end pretty quickly. You might be onto something here, actually.
We are involved because we took 2400 THERMONUCLEAR warheads and shitload of ICBMs, cruise missiles and strategic bombers from Ukraine
Dmitry Peskov, the press secretary of the President of Russia, has said that speculation about the possibility that the explosion on the Crimean Bridge may trigger Russia’s nuclear doctrine is "an incorrect formulation of the question".
Details: "No. It is a totally incorrect formulation of the question," he said, responding to a question whether Russian President Vladimir Putin’s words mean that the explosion at the bridge, aimed at destroying crucial civilian infrastructure of Russia, raise the possibility of triggering Russia’s nuclear potential, and whether it falls within the scope of the nuclear doctrine.
Earlier, Peskov reported that Putin would conduct a meeting with members of the Security Council of the Russian Federation on Monday, 10 October 2022.
"The Security Council meeting is planned for tomorrow. We will tell you about topics after the President’s speech," Peskov stated, replying to a question when the Council was going to meet and if the explosion on the Crimean Bridge would be discussed there.