patrick.net

Pacific Eclipse predicted a range of changes that COVID-19 would bring to the globe.

The prescience and timeliness of this meeting, held on December 9th and 10th 2019, was extraordinary. Within a month, those attending the meeting, would be facing the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic, hopefully implementing many of the lessons learnt.

Event 201 - widely recognized as the “COVID rehearsal” held on 18 October 2019 in NYC - is familiar to many.

The pandemic tabletop exercise was hosted by the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundations and the World Economic Forum.

Pacific Eclipse was a high-level (but low-profile) pandemic simulation held on 9-10 December 2019, conducted by the U.S. Department of Defense in collaboration with key academic institutions in Anglosphere countries.

The scenario was specifically adapted for the US 2020 presidential election year (!!!) ...

The ability of these experts to ‘anticipate’ [a phony-baloney crisis in which they’re heavily invested] is truly extraordinary!

They even ‘predicted’ the COVID scenes with cruise ships…

And then: Enter - the miraculous ‘vaccines’ (versus ‘vaccine hesitancy’)…

So there you have it: Just before COVID kicked off in a super-charged US presidential year and an anticipated second term for Trump (and overwhelming momentum in the UK to “Get Brexit Done”) the Five Eyes nations held a clandestine meeting of multi-level pandemic “stakeholders” across government, academia and industry - led by the US DoD and assorted university experts - and ran a “tabletop exercise” that more or less accurately predicted the desired ‘COVID response’ (of those present).

Is it possible that Event 201 was a modified limited hangout, and the real tabletop exercise - Pacific Eclipse - took place later, in private, just before Operation COVID-19 was officially launched, whereby a manufactured emergency then had the ‘anticipated’ effect of political destablization, particularly in the US and the UK?

This all looks very much like a smoking gun… nearly five years later.

Pharmaceutical giant Moderna has been caught offering children cash rewards for taking part in medical trials to test experimental Covid mRNA “booster” shots.

The company representatives were found to be using WhatsApp messages to minors in the UK.

The UK Prescription Medicines Code of Practice Authority (PMCPA) launched an investigation into the vaccine makers over complaints that Moderna was offering money to children between the ages of 12 and 18.

The WhatsApp messages offered children £1,500 ($1,962) each in return for being injected with experimental Covid mRNA “vaccines.”

The PMCPA ruled that the offer amounted to “inappropriate financial inducement.” ...

Moderna must provide a written undertaking that the practice will “cease forthwith” and pay for administrative costs.

The pharmaceutical company was also ordered to pay a £14,000 ($18,310) fine.

However, critics said that the sanction was too small to be effective.

Esther McVey MP, formerly of the APPG on COVID-19 vaccine damage said:

“A charge of £14,000 to a company that enjoyed a total revenue of $6.8 billion in 2023 is hardly likely to make them think twice before breaking the rules again.”

Dr. Vinay Prasad: No Amnesty for the COVID Tyrants

"I don't believe in forgiveness because in my opinion, these pieces of shit are still lying. I mean, like if you want forgiveness, the first thing you have to say is what you actually did wrong, and they're still fucking lying."

MICHAEL GRAY GRIFFITH: Like peanut butter.

BELINDA: Yeah, yeah! They say, stay away from it and we won't let anyone else bring to school either, you know? But in this case, if it's an ingredient in the covid vaccination that you're severely allergic to, the advice actually is, to go to a tertiary hospital to have it where they will have an anesthetist on standby to resuscitate you. Yep. So that's what I've been told by numerous—

MICHAEL GRAY GRIFFITH: Can you say that again a little slower so I can process what you just said?

BELINDA: [laughs] Yeah, so basically, if what you're allergic to is something in the covid vaccination, the usual advice of avoid it is not, you know, applicable. The advice is go to a tertiary hospital and they will have an anesthetist ready to resuscitate you after you've had your vaccine.

MICHAEL GRAY GRIFFITH: And that's the advice from the government.

BELINDA: Well, it's the doctors, that's, so you know, yeah, any doctors I did try and get, you know like an exemption. So yeah.

MICHAEL GRAY GRIFFITH: And they wouldn't give it to you.

BELINDA: No, no, no, I wouldn't get an exemption. Like, there was one— like, because they're all scared of losing their jobs as well and getting deregistered because if you, any registered health practitioner, I mean, I knew nurses and midwives for years and years and years, if we say anything that goes against what was in the government's, you know, little book like this, of all the vaccinations and that, if you say anything, basically you can be deregistered, fined, jailed, so, and doctors that had given out too many exemptions, even in the past before covid hit, have been removed from the register.

So yeah there was a doctor that probably would have liked to have given me one but he did refer me to a couple of specialists that, you know, because immunologists and allergy specialists are the people that are able to give vaccine exemptions, but yeah, the people where I was going they were this, yeah, like it was still the same advice from them, to kind of, yeah, have it and get rescusitated afterwards, thank you very much.

MICHAEL GRAY GRIFFITH: Is it just me? Or does that sound mad?

BELINDA: Ah, look, that, that's just absolutely crazy. I mean, look, the whole thing, the craziness thing that sticks out to me, is being a health professional, one of the first things you get taught in your training is that you cannot do anything to anyone without their consent. For a consent to be valid, it has to be given freely, with all the information provided, and without coercion. If it was coerced in any way, it's not valid. So technically, in the eyes of the law, if you do something after coercing someone, you have committed assault.

Professor Dr. Aditi Bhargava, Molecular Biologist at UCSF, Explains Why Mandates Make No Sense
"US Senator Ron Johnson Holds Expert Panel On Federal Vaccine Mandates - Nov 2 2021"
https://rumble.com/vu8wa4-us-senator-ron-johnson-holds-expert-panel-on-federal-vaccine-mandates.html

SENATOR RON JOHNSON: Next we will go to Dr. Aditi Bhargava. Dr. Bhargava's a professor in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology in the Center for Reproductive Sciences at University of California San Francisco. Dr. Bhargava.

ADITI BHARGAVA, PHD: Thank you for, thank you for the invitation. My name is Aditi Bhargava. I'm a professor at UCSF and a molecular biologist of 33 years of research experience. These are my scientific views.

Covid 19 vaccines are often compared to polio vaccines. This is apples to orange comparison because RNA and DNA viruses are fundamentally different. DNA viruses mutate at a very slow rate. DNA viruses induce lifelong immunity. After a natural infection with DNA viruses such as the polio or chickenpox, no one needs to be vaccinated or develops the disease in their lifetime.

In contrast, RNA viruses mutate frequently and do not induce lifelong immunity, as we have seen
with SARS-CoV-2 or flu viruses. One can have influenza multiple times in their life, vaccines or no vaccines. Flu has not been eradicated, nor is there any talk to eradicate it. There is no herd immunity for flu. It is simply not an achievable goal.

Safety issues with vaccines happen despite best of intentions. There are no drugs without side effects. For example, measles and rotavirus vaccines have been recalled due to safety concerns
despite stringent clinical trials and years of data.

Unlike other drug trials, vaccine trials are different as they are tested on a largely healthy population to prevent infection.

Next slide please.

[Title of slide: Natural immunity is unmatched, and many have it][1]
[screenshot]

Good vaccines are modeled to mimic natural infection and rely on one's own immune system to produce antibodies and provide protection. Natural immunity is the gold standard. CDC estimates that nearly 43% of the country is already infected with SARS-CoV-2 and thus naturally immune. And that was all before the more transmissible delta variant took hold.

Living in a bubble of sterile conditions is counterproductive to everything we know about strengthening the immune system. It's Immunology 101. To downplay the beneficial and protective powers of our immune system goes against the founding principles of immunology.

Several studies about SARS-CoV-2 are validating that knowledge. There is no documented case of a naturally immune person getting reinfected with severe disease or hospitalization despite the first case reported nearly two years ago. In sharp contrast, there are thousands of cases of severe covid, hospitalization and deaths, in fully vaccinated people.

CDC now estimates 90% of Americans over the age of 16 have antibodies against SARS-CoV-2. But vaccine-induced antibodies are only a small fraction of immune responses. New studies from the British Health Ministry suggest that covid vaccines might interfere with the ability of our immune system to produce antibodies against other parts of the virus, crucial aspect for developing cross-protection. The spike antibodies are incomplete and cherry-picked story.

Vaccine-induced protection fell to 33 to 42% within 3 months. That is no different than the protection the unvaccinated have. Hence mandates to prevent spread by using spike antibody levels as gold standard is gross misrepresentation of data.

[Title of slide: CurrentCOVID-19 vaccine efficacy and safety][2]

It should not have taken the Massachusetts break through infection in the summer to discover that fully vaccinated people are just as vulnerable to being infected and transmit SARS-CoV-2 as the unvaccinated.

Had the trials been stringent, had the Phase II and III stuck to the protocols of follow up, had the regulators enforced manufacturers to study prevention of infection in their clinical trials, this fiasco could have been avoided.

Instead, manufacturers configured these trials to study the prevention of mild symptoms and used preclinical models such as the recent monkeys in whom the virus does not cause disease.

If all we can do is to prevent symptoms and severe disease, we should be talking about drugs to treat covid, not vaccines and mandates.

We lost the opportunity of discovering these major shock coming by torpedoing the clinical trials when placebo groups were eliminated just two months after the second dose.

Instead we are learning through trials and errors on hundreds of millions of people, and we insist on eliminating a very important control group by these vaccine mandates.

There is no scientific study or experimental design in which we can learn anything of value without a control group, certainly not about safety and efficacy.

Persistent high levels of antibodies often indicate pathologies to the body's immune system. That is the basis of autoimmune disease. Hence boosters' long term adverse events should be weighed seriously.

The notion that we are in an emergency nearly two years after the pandemic and that should justify cutting corners or taking shortcuts is simply wrong. Trust in scientific method is at stake.

Media reports often state the science is clear. But scientific publications do not claim that the science is clear.

And as you've heard from various testimonies real people suffered serious adverse events and perhaps lifelong disabilities due to sloppy trials.[4]

I will conclude by asking you, if the vaccines don't prevent infection and transmission, surely mandating person A to protect person B is pointless. But if the vaccines are effective in preventing infection, transmission, decreased symptoms, hospitalization rates, and death, then what do the vaccinated fear?

‘The Covid debacle over the past nearly five years vividly displays how so many willingly ‘followed orders’, and uncritically accepted the Covid narrative of a ‘killer virus’ that didn’t actually kill most people…

This is shown to most devastating effect by the collaboration of the medical profession, with doctors, nurses and pharmacists willing to engage with coercive and mandatory vaccination, betraying their legal, ethical and moral obligation to ensure voluntary informed consent for vaccination, as per any medical intervention.

The medical profession was effectively conscripted to inject the population, with many vaccinators participating wholeheartedly in the destruction of personal autonomy and bodily integrity via coercive and mandatory vaccination.

The medical profession should have refused to collaborate with a plan that ostracised people who refused to submit to the injections, from ‘No Jab, No Job’ to ‘No Jab, No Life’.

Why did so many willingly ‘follow orders’ to inject without question?

Why did so few medical folk openly resist this travesty, which supported excluding from society critical-thinking people who refused to submit to this bodily assault?

This isn’t just about the vaccinators who inserted the needle. Other members of the medical profession not directly involved with vaccination stayed silent, despite witnessing obvious wrongdoing under coercion and mandates - the violation of voluntary informed consent for vaccination. They too ‘followed orders’ with their cowardly silence. ...

‘Covid’ was used as a cover to make the global population compliant, imposing subservience via on demand lockdowns, vaccination, testing, quarantine, and masking/muzzling, with people in many countries, e.g. Australia, having to ‘show papers’ to work and participate in society via the infamous ‘vaccine passport’.

It appears ‘Covid’ was an integral part of a plot to install a global totalitarian regime via the WHO, the UN, the World Economic Forum, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, the Five Eyes, and others, to control and exploit the entire global population.

The collaboration of the medical profession was a key part of this dastardly plan that included capturing the population for eternal compliance to vaccination, testing, and masking/muzzling edicts, and constant surveillance.

The medical profession was conscripted to ‘follow orders’ that went against their legal, ethical and moral duty to obtain voluntary informed consent.

The National Citizens Inquiry is a citizen-led and citizen-funded effort to examine Canada’s response to COVID-19, among other important topics.
The NCI’s purpose is to listen, to learn, and to recommend. What went right? What went wrong? How can Canadians and our governments react to national crises in the future in a manner that balances the interests, needs and rights of all members of our society?
The NCI is volunteer run and completely independent of government.

The Pfizer Papers: Pfizer's Crimes Against Humanity

Our book, The Pfizer Papers: Pfizer’s Crimes Against Humanity, was published two days ago; it is already a bestseller. This is a book that three governments — the US, the UK and Australia — all sought to suppress. The story of how it came to be is extraordinary — 3250 highly credentialed doctors and scientists under the leadership of one extraordinary woman, Amy Kelly, worked for two years on the 450,000 internal Pfizer documents released under court order by a successful lawsuit by attorney Aaron Siri. In the process these volunteers confirmed the greatest crime against humanity of all time. ...

Many people who took this injection, as it was launched in 2020–2021–2022 and to the present, did not realize that normal testing for safety of a new vaccine—testing that typically takes ten to twelve years—had simply been bypassed via the mechanisms of a “state of emergency” and the FDA’s “Emergency Use Authorization.” They did not understand that the real “testing” was in fact Pfizer and the FDA observing whatever was happening to them and their loved ones, after these citizens rolled up their sleeves and submitted to the shot. As we can never forget, many millions of these people who submitted to the injection were “mandated” to take it, facing the threat of job loss, suspension of their education, or loss of their military positions if they refused; in some US states and overseas countries, people also faced the suspension of their rights to take transportation, cross borders, go to school or college, receive certain medical procedures, or enter buildings such as churches and synagogues, restaurants and gyms—if they refused. ...

Thousands of people with arthritis-type joint pain, one of the most common side effect, were recorded. Other thousands with muscle pain, the second most common. Then, industrial-scale blood diseases: blood clots, lung clots, leg clots; thrombotic thrombocytopenia, a clotting disease of the blood vessels; vasculitis (the destruction of blood vessels via inflammation); astronomical rates of neurological disorders—dementias, tremors, Parkinson’s, Alzheimer’s, epilepsies. Horrific skin conditions. A florid plethora of cardiac issues; myocarditis, pericarditis, tachycardia, arrhythmia, and so on. Half of the serious adverse events related to the liver, including death, took place within seventy-two hours of the shot. Half of the strokes took place within forty-eight hours of injection.

But what really emerged from the first forty-six reports, was the fact that though COVID is ostensibly a respiratory disease, the papers did not focus on lungs or mucus membranes, but rather they center, creepily and consistently, on disrupting human reproduction. ...

Pfizer enumerated the menstrual damages it knew it was causing to thousands of women, and the damage ranges from women bleeding every day, to having two periods a month, to no periods at all; to women hemorrhaging and passing tissue; to menopausal and post-menopausal women beginning to bleed again. Pfizer’s scientists calmly observed and noted it all but did not tell women.

Babies suffered and died. In one section of the documents, over 80 percent of the pregnancies followed resulted in miscarriage or spontaneous abortion. In another section of the documents, two newborn babies died, and Pfizer described the cause of death as “maternal exposure” to the vaccine.

Pfizer knew that vaccine materials entered vaccinated moms’ breast milk and poisoned babies. Four women’s breast milk turned “blue-green.” Pfizer produced a chart of sick babies, made ill from breastfeeding from vaccinated moms, with symptoms ranging from fever to edema (swollen flesh) to hives to vomiting. One poor baby had convulsions and was taken to the ER, where it died of multi-organ system failure.

If you have been following my Substacks over the last year you would know about plasmids which are circular bits of synthetic DNA added to large volume bacterial fermentation vats to code for and produce commercial quantities of complicated biological products (eg mRNA used in COVID-19 “vaccines”). Plasmids have been known for many years and used as a tool for many years as an efficient way to produce biochemicals by fermentation, rather than direct chemical synthesis, on an industrial scale.

Unfortunately, circular DNA plasmids are known to be toxic and there are specific drug regulatory guidelines to direct the removal of such plasmids from pharmaceutical products that used plasmids in their manufacture.

Here is the problem. The circular DNA plasmids used in the manufacture of both the Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 “vaccines” used, in part, a genetic sequence from the African Green Monkey Simian Virus called SV40 promoter - a component which we now know caused cancer as far back as 1951 in relation to their use in a disastrous polio vaccine which had to be withdrawn (Cutter Incident).

In relation to the COVID-19 “vaccines”, initially, the drug regulators were not told of the presence of SV40 used by the manufacturers in their DNA plasmids and now that the drug regulators do know, the drug regulators are withholding information about this from the public and they have ignored calls for the withdrawal of the shots. I don’t know how long the drug regulators will be able to avoid investigation and potential prosecution.

Forced vaccination under sedation

Doctors, nurses and the courts acting as agents of the state

Can you imagine a situation today in which someone would be secretly sedated to force them to be vaccinated?

Well, after the past five years of ‘public health’ terrorism, and coercive and mandated COVID-19 vaccination, anything is possible…

But what sort of doctor or nurse would participate in such a heinous act, to forcibly inject someone who does not want the intervention?

How can they morally volunteer to commit such a crime which violates consent?

Consider this shocking story about ‘Adam’ and his mother ‘Catherine’, reported behind the paywall of the UK Telegraph, 28 September 2024 - reporter is Steve Bird:



"As a “thank you” for having a mug of breakfast tea and a glass of orange juice brought into his room, Adam invariably hugged the staff he trusts so implicitly at his care home.

Unbeknown to him, on five separate occasions over the last 16 months those drinks were laced with a “covert anxiolytic medication” – a powerful sedative. Twice he became groggy before eventually succumbing to a deep sleep.

Each time, a team of senior carers, a nurse and the home’s manager stood quietly outside the room awaiting the nod to enter. One of them was armed with a syringe – kept well hidden due to Adam’s needle phobia - loaded with the Covid vaccine.

When the sedatives worked, Adam’s sleeve was quickly rolled up, the antiseptic wipe swiped over his upper arm and the needle inserted deep into his muscle as the plunger was pressed emptying the syringe barrel of its viscous contents. One carer made copious notes in readiness for a report which would be sent to the Court of Protection explaining how the procedure had gone.

On two occasions, in November 2023 and June 2024, the primary dose and booster were administered, one carer then had the arduous task of telephoning Adam’s mother to inform her that despite her opposition her son had been vaccinated."

Forced vaccination under sedation

Doctors, nurses and the courts acting as agents of the state

Can you imagine a situation today in which someone would be secretly sedated to force them to be vaccinated?

UK judge rules severely learning disabled man with a heart condition to be force-jabbed

https://rumble.com/v3zjevs-forced-vaccinations-on-our-loved-ones-toms-story-update.html

Hat tip: https://vicparkpetition.substack.com/p/uk-pm-rishi-sunak-surprised-the-covid

Tom's case in the UK was reported by Abi Roberts on her Substack, Abi Daily. See "For the Love of Tom" February 12, 2024
https://abiroberts.substack.com/p/for-the-love-of-tom

TOM'S MOTHER: I've been through the court of protection twice. Both judges have said that Tom was to receive the covid vaccination. We sought a specialist's advice, a professor, in his words, based on the principle first do no harm, it would be a breech of medical ethics to administer the covid 19 vaccine to Tom.

His conclusions, "In my opinion there is significant risk to exposing Tom to the current covid vaccines."

Tom's doctor, she refused, stating that it is unethical.

I got contacted directly from the solicitors to say that they had received the primary course of the vaccination which is Pfizer, and that they had their own doctor to administer it. She has stated that she has seen the professor's report and that she's
still happy to go ahead with administering the vaccine to Tom.

She has written to me directly and given me three dates to choose from.

It's— obviously concerns me a great deal that a doctor has received a professional specialist's statement and she's still happy to administer it.

They expect me to walk my son into a room knowing that something will be injected into him that could potentially harm him or kill him. To be honest I just find it so cruel what they're doing.

She informed me there would be two people in the room and that I could attend but if I showed any sort of resistance then they'd ask me to leave the room.

MALE VOICE OFF-CAMERA: What would you say to her?

TOM'S MOTHER: Well, it can only come from the heart. It would be an emotional plea, really, huh, that I don't understand why she feels that he has to have it and why it wouldn't be a danger to him as he's already had covid and more than once. He has natural immunity.

We have a crowdjustice page[1] that I read every single comment. And I just want to thank everyone so much for, for helping.

[1] Screen shows a screenshot of crowdjustice page entitled "Forced Vaccinations On Our Loved Ones by Tom's Mother"
"My boy Tom was born with severe learning difficulties and a heart condition. Age 22 but with mental age of about 18 months I care for Tom asa a single parent. I love him with all my heart."

https://www.crowdjustice.com/case/tom/

Personnel would be happy to do this for the economic capping incentive. After all, they did it under the aegis of higher authority.

Lawyer and Judge In Family Court In TN Call For Father Of Three To Be Declared "Mentally Ill" For Believing In the Bible, Then Threaten To Call CPS Unless The Unvaccinated Kids Were Fully Vaccinated

Kids Given A Battery Of Injections At Once, Youngest Gets Extremely Sick, Is Hospitalized, And Develops Regressive Autism: "HE HAS NO LIFE!" Two More Shattering Interviews By Polly Tommey At CHD

https://nitter.poast.org/Inversionism/status/1848796243000234287

This story and interview with the family of the 5 year old boy who developed autism after getting 18 vaccines at once is by far one of the most egregious examples I've ever seen of a criminal judge abusing his power so far beyond his scope, and how undeniable it is that vaccines cause autism.

That judge should be rotting in prison for what he did in this case, and so should the mother. Not only did she jump at the opportunity for custody by agreeing to the judges opinionated demands to vaccinate against the fathers will to get custody, but after all these vaccines in one day injured that poor kid, she then abandoned them and disappeared without a trace.

After not seeing his children for 6 months when the mother had custody and then discovering his 5 year old had vaccine induced autism before the mother disappeared, he's still required to pay child support to her 5 years later??? That's so absurd. She should be required to pay back every single dime and then some.

I can't imagine the stress and anger the father must feel having to care for 3 kids, one requiring 24/7 care, and also getting financially sucked dry by that succubus POS of a mother.

And worst of all, when he tried to share his story with CHD, the attorneys tried to intimidate him not to, so I'm glad this father has the perseverance and righteous indignation to tell them to GFY and speak the truth about what happened to his family.

I can't believe how degenerated and evil this country has become and it's stories like this that make me feel black pilled sometimes. The legal system, medical system, food system...everything here is so ridiculously inverted and malicious that it just makes me want to disconnect from it all and go live like the Amish in the woods somewhere. It's exhausting to keep hearing these stories over and over and there never being any justice for those destroyed by it.

Nobody in the family has a future, as the youngest requires constant feeding by bottle and diaper changes around the clock, and as the father points out, they will be responsible for their little brother for the rest of their lives. The mother has fled. Said she “didn’t want a family.” The father is on his own. He was also threatened by the authorities when he was on his way to do the interview with Polly, and expects more harassments by the court as a result.

💉💉 This week, the House Oversight Committee released its long-awaited report on the government’s misuse of psychological manipulation during the pandemic. It’s ugly. The House report was titled, “We Can Do This: An Assessment of the Department of Health and Human Services’ Covid-19 Public Campaign.”

In fall 2020, the bureaucratic behemoth that is HHS was well along in swinging its monstrous apparatus of government over the heads of every citizen in the country. Instead of doing its own work, the government’s vast army of overpaid health bureaucrats outsourced critical public health communications to a “full-service behavior-change research” firm.

Not a science firm. Not a health firm. A “behavior-change research” firm. The firm’s name, which should become as much a hissing and a byword as the names “Mengele” or “Benedict Arnold,” is the Fors Marsh Group. (We will figure out the names of the involved individuals at FMG. I bet there is a lot more to this story.)

As the report’s introduction explains, for its “behavior change” services, HHS ultimately paid FMG over nine hundred million dollars. Stop and think about that for a second. The U.S. government paid nearly a billion dollars to one company to manipulate citizens into becoming more compliant to the government.

But … but … it was all meant for good, right? I mean, sure, we can quibble about the ethics of psychological manipulation and “nudging” and stuff, but those decisions were made during a pandemic, amidst a public health emergency, when lives were at stake. But the important thing is their hearts were in the right place. Right?

Maybe not. Maybe it was much simpler than it looks. What advanced techniques did FMG use to make the American public more compliant? What cutting-edge science did FORS bring to the HHS table, to earn their billion-dollar fee? Was it a blend of innovative AI and pioneering psychology?

Nope. They just lied. They lied, and they exaggerated stuff, to terrify people. Their lies were so bloody awful and so preposterous that nobody would have ever listened to them — except that they put the full weight and credit of the United States government behind their lies and fearmongering to make the whole grotesque scheme work. In doing so, they consumed every drop of historic trust earned by previous generations of hard-working public servants.

But … did they really lie? Yes. They lied. They lied like rugs, or dogs, or Joe Biden reminiscing about his Uncle Bosey. They lied tons of times. Lies like promising that vaccination would stop transmission of the virus dead in its tracks. That particular lie came from the CDC itself (i.e., the pits of hell) and sailed straight into the FMG’s advertising scripts:

CDC's guidance, which the Campaign relied on, went beyond the terms of FDA's
Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) to state, without evidence, that COVID vaccines
were highly effective against transmission. This ultimately had a negative impact
vaccine confidence and the CDC's credibility when proven untrue.

FMG’s plan wasn’t innovative. It wasn’t cutting edge. A child could have done it. They’re morons. They just lied, and they leaned on Americans’ trust in government to sell their simplistic lies. And the bureaucrats running the health agencies and the country’s liberal health professionals all compliantly went right along with it all, facilitating the lies at every step.

Lies are unethical and Liars are bad people. Even, or especially, public health liars. FMG’s whole stupid program was unethical to the core.

It was also overhyped nonsense. For example, FMG’s initial proposal to HHS was founded on a single “theory” they called the “Health Belief Model.” Here’s how they dressed their so-called Health Belief Model up in fancy, academic-sounding language:

The health belief model, used by the Campaign, posits that "a person's belief in a personal threat
of an illness or disease together with a person's belief in the effectiveness of the recommended
health behavior or action will predict the likelihood the person will adopt the behavior."

That’s not innovative, creative, cutting-edge, or even smart. All that Model says is, if you scare people by saying they’ll die, and don’t give them time to think, they’re likely to do whatever you say, especially if they already trust the person telling them what to do:

Based on reports shared with the Committee, FMG spent on average over $20 million per
month for the design and execution of the Campaign.' In its proposal for the task order, the
company asserted that it could benefit ASPA by using a strategic mix of paid and earned media
with exclusive radio partnerships, research-based messaging, and reinforced messaging from
trusted influencers, celebrities, and sports figures.

Of course, afterwards, once they figure out they’ve been had, people won’t trust the “influencers, celebrities, and sports figures” anymore, but who cares? FMG will already be rich by then.

In other words, the plan was to coerce or bribe top government officials, doctors, pastors, priests, social media stars, bloggers, vloggers, Hollywood celebrities, singers, football players, and tennis stars into lying for them. The House report included the scripts FMG prepared for actors who pretended to be covid victims.

It was all completely fake and completely outrageous.

Worse, it’s not just the billion dollars FMG got. The real cost includes Americans’ lost trust in government. And the lost trust in public health. The lost trust in vaccines (well, that one might actually be a positive). The lost trust in experts. The spiked anxiety rates from the fear campaigns. The broken brains of germaphobes and medical fetishists. The cost to the children in lost educational attainment, depression, and who knows what kinds of future psychosis.

(We could continue, adding vaccine injuries, jobs lost to mandates, closed businesses, destroyed economies, inflation, and so on.)

But the important thing is FMG’s owners got paid. And they were paid well. Very well. They are now set to retire on generational wealth earned from our tax dollars, all wielded as psychological weapons against us.

This House report was a great start toward accountability. Having documents like this is important, because they can be cited as official findings. For example, a court is much more likely to seriously consider something from a House Oversight Report than something some lawyer says. We’re getting there.

The internet enabled people to find each other and organize politically to start chipping away at state and corporate power. Arab Spring quickly morphed into Occupy Wall Street with 800 occupied plazas in major cities throughout the developed world.

The elites were losing their grip on power. And so they just threw the chessboard against the wall and started to demonstrate the full extent of their power.

They used the state to develop and release a new and novel virus that combined the furin cleavage site from HIV with a bat coronavirus.

They spent billions of dollars on propaganda to create a global panic.

They introduced murderous hospital protocols including ventilators that killed 90% of patients and blocked access to safe, effective, and cheap off-the-shelf medicines.

They developed and approved toxic and deadly treatments including Remdesivir and Paxlovid.

They bought the mainstream media and used it to broadcast lies every single day for five years and counting.

They developed the most toxic and deadly “vaccines” in human history which is really saying something because existing vaccines are horrible.

And in the process, they stole about $24 trillion globally and enslaved hundreds of millions of people throughout the developed world (where the money is) via chronic illness.

It’s the largest violent crime in human history. It’s the largest theft in human history. And it’s still going on.

On the same day (March 23) that Dr. Bright initiated his scheme to restrict hydroxychloroquine to hospitalized patients, New York Governor Andrew Cuomo issued the following executive order:

"No pharmacist shall dispense hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine except when written as prescribed as an FDA-approved indication; or as part of a state approved clinical trial related to COVID-19 for a patient who has tested positive for COVID-19 with such test result documented as part of the prescription. No other experimental or prophylactic use shall be permitted …"

Hundreds of thousands of pages of internal Pfizer documents related to the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine revealed deaths, serious adverse events and irreversible harm to reproductive health, according to Naomi Wolf, CEO of Daily Clout. ...

She said the 450,000 pages of Pfizer documents showed that the company and public health agencies “certainly knew that the vaccine didn’t work,” prompting the federal government and Pfizer to try to conceal them.

“The FDA [U.S. Food and Drug Administration] asked the court to keep these documents hidden for 75 years,” Wolf said. “They want us all to be dead before they see the light of day.”

A federal court ordered the release of the documents, following a successful lawsuit by Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency.

Media also helped conceal the documents and the vaccine’s dangers from the public. “None of this could have been accomplished … if the legacy media had done its job,” Wolf said.

‘They knew they were killing and injuring people at massive scale’ ...

“They knew that there were 1,223 deaths within three months and side effects. There were 43,000 people with serious adverse events and over 130,000 serious adverse events in total in just these three months. They knew that they were killing and injuring people at massive scale.”

Vaccine injuries were often “catastrophic” and included “horrific blood clots, lung clots … pericarditis, myocarditis, heart damage of all kinds, neurological events at massive scale, epilepsies, dementias, Bell’s palsy, Guillain-Barré syndrome, turbo cancers … liver damage, kidney damage” and other conditions, according to Wolf.

Wolf said the documents show the two most commonly reported adverse events are muscle pain and joint pain. “Many people feel bad now and don’t know why, and their doctors don’t know why,” she said. “Pfizer knows why.” ...

“The centerpiece of the Pfizer papers … has to do with destroying human reproduction in many ways,” Wolf said. “Lipid nanoparticles are designed to traverse every membrane in the human body. It’s not a bug, but a feature” of the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines.

Wolf cited a chart in the documents showing that 15,000 women experienced bleeding every day, 10,000 women were having two periods per month and 7,500 women were not having periods at all, “meaning no children, not fertile.”

Pregnant women also experienced side effects. Pfizer lost the records of 234 pregnant women who participated in the clinical trials. But for the 36 pregnant women whose records survived, “over 80% of them lost their babies,” Wolf said. ...

“It’s the most appalling eight pages you can imagine,” Wolf said. “There are two babies in that document who died in utero, and Pfizer concluded the deaths were due to maternal exposure to the vaccine. They also have a chart in there that shows babies getting very sick from nursing vaccinated mothers.”

Canada has just killed the first citizen under the Canadian government’s controversial new plans to begin euthanizing patients who have been injured by Covid “vaccines.”

An Ontario man in his late 40s has become the first person to be euthanized for “post-COVID-19 vaccination syndrome.”

The man was killed under Canada’s “assisted suicide” laws via the government’s taxpayer-funded Medical Assistance in Dying (MAiD) program.

Doctors had determined that the patient had become a burden on the socialized healthcare system.

They warned that he wouldn’t recover from “post-vaccine syndrome” and ruled that MAiD was a better option than long-term care.

The patient, identified only as “Mr. A,” had experienced “suffering and functional decline” following three Covid mRNA vaccinations.

Finally, the future is pregnant with possibilities. Will the newly-elected House set up a new January 6th Commission? Will it create a J6-style Covid Commission, leading to arrests and prosecutions? One’s imagination runs wild.

As private citizen, Dr. Fauci received $15 million taxpayer-funded security detail

For the past two years, Dr. Anthony Fauci has received $15,000,000 in taxpayer-funded security services – despite having returned to private citizenship. Open the Books discovered the arrangement within a memorandum of understanding (MOU) between the U.S. Marshals service and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) via a Freedom of Information Act request.

Ex-Walt Disney Company Cast Member Stephen Cribb: "You are not alone! "
"Kissimmee, FL Press Conference: Your Story Counts — The Untold Atrocities of COVID-19"
October 13, 2022
https://live.childrenshealthdefense.org/chd-tv/events/kissimee-fl-press-conference-your-story-counts--the-untold-atrocities-of-covid19/your-story-counts--untold-atrocities-of-covid19/

STEPHEN CRIBB: Hey good afternoon my name is Stephen Cribb. I am a former Disney cast member who after 11 years of working for the Walt Disney Company I was fired back in March. And the reason I was terminated was because I spoke out against the discrimination that was taking place against me and other cast members working for the Walt Disney Company.

My story actually starts when I was a young guy, little boy, living in North Carolina. We couldn't afford the Disney Channel growing up, but it was always really fun because every week during the summertime Disney would take over ABC for their Wonderful World of Disney programming that they had. It's just always so cool because you know to me, they were this company that always to provide that little magic. So they made sure even I could get it.

So as I got older this dream developed in me to want to work for the Walt Disney Company. I saw the magic, the memories that they were sharing. So this is all great, was all well and good, again, until almost, well, a little over a year ago now, that dream started to become a little bit of a nightmare for me because of the mandates that were taking place [inaudible] requiring the covid 19 shot.

I submitted a religious exemption from that. Well I will tell you right now, to this day, over a year, I have never gotten an up or down answer on whether or not my religious exemption was approved. Instead what I and so many other cast members ended up receiving was discrimination.

This began about just a little into the beginning of the year here. And what had happened was, Disney wrote out these new policies and protocols that made it so that if you did not have the covid 19 shot, you were going to have to wear a mask and in some cases a face shield. Whereas, if you did have the shot you didn't have to wear one. You were free to go about to breathe easy.

Not only did they make cast members that didn't have the covid 19 shot wear masks and face masks, in some cases even their face masks had warning written across them. Yes, right? So much for the most magical place on earth if you are a cast member there.

And so again, it was all these different things going on that lead me to stand up and to speak up out and that's what I'm here to encourage everyone to do today.

The information is out there, Rachel[1] went over a lot of it, Nick[2] went over a lot of it, I'm not going to delve into it. But ladies and gentlemen, the time has come. I was so encouraged, we were here earlier speaking, there is a, not a Disney cast member but someone from another company here that as she heard the conversation happening came forward and said, How do I get in touch? What is it I can do? Who are the attorneys helping you in your case?

And folks, that's what needs to be done. But as I was going through this process I had several people reach out to me and say, Stephen, you know, it's not worth your job.

Well I'm here to tell you, it is! It absolutely is!

[applause]

[inaudible; microphone distortion] Then let it. So that is what I'm here today to share with you again, that story of discrimination. To let you know, this is far from over. I've been so fortunate, so blessed to have some wonderful attorneys on our team, for those of us cast members that are bringing this lawsuit against Disney.

And yes, it may take some work, it may take some phone calls till you can find that one that represents you. But you are out there, they are out there. Don't give up! You are surrounded, look at all these people up here behind me. And there are more out there.

You are not alone! And that is the biggest thing to take away from this. You are not alone. There are folks around you in the same position you are just waiting for you to step up. Thank you.

Rochelle Walensky was head of the CDC during the panic. She made certain she was in front of many cameras in early 2021 to say “Vaccinated people do not carry the virus, don’t get sick. It’s not just in the clinical trials, it’s in the real-world data”. By May she was changing her story, saying “Data have demonstrated even if you were to get infected during post-vaccination, you can’t give it to anyone else.”

Perhaps you recall that Walensky is a physician, a medical doctor. Which means we have two choices. She was either grossly negligent, which is to say, monstrously incompetent. Or she was lying. ...

Walensky in an email with colleagues mentions discussing these breakthrough diagnoses with Fauci and Francis Collins, another grandee of science and the then Director of the NIH. Walensky wondered what to do about “breakthroughs”. If she wondered about what to do with them, she knew they existed. And if she knew they existed, she was lying when she said the vaxxed were perfectly protected.

It’s worse still because evidence had already been mounting, though it was then too early to tell for sure, that the vaccinated were perhaps more likely to be diagnosed with covid.

The CDC Planned Quarantine Camps Nationwide

No matter how bad you think Covid policies were, they were intended to be worse.

Consider the vaccine passports alone. Six cities were locked down to include only the vaccinated in public indoor places. They were New York City, Boston, Chicago, New Orleans, Washington, D.C., and Seattle. The plan was to enforce this with a vaccine passport. It broke. Once the news leaked that the shot didn’t stop infection or transmission, the planners lost public support and the scheme collapsed. ...

Even with all that, worse was planned. On July 26, 2020, with the George Floyd riots having finally settled down, the CDC issued a plan for establishing nationwide quarantine camps. People were to be isolated, given only food and some cleaning supplies. They would be banned from participating in any religious services. The plan included contingencies for preventing suicide. There were no provisions made for any legal appeals or even the right to legal counsel.

Covid was a decimating, shattering, nervous system ending event—let’s face it. We had every notion of life, liberty, government, rights shattered, and even when, especially when, the mRNA killings got underway—we were shown the faceless face of a mother (media) who mocked our every grief response, locked the basement door, taught us what real mercilessness looks like. A void, a total void, of everything human, from one day to the next.

We were expected to love being murdered. And thank her.

The Real Anthony Fauci was the only consolation. It was all true, but mother never responded. She did not have to.

We never had a mother, we never had “rights,” and everything to the contrary had been an illusion.

Trump still doesn’t seem to register that it even happened.

Will he, one day? Is it just too mortifying and impossible? In that case, we can look forward to a reality that has no reality in it. ...

What about protection against transmission? This question is extremely important because vaccination mandates were base don the claim that vaccinated persons also protect others. If it was just about self protection, then legal obligation had been out of the question. (emphasis mine)

What did RKI think about protection of others? Very early, in February 2021 we read: “It is to be expected, (but not certain, because it has never been shown) that vaccines protect from severe illness, but they cannot stop local proliferation of viruses”.

In August we read: “The benefit of 2G (a scheme excluding unvaccinated people from social life) is not greater protection of others, but greater self-protection.”, and in 2022 we read: “There is no indication that vaccination has an effect on excretion, no change in evidence.” In sum there existed a crystal clear and consistent position, in accordance with the literature, and especially with Pfizer’s approval study that made no respective claim: “There exists no protection of others. ...

Next quote: “The number of free and occupied beds are almost equal.”, meaning 50% vacancy in our hospitals, and RKI adds that usual vacancy is less than 10%. ...

The next slide concerns vaccine safety. Now things are getting serious, and if you have weak nerves, just go outside for a moment. I start with 29 March, 2021, at which time vaccination had been going on for almost three months: “Astra Zeneca, a lot of hype in general. Now twelve cases of sinus vein thrombosis. Paul Erlich Institute, pharmacovigilance offices can’t keep up well. Sinus thrombosis, also in men have a 20 fold higher incidence.” This means that if you have been vaccinated with Astra Zeneca, you had a 20 fold higher risk than an unvaccinated person of developing sinus vein thrombosis, a really severe and life threatening illness. ...

1. We all know by now that the Nürnberg defense (I was just following orders.) is null and void.

2. I have said time and time again that they needed the pandemic in order to roll out the vaxxine.

3. A perfect way to poison large crouds so they could transfect on a massive scale.

4. In my post «This is not you will see that production of vaxxines was well underway at Moderna in 2018.

5. By now my readers also know that the inventor of the PCR test has explicitly stated that it is NOT for diagnostic purposes. Besides, all other nerds like me who actually read the PCR instructions from top to bottom didn’t have to wait for someone on Substack to tell them this.

6. Earlier this year my wife and I had a dinner guest who out of the blue just blurted out: «You know, nine of my childhood friends are now dead. Five of them even were in the same class in grade school.» He is seventy years old.

7. I call it doubbling down.

8. You may recall the «traffic lights» related to terror threats a decade or more ago.

9. I believe this is because people were being cautious and carefull due to all things Covid.

10. Why on earth does Germany have military people at the top of an organization within health care?

There should be trials for those who forced the unknown effects of this toxic slime on billions of people, perhaps the way the Nuremberg trials were run. Sure, they will claim they did nothing illegal. The Nazis were not violating Nazi laws (well, maybe they were). The point is that they were violating fundamental human rights on a mass scale.

It would go against all my instincts to take someone by the scruff of the neck and hold their face close to the turd in the room until they acknowledge its existence. I’m not sure that instinct isn’t just cowardice though. And anyway – what can you show them?

Well, I’ll tell you an unequivocal fact you can point out, which - with a little background knowledge (most of which people already have) - alone can be sufficient:

Your government mandated vaccines

... After World War II we tried some Nazi doctors at Nuremberg. The doctors’ defense against the charges of carrying out experiments on unwilling subjects was basically

it was not illegal: there were no laws against it (in Germany or other countries). And

it was for “the greater good”: while the people experimented on may have suffered, society as a whole stood to gain from it.

This made things difficult for the prosecutors. “Hmm; these points are correct: guidance but no law; and we don’t want to let you get away with portraying something that seems so wrong as something noble”.

So “we” (the “good guys”) broke our own legal principle – that you cannot break a law that does not exist (in place since Roman times) - and convicted them of breaking a law we just made up. In fact we made out that it was so clearly wrong that the penalty was hanging for several of them. Essentially, our response was

Whilst voluntarily doing things for other people's benefit is a wonderful human attribute, you should not force anyone to suffer for others. The "greater good" argument doesn’t trump the principle that all humans must be respected! ...

You cannot give politicians the power to mandate vaccines (or any other medical treatment). Even if they don’t abuse that power at first, they will do so.

“Unlimited power in the hands of limited people always leads to cruelty.” - Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn

In fact in 2020 they did weaponise that narrative. You – the good guys – were up against not only a virus but the scapegoats you were supposed to hate. This time they weren’t “enemies of the revolution”, “lice-ridden Jews” or “class traitors”, they were

“those antivaxxers. The only reason they won’t take a vaccine is because they don’t have your noble instinct to help others. They are just selfish. (How easily people were induced to hate)!

[sarcasm] There definitely wasn’t any other reason for not taking the brand new technology injection, like

no long term safety studies could have been carried out (or, as it turned out, no studies at all on most of the stuff produced); or like

having sufficient understanding of the physiology or research to predict that mRNA in lipid nanoparticles was going to produce blood clots and damage to the immune system etc etc, in short do more harm than good (a consequence becoming even more obvious with time and recognition);

it couldn’t be that they were aware of the big drug companies’ long criminal record of casually killing and maiming people;

certainly not because they were aware of corrupt politicians making lucrative deals with drug companies who had nothing to lose;

nor because they knew enough history to understand the nature of governments – particularly one that has surreptitiously just declared itself to be collectivist;

surely not because of the systematic changes to laws in 2009 in countries the World over, which advertised the coming “medical martial law” (a prediction which came true in 2020).

COVID-19 Vaccine Recall Remains Top Public Health Priority

Dr. McCullough Reiterates Need to Keep Focus and Remove Public Health Threat ...

The public health and academic medical community must face the reality in data and real outcomes and capitulate with the federal government in a complete recall. Development on newer COVID-19 vaccines and combination products should be halted and government waste on COVID-19 vaccines should stop.