patrick.net

💉 Even worse, the results showed that the IgG4 increase lasted for years after repeated mRNA doses. The elevated IgG4 (and IgG2) levels stabilized above normal baseline levels and stayed that way for the rest of the study period— nearly three years. The researchers saw no sign of those levels returning to pre-booster norms.

Although they never came out and said it, the data the team collected suggested this could be a long-lasting, possibly chronic immune shift. And it’s not a shift for the better.

This kind of class-switching effect is called “immune tolerance.” It’s typically seen in cases of chronic allergies, long-term parasitic infections, and rare auto-immune disorders. In other words, victims’ immune systems get trained to chill out even though the virus keeps crashing the party and hogging the DJ stand.

Defenders continue to argue the shots may not “work” per se, but they reduce your chance of serious illness per infection. That tortured argument misses the forest for the viral trees.

They claim the shots reduce severity of covid cases. But even if you believe that, if each shot makes people catch covid more often, their total cumulative risk of a severe case may actually go up. A -10% drop in severity risk is worse than meaningless if you’re getting infected three times as often.

💉 This study reinforces early “conspiracy theories” that successive waves of covid would get increasingly deadly to people who’ve had lots of shots. (See, e.g., Geert Vanden Bossche.) It hasn’t happened quite so quickly as theorized by the heterodox researchers, but this study’s results add to evidence of a slowly unfolding disaster version of the same dark prediction.

Finally, since it was out of the study’s scope, the researchers did not consider whether chronically elevated IgG4 levels could suppress immune responses to other things besides covid, like infections, cancer, parasites, or any number of foreign invaders. The problem though is that elevated IgG4 is immunologically anti-inflammatory. It’s like issuing a permanent, body-wide “stand down” order to your immune system—the opposite of staying on high alert.

Rather, it’s on low alert. Like Jeffrey Epstein’s guards snoozing during his mur, I mean suicide.

Here’s the nub: Jab-takers were sold a medical product under the false assurance of zero long-term risk— an assurance that was always biologically impossible to make. It was the complete collapse of informed consent. Public health authorities assured us there were no meaningful long-term risk— not because they had any data to prove that, but because they had no long-term data at all, the world’s most fraudulent blank check on an empty bank account.

The public health morons played the most dangerous shell game in human history, and we still don’t know the full scope. ...

Because if I’m right, we’re headed toward a reckoning. A point where the machine can no longer hide behind silence or slogans. Once every other option has been exhausted, they’ll finally need to admit what they did. And when that day comes, the only way they can recover even a shred of public trust will be to name names, admit fault, and hold people accountable.

Everything is lining up behind that being the most likely timeline. Folks, accountability day is coming.

You may or may not recall this particular bureaucratic insect, but until Friday Dr. Peter Marks was the Director for FDA’s Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER). CBER’s job is to regulate vaccines and gene therapies. As you can imagine, Marks has long been despised for his key role in approving and helping roll out the covid shots in particular (as well as other mRNA products).

Marks was one of the main architects of the Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) process that enabled early approval of the jabs by lowering safety standards and axing long-term safety studies.

And Marks was the genius who expanded mRNA EUAs to children and infants. He rubber stamped the ‘bivalent’ vaccines, based only on a six-mouse study. He often criticized his own agency’s VAERS injury reporting system, calling it unreliable— even though it was his job to fix it. He was the creature who slow-walked the FDA’s public records response with jab data, and insisted responding would take 75 years.

But that’s nothing. The AP also reported that Dr. Mengele, sorry, I mean Marks, was the criminal who first came up with the name and concept for “Operation Warp Speed.”

In other words, Marks is another human cockroach. He is the FDA’s version of Anthony Fauci, except with even less charisma and more red tape. ...

What do you want to bet Dr. Marks reappears on Pfizer’s board of directors?

...the European Court of Justice (ECJ) has ruled that doctors must be held criminally liable for the deaths and injuries caused by the Covid “vaccines” they administered or recommended.

According to a ruling by the ECJ, all healthcare professionals who urged or vaccinated patients are civilly and criminally liable.

The decision was made in a case before the ECJ led by Professor Giovanni Frajese of the Foro Italico University of Rome in Italy.

In October 2022, the European Commission granted definitive marketing authorizations (MAs) for the Covid vaccines Spikevax (Moderna) and Comirnaty (Pfizer/BioNTech), transitioning from the conditional approvals issued during the pandemic’s peak.

Dr. Frajese contested these decisions, arguing that the widespread availability of these vaccines imposed an obligation on physicians to assess their safety and efficacy, thereby exposing them to potential liability for adverse patient outcomes. ...

In addition, the reasons given by the court could also call into question the disciplinary and criminal proceedings brought against doctors who opposed vaccinations.

https://www.buongiornosuedtirol.it/2025/02/19/esclusivo-vaccini-covid-la-corte-ue-serviva-la-prescrizione-e-il-medico-poteva-sconsigliarli/

The ECJ ruled that doctors must take responsibility for the vaccinations they administer “without ifs or buts.”

Health professionals must also warn patients of the risk of death and other serious adverse events caused by Covid “vaccines.” ...

This ruling is considered groundbreaking, as it definitively dismantles the charges that have been brought, both in court and in disciplinary proceedings, against all doctors who have advised their patients against Covid vaccination or refused to promote it.

The ECJ’s decision will help to restore doctors’ full freedom of care.

the European Court of Justice (ECJ) has ruled that doctors must be held criminally liable for the deaths and injuries caused by the Covid “vaccines” they administered or recommended.

Dr. Bowden pointed to data from the CDC’s VAERS system, explaining that over 38,000 deaths have been reported following the rollout of the so-called COVID-19 vaccines.

She said that under normal circumstances, such numbers would’ve prompted the FDA to pull the shots.

Instead, they pushed forward, adding the COVID vaccine to the routine childhood schedule, with the expectation that babies receive three doses by just nine months of age.

She added that the shots are still under Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for children under 12—not fully FDA approved—and yet they remain on the official vaccine schedule.

Tucker was horrified when Dr. Bowden mentioned a disturbing fact: “According to the CDC, 9 million American children have gotten the latest version of these COVID shots,” she said. ...

The conversation took another dark turn when Carlson asked about the potential long-term consequences of these shots, to which Dr. Bowden pointed to a disturbing trend.

“I don’t see a ton of cancer in my practice,” she said, “but I do have friends at MD Anderson, and they said they’ve never seen anything like it. The young people coming in with very advanced tumors, I think that’s what we have to be worried about now.”

The Dr. Ardis Show, November 15, 2021
https://rumble.com/vp8xcd-dr.-ardis-interviews-nurse-dani-at-the-health-and-freedom-conference-in-san.html

...

DR. BRYAN ARDIS: Alright, so why is that important to you?

NURSE DANI: That's important to me because my career was at stake after 16 years of being a pediatric nurse and 20 years in the medical field, I walked away from my career, my passion, my love, to stand for freedom, for medical and religious freedom.

DR. BRYAN ARDIS: What was going on in the hospital where you worked that made you so upset to walk away?

NURSE DANI: Oh my gosh. Where to start? It really was systemic from the top to the bottom. They were sending out propaganda emails from the very beginning. It was a whole fear-mongering propaganda mess and it really did affect us as as healthcare professionals, as individuals— Sorry, I touched the mic.

DR. BRYAN ARDIS: Doesn't matter.

NURSE DANI: So from there it really just tickles down to our children. And that's, that's what we're here for. We're here to—

DR. BRYAN ARDIS: Do you have children?

NURSE DANI: I have 2 children and as a pediatriac nurse I'm a stand for all children and empowering all parents to do what's best for their children. So yeah, and, and the protocols that got put in place really dehumanized the whole healthcare process. We stopped surgeries during the pandemic—

DR. BRYAN ARDIS: For pediatrics?

NURSE DANI: We stopped surgeries, let's get this, we stopped surgeries for pediatrics during a pandemic that didn't affect them. So we medically neglected our pediatric population for at least two months, and then we trickled in, we, we started to bring back surgeries after that. But still, to this day we are still affecting our pediatric population because every single child is getting a swab, you know that swab that doesn't work? They're getting a swab, and if it comes back positive, even if they're asymptomatic, they don't get the surgery they need.

DR. BRYAN ARDIS: What do you think about these new extensions of the Emergency Use Authorization for children? How old are your kids?

NURSE DANI: I have a 6 year-old and a 14 year-old.

DR. BRYAN ARDIS: They're all inside those ages. So how do you feel about extending these experimental shots on children?

NURSE DANI: It's a straight up child abuse.

DR. BRYAN ARDIS: And this is a pediatric nurse, everybody.

NURSE DANI: Yeah. It's straight up child abuse. And what I'd like to say as a pediatric nurse to every parent in your earshot of me, is that your child's health and well-being is your responsibility and yours alone. It lands on no one else, not our government, not the CDC, not the NIH, not the school system, not your personal doctor. It lands on you and you alone. So make the right choice for your child.

Here’s your poster-boy for that: the retarded slob rock-and-roller Neil Young, performing in support of the US Intel blob, the Covid-19 vaccine campaign, the degenerate Democratic party, Senator Adam Schiff, and BlackRock. Neil Young’s estimated net worth is about $200-million. He could lose ninety percent of that and still live a life of luxury. In 2022, he inveighed against Covid vaccine “misinformation” and promoted the shots. Guess, what? You were dead wrong about that, Neil, and now a lot of people are dead and dying because of those vaccines. He has many compadres in showbiz who took the same position against reality.

The time is not far-off when they will be revealed as disgraceful tools — Public vaxx champions such as Stephen Colbert, Jimmy Kimmel, Arnold Schwarzenegger, Oprah Winfrey, Howard Stern, Ryan Reynolds, Lady Gaga. . . the list is long and discouraging.

I think constantly (mentally whittle) about how to destroy the destroyers and simultaneously save humanity. For you see, unless and until it is no longer possible for the Gates, Faucis, Bourlas and Swabs of the world to walk the streets, nothing will change, nothing. So far, my mental whittling has potentially solved half the equation (vaccine damage) but the other half, the more pernicious half, is still unsolved. How do we hold these genocidal maniacs accountable for their crimes against the very essence of humanity? How do we punish these thieves of freedom and bodily autonomy sufficient to discourage all future genocidal wannabes?

Pentagon welcomes back troops discharged over COVID-19 vaccine, offers back pay

"It is well worth the department's time and investment in welcoming these former service members back. It's the right thing to do," Tim Dill said.

COURT: AUSTRALIAN GOVERNMENT NOT ACCOUNTABLE FOR COVID VAX DEATHS
......while irresistible data shows a massive increase in stroke and brain clots

A meta-analysis of 15 clinical studies and 11 controlled observational studies totalling 85,000,000 individuals found COVID jabs increase heart attack by 286% and stroke by 240%.

Another peer-reviewed study showed that Covid-19 “vaccines” pose a 1120x great risk of brain clots and strokes than flu vaccines. This data was extracted from the US CDC’s own VAERS adverse drug reaction database.

Fauci, Birx, Walensky, and Other Top COVID Officials Face Criminal Referral Requests in Seven States for Alleged Murder and Medical Terrorism

Criminal referral requests have been formally filed in seven U.S. states—Arizona and Pennsylvania being the latest—accusing Fauci and others of heinous crimes, including murder, medical coercion, and even terrorism stemming from their COVID-era policies and decisions.

Arizona and Pennsylvania have joined Florida, Texas, Louisiana, Missouri, and Oklahoma.

The Vires Law Group and the Former Feds Group Freedom Foundation submitted the explosive referrals this week, urging state attorneys general to pursue criminal investigations into Fauci and his pandemic-era cohorts, according to Nicolas Hulscher, MPH.

The filings represent a growing grassroots and legal effort to hold COVID-19 tyrants accountable for the damage wrought by deadly hospital protocols, the suppression of early treatments, and the coercive push for experimental vaccines.

The list of individuals is:

Dr. Anthony Fauci – Former NIAID Director
Dr. Deborah Birx – Former White House COVID Coordinator
Dr. Rochelle Walensky – Former CDC Director
Dr. Francis Collins – Former NIH Director
Dr. Cliff Lane – Deputy Director, NIAID
Dr. Stephen Hahn – Former FDA Commissioner
Dr. Janet Woodcock – Principal Deputy Commissioner, FDA (Arizona-specific)
Dr. Peter Hotez – Baylor vaccine promoter (Arizona-specific)
Dr. Robert Redfield – Former CDC Director
Dr. Peter Daszak – EcoHealth Alliance president and Wuhan collaborator
Dr. Ralph Baric – UNC virologist linked to gain-of-function research
Dr. Rick Bright – Former BARDA Director
Hospital administrators and care providers across Arizona and Pennsylvania
The referral letters outline a jaw-dropping list of charges, including:

Murder
Negligent Homicide
Involuntary Manslaughter
Medical Coercion and Abuse
Kidnapping
Human Trafficking for Forced Labor
Racketeering
Operating a Corrupt Organization
Terrorism
You can find the previous filing here at Vires Law Group.

In February, seventeen state attorneys general formally requested aid from Republican congressional leaders to investigate the origins of COVID-19 and explore possible legal actions against Dr. Anthony Fauci at the state level.

This concerted effort, spearheaded by South Carolina Attorney General Alan Wilson, aims to circumvent the preemptive pardon issued by Joe Biden on his last day in office, which sought to shield Fauci from federal prosecution.

The state attorneys general emphasize that the federal pardon does not preclude state-level legal actions and are actively seeking further details from Congress to facilitate state investigations and potential prosecutions.

Anyone can make a criminal referral.

Do you think that any AG will press charges ???

Misc says

Anyone can make a criminal referral.

Do you think that any AG will press charges ???

Misc

I doubt it. So much of the system is complicit.

"Dr. Peter McCullough Speaks at the Remdesivir Lawsuit Conference in Fresno, California"
Vigilant News Network, Posted Sept 12, 2022
https://rumble.com/v1ju8uj-dr.-peter-mccullough-speaks-at-the-remdesivir-lawsuit-conference-in-fresno-.html

DR. PETER MCCULLOUGH: So there's actually been now two waves of damage that's been done to our country. SARS-CoV-2 the virus, and now the vaccines.

Let me just say from the very beginning, and I'm a practicing internist and cardiologist but I've treated hundreds of patients, I've done my best to apply scholarship and I've published dozens and dozens of papers on the pandemic. I'm the most published person in my field in the world in history in terms of heart and kidney disease. And as a single person I have applied more academic production and clinical treatment and national media appearances, and I've cited more data in the media than any person in the world in history on this topic. I can tell you without any reservation, I have medical authority to render these opinions.

[applause and cheers]

[inaudible]

[applause and cheers]

And these are the opinions, these are the opinions. From the very beginning with the covid 19 crisis it fell into the minds of people to hurt other people. From the very beginning.

VARIOUS WOMEN'S VOICES: Yes, yes.

DR. PETER MCCULLOUGH: And it was simultaneous and it was all over the world.

WOMAN'S VOICE: That's right.

DR. PETER MCCULLOUGH: We have never witnessed this in human history. It, it landed in the most remote areas of the world to the most populated areas of the world.

Everything about covid was done incorrectly, from lockdowns to unnecessary testing to very, very strict prohibition of reasonable things to help individuals, to people losing their jobs, and then sadly, to the intentional suppression of early treatment. And it was everything. And it was from the very beginning.

In France they took hydroxychloroquine off the over-the-counter market months before the virus was even announced. Months before. And in— I have a book out called Courage to Face Covid 19,[1] it's on amazon, you can find it in a black and red cover. We outlined all of this. From the very beginning there was a plan to use SARS-CoV-2, this pandemic, to craft a program of mass vaccination in the world.

The suppression of early treatment and the suppression of any advancement in hospital care was intentional to create fear, suffering, hospitalization, and death, in order to prepare the world's population to accept mass vaccination—

WOMAN'S VOICE: Right.

DR. PETER MCCULLOUGH: — with no end in sight. It was very intentional. It was very intentional.

3:38
In our book is the story of Miss Carol, who was admitted to a hospital in central Texas. And the daughter— it's a perfectly healthy 70 year-old woman, not unlike the people you see up here. And the daughter reached out to me, and whatever, she goes, Dr. McCullough, what would you do? How would you ideally manage such a patient?

I said, well, you have all the rights that you should have. What's called medication reconciliation. Everything that as an outpatient should be continued as an inpatient, including the use of hydroxychloroquine,[2] ivermectin,[3] colchicine,[4] aspirin, blood thinners, doxycycline[5] and azithromycin,[6] inhaled budesonide[7].

There is an entire outpatient protocol that has been assembled, multiple of them have been assembled. There's a major physician organization that supports all this. We had this all in place in the fall of 2020.[8] All of that should have been continued.

And none of it was given to this woman in the hospital.

4:39
So she took the hospital to court. The hospital ponied up and hired very expensive outside attorneys. It's in our book. It's in this chapter. And the hospital fought everything!

And let me tell you what the hospital denied this woman. Denied her ivermectin. Denied her aspirin, full dose. Denied her [inaudible] full dose. Denied colchecine. Denied full dose corticosteroids which would have been [inaudible]. Denied her every single medicine that could have enabled her survival. And this woman she died.

And when she died, I felt most strongly because she was late in the syndrome that she should have gotten aspirin and full-dose blood thinners. I felt very strongly about that. When she died, I told Jody the daughter, I said, get an autopsy. And she got an autopsy and the lungs were filled with blood clots.

[audience murmur]

5:38
It was in the minds of those hospital administrators and those doctors, chief medical officer, the ICU doctors, they work in closed covid units, they don't have the interchange with independent practicing doctors, they all got locked out, it was in their minds to cause harm.

There is no harm in giving a trial of full-dose aspirin and full-dose [inaudible]. And there's no harm in giving ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine. If this patient would have been in the hospital in Mexico City, they would have gotten full-dose ivermectin. They would have been fine. How about in Athens, Greece? Would have gotten hydroxychloroquine.

These drugs are first line in protocols used worldwide. Yet in American hospitals they are prohibited because these drugs — [pointing to banner of the conference behind him, that is, referring to remdesivir, etc., subject of the conference] — are featured.

Something is wrong in our country. Something is very wrong.

WOMEN'S VOICES: Yes.

6:38
DR. PETER MCCULLOUGH: The most successful study, the most successful studies of in-hospital Americans were done early in 2020. One by Henry Ford and it was with hydroxychloroquine. In thousands of patients at Henry Ford Hospital in Detroit, Michigan, I was program director there, I know the doctors there. It was legit. It worked.

And the most successful American study with ivermectin was done by Jean Jacques Rajter and his wife down in a constellation of Florida hospitals, called [inaudible] study. It was published in the best critical care journal called Chest.[9]

In America the most successful in-patient drugs were hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin in published studies.

Now quickly, [inaudible] and colleagues has published a survey recently, 18,000 individuals. It's only those individuals who were denied or didn't receive early treatment in the United States and worldwide were hospitalized with that. Being hospitalized in the United States with covid is a product of not receiving early ambulatory therapy. Dr [inaudible] testified thousands of patients in enormous success. Success becomes less as patients come in to the hospital.

In November of 2020 the WHO [World Health Organization] published its analysis from the Strauss and others, held a conference, had [inaudible] there. In November of 2020 the World Health Organization declared, do not use remdesivir in the hospital.

WOMAN'S VOICE: That's right.

DR. PETER MCCULLOUGH: Because it does not improve outcomes, it actually tips the scales towards complications including kidney failure, liver failure, and death.

In November of 2020 I testified in the Texas Senate under oath[10] on June 22nd, or, June 27th, 2022, and I said, in November of 2020 the Texas Senate, and the California Senate and every state senate in the United States should have had emergency meetings and said, get remdesivir out of the hospitals.

[applause]

It was on their watch! The World Health Organization said that!

[applause]

You can go to the World Health Organization website and still pull up that warning.[11] Do not use it. Do not use it.

Now in May of 2022 the World Health Organization published an update of every single study, every meta-analysis of the use of remdesvir and its impact is neutral. It has actually no impact on the virus whatsoever, and it tips the scales towards, just if someone has a complication like acute kidney injury or liver injury, that person's going to be harmed with remdesivir. But the published data suggests no one is going to be helped with this product. Period.

I'm a doctor, I take care of patients, I've been in hospitals for decades. We never are limited by protocols. Never!

WOMAN'S VOICE: Yes!

DR. PETER MCCULLOUGH: — Never. I go in the hospital I write any order I want to. If there's a protocol and it has some base suggestions I can look at it. But I am never circumscribed by protocol. Never.

WOMAN'S VOICE: Right.

DR. PETER MCCULLOUGH: For the first time in medical history doctors claimed they could do nothing else but using protocol. It was inexplicably in their minds to stick to a protocol for the first time ever. Ever. Ever. Ever.

And the protocols had drugs like remdesivir which didn't work against covid. But [inaudible] which was modestly effective. They never had ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine. They had very low dose ineffective dexamethasone and not full-dose [inaudible], not full-dose aspirin, not full-dose anti-coagulants. So the protocols provided a base of care that was inadequate, and any doctor who's seen and examined inpatients had a duty to treat that patient to the fullest ability. And it wasn't done in a single case here.

That's actually what's on trial, is failure to treat. OK?

What the families were and the patients were denied is they were denied medication reconciliation, meaning anything that as an outpatient can be used as an inpatient, period. Period.

And the other thing they were denied is called shared decision making. When your loved one is in the hospital and you're in the hospital, you have a right to share in the decision. And if you stay in in the hospital and you say, I want ivermectin, that is your right.

[applause and cheers]

If you said, I want hydroxychloroquine—

[applause]

— if you said I don't want it, I don't want remdesivir, that is your right.

11:16
The rights of these people and these family members were taken away from them. And in our country, when rights are taken away, and there is harm caused, in this case the most ultimate harm, the loss of life, justice will be served.

[applause]

WOMEN'S VOICES: Yes, yes.

[applause, cheers]

DR. PETER MCCULLOUGH: It will be served.

[applause]

The writing is on the wall. And I'm encouraging each and every one of you to pursue this with your strongest efforts. Because your pursuit of this and your pressing this case will help a large, large number of people. This crisis is not over with. And until we crack this wall and then ultimately tear it down—

WOMEN'S VOICES: Yes.

DR. PETER MCCULLOUGH: — this will go on. People are being denied their rights and they are losing their lives. And it's happening on our watch. That's the reason why we're all here.

12:30
We cannot in a civil society allow our rights to be taken away, especially in the setting of duress, in medical duress. That's where we need the most compassion, that's where we need the most flexibility, that's where we need the most care and concern.

And these people didn't get that. And the families know it. You and I know it. These doctors know it. And I say, let's join together and let's call it.

[applause and cheers]

WOMEN'S VOICES: Yes! Yes!

[applause and cheers]

DR. PETER MCCULLOUGH: And let's bring justice, let's bring justice to these people, and let's bring justice back to our country.

Marks was one of the main architects of the Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) process that enabled early approval of the jabs by lowering safety standards and axing long-term safety studies.

But where is your sympathy for Pfizer's shareholders?

Don't you know that safe, cheap, and effective drugs like ivermectin and HCQ threaten Pfizer's profits from mRNA injections?

Think of the yachts that will never get bought if Pfizer loses its absolute control over the FDA!

Lol.

The Accused
Dr. Anthony Fauci – Former Director, NIAID

Dr. Cliff Lane – Deputy Director, NIAID

Dr. Francis Collins – Former Director, NIH

Dr. Deborah Birx – Former White House COVID Response Coordinator

Dr. Rochelle Walensky – Former Director, CDC

Dr. Stephen Hahn – Former Commissioner, FDA

Dr. Janet Woodcock – Principal Deputy Commissioner, FDA

Dr. Peter Hotez – Dean, National School of Tropical Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine

Dr. Robert Redfield – Former Director, CDC

Dr. Peter Daszak – President, EcoHealth Alliance

Dr. Ralph Baric – Professor, University of North Carolina

Dr. Rick Bright – Former Director, BARDA

Administrators of various hospital systems and care facilities.

Applicable Crimes
The Vires Law Group is seeking state criminal investigations into the aforementioned individuals. The charges outlined include:

Terrorism
Under many state laws, terrorism includes committing crimes to coerce or influence government policy or civilian behavior. The attorneys argue that public fear was deliberately manufactured to increase uptake of vaccines, drive compliance, and suppress dissent—via manipulated death counts, relentless fear-based media messaging, and denial of early treatment.

Murder & Involuntary Manslaughter
Patients were knowingly given lethal treatments such as remdesivir—despite it being pulled from an Ebola study for causing over 50% mortality. Families were denied the right to refuse treatment, and ventilators were used despite overwhelming evidence of fatal outcomes.

Aggravated Assault & Lack of Informed Consent
Patients were subjected to medical procedures—ventilators, remdesivir, and even COVID-19 vaccines—against their will or without informed consent. This constitutes unlawful bodily harm under most state statutes.

Racketeering (RICO)
The team alleges this was a coordinated scheme for profit—fueled by CARES Act incentives and PREP Act immunity—where hospital administrations financially benefited by complying with federal protocols at the expense of patient lives.

Abuse of Vulnerable Adults
Victims were elderly or incapacitated, often denied food, water, vitamins, and family visitation—all while being isolated and coerced into fatal treatment pathways.

Scope & Strategy
While the larger COVID response is under scrutiny, the petitions focus specifically on hospital homicides—where the legal case is strongest and where witnesses (survivors and next-of-kin) are actively seeking justice.

By targeting state-level criminal codes, the team bypasses federal hurdles and builds strategic, streamlined cases with clearly defined jurisdiction and causality.

The goal: create a roadmap for local prosecutors to pursue charges, without being overwhelmed or confused by federal overlap or civil legal complexities.

CDC ACIP Set to Recommend More mRNA Shots This Year — Despite Millions of American Casualties

Now hiding behind a “risk-based” framework, ACIP still plans to push deadly COVID-19 mRNA injections on daycare children, healthcare workers, and the elderly — while ignoring grave safety signals. ...

In other words, the CDC ACIP is set to still recommend deadly and contaminated COVID-19 mRNA booster injections to a large subset of the population that could still include young children. While a “risk-based” approach may appear more cautious than blanket recommendations, the reality remains unchanged: the risks of COVID-19 mRNA booster shots still far outweigh any theoretical benefit, even in so-called “high-risk” groups.

The matter of Daniel Andrews’ role in Victoria’s COVID-19 curfew and broader pandemic response will not go away—nor should it. The public’s demand for accountability is growing, fueled by revelations like Document 34, which expose a troubling disregard for public health expertise and democratic transparency. Punishment is necessary, not merely for retribution but to deter future governance failures. As more information emerges about the nature of the pandemic, particularly the contentious debates around its management, the case for holding Andrews accountable strengthens.

“We have killed more people in the last 4 years than we did in any world war we’ve been involved with.”

“That alone should end everything that’s going on with Covid,” he adds.

“60 billion copies of DNA plasmids and SV40 promoter in it.”

According to Kruse, Pfizer intentionally spiked its Covid mRNA “vaccine” with SV40 to trigger a “turbo cancer” epidemic.

However, he warns that Pfizer has been battling to keep the use of SV40 hidden from the public.

Kruse goes on to note that the depopulation effort backfired when young, healthy “vaccinated” people started dying from cancers typically associated with older people.