patrick.net

Anyone can make a criminal referral.

Do you think that any AG will press charges ???

Misc says

Anyone can make a criminal referral.

Do you think that any AG will press charges ???

Misc

I doubt it. So much of the system is complicit.

"Dr. Peter McCullough Speaks at the Remdesivir Lawsuit Conference in Fresno, California"
Vigilant News Network, Posted Sept 12, 2022
https://rumble.com/v1ju8uj-dr.-peter-mccullough-speaks-at-the-remdesivir-lawsuit-conference-in-fresno-.html

DR. PETER MCCULLOUGH: So there's actually been now two waves of damage that's been done to our country. SARS-CoV-2 the virus, and now the vaccines.

Let me just say from the very beginning, and I'm a practicing internist and cardiologist but I've treated hundreds of patients, I've done my best to apply scholarship and I've published dozens and dozens of papers on the pandemic. I'm the most published person in my field in the world in history in terms of heart and kidney disease. And as a single person I have applied more academic production and clinical treatment and national media appearances, and I've cited more data in the media than any person in the world in history on this topic. I can tell you without any reservation, I have medical authority to render these opinions.

[applause and cheers]

[inaudible]

[applause and cheers]

And these are the opinions, these are the opinions. From the very beginning with the covid 19 crisis it fell into the minds of people to hurt other people. From the very beginning.

VARIOUS WOMEN'S VOICES: Yes, yes.

DR. PETER MCCULLOUGH: And it was simultaneous and it was all over the world.

WOMAN'S VOICE: That's right.

DR. PETER MCCULLOUGH: We have never witnessed this in human history. It, it landed in the most remote areas of the world to the most populated areas of the world.

Everything about covid was done incorrectly, from lockdowns to unnecessary testing to very, very strict prohibition of reasonable things to help individuals, to people losing their jobs, and then sadly, to the intentional suppression of early treatment. And it was everything. And it was from the very beginning.

In France they took hydroxychloroquine off the over-the-counter market months before the virus was even announced. Months before. And in— I have a book out called Courage to Face Covid 19,[1] it's on amazon, you can find it in a black and red cover. We outlined all of this. From the very beginning there was a plan to use SARS-CoV-2, this pandemic, to craft a program of mass vaccination in the world.

The suppression of early treatment and the suppression of any advancement in hospital care was intentional to create fear, suffering, hospitalization, and death, in order to prepare the world's population to accept mass vaccination—

WOMAN'S VOICE: Right.

DR. PETER MCCULLOUGH: — with no end in sight. It was very intentional. It was very intentional.

3:38
In our book is the story of Miss Carol, who was admitted to a hospital in central Texas. And the daughter— it's a perfectly healthy 70 year-old woman, not unlike the people you see up here. And the daughter reached out to me, and whatever, she goes, Dr. McCullough, what would you do? How would you ideally manage such a patient?

I said, well, you have all the rights that you should have. What's called medication reconciliation. Everything that as an outpatient should be continued as an inpatient, including the use of hydroxychloroquine,[2] ivermectin,[3] colchicine,[4] aspirin, blood thinners, doxycycline[5] and azithromycin,[6] inhaled budesonide[7].

There is an entire outpatient protocol that has been assembled, multiple of them have been assembled. There's a major physician organization that supports all this. We had this all in place in the fall of 2020.[8] All of that should have been continued.

And none of it was given to this woman in the hospital.

4:39
So she took the hospital to court. The hospital ponied up and hired very expensive outside attorneys. It's in our book. It's in this chapter. And the hospital fought everything!

And let me tell you what the hospital denied this woman. Denied her ivermectin. Denied her aspirin, full dose. Denied her [inaudible] full dose. Denied colchecine. Denied full dose corticosteroids which would have been [inaudible]. Denied her every single medicine that could have enabled her survival. And this woman she died.

And when she died, I felt most strongly because she was late in the syndrome that she should have gotten aspirin and full-dose blood thinners. I felt very strongly about that. When she died, I told Jody the daughter, I said, get an autopsy. And she got an autopsy and the lungs were filled with blood clots.

[audience murmur]

5:38
It was in the minds of those hospital administrators and those doctors, chief medical officer, the ICU doctors, they work in closed covid units, they don't have the interchange with independent practicing doctors, they all got locked out, it was in their minds to cause harm.

There is no harm in giving a trial of full-dose aspirin and full-dose [inaudible]. And there's no harm in giving ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine. If this patient would have been in the hospital in Mexico City, they would have gotten full-dose ivermectin. They would have been fine. How about in Athens, Greece? Would have gotten hydroxychloroquine.

These drugs are first line in protocols used worldwide. Yet in American hospitals they are prohibited because these drugs — [pointing to banner of the conference behind him, that is, referring to remdesivir, etc., subject of the conference] — are featured.

Something is wrong in our country. Something is very wrong.

WOMEN'S VOICES: Yes.

6:38
DR. PETER MCCULLOUGH: The most successful study, the most successful studies of in-hospital Americans were done early in 2020. One by Henry Ford and it was with hydroxychloroquine. In thousands of patients at Henry Ford Hospital in Detroit, Michigan, I was program director there, I know the doctors there. It was legit. It worked.

And the most successful American study with ivermectin was done by Jean Jacques Rajter and his wife down in a constellation of Florida hospitals, called [inaudible] study. It was published in the best critical care journal called Chest.[9]

In America the most successful in-patient drugs were hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin in published studies.

Now quickly, [inaudible] and colleagues has published a survey recently, 18,000 individuals. It's only those individuals who were denied or didn't receive early treatment in the United States and worldwide were hospitalized with that. Being hospitalized in the United States with covid is a product of not receiving early ambulatory therapy. Dr [inaudible] testified thousands of patients in enormous success. Success becomes less as patients come in to the hospital.

In November of 2020 the WHO [World Health Organization] published its analysis from the Strauss and others, held a conference, had [inaudible] there. In November of 2020 the World Health Organization declared, do not use remdesivir in the hospital.

WOMAN'S VOICE: That's right.

DR. PETER MCCULLOUGH: Because it does not improve outcomes, it actually tips the scales towards complications including kidney failure, liver failure, and death.

In November of 2020 I testified in the Texas Senate under oath[10] on June 22nd, or, June 27th, 2022, and I said, in November of 2020 the Texas Senate, and the California Senate and every state senate in the United States should have had emergency meetings and said, get remdesivir out of the hospitals.

[applause]

It was on their watch! The World Health Organization said that!

[applause]

You can go to the World Health Organization website and still pull up that warning.[11] Do not use it. Do not use it.

Now in May of 2022 the World Health Organization published an update of every single study, every meta-analysis of the use of remdesvir and its impact is neutral. It has actually no impact on the virus whatsoever, and it tips the scales towards, just if someone has a complication like acute kidney injury or liver injury, that person's going to be harmed with remdesivir. But the published data suggests no one is going to be helped with this product. Period.

I'm a doctor, I take care of patients, I've been in hospitals for decades. We never are limited by protocols. Never!

WOMAN'S VOICE: Yes!

DR. PETER MCCULLOUGH: — Never. I go in the hospital I write any order I want to. If there's a protocol and it has some base suggestions I can look at it. But I am never circumscribed by protocol. Never.

WOMAN'S VOICE: Right.

DR. PETER MCCULLOUGH: For the first time in medical history doctors claimed they could do nothing else but using protocol. It was inexplicably in their minds to stick to a protocol for the first time ever. Ever. Ever. Ever.

And the protocols had drugs like remdesivir which didn't work against covid. But [inaudible] which was modestly effective. They never had ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine. They had very low dose ineffective dexamethasone and not full-dose [inaudible], not full-dose aspirin, not full-dose anti-coagulants. So the protocols provided a base of care that was inadequate, and any doctor who's seen and examined inpatients had a duty to treat that patient to the fullest ability. And it wasn't done in a single case here.

That's actually what's on trial, is failure to treat. OK?

What the families were and the patients were denied is they were denied medication reconciliation, meaning anything that as an outpatient can be used as an inpatient, period. Period.

And the other thing they were denied is called shared decision making. When your loved one is in the hospital and you're in the hospital, you have a right to share in the decision. And if you stay in in the hospital and you say, I want ivermectin, that is your right.

[applause and cheers]

If you said, I want hydroxychloroquine—

[applause]

— if you said I don't want it, I don't want remdesivir, that is your right.

11:16
The rights of these people and these family members were taken away from them. And in our country, when rights are taken away, and there is harm caused, in this case the most ultimate harm, the loss of life, justice will be served.

[applause]

WOMEN'S VOICES: Yes, yes.

[applause, cheers]

DR. PETER MCCULLOUGH: It will be served.

[applause]

The writing is on the wall. And I'm encouraging each and every one of you to pursue this with your strongest efforts. Because your pursuit of this and your pressing this case will help a large, large number of people. This crisis is not over with. And until we crack this wall and then ultimately tear it down—

WOMEN'S VOICES: Yes.

DR. PETER MCCULLOUGH: — this will go on. People are being denied their rights and they are losing their lives. And it's happening on our watch. That's the reason why we're all here.

12:30
We cannot in a civil society allow our rights to be taken away, especially in the setting of duress, in medical duress. That's where we need the most compassion, that's where we need the most flexibility, that's where we need the most care and concern.

And these people didn't get that. And the families know it. You and I know it. These doctors know it. And I say, let's join together and let's call it.

[applause and cheers]

WOMEN'S VOICES: Yes! Yes!

[applause and cheers]

DR. PETER MCCULLOUGH: And let's bring justice, let's bring justice to these people, and let's bring justice back to our country.

Marks was one of the main architects of the Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) process that enabled early approval of the jabs by lowering safety standards and axing long-term safety studies.

But where is your sympathy for Pfizer's shareholders?

Don't you know that safe, cheap, and effective drugs like ivermectin and HCQ threaten Pfizer's profits from mRNA injections?

Think of the yachts that will never get bought if Pfizer loses its absolute control over the FDA!

Lol.

The Accused
Dr. Anthony Fauci – Former Director, NIAID

Dr. Cliff Lane – Deputy Director, NIAID

Dr. Francis Collins – Former Director, NIH

Dr. Deborah Birx – Former White House COVID Response Coordinator

Dr. Rochelle Walensky – Former Director, CDC

Dr. Stephen Hahn – Former Commissioner, FDA

Dr. Janet Woodcock – Principal Deputy Commissioner, FDA

Dr. Peter Hotez – Dean, National School of Tropical Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine

Dr. Robert Redfield – Former Director, CDC

Dr. Peter Daszak – President, EcoHealth Alliance

Dr. Ralph Baric – Professor, University of North Carolina

Dr. Rick Bright – Former Director, BARDA

Administrators of various hospital systems and care facilities.

Applicable Crimes
The Vires Law Group is seeking state criminal investigations into the aforementioned individuals. The charges outlined include:

Terrorism
Under many state laws, terrorism includes committing crimes to coerce or influence government policy or civilian behavior. The attorneys argue that public fear was deliberately manufactured to increase uptake of vaccines, drive compliance, and suppress dissent—via manipulated death counts, relentless fear-based media messaging, and denial of early treatment.

Murder & Involuntary Manslaughter
Patients were knowingly given lethal treatments such as remdesivir—despite it being pulled from an Ebola study for causing over 50% mortality. Families were denied the right to refuse treatment, and ventilators were used despite overwhelming evidence of fatal outcomes.

Aggravated Assault & Lack of Informed Consent
Patients were subjected to medical procedures—ventilators, remdesivir, and even COVID-19 vaccines—against their will or without informed consent. This constitutes unlawful bodily harm under most state statutes.

Racketeering (RICO)
The team alleges this was a coordinated scheme for profit—fueled by CARES Act incentives and PREP Act immunity—where hospital administrations financially benefited by complying with federal protocols at the expense of patient lives.

Abuse of Vulnerable Adults
Victims were elderly or incapacitated, often denied food, water, vitamins, and family visitation—all while being isolated and coerced into fatal treatment pathways.

Scope & Strategy
While the larger COVID response is under scrutiny, the petitions focus specifically on hospital homicides—where the legal case is strongest and where witnesses (survivors and next-of-kin) are actively seeking justice.

By targeting state-level criminal codes, the team bypasses federal hurdles and builds strategic, streamlined cases with clearly defined jurisdiction and causality.

The goal: create a roadmap for local prosecutors to pursue charges, without being overwhelmed or confused by federal overlap or civil legal complexities.

CDC ACIP Set to Recommend More mRNA Shots This Year — Despite Millions of American Casualties

Now hiding behind a “risk-based” framework, ACIP still plans to push deadly COVID-19 mRNA injections on daycare children, healthcare workers, and the elderly — while ignoring grave safety signals. ...

In other words, the CDC ACIP is set to still recommend deadly and contaminated COVID-19 mRNA booster injections to a large subset of the population that could still include young children. While a “risk-based” approach may appear more cautious than blanket recommendations, the reality remains unchanged: the risks of COVID-19 mRNA booster shots still far outweigh any theoretical benefit, even in so-called “high-risk” groups.

The matter of Daniel Andrews’ role in Victoria’s COVID-19 curfew and broader pandemic response will not go away—nor should it. The public’s demand for accountability is growing, fueled by revelations like Document 34, which expose a troubling disregard for public health expertise and democratic transparency. Punishment is necessary, not merely for retribution but to deter future governance failures. As more information emerges about the nature of the pandemic, particularly the contentious debates around its management, the case for holding Andrews accountable strengthens.

“We have killed more people in the last 4 years than we did in any world war we’ve been involved with.”

“That alone should end everything that’s going on with Covid,” he adds.

“60 billion copies of DNA plasmids and SV40 promoter in it.”

According to Kruse, Pfizer intentionally spiked its Covid mRNA “vaccine” with SV40 to trigger a “turbo cancer” epidemic.

However, he warns that Pfizer has been battling to keep the use of SV40 hidden from the public.

Kruse goes on to note that the depopulation effort backfired when young, healthy “vaccinated” people started dying from cancers typically associated with older people.

COVID CRIMINAL PROSECUTIONS AND COURT MARTIALS
Should those responsible for harmful mandated experimental injections and lockdowns go unpunished?

We have long passed the “evidence” stage of the Covid saga. ...

There is now palpable anger among a large section of the community who understand what criminal and evil acts have been perpetrated upon us.

We have witnessed pure evil in lying about the safety and efficacy of the gene-based experimental mRNA injections and forcing people to be injected. There has never been anything like this in history. Potentially, millions have been killed and millions more have suffered serious consequential adverse effects, Now that the truth is being revealed the question must be - Should those directly responsible pay a personal price for their actions?

Well, freedom fighter Monica Smit, for one, thinks so. Remember she was jailed for 21 days for opposing the illegal and totalitarian lockdowns of the Andrews State government. She has taken advice that it is possible to personally take action to criminally prosecute Daniel Andrews and she is seeking justice. Monica has received credible legal advice that it is possible to pursue a private prosecution, not a police prosecution, for criminal acts. ...

It is now widely acknowledged that it was illegal to mandate US military to be forced to receive an experimental vaccine under release of the gene-based experimental therapies using Emergency Use Authorisation. The new Pentagon Secretary of Defence, Pete Hegseth has admitted it was wrong. ...

The Gateway Pundit previously reported on military veterans’ concerns about a new Department of Defense reinstatement form, which they claim hides the truth about their forced separations during the COVID-19 vaccine mandate era.

They are being told that if they want back in, they must lie on paper and pretend they left the military of their own free will.

According to the form: “I, [name], attest I voluntarily separated from the (Air) (Space) Force or allowed my service to lapse rather than be vaccinated under the COVID-19 vaccine mandate, which was in effect from 24 August 2021 to 10 January 2023. My decision to separate was made freely and without coercion.”

According to the form: “I, [name], attest I voluntarily separated from the (Air) (Space) Force or allowed my service to lapse rather than be vaccinated under the COVID-19 vaccine mandate, which was in effect from 24 August 2021 to 10 January 2023. My decision to separate was made freely and without coercion.”

It sounds like Trump did approve the false and manipulative language.

Sounds like the same thing to me.

I suspect that the demand that those people sign something saying they "voluntarily" left rather than suffer the mandatory mRNA injection is to deny them legal standing for future lawsuits.

rather than be vaccinated under the COVID-19 vaccine mandate, which was in effect from 24 August 2021 to 10 January 2023. My decision to separate was made freely and without coercion

"rather than be vaccinated" is the very opposite of "freely and without coercion"

I still think it's a deliberate attempt to get people who suffered for doing the right thing to explicitly give up their legal rights, to pre-empt a whole class of extremely well-justified lawsuits.

CHD Funds Lawsuit Against CDC Over Program That Forces Pediatricians to Give COVID Vaccines to Kids on Medicaid

In her first-of-its-kind lawsuit, Cardenas alleges the CDC's Vaccines for Children Program violates the Fifth Amendment's equal protection and due process provisions.

A California pediatrician is suing the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) over a federal program that requires doctors in her state who treat children enrolled in Medicaid to give those children all of the vaccines recommended by the CDC.

Children’s Health Defense (CHD) is supporting the lawsuit, filed April 25 in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, Santa Ana Division.

Dr. Samara Cardenas lost her medical practice after the CDC Vaccines for Children Program kicked her out of the program because she wouldn’t give COVID-19 vaccines to healthy kids.

California, like most states, requires pediatricians who treat Medicaid patients to be enrolled in the Vaccines for Children Program. The program, in turn, requires doctors to strictly follow the CDC’s childhood immunization schedule.

In late 2023, the Vaccines for Children Program informed Cardenas that her vaccine orders “were being scrutinized” for not including COVID-19 shots. She was later expelled from the program. As a result, she lost her Medicaid contract, forcing her to close her practice.

If one were to set out to do intentional, immeasurable and intergenerational harm to a population, there are a number of important strategic elements which one could consider to ensure success. These elements include the following:

· Create a virus in secret which is highly infective. Release it and convince as many as possible that the virus can be deadly to everyone.

· Develop a test which grossly overestimates the number infected. Use the mainstream media to generate fear. Wherever possible, count those dying for any reason as dying from the “virus” to boost the “virus” death statistics.

· Create a novel “countermeasure” to the virus. Sell the “countermeasure” as the only available treatment. Rush it through a lax regulatory approval process and declare the innovative “countermeasure” a “vaccine” (even though it is not) so people would assume it was safe.

· Hide proven cancer-causing genetic sequences in the “vaccine”. If these sequences are uncovered, deny they are a problem even if there is no scientific basis for the denial. Just ignore it.

· Cover all those involved in the development and deployment of the “vaccine” with legal indemity. Even the government should argue it has “no duty of care” for those injured or killed by the “vaccine”. Just stonewall.

· Deny the use of any product which might protect against the virus. Threaten doctors who dared to use alternative effective early treatment with deregistration. Make examples of doctors to dared to fully inform their patients about the dangers of the “vaccine”.

· Hide details of the true number of people killed or injured by the “vaccine” on the basis of confidentiality.

· Ensure mandatory public uptake of the product by coercion. Perhaps make administration of the “vaccine” a condition of employment or travel.

· Despite limited, flawed and poorly conducted clinical trial safety and efficacy data, proclaim it to be morally unacceptable not to be administered the “vaccine”. Children should get the “vaccine” to protect others even though they don’t really need it. With any evidence just say everybody should get the “vaccine” regardless of age, pregnancy status or natural immunity.

· Suppress reports of harm in the media. Demonise anybody who attempts to report cases of death or serious injury. It would assist greatly if there was something like “disinformation and misinformation” legislation to further suppress opposition to the “vaccine”.

· In order to weaken opposition to the use of the “vaccine”, enforce lockdowns to undermine the economy, destabilise society and create more fear. The lockdowns need not be based on any science whatsoever. The use of masks is another instrument of fear which could be used effectively. Make people wear masks.

· Under no circumstances, should the government permit a credible and independent investigation into the harms being recorded by the “vaccine”.

· As a matter of policy, never apologise, never admit wrongdoing and give those people most responsible for the death and destruction national awards so as to gaslight the community into thinking they have not been attacked but rather protected by dedicated individuals.

· Ensure a continual supply of the deadly “vaccine” by building manufacturing plants to produce an endless supply of the “vaccine”. Develop new “vaccines” based on the same platform which could be just as deadly and allow these to be released with a minimum of quality, safety and efficacy data. Maybe testing in as few as 8 mice.

I must have an evil mind to be able to conceive such a scenario for depopulation. I’m sure no government would allow anything like this fictious scenario to occur.

Moderna faces suspension or expulsion from a U.K. trade group for breaking several industry rules, including offering children teddy bears and large payments to participate in COVID-19 trials.

Pharma giant Moderna faces suspension or expulsion from a U.K. trade group for breaking several industry rules, including offering children teddy bears and large payments to participate in COVID-19 trials, The Telegraph reported.

The vaccine maker is facing an audit by the Prescription Medicines Code of Practice Authority (PMCPA), an independent, self-regulatory body established by the Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry, which it joined in 2023.

The CIA hired “Doctor” Terry Adirim (Master’s in Public Health) in December on a five-year renewable contract, as its “Director of the Center for Global Health Services.” Surely, if the blandly-named Center did anything good, the Times would surely have told us all about it. But readers got zero background; it remains a baffling mystery. That probably means the Center does virus-related stuff in other countries whose citizens would intensely dislike it if they knew what CIA was really up to. But whatever.

Dr. Terry holds a Harvard MPH and has a long resume of government service. In particular, and what got her plug pulled, Terry helped design and enforce the Pentagon’s vaccine mandate. Reports suggest she was the loudest and strongest internal DoD advocate for requiring jabs for healthy people in the least-risk cohort: U.S. soldiers.

Perhaps, or probably, seeing the writing on the Old Testament wall, the deep state spirited Dr. Terry out of DoD and into the bowels of the CIA skunkworks. Why? Because according to the Times, Dr. Adirim was only a month away from qualifying for full top-tier federal retirement benefits. But the Trump Administration found out about her new 5-year CIA contract, and she got her notice on April 4th. In other words, they deleted her plush retirement package.

Now, she’s suing.

...the story’s final paragraph got around to admitting that “a clause in her contract allows termination with 30 days’ notice for any reason.” In other words, it doesn’t matter whether Laura Loomer complained to someone about bureaucratic barnacle Dr. Terry. She was an “at will” contractee, who enjoyed no civil service protections.

Unless she can show illegal discrimination or breach of specific terms in her contract, neither of which were mentioned in the story, her lawsuit is going nowhere.

Lest you be tempted to feel any sympathy for poor Dr. Terry, recall that, if the jab critics —particularly the most serious and data-driven among them— are even partly right, then this doctor you never heard of may be the culprit of the most consequential medical policy error in modern U.S. military history.

What the Times did its level best trying to make sound like more ugly Trump retaliation politics was, in fact, great news. Terry Adirim’s firing shows that covid accountability is starting to catch up with the insiders, not just the disposable white-coated morons dumb enough to leap in front of cameras during the virus time. “Doctor” Terry was a strategic-level bureaucrat, an insider who actually pulled Pentagon policy levers. And her firing shows the reckoning is no longer reaching just the media-exposed doctors— it’s catching up to the shadowy technocrats behind the curtains.

Her termination was significant and encouraging because she never said anything controversial in public. Terry stayed safely hidden behind the bureaucratic drapes. But they found her anyway. In other words, the Trump Administration’s focus on covid accountability is not just performative. They really are trying to root these dangerous people out.

A former top U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) vaccine official ignored evidence that COVID-19 vaccines caused serious injuries, and dismissed the pleas of people injured by the vaccines, all while reassuring the public the shots were safe, documents published today on TheRealPeterMarks.com website reveal.

The website hosts public statements by Peter Marks, M.D., Ph.D., recordings of his calls with vaccine-injured individuals, transcripts and previously unreleased FDA records. ...

Wallskog said he wants to know why Marks “refused” to give Kennedy the vaccine injury data he requested. Dressen said she wants to ask Marks “about the countless lives negatively impacted by the COVID vaccines.”

“We brought the truth front and center to Marks, and he refused to see it,” Dressen said. “His decisions not to disclose highly reported injuries had devastating impacts on the medical community's ability to recognize and treat injuries.” As a result, she said, “countless lives” were lost and people were “permanently harmed.” ...

Documents on TheRealPeterMarks.com site reveal that Marks knew about adverse events following vaccinations as early as October 2020 — less than two months before the Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna vaccines received emergency use authorization (EUA).

Dressen said she was “astonished” that Marks ignored those warning signs and instead promoted the government’s “safe and effective” narrative.

“He knew very well that there were serious problems with the COVID vaccines,” Dressen said. “What astonished me was how he can say it with such resolve.”

Marks approved COVID vaccines, boosters for kids despite knowledge of risks

The Singapore government has just updated its laws to make it a crime to refuse mandatory “vaccines,” punishable with prison time.

The updates to the nation’s laws open the door to criminal prosecution for members of the public who refuse to submit to government-mandated injections.

Interestingly, the changes have emerged while “vaccine” advocate Bill Gates has been visiting Singapore to meet with the nation’s leadership.

This week, Gates wrapped up his two-day visit in Singapore. ...

During the height of the pandemic, the Singapore government enacted various draconian measures coercing many Singaporeans.

Citizens were presented with two options: Take the “vaccine” or lose their job.”
Despite people suffering injuries from the experimental COVID shots, the Singapore authorities censored and discouraged public discussion.

People who dared question the Singapore government’s narrative were silenced, humiliated, and discredited by the authorities and their allies in the corporate media and sleazy “fact-checking” industry.