patrick.net

JANETTE REMPFER, RN: I will say that there was one thing that was quite astonishing in the very beginning where I was very close to a chaplain that was working at the hospital. She was absolutely berated, harassed, to the point where I think she, if she hadn't had the team I don't think she wouldn't have made it mentally. So we've all taken a beating in that sense.

But came down to the lanai and they had at least 50 to 60 soldiers just lined up, ready to take the vaccine, and they were women, there were girls that were crying, that were pregnant. Some guys were just not sure what to do. The chaos was insane. It was like, it was like, World War II camp, just put your shoulder up, you know, bring your uniform down, and it was just, shot, shot, shot, shot. And the chaos and the fighting and the screaming was just, I've never seen anything like it.

And the chaplain came down and she's just, like, hey, you guys are allowed to request a religious accommodation or a medical accommodation, or legal. And higher up came down and started berating her in front of the soldiers, as a major and she's a chaplain. She's just, like, stop, don't— They were telling her she's denying them of getting the shot. She said, no, I'm telling them that the army just gave us 3 options to look into and consent. You need a consent. These people are crying and, they were— It was just awful.

We would up getting like 40 signatures and the soldiers wound up coming back after just to figure out what's going on. Most of them didn't even get the second shot. It was just, it was chaotic, and I'm like, what, what year are we living in and what era are we in, and why are we treating our soldiers like this? The morale was horrific.

22:22
DR. SA; SIGOLOFF: In order to get the shot they had what they called a vaccine rodeo at the gymnasium here on post. And I had to go there every day for almost a week and just sit there in the unvaxxed area. I think it was a way to segregate me and others. And while I was sitting there, there was a company commander who started speaking to me, and I told him, hey, you and I can talk later in a different place, not in front of all these privates, but this is an unlawful order that you need to know because you are giving this unlawful and illegal order.

And as I'm saying this, there's a guy, you know, maybe 30 feet to my left who just received the vaccine seconds ago and his left arm went numb. And the nurse standing next to him who just administered that, said, oh yeah, that's normal, that happens. And he's like, I can't feel my arm! And he was freaking out, for a good reason because he couldn't feel his arm.

And then that ended up culminating in me getting a general officer memorandum of record, a GOMAR, for telling that officer that this was an illegal and unlawful order and that he should not be giving it.

Federal government immunologist Dr. Paul Offit has revealed that former President Joe Biden’s administration suppressed evidence showing the benefits of natural immunity against COVID-19 to push mRNA vaccines onto the public instead.

Offit, a member of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee, is one of America’s most prominent mass vaccination advocates.

Since the early days of the pandemic, the idea that natural immunity could protect against Covid was ridiculed, censored, and dismissed as “misinformation.”

Now, Offit admits that the Biden administration knew that natural immunity was a good defense against “serious disease.”

However, the idea that natural infection is a valid alternative to “vaccines” was shut down by the Biden admin to promote Covid mRNA injections.

Offit revealed that the natural immunity idea was covered up due to “bureaucratic concerns.”

This bombshell revelation came from Dr. Offit himself in a video where he acknowledges that natural immunity does protect against severe disease — a fact now backed by data.

Yet, in the heat of vaccine mandates, Offit reveals that the White House simply did not want to deal with the hassle of verifying natural infection.

Instead, millions of Americans were forced to comply, lose their jobs, or be cast out of society — all to avoid a “bureaucratic layer.”

Offit, director of the Vaccine Education Center at Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia and a longtime defender of mass vaccination, has now admitted that the government overlooked a critical scientific reality.

“There’s every reason to believe natural infection would prevent against serious disease,” Offit stated. “And data came out showing this was true.”

Yet, when COVID-19 vaccine mandates swept across the nation, natural infection wasn’t even considered as an alternative. Offit attended meetings in early 2021 where the Biden administration decided to lean into a strict pro-mandate policy, ignoring the millions of Americans who had already recovered from COVID-19.

Why? According to Offit, the administration didn’t want to deal with the logistics of verifying prior infection.

This mass psychosis wasn't accidental - it was the product of sophisticated reality engineering. The same systems that manufactured consent for endless wars were now deployed to enforce medical and social compliance. But this time, they had new tools: social media algorithms, AI content moderation, and real-time narrative control. And at every level, the deception was coordinated from the top down:

Dr. Fauci: "When people are vaccinated they're not going to get infected"

President Biden: "You're not going to get COVID if you have these vaccinations"

CDC Director Walensky: "Vaccinated people do not carry the virus and don't get sick"

Rachel Maddow: "Now we know the vaccines work well enough that the virus stops"

Pfizer CEO Bourla: "There is no variant that escapes the protection of our vaccines"

Bill Gates: "Everyone who takes the vaccine is not just protecting themselves but reducing their transmission”

The unvaccinated and vaccine-injured represent the most brutally marginalized groups in recent American history. The scale of this systematic exclusion was unprecedented in modern America:

Over 7 million Americans lost jobs due to mandates

22,000 military service members discharged

50,000+ healthcare workers terminated

Countless families denied access to basic services

Children barred from schools and activities

The injured systematically denied medical care and disability benefits

No other group in recent history has faced such comprehensive banishment from society - excluded from workplaces, education, travel, entertainment, and even basic medical care, all while being publicly demonized by mainstream media and entertainment figures.

@WarClandestine
15h
Another reason Zelensky cannot allow this war to end, is because he is covering up Deep State bioweapon development in Ukraine.

Elon already found the paper trail via USAID Project PREDICT, which means Trump knows also.

This is why Fauci and Hunter’s pardons begin in 2014.

This is why Zelensky ordered the destruction of all files associated with Hunter Biden’s biolab company, Metabiota.

This is why the media mercilessly attacks anyone who talks about the biolabs in Ukraine, to include RFK Jr. and Tulsi.

This is why Zelensky can’t surrender.

If this war ends, Putin and Russian MIL have been adamant that there must be a formal investigation into US/Ukrainian bioweapon development in Ukraine. This will surely be part of the negotiations between Trump and Putin. Putin wants justice for Covid, and he claims George Soros and his puppets are behind it all.

Some of Trump’s closest advisors and most important cabinet positions, Elon, Tulsi, and RFK Jr., have also echoed the importance of this exact situation.

Many keep asking about what we will find when we investigate where the money went in Ukraine. Eventually, we will end up at crimes against humanity.

A state Supreme Court has given the green light for children to be force-vaccinated without their parents’ knowledge or consent.

On Tuesday, Maine’s Supreme Court dismissed a medical malpractice lawsuit filed by a father whose 5-year-old daughter had been injected with a Covid mRNA “vaccine” against his wishes.

The father, Jeremiah Hogan, filed the lawsuit against Lincoln Medical Partners and its parent company, MaineHealth, Inc.

The case Hogan v. Lincoln Medical Partners raised significant legal questions about the scope of immunity under the federal Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness (PREP) Act.

The high court’s March 4 ruling also raises concerns as it sets a precedent for institutions to begin vaccinating children against their parents’ wishes.

Hospitals Accused of Covertly Administering Covid-19 Jabs to Sedated Patients, Bypassing Consent in Shocking Violation of Medical Ethics

Patients in U.S. hospitals were given COVID-19 vaccines without their knowledge or consent while under sedation.

• Patients in U.S. hospitals were given COVID-19 vaccines without their knowledge or consent while under sedation.

• Legal teams claim health care workers have confirmed the practice, calling it an "abominable covert act."

• A mother in the UK fights to stop a hospital from vaccinating her Down syndrome child under sedation against her will.

• Medical journals propose administering vaccines during perioperative periods to boost compliance, raising ethical concerns.

@MendenhallFirm

17 Dec 2024
Were you or a family member covid vaxxed while under sedation? We are hearing stories of this abominable covert act.

This I don't undestand. If you are vaccinated and you have immunity then
what is the problem with the unvaccinated?

Doc Malik

Covid was a plandemic, scamdemic. It was premeditated.

There was no increased mortality at the height of Covid.

Most deaths were due to hospital and care home protocols, which included isolation, morphine, midazolam, remdesivir, intubation, and withholding antibiotics.

Lockdowns, social distancing, and masking are unscientific and fatally flawed policies.

The plandemic was all about introducing and normalizing:

gene therapy as vaccines.

mass population inoculation at the Government’s behest.

destruction of medical ethics, informed consent, and bodily autonomy.

the largest transfer of wealth.

Our politicians and government are mere puppets serving, not the people but the super wealthy and corporate interests.

Our media is not impartial and balanced, and investigative journalism doesn't exist, they are propaganda mouthpieces for the ruling philanthropaths.

The medical profession is sick to the core, they are highly ignorant, worship the Golden Cow that is the vaccine blindly like cult followers and put their own interests in front of their patients. They can not be trusted.

Do no harm means do no harm to their medical license, reputation, career, pension, mortgage, private school fees, holidays, etc.

The government (s) used military grade psyops and behavioral manipulation against its own people. ...

I know that no one has been held responsible and paid the consequences. No one has been punished.

I know that those who questioned and spoke out against the wrongs, however, lost their jobs and livelihoods and were destroyed financially and reputationally. ...

MRNA tech is dangerous and needs to be resisted at all costs.

All vaccines are a pharmaceutical product and a racket.

Yesterday, the far-left Boston Globe ran an astonishing story headlined, “The case against Anthony Fauci.” To remove all doubt, the sub-headline explained, “On the fifth anniversary of the COVID outbreak, a new book examines where American science — and politics — went wrong.”

For a half-decade, we were mocked, gaslit, canceled, hounded, ostracized, and called every ridiculous name in the book by arrogant, birdbrained “science followers” who sneeringly ridiculed us for asking questions. Well, here we finally are. We were right. Conspiracy theory has gone mainstream.

But don’t hold your breath waiting for an apology. ...

The article described how then-NIH director Frances Collins orchestrated a “devastating takedown” of the Great Barrington Declaration, the open letter published by three gold-standard health experts arguing against broad lockdowns and advocating for “focused protection” of our most vulnerable citizens. “Banishing the Declaration from the realm of acceptable debate,” the Globe admitted, “was a pretty stunning betrayal of scientific and democratic ideals.”

The banishment of any inquiry into the Wuhan lab origin of the virus, the Globe allowed, “not only clouded judgment on public policy, it also did enormous damage to public trust.”

Now they tell us.

This Globe article wasn’t the first acknowledgement in corporate media of elite failure during the pandemic. But three things stood out. First, it was the harshest, least apologetic takedown to date. Second, it appeared in one of the pandemic era’s most enthusiastic “science” defenders, the Boston Globe. And third, it disgracefully did so without any acknowledgement of the Globe’s own role as gatekeeper, enforcer, and cheerleader of the approved lie.

In other words, they haven’t learned their lesson yet.

In its tangible form, the pandemic is over. As this article evidences, all those NPIs that the elites leaned into are now being incrementally discredited, “one by one,” as Charles Mackay might have said. Or maybe it’s more accurate to say they are being re-discredited.

But in another sense, the pandemic is not over. Trust in the institutions lies in ruin, where it belongs. The perpetrators of a historically destructive fraud have — so far — escaped punishment. While the media is starting to come around, the so-called experts — the architects of this disaster — are still clinging to their fictions, investing their ill-gotten pandemic proceeds, and hoping the public forgets before they’re ever held to account.

But we are not forgetting.

If “In Covid’s Wake: How Our Politics Failed Us” is any sign at all, it is a sign that the long overdue accounting is rising over the horizon, like the distant sails of a yet-to-be-identified ship. Justice may be slow, but it’s sailing toward us.

THIS IS TRUE…. listen to her voice…. She's telling the truth…. They were targeting the unvaxed…. Essentially murdering them…

People who DID NOT want a COVID-19 vaccination were reluctantly turning up in front of a vaccinating practitioner because the alternative was losing their job and participation in society

This was the ‘choice’ - get vaccinated or be penalised.

A two tier society was created of the ‘vaccinated’ and the ostracised ‘unvaccinated’ - it was a vaccination apartheid, enforced discrimination in Australia.

This was the situation that many people faced if they refused to ‘consent’ to COVID-19 vaccination in Australia, at the height of the ‘Covid’ debacle…

Again, please keep in mind the information above, and that vaccinating practitioners collaborated with this tyranny, as 72.9 million COVID-19 vaccine doses have reportedly been administered in Australia, as at February 2025.

The vaccinating practitioners knew that coercion and vaccine mandates were in place - why didn’t they refuse to collaborate with the violation of valid voluntary informed consent for vaccination?

How could the vaccinating practitioners obtain valid voluntary informed consent when vaccine mandates were in place?

The simple answer is…they couldn’t.

They shouldn’t have collaborated with the mandates.

And now here we are…there is NO VALID CONSENT for COVID-19 vaccination.

5 Years Ago Today, the National Security Council (NSC) Was Officially in Charge of COVID Policy

No discussion of COVID makes any sense without understanding this key fact and its global implications. ...

Just about a year ago, Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, one of the kindest and most genuine people I have ever met, and our soon-to-be confirmed NIH secretary, asked me to annotate the PanCAP-A to explain how a document that was supposed to reflect public health policy had been strangely mutated and altered to include, without explicitly stating so, the new, national security-based control structure for the pandemic response. Here is the document, with my notes on the first few key sections. ...

The Great 2025 Egg Price Fracas wasn’t the only narrative cracking up yesterday. The Wall Street Journal ran an astonishingly honest story headlined, “Retractions, Walkouts Plague Science Journals Eager to Churn Out Research.” It’s funny what a little cancelled USAID money can uncover.

Never forget that, during the pandemic, we were repeatedly hammered and hectored with the endless and unbelievably annoying refrain follow the science. The academic journals were so sacrosanct that they were above being questioned at all. We weren’t even supposed to read them for ourselves — don’t do your ‘own research,’ dummies! — but instead, just gullibly gobble up corporate media’s low-calorie interpretations of the science. We’ll tell you what it means.

Welp. Times have changed. The Journal reported that over the last ten years — i.e., spanning the pandemic — editors at over 40 journals have rage-quit in protest of “editorial differences” with publishers related to the poor quality of their published science. Indeed, exactly ten years ago in 2015, Richard Horton, then editor-in-chief of the blue-ribbon journal The Lancet, penned a striking critique of the scientific publishing industry. In a Lancet editorial, he prophetically wrote:

“The case against science is straightforward: much of the scientific literature, perhaps half, may simply be untrue. Afflicted by studies with small sample sizes, tiny effects, invalid exploratory analyses, and flagrant conflicts of interest, together with an obsession for pursuing fashionable trends of dubious importance, science has taken a turn towards darkness.”

You would think a scathing critique of science like that from a top science journal’s top editor — half of published science might be false! a turn toward darkness! — would have swelled into a tsunami of brutal self-reflection and reform. But no. It hardly even splashed. Horton’s complaint sank right into corporate media’s putrid pond of conformity with nary a ripple.

Not even “peer review” — science’s so-called ‘gold standard’ — can be trusted anymore. Last year, 23 disgruntled scientists penned a public letter to Springer Publishing that said, “Some of the work that has been published is so seriously flawed that it is not credible that it underwent any meaningful form of peer review.”

In other words, we think you’re lying.

Peer review is an antiquated and obscure process that anonymizes the peer reviewers, hding them behind a Wizard of Oz-style blanket of privacy and implied elite disinterest. Consumers of academic pabulum must trust pure-hearted journal editors to remain free from influence and bias and ensure the sanctity of the peer review process. The argument over peer review is not just a rarified controversy among elites. As we saw during COVID-19, the most ridiculous conclusions can be lifted right from the pages of peer-reviewed papers and then institutionalized as public policy mandates, while we are told to shut up and never ask questions.

The science is settled, dummies!

The Journal’s article blamed big study money and too many papers, apparently advocating for even more gatekeeping by small groups of anointed, priestly elite editors. I disagree. The solution is more transparency. Crowdsourcing. As Justice Brandeis sagely observed in 1927, “the answer to bad speech is more speech, not enforced silence.” Publish all the papers, every one, then let other registered scientists add “peer” community notes under their own names, while also disclosing their income sources. Let the readers vote on the community notes. Then show those notes voted most helpful at the top, like Amazon reviews for combo hotdog and bun toasters.

It’s a simple, inexpensive solution that they will resist to the last Ukrainian.

11/17/2024

The consistency seen among cases in this review with known COVID-19 vaccine mechanisms of injury and death, coupled with autopsy confirmation by physician adjudication, suggests there is a high likelihood of a causal link between COVID-19 vaccines and death. Further urgent investigation is required for the purpose of clarifying our findings.

The House report on the United States Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) covid propaganda is devastating.

The Biden administration spent nearly a billion dollars spreading misinformation about COVID-19 vaccines, boosters, and masks. If a pharmaceutical company had led such a campaign, it would have faced crippling fines.

HHS hired the Fors Marsh Group (FMG), a public relations firm, to lead a propaganda campaign aimed at boosting COVID-19 vaccine uptake.

The strategy was clear:

1. Exaggerate the risk of COVID-19 mortality.
2. Downplay the lack of solid evidence that the COVID-19 vaccine prevents transmission.

The campaign went beyond promoting vaccines—it exaggerated mask effectiveness, pushed for strict social distancing, and enforced school closures. When the messaging failed to align with reality, it shattered public trust in public health.

The PR firm FMG relied heavily on flawed “guidance” from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), ignoring findings from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on the vaccine's limitations, and dismissing international research that contradicted the CDC's preferred narrative. ...

During this time, the PR firm FMG ran ads warning parents that schools would shut down unless children wore masks, avoided friends, and got vaccinated. ...

In 2021, the PR firm, backing the Biden-Harris administration's vaccine mandates, falsely claimed that the vaccine prevented COVID transmission. When "breakthrough" infections surged, public trust in health officials crumbled.

Later, when the FDA approved the vaccine for 12- to 15-year-olds, the PR firm pushed parents to vaccinate their kids, claiming schools could only reopen in fall 2021 if children were vaccinated. These ads conveniently ignored side effects like myocarditis.

HHS has wiped the propaganda ads from its webpages—and it's clear why. They're an embarrassment. The ads essentially told kids to treat their peers like biohazards unless they were vaccinated. ...

In September 2021, CDC Director Walensky took the rare step of overruling the agency’s own external experts, expanding the booster recommendation to all adults—not just the elderly. Her decision went well beyond the FDA's approval, which was limited to older adults, and was described as "highly unusual."

The PR campaign and the CDC consistently exaggerated the COVID-19 mortality risk for children, using fear to pressure parents into vaccinating their kids.

In August 2021, the military enforced a COVID-19 vaccine mandate, resulting in the discharge of 8,300 servicemembers. By 2023, the Department of Defense was actively encouraging them to re-enlist.

The Biden-Harris administration enforced vaccine mandates through the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), and the military, despite knowing the CDC had evidence that the Delta variant could evade vaccine immunity. Their PR campaign deliberately kept Americans in the dark about the declining effectiveness of vaccines against new variants.

The propaganda campaign enlisted celebrities and influencers to "persuade" children to get the COVID vaccine. If a celebrity is paid to promote a faulty product, they should share the liability if that product ends up harming people.

Without any supporting evidence, the propaganda campaign ran ads claiming the vaccine would protect children from long COVID.

As public trust in the CDC has crumbled, parents are now questioning all of its guidance. Unsurprisingly, the HHS propaganda campaign has resulted in a drop in routine childhood vaccination rates.

And the report fails to advocate hangings, which are absolutely necessary to prevent a repeat, and because the creation of the virus and the mandates were the worst crimes against humanity ever.

Mass General Brigham Used Vaccine Mandates to Wipe Christian Beliefs from Their Workforce

In addition to claiming the right to have their individual cases heard, plaintiff Michelle has a new cause of action. She applied for employment again in 2023, two years after she was denied religious accommodations and terminated for not getting the Covid gene drug therapy inappropriately called a “vaccine.” MGB hired her again in 2023 as a staff nurse and approved her religious exemption request for the flu vaccine. She worked for 2.5 months and then HR learned she had not taken the Covid “vaccine” or that she was still in a lawsuit against MGB. Michelle then requested an exemption from the Covid “vaccine.” MGB denied her the exemption and fired her again.

"MGB hired her again in 2023 as a staff nurse and approved
her religious exemption request for the flu vaccine."

Patrick says

"MGB hired her again in 2023 as a staff nurse and approved
her religious exemption request for the flu vaccine."

Why do we need a religious reason to refuse a vaccine that we don't trust?

This study makes it abundantly clear that vaccine mandates were a disgraceful violation of informed consent and bodily autonomy, discriminating against—and ultimately harming—those who chose not to comply.

According to a previous study, also conducted by Chaufan et al, employer vaccination mandates led to suicidal thoughts in 23.5% and depression/anxiety in 81.4% of healthcare workers...

Patrick says

"MGB hired her again in 2023 as a staff nurse and approved
her religious exemption request for the flu vaccine."

Why do we need a religious reason to refuse a vaccine that we don't trust?