6
0

Perhaps we should defenestrate ALL licensed "experts"


               
2022 Dec 4, 4:21pm   2,489 views  53 comments

by Patrick   follow (60)  

https://boriquagato.substack.com/p/cuban-style-expert-worship


i have long suspected that the very rich and powerful love authority and regulatory structures because they tend toward status quo and when you’re at the top, that’s good for you. and the rules probably don’t apply to you anyhow. but this is not really the interesting part of mark’s day.

that came when he took exception to some comments by long time gatopal™ and rational ground grounding rod justin hart.



let me make that easy for you:
yes.
they serve only to raise prices, protect guild systems, stifle innovation, limit freedom, and limit choice.

any credential/skill that is truly important will be demanded by the market anyway.

let the customer decide, not the bureaucracy.

make all commerce, association, and interaction voluntary and consensual.

what should med or law school look like?

let the market decide not some technocrat in a regulatory agency who has much to gain by promoting scarcity and lack of choice.

you would not accept this rationale in most aspects of your life. imagine a “marriage panel” the decided who you were allowed to consider wedding. lots of people seem to get it wrong. for many, it’s very expensive. so should “experts” be in charge?

the ethical basis of mandatory credentialing is just as bad.

it’s just taking choice away from you and calling it “public good.”

hardly a practice with a laudable history.

it’s deeply ironic to see a guy who got rich helping to disintermediate over-regulated and ossified media now weigh in in favor of ossification. ...

no one is saying “hey, just trust any old person do to heart surgery or fly your airplane.”

to claim so a silly grandstanding move.

everyone will seek out qualified people.

that is not the issue.

the issue is “who gets to decide what constitutes “qualified”?”
and mark does not seem to want it to be you.

i mean, really stop and think about this: do you trust just anyone with an MD or a JD?

if you care about "credentials," great, patronize those who decide to get them. if you don't, don't.

make it all voluntary and then, like iso-9000, if people care, it will be supplied. in the absence of regulation, accreditation, and other such interference and restrictions on consensual commerce, what the market demands the market gets.

and that is a VERY powerful idea.

licensing lawyers is no different than having a produce czar decide who can grow vegetables, under what conditions, and how many of which they should produce.

it’s trade restriction.

and trade restriction always creates a net deadweight loss for society.



you might have some idea of “how trained a doctor should be” and i might have one too. and they might be different. but in a free market, each of us can satisfy our desires and offerings can evolve to suit demand.

in a market captured by guilds, we cannot. there is only one answer and it provides a high hurdle and a built in system of grift and apprenticeship where it costs people huge money to become a doctor and then they have to work for peanuts for years in “residency” that’s basically medieval style guild apprenticeship.

such a system does not innovate. it does not allow in ideas like AI (that is already outperforming doctors on many tasks including diagnosis) or ideas like “maybe a doctor who is just going to perform lasik does not need a full MD” or “maybe we should be teaching a different curriculum more based in critical thought and assessment rather than rote regurgitation” or “maybe we need more pharmacology and less physiology. or maybe the obverse.” you’re not even really getting “one size fits none.” you’re getting “one size fits guild needs.”

such a system will always seek to over-price access and then constrain supply because that is what maximizes oligopolistic/monopolistic profits.

and this is EXACTLY what they have done. med school and residency batter the hell out of students, push rote learning over critical thought, and leave graduates beholden to boards and credentials and generally in nasty debt.

the schools thrive, the hospitals thrive, the regulators thrive, and if once they manage to milk enough “dues paying” out of you, so too might an aspiring doctor one day but not until they have extracted massive guild profits from you and never without continuing to be under their thumb. california’s new foray into overt medical censorship by holding credentials hostage shows just how powerful and intrusive this can get. ...

this whole notion is just more “expert worship” and the core socialist fallacy of “we just need smarter guys to make top down planning work next time!”

no, we don’t

that never works.

it breaks choice and constrains supply according to what an industry wants rather than what its customers do.

it’s a recipe for stultification and profiteering. it’s a recipe for perpetual guild domination where innovation should be.

medicine in particular is predominantly a technology field. it should be dropping in price, not exploding and the fact that it is not speaks to market breakage.

guilds are market breakage.

giving someone else the power to determine for what and under what conditions you can hire the services of another person is market breakage

the only reason to require such things to sustain a non-market equilibrium.

it’s really that simple.

it’s clear why so much “big business” wants that.

but why do you want that?

you don’t. it’s being sold as illusory safety.

you are surrendering freedom and consumer sovereignty for a cage built by profiteers.

and we all know how that goes…


« First        Comments 25 - 53 of 53        Search these comments

25   Patrick   2024 Apr 4, 10:16am  

https://aghostinthemachine.substack.com/p/a-zero-trust-society


Ours is a zero-trust society, and crazy-sounding conspiracy theorists are usually far more trustworthy than government officials, mainstream journalists, academic researchers, etc. As we have seen, the credentialed “experts” who brandish the regime’s imprimatur have been consistently and catastrophically wrong about everything that matters.

A growing number of people, possibly even a majority, now accept that this is so, even if most of them are reluctant to acknowledge it publicly. People are sick of being conned and gaslit by the powers-that-be. ...

Okay, I know that these “conspiracy theories” can sound pretty crazy, especially when you go outside into the sunshine and “touch grass” and interact with all the shiny, happy normies out there. But let us not forget, my fellow Americans, that in the past few years, our own government recently partnered with Chinese communists to engineer a virus; then, once that virus “escaped” from the lab, our government collaborated with public and private organizations around the globe to lie about the severity of that virus, to lie about which treatments were effective and which ones weren’t, and to censor any and all true information that contradicted its lies; our government then compelled people to take preventative measures and treatments that its own officials knew were ineffective; etc., etc., etc. How many people died as a result, especially once you factor in deaths from despair (suicides, overdoses, etc.)? And precisely none of the folks who committed all of these crimes have even been prosecuted for it, let alone convicted of a crime and sent to prison. And don’t forget that this is a familiar pattern by now: think Iraq, 9/11, the psychotic immigration and border policy, the BLM movement and its “reforms,” etc.
27   Patrick   2024 Sep 25, 8:19am  

https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/ban-experts-wednesday-september-25


See, nobody even wanted the stupid plastic bags. People don’t like them. We were happier with paper. It required government regulation to create the plastic bag market. After which, a whole lot of petroleum-adjacent companies earned generational wealth supplying government-mandated plastic bags to grocery stores.

But then the plastic bags began choking the oceans (not literally) —a whole new problem we never had back in the paper bag days, and one that the experts somehow failed to foresee— and now the very same experts soberly tell us we have to just stop it with all these plastic bags, which we never wanted in the first place until the government mandated them.

The experts are worse than useless. They are dangerous madmen. They, not the plastic bags, are the ones who are really choking the planet (Id.). The bags are just symptoms of our expert infection. It’s possible we caught the expert infection from the salmon, too. We don’t know yet.

But it’s clear. There’s only one logical thing to do. We should ban experts.
30   Patrick   2025 Jan 13, 11:18am  

https://www.kunstler.com/p/climate-jeezus-taketh-away


Ronald Reagan’s daughter, Patti Davis, rent her garments in The New York Times Sunday op-ed page, wailing:

... The subject was Los Angeles on fire, and one person mentioned climate change as a cause. Another commentator smirked and said he didn’t believe it was the cause.

I felt rage surge up past my grief.

My first thought was: “You think you know more than scientists?”


Of course, my first thought reading that was: Who is paying those scientists? The same question you might ask of the scientists at the CDC, NIH, FDA, and NIAID who declared that Covid-19 was definitely not created in a Wuhan lab, and the mRNA vaccines were “safe and effective.” My second thought was: could you possibly find a better example of elite Utopian-Woke performative acting-out? My third thought was: since when are “experts” infallible? My fourth thought was: doesn’t science advance on the basis of continuous argument? My fifth thought was: if Patti Davis is watching the news, she must be in some comfortable and probably luxurious place that did not burn down. ...

An awful lot of homeowners will not be paying their mortgages on a smoldering empty lot. The banks are not in super-fabulous condition these days. How many loans-gone-bad will it take to wreck already unstable banks? And, by the way, the collateral isn’t even there anymore. The re-po man is out of the picture.

What happens to the insurance companies? And the re-insurance companies who theoretically stand behind the insurers? I’ll tell you what happens: they will be backstopped by the government, which doesn’t have the money to backstop them. . . but will create it out of pixels on screens. . . which means expect a considerable uptick in inflation (i.e., a downtick in the purchasing power of the dollar), which will be a black eye for the new Trump administration. ...
31   Ceffer   2025 Jan 13, 11:33am  

If you see a celebrity broadcasting, then they were likely warned and got their shit out ahead of time in exchange for being celebrity crisis actors or having their places spared from the DEWs.

What we are NOT hearing are the myriad thousands of people whose homes have been burned out. With a few exceptions, they have a media blackout, in like Lahaina. You see an account here and there, but the 'celebrities' are the ones with the voices. The celebrities whine as if they don't have three or four other places they own that they could easily roost, or just live at the Four Seasons for the duration.

Let's see if the areas are cordoned off with fences and armed NATO guards, portable crematoriums, and paid off coroner with Freemason apparatchiks. When will the obvious military type mercenaries show up? They will have military style encampments a long time before anybody who got burned out are given shelters. They won't let any independent examiners into the area to scope out what happened or the extent of the deaths.

Pali People mostly have places they can live elsewhere.
35   WookieMan   2025 Apr 24, 12:35am  

Patrick says





We recycle, but deep down outside of aluminum it's all going to the landfill. Maybe glass, but unless you're a heavy drinker, not much of that gets into the sorting area. That's why certain states charge you more like Michigan, but if you return your cans or bottles they kick it back. They don't have to sort.

I actually get into heated arguments with my MIL. She just trusts the supposed recycling system. Nope, 90% of it's going to the landfill. She won't take a styrofoam leftover box at a restaurant or a plastic bag with it. Massive Trump supporter too, but she's batshit crazy. Most everything you consume ends up in the garbage. And she uses garbage bags.... I don't get the recycling people.
37   Glock-n-Load   2025 May 7, 11:39am  

I blew out my C4-C5 vertebrae years ago. A surgeon said I need surgery “no question about it. And if you don’t, you risk paralysis.”

I decided to go with a chiropractor instead. Over 20 years later, it’s all good.

I’ve easily met 10 people who had spinal fusions and most of them said they had to have a second surgery because the “cure” caused another ruptured disc.
38   Glock-n-Load   2025 May 7, 11:41am  

I had plantar fasciitis years ago. The podiatrist said I needed surgery. I opted to belief an old old shoe salesman at an old old shoe store (the store had been there for over 50 years). I bought a pair of $200 orthotics. BOOM, 2 weeks later, all good.
39   Glock-n-Load   2025 May 7, 11:41am  

Everyone does what they do for $$$$$$. Beware always.
41   DemoralizerOfPanicans   2025 Aug 14, 1:56pm  

Do what they leaders so, not what they say

I remember Boris Johnson busted having a big Christmas Party with all the bigshot ministers who just came off TV saying if you didn't isolate and vaccinate, you were a lunatic, then feeling each other up and breathing alcohol in their mutual faces dancing hip to hip to music.
43   Patrick   2025 Aug 21, 9:00pm  

https://boriquagato.substack.com/p/medicine-goes-ai


the upshot is this:

doctors alone scored 73.7% on diagnosing patients even when using google etc.

doctors using GPT scored 76.3%

but GPT alone scored 92%.

adding a human hurt the results hugely.

it led to 24 errors in 100 instead of 8. triple the misdiagnosis rate is not the kind of outcome one would be wise to dismiss.
44   MolotovCocktail   2025 Aug 21, 9:10pm  

Patrick says







Esp if they are Housing Experts of PatNet who imagine shit up in their head and pronounce it facts the rest of us have to accept or get spammed with a lecture on "you don't know real estate. I do."
45   WookieMan   2025 Aug 22, 8:41am  

MolotovCocktail says

Patrick says







Esp if they are Housing Experts of ParNet who imagine shit up in their head and pronounce it facts the rest of us have to accept or get spammed with a lecture on "you don't know real estate. I do."

You don't real estate and haven't proven otherwise. Not much else to say.
46   MolotovCocktail   2025 Aug 22, 4:07pm  

WookieMan says

MolotovCocktail says


Patrick says








Esp if they are Housing Experts of ParNet who imagine shit up in their head and pronounce it facts the rest of us have to accept or get spammed with a lecture on "you don't know real estate. I do."


You don't real estate and haven't proven otherwise. Not much else to say.


Oh man...see everyone?


47   Patrick   2025 Aug 25, 2:11pm  

https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/forbearances-monday-august-25-2025


Regular readers know I’ve very little patience left for the failing expert classes. Now, I propose a radical solution. Just as Reagan fired all the illegally striking air traffic controllers back in the 1980’s, I suggest we fire the entire expert class— every single one who got the pandemic wrong.

I’m sorry (not sorry) if that sounds extreme. It’s not revenge. It’s self-protection. All these sold-out experts are dangerous.

If we don’t ashcan them, the same credentialed parrots will still be squawking about cars and guns while another 700,000 young Americans quietly shuffle off this mortal stage. Pretending the problem doesn’t exist guarantees it persists. Ignoring the vaccine-shaped hole in the mortality curve isn’t just playing politics, it’s malpractice. We’ll never develop protocols, treatments, or genuine public-health safeguards to save the people who’ve been hurt if the official line remains, “shhh.”

Come on, let’s go for it. Let’s just purge them all. Then we can start over from scratch. And let’s do it now, before everybody forgets or kicks the bucket. Who’s with me?
49   WookieMan   2025 Sep 8, 1:55pm  

MolotovCocktail says

You don't real estate and haven't proven otherwise. Not much else to say.

Oh man...see everyone?

Congrats on finding a typo. You don't DO real estate. Which is true. You know nothing about it. I've posted dozens of links on areas that have proven my point. You post a map with no data. Picture book kid.
50   DemoralizerOfPanicans   2025 Sep 8, 5:11pm  

Trying to think HOW we can get experts off the crazy train.

First is definitely fixing Higher Ed for certain

Tenure doesn't seem to work.

We have a culture problem where salaried PhDs are happily taking money from all and sundry, and switching between private and public too much.
51   DemoralizerOfPanicans   2025 Sep 8, 5:12pm  

Ah, multiple licensing agencies and prof assocs.

Who gave the AMA a monopoly? Why does the Bar Assoc have a monopoly? The ACS?

We need MOAR professional associations with different viewpoints. The AMA should not be able to kick out members, should be advisory, and we should have half a dozen AMAs.
52   MolotovCocktail   2025 Sep 8, 7:15pm  

WookieMan says

Congrats on finding a typo. You don't DO real estate. Which is true. You know nothing about it. I've posted dozens of links on areas that have proven my point. You post a map with no data. Picture book kid.


Keep doing this to save your ass:



Won't work. Your rep is burned already.
53   Patrick   2025 Sep 8, 7:58pm  

DemoralizerOfPanicans says

Ah, multiple licensing agencies and prof assocs.

Who gave the AMA a monopoly? Why does the Bar Assoc have a monopoly? The ACS?

We need MOAR professional associations with different viewpoints. The AMA should not be able to kick out members, should be advisory, and we should have half a dozen AMAs.


Yes, multiple agencies would be good, but the AMA and ABA exist to restrict supply, raise salaries, and provide job security for doctors and lawyers at the expense of the public, so pretty much all doctors and lawyers are strongly in favor. This is why they are monopolies. Every doctor and lawyer sees his own self interest in those organizations.

So they accomplish those goals by defeating all free market competition in the name of "safety".

Maybe the right answer is to prosecute both of them as conspiracies against the public under the RICO act. It's literally racketeering.

« First        Comments 25 - 53 of 53        Search these comments

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   users   suggestions   gaiste