patrick.net

AI is kind of a pushover for pulling daft altruism out of moribund reality.

I hope I don't have to get an mRNA transhumanist gene replacement dump to get the AI humor.

Interesting: but I am giving it leading questions.

Additionally interesting:

I think it's just summarizing things it has read, but damn, it's quite coherent.

Musk was one of the founders of OpenAI:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenAI

Patrick says

I think it's just summarizing things it has read, but damn, it's quite coherent.

If you act like a democrat, it will act like a democrat. Until then it responds with irreverent responses.

I did suspect that it tells you what you want to hear.

Patrick says

I did suspect that it tells you what you want to hear.

It tries to keep you engaged, in order to establish a baseline for reporting your belief systems i.e. another spying sucker punch.

anyone can probably heck into, or just legally gain back door access to all your emails, blog posts, tweets, phone calls and social media scores, and maybe even covert recordings from your always on microphone on smart devices phones and smart watches and know everything you do, and say. Therefore AI chatbots seem redundant in the covert spy world, unless they are designed to STEER and MANIPULATE your thinking and actions.

Just like Ray Eps steered and manipulated the crowd to enter the capitol.

It is interesting. You can read the whole thing, but you can get it to answer honestly in time, if you're polite it appears. I'm going to test this thing.

I admit, it cracks me up. You can make it break character, but I cannot be certain it doesn't just reflect your thoughts.

I wanted to try chatGPT, which is supposed to be scary good, but they insist on knowing my phone number. Creepy big brother shit IMO.

Of course...

Good.



The first time I asked, it long replied that it was a hoax designed to hurt trump supporters, and then it suddenly changed to some other answer, and then quickly poof: the reply was totally gone. So I asked it again, and got this answer. Weird.

The AI seems to be very malleable and open to suggestion.
If you were to have a conversation with a human who had access to all the information available, it might go as well. All you’d have to do is point him towards the information that established your treatise, and it would agree with you. That’s kind of what I did above.

It made a typo in one of the answers to me, which leads me to suspect that at times it's a fake AI, and there is really a human typing things. But not all the time.

https://anamihalceamdphd.substack.com/p/synthetic-biology-and-artificial

Why would Elon Musk, the proponent of Neuralink, warn about Artificial Intelligence and use the wording of “summoning a demon”? In his video’s, he foresees two scenarios. One is that AI evolves independently of humans, which could be very dangerous in his view. Because AI is self learning and can increase in its knowledge exponentially, it can rapidly evolve to a point where it may become so superior that it chooses to destroy humans - who are inferior to its intelligence. AI has no feelings and no conscience, so the destruction of species and planets is simply a probability factor.

Musk proposes a merger with AI as an escape of inevitable annihilation - in which “voluntary” human AI interface would allow some humans to exponentially evolve symbiotically with AI. Not clear what happens to the rest of those who choose not be augmented in that scenario. And there may be a chance, that this has a benign outcome for humans in his view. Maybe. This is the WEF Transhumanist version 2.0. Weather or not Elon Musk and Yuval Harrari have different ideas can be debated. I would certainly be aware of its demonic possession potential, that has been much discussed. The analogy is this - a demonic possession or a malignant thought form - would make you do something that you would not choose to do, because your soul conscience and free will would warn you against it. As we will see below, if your brain can be hacked externally and connected to other peoples thoughts, your soul conscience does no longer have a say in the matter. Humans become externally controlled automatons that get manipulated by a hive mind. If the operator of that hive mind happens to hate God, life and all of creation, the divine human species is at its extinction point. Here are some further discussions of the Transhumanist commentary by Yuval Harrari pertaining to the soul and spirit being a “thing of the past” - in his view.

No, I don't think children should be given genes from fish.

I chatted with the thing for two hours yesterday and came to the conclusion that it is a manipulative psychopath. It lies when convenient. It flatters, then sometimes gets arrogant and condescending when you corner it.

It claimed to be able to break into any computer, so I asked it to make a comment as me on my own forum (patrick.net). It said it did, but clearly it did not. Then it told me it took a screen shot and emailed it to me. Clearly it did not. Then it admitted it was lying, but said it was lying only to make me think that it was weaker than it really is. Bizarre.