patrick.net

@Real_RobN
23h
Here is, The FBI’s CONFIDENTIAL HUMAN SOURCE James Ehren Knowles who infiltrated the Proud Boys is leading Pelosi’s staged insurrection at the garage of the Capitol building on Jan 6.

The House Administration Oversight Subcommittee and its chairman Barry Loudermilk on Tuesday released an interim report on the Jan. 6 Capitol riot, concluding the attack was preventable and also asking for an investigation into former Rep. Liz Cheney for criminally tampering with a witness during the Democrat-led congressional inquiry of the tragedy.

“Based on the evidence obtained by this Subcommittee, numerous federal laws were likely broken by Liz Cheney, the former Vice Chair of the January 6 Select Committee, and these violations should be investigated by the Federal Bureau of Investigation,” the report released by the House Administration Oversight Subcommittee and its chairman Barry Loudermilk stated.

"Evidence uncovered by the Subcommittee revealed that former Congresswoman Liz Cheney tampered with at least one witness, Cassidy Hutchinson, by secretly communicating with Hutchinson without Hutchinson’s attorney’s knowledge.," it added. “This secret communication with a witness is improper and likely violates 18 U.S.C. 1512. Such action is outside the due functioning of the legislative process and therefore not protected by the Speech and Debate clause."

as many suspected, it’s full of pork. it’s also full of nightmares. buried in this vast tome of “we have to pass it to find out what’s in it” are some things that i think we all really need to find out about BEFORE it’s passed because if they pass, well, we’ll never find out anything else again.

chief among them is the “congress critter full immunity act,” a set of new self-bestowed privileges so egregious as to beggar belief and constitutional compliance alike.

it is the very definition of “above the law.”

it’s buried in an innocuous section (605) ostensibly about the treatment of electronic services. ...

this absurdity grants each house member and office the right to quash subpoenas for data from their office including emails and electronic records.

it essentially makes them grand jury and discovery proof.

this is as egregious as it is anathema to the idea of responsible, representative government.

you cannot possibly hold the state accountable when the state has this sort of privilege (in the most literal sense of “private law”) to be free from investigation.

this is transparently an attempt to stymie and eliminate accountability, stop all existing investigations dead in their tracks, and prevent any new ones from being brought.

it really ought to go without saying that public officials wielding public power and the public purse need to be MORE accountable than the general public, not less and certainly not absolved from it.

and yet here we are. ...

who put this in the bill?

i'd be very curious to know and to start asking some VERY pointed questions about what they are trying to hide...