First of all the only time that ever becomes an issue is during election season. So I give those charges zero credibility.
Secondly until the establishment decided it was a good way to get rid of White Males and push the Queering agenda only in the last two decades. Before that, 16 was considered age of consent always. To look back now at people in their 20's that dated girls between 16 and 18 and wag your finger at them based on current political climate. I don't get all up in a huff.. If there was no pollical benefit in imperiling potlicians in old unproven charges, then it wouldn't be any issue. It's not like the same idiots that dig up these stories against populist Republican candidates, themselves are pedophiles championing diddling children under 12. It amazes me the outrage at young women decades ago put themselves out there for men 10 years older than them, but there's not as much outrage at the sexualization of elementary and preschoolers.
More over the details surrounding the made up charges against Matt changes every time it comes back up to stop him, prevent him or remove him.
patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,197,624 comments by 14,114 users - NuttBoxer, Onvacation online now