3
0

CDC Finally Releases VAERS Safety Monitoring Analyses For Wuhan Virus Vaccines


 invite response                
2023 Jan 9, 10:27pm   434 views  3 comments

by Patrick   ➕follow (60)   💰tip   ignore  

https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/cdc-finally-releases-vaers-safety-monitoring-analyses-covid-vaccines


CDC’s VAERS safety signal analysis based on reports from Dec. 14, 2020 – July 29, 2022 for mRNA COVID-19 vaccines shows clear safety signals for death and a range of highly concerning thrombo-embolic, cardiac, neurological, hemorrhagic, hematological, immune-system and menstrual adverse events (AEs) among U.S. adults.

There were 770 different types of adverse events that showed safety signals in ages 18+, of which over 500 (or 2/3) had a larger safety signal than myocarditis/pericarditis.

The CDC analysis shows that the number of serious adverse events reported in less than two years for mRNA COVID-19 vaccines is 5.5 times larger than all serious reports for vaccines given to adults in the US since 2009 (~73,000 vs. ~13,000).

Twice as many mRNA COVID-19 vaccine reports were classified as serious compared to all other vaccines given to adults (11% vs. 5.5%). This meets the CDC definition of a safety signal.

There are 96 safety signals for 12-17 year-olds, which include: myocarditis, pericarditis, Bell’s Palsy, genital ulcerations, high blood pressure and heartrate, menstrual irregularities, cardiac valve incompetencies, pulmonary embolism, cardiac arrhythmias, thromboses, pericardial and pleural effusion, appendicitis and perforated appendix, immune thrombocytopenia, chest pain, increased troponin levels, being in intensive care, and having anticoagulant therapy.

There are 66 safety signals for 5-11 year-olds, which include: myocarditis, pericarditis, ventricular dysfunction and cardiac valve incompetencies, pericardial and pleural effusion, chest pain, appendicitis & appendectomies, Kawasaki’s disease, menstrual irregularities, vitiligo, and vaccine breakthrough infection.

The safety signals cannot be dismissed as due to “stimulated,” exaggerated, fraudulent or otherwise artificially inflated reporting, nor can they be dismissed due to the huge number of COVID vaccines administered. There are several reasons why, but the simplest one is this: the safety signal analysis does not depend on the number of reports, but whether or not some AEs are reported at a higher rate for these vaccines than for other non-COVID vaccines. Other reasons are discussed in the full post below.





https://twitter.com/P_McCulloughMD/status/1612620387199623169?ref_srpatrick.net


Just the tip of the iceberg! Worst safety report for bio-pharmaceutical agents in history! Should have been pulled from use by Feb 1, 2021. All involved will pay heavily in personal guilt, shame, and for some public proceedings bringing justice.

Comments 1 - 3 of 3        Search these comments

1   HeadSet   2023 Jan 10, 6:34am  

Patrick says

All involved will pay heavily in personal guilt, shame, and for some public proceedings bringing justice.

Nope. The checks have already been cashed and this whole affair will gradually drop from sight.
2   PeopleUnited   2023 Jan 10, 6:46am  

HeadSet says

Patrick says


All involved will pay heavily in personal guilt, shame, and for some public proceedings bringing justice.

Nope. The checks have already been cashed and this whole affair will gradually drop from sight.

Meanwhile, people will continue to die suddenly.
3   HeadSet   2023 Jan 10, 11:01am  

PeopleUnited says

Meanwhile, people will continue to die suddenly.

Yes, and when the jabbed caused deaths can no longer be plausibly denied, the covidiots will say "True, the jab has caused a few deaths, but millions more would have dies from Covid without the jabs."

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions   gaiste