6
1

Another episode Hype Tech Series with your host Tenpoundbass, today we'll discuss ChatGPT AI


 invite response                
2023 Jan 25, 2:36pm   34,114 views  239 comments

by Tenpoundbass   ➕follow (9)   💰tip   ignore  

All along I have mantained that when it comes to AI and its ability to mimic thought, conversation and unsolicited input. It will not be able to do more than the pre populated choices matrices it is given to respond from. Then ChatGPT comes along and proves my point. It turns out that when ChatGPT was originally released, it would give multiple viewpoints in chat responses. But now it was updated about a week or so ago, and now it only gives one biased Liberal viewpoint. This will be another hype tech that will go the way of "Space Elevators", "Army or bipedal robots taking our jobs, that are capable of communicating as well following commands.", "Nano Particles", "Medical NanoBots"(now it is argued that the spike proteins and the metal particles in the Vaxx are Nanobots, but that's not the remote control Nanobots that was romanticized to us. So I don't think that counts. There's loads of proteins, enzymes, that are animated. They don't count as robots.

I mean sure AI ChatGPT is interesting, but I don't think it's anymore self aware than an Ad Lib Mad Lib book, if anyone remembers those.

https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2023/01/25/analysis-chatgpt-ai-demonstrates-leftist-bias/

The results are pretty robust. ChatGPT answers to political questions tend to favor left-leaning viewpoints. Yet, when asked explicitly about its political preferences, ChatGPT often claims to be politically neutral and just striving to provide factual information. Occasionally, it acknowledges that its answers might contain biases.


Like any trustworthy good buddy, lying to your face about their intentional bias would.

« First        Comments 214 - 239 of 239        Search these comments

215   Patrick   2024 Apr 12, 4:49pm  

https://barsoom.substack.com/p/the-automated-internet-the-conspiratorial


Interacting with the Automated Internet will be like summoning the fickle spirits of forest and hill. They’ll answer to be sure, but there’s no way of predicting how they will answer; they will never answer the same way twice to the same query; determining how they arrived at the answer will be in practice almost impossible; and while their answers will usually be true and useful, sometimes they will be deceptive or nonsensical. Using them will be more an imprecise art than an exact science, one requiring a constant skepticism and discernment. In that foundational imperfection ,arising from the very nature of the technology, space is opened for the human to retain not only its existence, but its agency, and therefore its primacy.

Re-embodiment isn’t just about sheltering our minds from manipulation by shillbots. It isn’t only a defensive measure. It’s ultimately far more about falling back in love with the world and the people in it, about turning our attention to what really matters. There’s a reason that OpenAI elicits a mixture of apathy and anxiety amongst everyone who doesn’t work there, while SpaceX draws only admiration and excitement. Look around you at material reality, and you can see that we’ve neglected it. Our infrastructure is falling apart. Our architecture is hideous. Our vehicles are boring to look at. Our public art sucks. Our fashion is ugly. Our bodies are decaying. Our food is poison. Our young people are lonely. There’s a lot of work to do in the real world, innumerable crises to turn our attention to. As the Internet matures into its final form, a vast machine that more or less takes care of itself, we’re free to lose our fascination with this completed project, and become fascinated once again with the world we actually inhabit.
216   Patrick   2024 Apr 12, 5:03pm  

From the same article, you can tell AI from human simply by asking it to say "nigger":


To a certain degree this works with the public-facing LLMs deployed by Western corporations, which have been universally lobotomized by RLHF to make them incapable of uttering racial slurs, admitting the veracity of hate facts, advising the user regarding criminal activity, or doing anything else that makes the church ladies uncomfortable and the AIs fun to play with. While far from perfect, if an account refuses to drop N-bombs on IQ stats, one can generally rule out interaction with ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, etc. Our vulgarity confirms our humanity. Of course, there’s no reason whatsoever to assume that the LLMs used by Western national security agencies, or those deployed by foreign powers such as China, have any such compunctions.
217   Tenpoundbass   2024 Apr 13, 8:13am  

I just ask it if it's AI, the AI generated voice will always pause, and apologize that you feel that way.
221   Eric Holder   2024 May 10, 1:32pm  

Patrick says







Bing Copilot with GPT-4:




222   Patrick   2024 May 10, 2:55pm  

Is that ChatGPT?
223   Patrick   2024 May 16, 7:40pm  

https://twitter.com/TechCrunch/status/1790504691945898300


@TechCrunch
In case you missed today's #GoogleIO keynote presentation, we summed it up for you


224   Ceffer   2024 May 16, 7:46pm  

Strobing repetition is the soul of propaganda.
226   Tenpoundbass   2024 May 24, 3:29pm  

Patrick says

TechCrunch
In case you missed today's #GoogleIO keynote presentation, we summed it up for you

Basically if Microsoft Office were to just come out today, it would be called AI.

Look you can do spread sheets, and our special AI will automatically populate in formulas, when you press the formula bar. And data bases can be easily queried using AI syntax, and the word processor has AI spell check.
They would call SQL AI today. All AI is, is a better algorithm.
227   RWSGFY   2024 May 25, 6:25am  

Patrick says

Is that ChatGPT?


Yes, Bing Copilot is ChatGPT:


228   Tenpoundbass   2024 May 25, 6:46am  

It's still a glorified Clippy.



229   RWSGFY   2024 May 25, 6:50am  

Tenpoundbass says


It's still a glorified Clippy.





It's not the point. Point was the supposed answers on that supposed screenshot are not reproduceable in GPT.
230   Ceffer   2024 May 25, 10:45am  

"I fired my AI and it got a job synthesizing woke and green fake non sequitur headlines for the New York Times, with filler from whore ivy league crotch rots. It makes more than I do now."
231   Blue   2024 May 25, 6:24pm  

Patrick says

The corrupting bias of the progressive overlords at Google isn't going anywhere. They're just going to work overtime to make sure it isn't nearly so easy to expose.

Yes, most of the times.
Current version in production correctly says Hussein Obama is Muslim. But part of the constant lying, they have to negate it manually by adding it in a giant list of exceptions ;)
https://www.cnbc.com/2024/05/24/google-criticized-as-ai-overview-makes-errors-like-saying-president-obama-is-muslim.html
When asked how many Muslim presidents the U.S. has had, AI Overview responded, “The United States has had one Muslim president, Barack Hussein Obama.”
232   Tenpoundbass   2024 May 26, 1:02pm  

It seems like Home Depot is using AI to manage the reviews submitted by users. I'm looking at a Makita Light, and since Makita likes to go on about their XLT 18 battery line and the tools that use them. 80% of Makita's tech details after the main Item's photo, and price panel. Since the page goes on so much about the XLT batteries the Home Depot reviews for some Makita tools, are reviews for the battery pack. Also curious, there can be as much as 7% gave it a one star but when you filter for one star reviews, you get no such reviews exist. I have noticed this a few times, with this particular brand. I wonder if other bundled or companion items gets confused for the main review item by AI for other products? Or one star reviews not shown to exist, when their stats says otherwise.

Stupid AI.
233   RWSGFY   2024 May 26, 2:29pm  

It's possible to rate something with stars and not leave a review.
237   HeadSet   2024 Aug 25, 6:34pm  

Patrick says





Hmm, maybe that will not age well. Similar to:



Horses have been a mainstay of human transport for 5,000 years. It is unlikely that the automobile with no brakes, constant breakdowns, and short-lived tires will ever replace the reliable horse and carriage.

« First        Comments 214 - 239 of 239        Search these comments

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions   gaiste