6
1

Another episode Hype Tech Series with your host Tenpoundbass, today we'll discuss ChatGPT AI


 invite response                
2023 Jan 25, 2:36pm   34,120 views  239 comments

by Tenpoundbass   ➕follow (10)   💰tip   ignore  

All along I have mantained that when it comes to AI and its ability to mimic thought, conversation and unsolicited input. It will not be able to do more than the pre populated choices matrices it is given to respond from. Then ChatGPT comes along and proves my point. It turns out that when ChatGPT was originally released, it would give multiple viewpoints in chat responses. But now it was updated about a week or so ago, and now it only gives one biased Liberal viewpoint. This will be another hype tech that will go the way of "Space Elevators", "Army or bipedal robots taking our jobs, that are capable of communicating as well following commands.", "Nano Particles", "Medical NanoBots"(now it is argued that the spike proteins and the metal particles in the Vaxx are Nanobots, but that's not the remote control Nanobots that was romanticized to us. So I don't think that counts. There's loads of proteins, enzymes, that are animated. They don't count as robots.

I mean sure AI ChatGPT is interesting, but I don't think it's anymore self aware than an Ad Lib Mad Lib book, if anyone remembers those.

https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2023/01/25/analysis-chatgpt-ai-demonstrates-leftist-bias/

The results are pretty robust. ChatGPT answers to political questions tend to favor left-leaning viewpoints. Yet, when asked explicitly about its political preferences, ChatGPT often claims to be politically neutral and just striving to provide factual information. Occasionally, it acknowledges that its answers might contain biases.


Like any trustworthy good buddy, lying to your face about their intentional bias would.

« First        Comments 160 - 199 of 239       Last »     Search these comments

161   AmericanKulak   2024 Jan 17, 10:16am  

stereotomy says


Gout - figure out what triggers it and stop eating it.

Marmite, sadly. Only one marmite sandwich every so often. Same with Franks.
162   Patrick   2024 Jan 29, 9:54am  

https://notthebee.com/article/creatives-fight-back-with-nightshade-a-new-software-that-poisons-ai-models


Creatives fight back with Nightshade, a new software that “poisons” AI models.

Computer scientists at the University of Chicago have developed two free softwares to combat AI scraping.

Their first software was called Glaze, and it works defensively by confusing AI, showing brush strokes and colors to the programs that aren't actually there, effectively disguising the artists' styles.

The second software is an offensive "poison" for AI programs called Nightshade.

Nightshade shows the data scraping programs images that aren't actually there.

"For example, human eyes might see a shaded image of a cow in a green field largely unchanged, but an AI model might see a large leather purse lying in the grass."

For someone using the AI programs, that means that if Nightshade infected images are scraped into the dataset, prompting AI to generate a cow flying in space, it might generate a purse in space instead.
165   Patrick   2024 Feb 20, 8:59am  

https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/suddenly-tuesday-february-20-2024


But paradoxically, the sudden appearance of this new technology is also even more mysterious than it seems, since all artificial intelligence-based technology sprouts from a common large-language model that even the developers admit they do not fully understand...

Maybe I’m wrong. But I cannot believe that an invention as significant as artificial intelligence sprang from some serendipitous lab accident. Post It notes — yes. Rubber — yes. Antibiotics — okay. But not artificial intelligence, which requires millions of lines of computer code to operate. Accidentally discovered? No. Impossible.

So then, where did the ‘spark’ of intelligence come from? Is A.I. demonic, a malicious gift whispered into the ear of some luckless scientist who sold their soul for access? Maybe. But my preferred theory is it was dished out of a DARPA skunkworks lab somewhere, for some sinister military purpose. I don’t know. I just find it utterly remarkable that developers say they don’t really understand how AI works — and everybody is just fine with that!
168   DemocratsAreTotallyFucked   2024 Feb 22, 11:05am  

Google AI generated image of a polar bear:


197   richwicks   2024 Feb 23, 8:04pm  

Patrick says





Ask it to draw pictures of Jewish males.

I'll bet you $100 that they aren't black.

« First        Comments 160 - 199 of 239       Last »     Search these comments

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions   gaiste