invite responseComments 1 - 5 of 5 Search these comments
1
Patrick
2023 Feb 16, 1:15pm
Patrick
2023 Feb 16, 1:15pm
> I do not have the expertise on this issue to come to my own conclusion independently. So I ask myself: “Do most virologists agree that the vaccine program was not a mistake?”
1. Nobel Prize winning virologist Luc Montagnier came out strongly against the vaxx and spoke repeatedly in public before dying mysteriously.
2. Dutch virologist Geert Vanden Bossche continuously publishes facts about the danger and inefficacy of the vaxx.
3. Virologist Robert Malone created the basic nanoparticle mechanism for getting mRNA into cells and is probably the best known voice against the vaxx.
What do they all have in common? They do not depend on funding from the NIH or NIAHD. But the majority of virologists depend on keeping a low profile on this issue if they want to remain funded and employed.
So I think it's a mistake to appeal to authority to uncover the mistakes and/or crimes of higher authorities that are funding and controlling them.
As an example of the kind of pressure applied to doctors and researchers, it is now illegal for any doctor in California to state any facts about the danger and inefficacy of the vaxx:
https://finance.yahoo.com/video/california-approves-bill-could-punish-155856954.html
Scientific "facts" are now decided exclusively by politicians. This is Lysenkoism. The US resembles the late Soviet Union more and more.
The Claifornia law is in force but is being challenged on 1st Amendment grounds. Nonetheless, the message has been very clearly delivered: state the facts and you will lose all the work you put into getting your medical license.
1. Nobel Prize winning virologist Luc Montagnier came out strongly against the vaxx and spoke repeatedly in public before dying mysteriously.
2. Dutch virologist Geert Vanden Bossche continuously publishes facts about the danger and inefficacy of the vaxx.
3. Virologist Robert Malone created the basic nanoparticle mechanism for getting mRNA into cells and is probably the best known voice against the vaxx.
What do they all have in common? They do not depend on funding from the NIH or NIAHD. But the majority of virologists depend on keeping a low profile on this issue if they want to remain funded and employed.
So I think it's a mistake to appeal to authority to uncover the mistakes and/or crimes of higher authorities that are funding and controlling them.
As an example of the kind of pressure applied to doctors and researchers, it is now illegal for any doctor in California to state any facts about the danger and inefficacy of the vaxx:
https://finance.yahoo.com/video/california-approves-bill-could-punish-155856954.html
Scientific "facts" are now decided exclusively by politicians. This is Lysenkoism. The US resembles the late Soviet Union more and more.
The Claifornia law is in force but is being challenged on 1st Amendment grounds. Nonetheless, the message has been very clearly delivered: state the facts and you will lose all the work you put into getting your medical license.
4
Shaman
2023 Feb 17, 7:30am
Shaman
2023 Feb 17, 7:30am
Why argue with dead people?
Sorry, I guess it’s a relative, but if the vax kills, he’s a dead man walking.
Sorry, I guess it’s a relative, but if the vax kills, he’s a dead man walking.
5
Tenpoundbass
2023 Feb 17, 8:22am
Tenpoundbass
2023 Feb 17, 8:22am
The Death rate is ten times that if they were to count all of the folks like my Mom that got a stroke and then got bedsores 4 days later and died. Or My friend Pito who got a stroke, then slowly died of organ failure over a year. I don't think they count those that get a Stroke, then their health deteriorates and dies. They wont count John Fetterman when he eventually dies. PIto was what I would have called Clinically depressed the last few months of his life. I was suggesting his ailment was being compounded by his frame of mind at the time. He was very negative, and depressed looking back. Fetterman checked into a Nuthouse yesterday got me thinking about that.
I think they are only counting people who fall over dead, on one shot, no other maladies before. I think if you survive the initial Heart Attack or Stroke, or what ever you get. Then they wont count it as a Vax death if you make it to live past that hospital visit. Even if you die a week later, it wont count.
I think they are only counting people who fall over dead, on one shot, no other maladies before. I think if you survive the initial Heart Attack or Stroke, or what ever you get. Then they wont count it as a Vax death if you make it to live past that hospital visit. Even if you die a week later, it wont count.
>
> My understanding is that most virologists support vaccine requirements. If I am wrong in believing that, then I would agree with you in this case.
There are now multiple lines of evidence that the C-19 vaccine is killing about 1 in 800 of the people who take it, globally, while the death rate from the virus itself keeps being retroactively revised downward to the point where it is not significantly different from the seasonal flu, an infection (not case) fatality rate of about 1 in 1000.
In all countries, insurance companies are reporting excess non-covid deaths in proportion to the fraction of the population which took the vaccine, about 300,000 in the US and 100,000 excess dead in Germany. A bit more than 6 million are dead globally directly from the vaxx so far, including my wife's co-worker Danielle: https://www.altamesafuneralhome.com/obituary/danielle-carmichael
Also, G. got tachycardia, a well-known effect, and my friend's ex-wife got myocarditis and was told by her doctor that it was a side effect of the vaxx.
It was known from the start that the vaccine (and masks) could not possibly have impeded transmission, and even Fauci now quietly admits this. Smallpox is a DNA-based virus which mutates slowly and has no animal reservoir. It is a sitting target. You can make a vaccine that will give lifetime immunity. Most respiratory viruses, like Wuhan Virus, are quickly-mutating RNA-based viruses which have large animal reservoirs. It keeps moving, fast. You can never make a vaccine that will give durable immunity.
In fact, your probability of getting the disease is proportional to how vaxxed you are, because of "Original Antigenic Sin" and immune system imprinting:
(UK)
(US)
(Japan)
Democrats are more likely to have taken the vaxx, and therefore more likely to know someone who dropped dead from it:
I've personally written epidemiologist Harvey Risch at Yale about this topic and gotten some good answers.
The problem is:
1. the cult refuses to acknowledge the depth of their error on the vaxx; it has become a purely religious belief intertwined with being a "good person"
2. NIH/NSAID funding is cut off for scientists who question Pfizer, and they may even get fired
3. the corporate media's top advertiser is Pfizer
4. the US DoD was extremely interested in trying out the new mRNA vaxx technology on masses of people for some reason