« First « Previous Comments 165 - 204 of 1,019 Next » Last » Search these comments
Is this a peaceful move, or, will this edge us closer to WW III?
NATO Looking to Send 300,000 Troops to the Russian Border
https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/rick-moran/2023/03/19/nato-looking-to-send-300000-troops-to-the-russian-border-n1679663
US Secretary Of State Rebuffs China - No Diplomatic Solution Without Total Russian Pullback (which is never going to happen)
Wunderwaffen being position for the WWIII: https://twitter.com/Seveerity/status/1638556341022121985?ref_src=patrick.net
AND THEY HAVE NOT EVEN STARTED USING T-34/85's!!!!
Hesitant to believe Russia will pull back. They want the land bridge to Crimea. Frankly they're idiots. Ukraine is no saint either. Negotiate a land deal.
RayAmerica says
US Secretary Of State Rebuffs China - No Diplomatic Solution Without Total Russian Pullback (which is never going to happen)
Hesitant to believe Russia will pull back. They want the land bridge to Crimea. Frankly they're idiots. Ukraine is no saint either. Negotiate a land deal. Give them their god damn road/rail and negotiate a resource deal for crops or whatever.
Ukraine is more corrupt, but Russia is just looking like a massive moron at this point. Negotiate. Give them money for the land you want with negotiations over resources. It's not complicated. They're going to piss away an entire generation of men and have demographic issues for decades. Russian women will flee to the west and Russia is fucked as usual for a century.
How would you sell to your constituence the idea of just giving up half of your country and turning it into a land-locked rump of its former self?
A strike Thursday by a suspected Iranian-made drone killed a U.S. contractor and wounded five American troops and another contractor in northeast Syria, the Pentagon said.
A little of topic here, but why would anyone use nukes when massive EMP's that rock us back to the stone age might be just as effective?
A little of topic here, but why would anyone use nukes when massive EMP's that rock us back to the stone age might be just as effective?
RedStar says
A little of topic here, but why would anyone use nukes when massive EMP's that rock us back to the stone age might be just as effective?
Isn't a nuke the method to make a massive EMP?
Yes. From what I understand of it, it's a nuclear bomb set off above the atmosphere. The atmosphere is charged, moving it suddenly creates a magnetic and electrical surge, this hits all circuits with eddy currents, and it blows everything out.
One thing I do wonder is how many Western Contractors are there.
Chances are such a low number are trainers for small groups of UA. It's too few to be advisors.
One thing I do wonder is how many Western Contractors are there.
« First « Previous Comments 165 - 204 of 1,019 Next » Last » Search these comments
"President Vladimir Putin on Tuesday suspended Russian participation in the last remaining nuclear arms control treaty with the United States, warning Washington that Russia had put new ground-based strategic nuclear weapons on combat duty," Reuters reports of the new declaration.
https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/putin-suspends-new-start-nuclear-treaty-puts-new-missiles-combat-readiness