patrick.net

It was a classic Trumpian third way. Allow me to summarize. Trump just admitted, for the first time, that the shots might not have been as great as he’s always thought. But not only that. The President just said:

Some people fairly think mRNA stinks.
The fight over mRNA is tearing the CDC apart — so it must be resolved.
It’s not his fault — President Trump relied on Pfizer data.
Pfizer hid the data.

He allowed that Operation Warp Speed might not have been “brilliant,” and if not, he wants answers.

He wants answers NOW.

Trump’s Truth wasn’t just venting or blame-dodging; it was political judo. By demanding immediately Pfizer release its “extraordinary” internal data, he boxed them in. If they produce the data, Kennedy’s team will dissect it. If they don’t, Trump will say, “See, they’re hiding something.” If Pfizer denies that it ever gave Trump secret data, then they open up the court of public opinion, and the trial begins.

Meanwhile, all of it allows for the possibility that Trump might’ve been tricked. He’s tilting in Kennedy’s direction.

Call it throwing down a gauntlet, letting a genie out of a bottle, or crossing the jabby Rubicon— whichever, Trump’s post is a tipping point of no return.

But maybe most importantly, Trump just ripped off the media’s bandaid of pretense that all the CDC hysteria is just about vaccines in general, or firing of directors, or anything else. He just nailed the debate to the church door: it’s about the jabs.

He has, once again, co-opted and occupied the media narrative. Nobody will want to talk about anything else now. ...

But this morning, when Trump essentially said, “Maybe Warp Speed wasn’t brilliant, maybe Pfizer’s hiding data, maybe the jabs themselves are the issue,” he named the unnameable.

That instantly redefined the entire conflict.

Let me be clear: this isn’t a fight to save a shelved vaccine technology. This is an existential fight for Democrats, and Trump picked the fight now, right as primary season is heating up.

Two things happened yesterday following President Trump’s explosive Labor Day vaccine post. First, only second-tier media (CNN, CNBC, USA Today, Axios, etc) covered the story, delicately and tentatively. Second, and much more telling, the nonstop, wall-to-wall coverage of the CDC-Kennedy controversy completely disappeared. Shazam! Trump nuked the narrative. Let’s start with STAT News’s story, headlined, “Trump says CDC is ‘being ripped apart’ over Covid products, calls for drugmakers to prove their benefits.”

The experts are spinning; they haven’t quite yet decided what to say about the President’s vaccine post. Which means nobody’s told them the new narrative yet.

“Experienced observers of the Trump administration were uncertain what to make of the Truth Social post,” STAT reported, “viewing it as being akin to a Rorschach test.” In other words: “the anti-vaxxers love it, they think he’s saying Pfizer lied to him,” an anonymous ‘former official’ explained. “The public health people like it too, they think he’s trying to create daylight with RFK.”

But, “I would not want to be (Pfizer CEO) Al Bourla today,” the former official added. ...

As for the big corporate media players— it’s not fair to say they completely ignored the story. To be sure, they didn’t report Trump’s post, but they dropped the rope on the exploding CDC narrative like they’d just realized they were holding the business end of a coral snake.

And, as we expected, conservative social media was completely consumed by Trump’s post yesterday. ...

Trump flipped the burden.

It’s not Secretary Kennedy’s job, to prove their shots are unsafe. It’s Pfizer and Moderna’s job to prove they’re safe— in public, under the lights, and without the protection of captured regulators. And to “do it NOW.”

Although Trump only named Pfizer (the household name), every other mRNA player heard the message, too, loud and clear. ...

In other words, the debate is no longer about Monarez, the CDC, satanic scientists, HEP-B, or “trust in science.” Trump yanked pharma onto the stage and nailed the issue to the wall: it’s the mRNA jabs themselves. From here on out, every defender and every critic will fight on that ground, where Kennedy is strongest and Pfizer has the most to lose.

The FDA is conducting an “intense investigation” into the deaths of young, healthy children following COVID-19 vaccination, the agency’s commissioner confirmed in a CNN interview last week.

“We’re going to release a report in the coming few weeks,” Dr. Marty Makary, head of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), told CNN’s Jake Tapper. “We’re talking to the primary sources, the family members who lost a child … we’re reviewing the autopsy reports, we’re having physicians do the investigation,” he said. ...

Cardiologist Dr. Peter McCullough said the investigation is “very late” and should also examine adult post-vaccination deaths, adding that administration of the COVID-19 vaccines should be halted pending the outcome of such an investigation.

He said:

“Starting with the pediatric deaths is an anemic start, as we expect that he will review all … cases and the dozens of peer-reviewed manuscripts that have analyzed these cases. Any such investigation should be done after any further vaccination is halted, so more deaths do not occur under the new FDA administration.”

Epidemiologist Nicolas Hulscher agreed. He called the investigation “a breath of fresh air” but said it “should have been initiated a long time ago — in 2021.”

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) vaccine advisory board had its chance.

On Friday, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP)—newly reconstituted with members who were supposed to prioritize transparency under HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.—could have finally taken action on what’s become impossible to ignore: COVID-19 shots are contaminated with plasmid DNA carrying human gene segments (here) capable of integrating into recipients’ genomes.

COVID shots have been linked to 38,773 deaths and a total of 1,666,646 adverse events, per CDC VAERS data—and since the Harvard Pilgrim study commissioned by HHS found that fewer than 1% of vaccine injuries are ever reported to VAERS, the true numbers are likely far higher.

There are exploding rates of myocarditis and pericarditis, a surge of aggressive “turbo cancers,” widespread reports of menstrual irregularities and fertility concerns, documented immune suppression after repeated doses, and a complete lack of long-term safety testing for cancer, genetic damage, or autoimmune disease.

But ACIP refused to issue any warning.

Ages 6 Months to 64 Years: ‘Individual Decision-Making’

All 12 members voted unanimously that for people ages 6 months through 64 years, COVID vaccination should be based on “individual-based decision making.”

The panel emphasized that the risk-benefit is “most favorable” for people at higher risk of severe COVID and “lowest” for healthy people.

In other words, COVID shots remain recommended as a legitimate option, with no statement advising against them.

Age 65 and Older: ‘Shared Clinical Decision-Making’

For older adults (65 and up), ACIP moved away from its prior blanket recommendation that all seniors should get the vaccine.

Now, the board says decisions should be made through “shared clinical decision-making,” meaning patients are told to consult their healthcare providers on whether to take the shot.

But again—no warning, no reversal, no acknowledgment of the gene-contaminated injections.

COVID Shots Now Easier to Access—No Prescription Required

ACIP also considered whether states should require prescriptions for COVID shots.

That vote split 6–6, with Chair Martin Kulldorff breaking the tie against the measure.

The result?

No prescriptions required.

COVID shots remain open-access, widely available at pharmacies, and—thanks to ACIP’s recommendation—still covered by insurance.

A Hollow Pivot

By softening its language for seniors and shifting younger age groups into “individual choice” framing, ACIP creates the illusion of restraint.

In reality, the panel kept COVID shots on the table for all Americans while burying the growing evidence of risk.

Bottom Line

ACIP had the power to do what the evidence demands—recommend against COVID shots altogether.

Instead, the board doubled down on keeping them in circulation.

CHD Asks FDA to Revoke COVID Vaccine Licenses, Calls on Public to Submit ‘Hundreds of Thousands’ of Comments

Children’s Health Defense filed a Citizen Petition with the FDA, urging the agency to revoke all existing licenses granted to the Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines.

On Monday, CHD filed a Citizen Petition with the FDA and is urging the public, including healthcare workers, parents and military members, to submit comments on the petition. ...

CHD calls on the public to submit comments on FDA’s website

The FDA is now obligated to review the petition and respond within 180 days, although the agency may extend that timeline.

In the meantime, CHD said it hopes that hundreds of thousands of people will read the petition on the FDA’s website, and express their support — sharing their thoughts and experiences.

We first became suspicious of the safety of the mRNA injections when my wife's co-worker dropped dead shortly after taking it:

https://www.altamesafuneralhome.com/obituary/danielle-carmichael

Then my father-in-law developed tachycardia after taking the mRNA injection. This required surgery to correct.

Then a friend's wife developed myocarditis after taking the mRNA injection. Her doctor admitted that the mRNA was almost certainly the cause, but refused to report the incident on VAERS because he was afraid for his medical license.

Then several more such cases happened to people we know.

I have no doubt that the mRNA injections are extremely dangerous. The continued lies from the medical establishment about this danger have destroyed their credibility.

In addition, it was obviously an outright lie that the mRNA injections were effective at preventing infection or transmission. Everyone I know who got the mRNA also got infected with the virus, yet many who did not get the mRNA remained free of infection. This looks like strong negative efficacy.

These lies and the coercion to inject the dangerous mRNA are perhaps the worst crimes against humanity ever committed, given the global scale of the crimes.

One further comment: your use of the Google ReCaptcha spyware hands over all data on this page to Google, as does every use of 3rd party javascript. This is a gross violation of privacy and blurs the lines between the government and Google.