by Zak ➕follow (0) 💰tip ignore
Comments 1 - 18 of 18 Search these comments
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/supreme-court-strikes-down-bidens-plan-to-forgive-student-loan-debt-154017599.html
Supreme Court strikes down Biden's plan to forgive student loan debt
Those who were granted a pause will have to resume making interest payments on Sept. 1 and regular payments due starting in October.
WASHINGTON, D.C. — Leftists are devastated this morning after the Supreme Court passed down a new ruling that will ban robbing those who didn't attend college to pay for the expensive and useless degrees of those who did.
"If the useless poor can't pay for my $300,000 Diversity and Belonging Doctorate degree, what good are they?" said Dr. Mikayla Barnes, a local Starbucks shift manager. "What am I supposed to do now? Work more? I'm ruined!"
Sources say this tragic ruling will adversely affect the lives of thousands of feminists who will no longer be able to afford blue hair dye, and may now have to find a rich man to marry them. "How could the poors be so coldhearted to our suffering?" said Barnes. "Curse you, Clarence Thomas!"
At publishing time, Democrats had been rocked by further tragedy as SCOTUS ruled you can't force Christians to do gay stuff.
Allow the student loan forgiveness proposed, with this requirement - the university the debt was incurred to first has the opportunity to cover the cost of the forgiveness.
If the university does not cover 85% of all requested loan forgivenesses, they are barred from having students at their institution receive ANY further federal loan assistance, until such time as the 85% is remitted.
The reason student loans are controlled by the Federal government is to enslave the population purposely. Student loans are considered an ASSET by the Federal government, they will NEVER be forgiven.
I hear you but surely the conservatives realize this but why don't they oppose student loans?
"Biden made a campaign promise to forgive student loan debt on a wide scale. With that plan upended, the administration has made a point to showcase smaller tranches of forgiveness, which now total $132 billion for several million borrowers."
The real issue is the bloating percentage of admin staff! If admins are cut 90% so does the cost then no one needs loan.
First, universities are supposed to be educating students. If they can't educate them with a basic financial understanding of the value of their major vs the cost of student loans over a student's life, do they deserve to be educating ANY student?
Given that, here is what I propose:
Allow the student loan forgiveness proposed, with this requirement - the university the debt was incurred to first has the opportunity to cover the cost of the forgiveness.
If the university does not cover 85% of all requested loan forgivenesses, they are barred from having students at their institution receive ANY further federal loan assistance, until such time as the 85% is remitted.
Note: if the university is doing its job, 85% of any assistance requests from its school will be a very small number. If it isn't doing its job, and its a large number, they are stopped from getting federal loan guarantees as those seem to be a bad risk at the institution.