patrick.net

So: the sneakers, here's my explanation of it:


original link


This is video (from what I could find) of where the sneakers APPARENTLY change color. The video is slowed down to 1/8th the speed, and there's also a link to the original source I got it from.

If you can find better sources of ANY of the videos, post them, and I will review to see if I'm incorrect.

My opinion is that the color of the sneakers appear to be different depending on viewing angle, or this is an artifact of encoding. You can see this effect in the video provided.

richwicks says

My opinion is that the color of the sneakers appear to be different depending on viewing angle, or this is an artifact of encoding. You can see this effect in the video provided.

How do you explain...
1) The white stripes of the shoes are much different
2) There is an actual shoe manufactured that looks like the one she is wearing when dead.

Even if the colors change because of encoding, is it not interesting that he colors and shapes would mimic a shoe that is in production?

My current thought is that this tranny was recruited by an activist org who radicalized her and sent her like a suicide drone against that school. Her text messages clearly indicate that she didn’t intend or expect to survive this and that she wanted to die. They also imply that she had an extreme level of commitment to this course of action, which usually comes from the expectations of others pushing her along.

GNL says

richwicks says

My opinion is that the color of the sneakers appear to be different depending on viewing angle, or this is an artifact of encoding. You can see this effect in the video provided.

How do you explain...
1) The white stripes of the shoes are much different.

They aren't. Pant cuffs further up on downed body, lower when the shooter was standing up. The leg is bent (and at quite a severe angle) on the downed body, that would explain why the pant cuff is further up and obscuring the sneaker less.

GNL says

2) There is an actual shoe manufactured that looks like the one she is wearing when dead.

Even if the colors change because of encoding, is it not interesting that the colors and shapes would mimic a shoe that is in production?

Not really, there's lots of different types of sneakers.

Last June, I needed a new pair of sneakers, so I went over to Dick's Sporting goods, and every freaking shoe was some fruity color, I couldn't find something that was just grey/white or black/white - well it was gay pride month. They do this shit just for a MONTH to sell sneakers that I think over 1/2 of the population would never buy.

There's craploads of designs.

My question would be - what do you think the explanation is if they ARE different sneakers? Did they get somebody to go in to murder 6 people, and then frame the person they killed? You think the one that is shown in the body cam was a patsy? Well, they would have had to get her there, somehow. Have her alone when gunshots were going off - how did they do that? If she was kidnapped and forced to be there, shouldn't she be screaming as this was going on? The body did have a gun next to it, maybe they killed her before and brought her body there?

Think of what would have had to be done if it IS two different people. Can you come up with a scenario that makes sense? I can't, but that's me. Maybe there is a possible scenario and I'm just not creative or smart enough to come up with it. If you can, fill me in.

I think the sneaker, BTW, was ALWAYS the one with the flames on it, it's the colors are just not visible in the surveillance video.

I must not know much about video encoding(?) then. I simply can't agree with you that the colors are the same and the swoosh is the same.

richwicks says

Think of what would have had to be done if it IS two different people. Can you come up with a scenario that makes sense? I can't, but that's me. Maybe there is a possible scenario and I'm just not creative or smart enough to come up with it. If you can, fill me in.

I don't know but, I am very distrustful of "officials". I do know that there is a segment of the population and the government that would love nothing more than to take the guns. What is the best way to accomplish that? Call me a conspiracy theorist but, those shoes do not look the same to me. Is it possible that training exercises could be used to stir the gun debate? I'm with you, how can we know for sure? Who can we trust to investigate and tell us the truth?

Seems they have spotted a few more Mockingbird inconsistencies.

https://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=219922

GNL says

Call me a conspiracy theorist but, those shoes do not look the same to me.

The quality of the surveillance video I could find was kind of low. The cameras might be lower than 720p in resolution. I also know something about image encoding, it's FAR more important to get brightness levels right, than color. I can see the color being dropped by the camera if the color change is subtle at certain angles.

GNL says

Is it possible that training exercises could be used to stir the gun debate?

I wouldn't put it past this government to push violence on innocent people. I'm quite comfortable stating that the US government (or portions of it) were involved with 9/11. They'll do anything. Our government has never been as corrupt and as tyrannical than it is now in my lifetime.

GNL says

I'm with you, how can we know for sure? Who can we trust to investigate and tell us the truth?

You can't trust anybody, not really. I started out being like "is the media making mistakes about X?" to moving on to "the media is fucking lying all the time" and there's people ONLINE that go through quite a bit of effort to give accurate information - they make mistakes, but when they do they correct them. You have to start out checking people to see if they are "mostly right". You can do this quickly by looking at old articles or old interviews or whatever, and see what they were saying 5 years ago was accurate.

I also have a rule of thumb here: It is better let a lie go unnoticed, than to falsely condemn the truth. You don't need to catch EVERY lie, but you should never defend a lie as truth that CERTAINLY is a lie. You don't have to catch the government in every crime either.

Be certain that what you say is true about an event, is true
Be certain that what you say is false about an event, is false

The rest is unknown. You shouldn't talk about it much. You can mention it, but don't do it in such a way as to lead people to use that to draw a conclusion.

Let's say that there WERE two people, and one was a hired assassin, and while there was the shooting, they dragged in the dead body of the patsy shooter. I saw the police shooting to take the perp down, but I didn't see the perp GO down in the videos I looked at. So maybe she was already dead when they got there. Let's say the government did this, and the person that actually did the shooting just fucked up, and put on the wrong shoes this morning.

Let the government get away with it. There's bigger fish to fry. There's already an explanation of how the color might night have been picked up and it's believable.

Don't bother with jumping on every single piece of bullshit. Take this picture for example:



It's supposed to be showing 4 discrepancies. The top is matched with the bottom.

Where's the watch in the top left corner, what the hell am I even looking at? Looks like a torso and the blurred area is evidently the head that was shot. On the bottom left, you can barely see maybe a watch partially under a glove?

Next set of panels are the shoes. Let me show you what is being proposed as the two different pairs of shoes:



Notice that the black and white shoe, the white strip is not as white as the sole of the shoe. In the "flaming shoe", the white strip is whiter than the sole of the shoe. Also notice where the strip ends. On the black shoe, before the end of the shoe laces, and on the flaming shoe, right at the end of the shoe laces. Go look at all the pictures that are stills of the video again with this in mind. Notice you never see color above the white stripe in the flaming shoe ever. Even in my video. It always appears black over the strip.

The next is the belt. What belt?

And the last is the camouflage. Looks the same to me, the top is just more of a closeup.

So why do people do lazy ass research and just throw this shit out there? Well one is that people want to be first, another is some sites just don't give a shit about being right, and are creating click bait, and they don't care if it's true or not, and lastly it's the intelligence agencies "muddying the water" - throwing shit into the mix.

Ceffer says

Pretty bloodless 'death scene' considering police usually pump at least 50 rounds into perps. Maybe they will change the narrative back to suicide again. I think that elbow is photoshopped.

plenty of blood on the floor dude.

Ceffer says

I think that elbow is photoshopped.

And look at that wonky knee? They forgot to bring the moulage kit

Ceffer says

So, 95% of conspiracy theorists thing that the government is conspiring against us.

FortwayeAsFuckJoeBiden says

Ceffer says

Pretty bloodless 'death scene' considering police usually pump at least 50 rounds into perps. Maybe they will change the narrative back to suicide again. I think that elbow is photoshopped.

plenty of blood on the floor dude.

Which photo?

https://amidwesterndoctor.substack.com/p/the-decades-of-evidence-that-antidepressants?isFreemail=true

The Decades of Evidence That Antidepressants Cause Mass Shootings
As we have seen with the vaccines, almost no social cost can keep a lucrative pharmaceutical off the market.

https://notthebee.com/article/this-is-hallie-scruggs-the-daughter-of-the-pastor-at-covenant-presbyterian-church-the-trans-shooter-murdered-her

https://notthebee.com/article/nashville-christian-school-headmaster-killed-during-shooting-hailed-as-hero

https://babylonbee.com/news/fbi-vows-to-get-to-the-bottom-of-what-christians-did-to-provoke-attack

QUANTICO, VA — The nation's top investigative force has pledged a full commitment of its resources to identify, isolate, and destroy whichever Christian beliefs were responsible for the brutal attack at a private Christian school this week.

"Our stated goal is to protect U.S. citizens from foreign and domestic terror threats, such as parents at school board meetings, pro-life demonstrators, and Christians who push innocent trans people toward violence by being mean-heads," said FBI Director Christopher Wray at a mandatory meeting of the full staff of all branches. "I want a halt on all investigations until we figure out what Christians did to deserve being attacked!"

"The evil that sparked this event has yet to be eradicated, but we will hunt it down and end it."

The shooter's manifesto has yet to be released, but prominent media attention has focused on the shooter's victims' sinister Christian faith. FBI personnel are expected to spend the next several months reviewing the historic Christian doctrines that caused the tragic shooting, with plans to roll out more comprehensive tracking of Christians whose improper beliefs trigger attacks on themselves.

At publishing time, the Biden administration announced their plan to prevent further Christian school shootings by banning Christianity altogether.

Transgender Shooter’s Manifesto Will Be Released Publicly

(After the FBI has combed through it.)
https://summit.news/2023/03/30/transgender-shooters-manifesto-will-be-released-publicly/

Jim Stone declares it a hoax.
"Knocked offline, SANDY HOOK 2.0
My internet got cut right when I was onto something big.
Others have probably nailed this by now, I am just picking up where I left off two days ago.

The shooting is provably another Sandy Hook. The objective was to get mental screening for everyone before firearms purchases with the story line behind it being that a whacked out trans on antidepressants shot up a school. ONLY NO.

What actually happened: Last year this school had an active shooter drill. That drill was recorded by police body cams. In that drill, the death scene at the end was not done, and I am guessing (only a guess) the doors of the school were not shot out. I was in the process of nailing down precisely where the shoes on the shooter changed and was getting better quality stuff than other people were posting. I got a nice clear shot of the entire death scene that was better than anything else posted at that time, complete with full context so there's no mistaking what it was:"
http://101.99.91.131/330.html

Goes over Sandy Hook stuff, too. People will continue to believe with their emotions rather than their eyes and brains.

I could give a dump about Sandy Hook, was never worth my time to look into the stuff. They are churning out MKUltra movies that I just don't want to waste my time and mental energy on.

Yeah, this crapfest is about as valid as a fiat printing press three dollar bill. Why MKUltra and Mockingbird decided to make it a tranny thing is anybody's guess. They are at this point stacking on the irrational.

The CIA/MKUltra stagings have earned the Napoleonic Code for these stagings. They are all fake and fraudulent until meticulously demonstrated beyond any presumption of doubt to be real.

"I saw the video of the doors being shot out from the inside of the school with the shooter too obscured to see, the video cut and did not even show the shooter going through the broken glass. Probably because it was "too dangerous", maybe that video does exist but everything I came across just showed the glass breaking, and then suddently (sic) the "shooter" was walking around inside the school. Makes no sense. If the doors really were shot out, and that's on video, the shooter ought to enter on video too, right? I did not find that.

Here is what I found: Two sets of video, one from a previous drill, with one pair of shoes, and another with a different pair of shoes, spliced together where the doors were shot out recently and a death scene was shot out recently and they could not have the shooter on video entering because the shoes changed and/or because broken glass is dangerous. Maybe. Who knows how they stitched together this lie, but the shoes blew it. Shoulda had a guy do it, he'd have had the same pair of shoes available for the closing scenes a year later!!!"https://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=219976

Horrors, another shopping mall mass murder. They'll CGI in knives, arrows etc. in post production.

Onvacation says

Ceffer says

So, 95% of conspiracy theorists think that the government is conspiring against us.

I know it sounds fucking crazy, but there's a lot more school shootings when a democrat is president than a republican is president.

I don't blame them for this suspicion.

Imagine murdering a child. Who could do that? It's unthinkable to me. If I killed a child by ACCIDENT I would absolutely be suicidal. It's just a gulf people cannot cross, so they wonder if this isn't the government doing this. I know you are older than I am, could you kill a kid even to save your own life? I couldn't.

BTW: the government is absolutely conspiring against the population. The last 2 years proved that. There's no question.

RayAmerica says

Transgender Shooter’s Manifesto Will Be Released Publicly

(After the FBI has combed through it.)

Yup, we'll get a redacted, modified version of it, I'm certain.

You know things are bad when RW is the most sane person on the thread (thank you RW for doggedly tracking the misinfo down). The shooter wore Vans that whole time.
Indeed, in the bodycam footage when police enter the room where Hale was shot, the shoes at first appear colorless, only for the flame to appear as the camera is pointed toward the shoe, as the camera lens focuses, providing more light into the frame.
Even without this data, the "Vans Off The Wall" logo that appears on the rear of its shoes, a branding kitemark, can be seen in the CCTV footage as well.
Therefore, the claim that the shoes changed during the incident is based on misinformed conclusions based on the quality of the footage captured at the school.
https://www.newsweek.com/fact-check-was-nashville-shooters-body-wearing-different-shoes-1791148

Seriously, Newsweek...

I'd want to see the video myself, not trust some propaganda network.

NuttBoxer says

Seriously, Newsweek...

I'd want to see the video myself, not trust some propaganda network.

I feel like I'm being gaslit. When I watch the video, I know what I see.

Carpe Donktum, the guy who made some of the best Trump Meme Viral videos like CNN Spaceballs, said the same shit, and he's a pro video editor for a living. The camera focus is a factor.

It's a Transradical Terror Attack.

Ceffer says

Seems they have spotted a few more Mockingbird inconsistencies.

https://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=219922

man you guys are going full retard here

Bottom line is the excitation pulse of their fear porn movies has subsided into mostly short term blather. Saturation followed by extinction is faster. The Illuminati circuit isn't achieving the desired amplification factor.

There's also the innate suspicion, even in those who enjoy 'believing', that something artificial is going on. It's a subconscious thing that obtunds that last iota of focussed attention before the return to reality. These events are increasingly having a repetitive packaged and processed feel to them. Production values are limited.

The false flag resources are not getting the return they used to. However, these staged-icides probably aren't any more expensive to churn out per episode and CGI art than an elaborate episode of Star Trek, so they will continue to punctuate the news hoping the Second Amendment can be vanquished.

EBGuy says

You know things are bad when RW is the most sane person on the thread

Thanks. I think.

I'm just hyper-sane at this point. I'll debunk the conspiracy bullshit, and the government bullshit.

Sometimes I wonder if this wasn't a 'White Hat' reverse Illuminati movie, with clues obviously inserted to show it was faked, in order to put egg on the faces of the wokesters and their hench-critters. Maybe it was an April Fool's on the lock, stock and barrel MSM goons. Look at how it has revealed the callous disregard and hypocrisy of the perverts and their handlers.

It does seem odd that the Deep State and CIA would make the perp one of their current deputized pet pervs.

As a staged production, is it a drama, a tragedy, a comedy, or a satire? It could it be a satire of the DS serial shooting false flags? The military could probably pull it off as easily as FBI/CIA? Curious minds speculate.

Ceffer says

http://101.99.91.131/330.html

Ceffer - always check history of somebody that is supposedly a guru. I've just checked that site, and I can't see history.

Don't latch onto everything as a government conspiracy. There's plenty of real government conspiracies, I will be the FIRST to tell you about what I think are real ones, and I will back up my reasoning as much as you probe me, but I never latch onto a new claim. Most claims are false, and I'm convinced they are false in order to muddy the waters, created either by just fucking assholes or intelligence, who are assholes but they are paid to misinform the public.

https://babylonbee.com/news/media-warns-this-hitler-fellow-could-cause-violent-backlash-against-nazis

Just kick them in their weeping, artificial hormone compromised, gaping fake cunt wounds.

Patrick says