patrick.net

HeadSet says

Because they would have to admit they were easily duped fools. Plus, they would have to admit that the "conspiracy theorists" are their intellectual superior.

First, everybody can be duped, and those that don't recognize this are always duped.

Second, it's not about intellectual superiority, it's about the capacity to learn. 90% of what I know, or consider valuable to know, I learned by being wrong first.

I'd hate to be the same dumb idiot I was when I was 23. Wouldn't everybody?

richwicks says

First, everybody can be duped,

Yes, but not EASILY duped.

richwicks says

Second, it's not about intellectual superiority, it's about the capacity to learn.

But first they have to admit they were wrong and antjabbers were right. That is the step they won't take.

richwicks says

4th Reich Great Reset globalist Satanic new world order.

We've been in it since George W. Bush lied us into war, and the US had their Reichstag fire in the form of 9/11. I'm pointing out that what you fear is about to happen, happened already. I'm trying to get people to realize that.

So it didn’t start when the League of Nations was formed, or when Roosevelt back doored us into world war 2 by blockading the Japanese, and deliberately ignoring fore knowledge of the planned attack of Pearl Harbor, or when they killed Kennedy and escalated war in Vietnam? The corruption runs for over 100 years and almost every war, every “crisis”has been manufactured by the 4th Reich globalists to bring us to the day when central bankers and their digital currencies can control everyone by dictatorship of what they can buy and sell.

We are less than a decade away from this, and then you will see what happens when the republic ceases to exist.

https://babylonbee.com/news/cnn-buys-extra-large-excavator-to-help-bury-durham-report

HeadSet says

richwicks says

First, everybody can be duped,

Yes, but not EASILY duped.

I disagree. How easy is it to recognize there is a scam going on, when you are told the unvaccinated pose a threat to the vaccinated? That's not like figuring out that the US overthrew Ukraine, "the unvaccinated threaten the vaccinated" defies basic logic. We all took biology, the purpose of a vaccine is to grant immunity. The unvaccinated only pose a threat to the unvaccinated, if the vaccine works.

HeadSet says

richwicks says

Second, it's not about intellectual superiority, it's about the capacity to learn.

But first they have to admit they were wrong and antjabbers were right. That is the step they won't take.

Once I realize I'm wrong, I feel embarrassed and even ashamed - many times I have promoted incorrect ideas. I try to be very careful not to do that, but I still do it. It's better to be embarrassed for a bit than to be wrong for a lifetime, peddling bullshit for your entire lifetime.

I think the key to fixing this is removing the shame of being wrong. There should be no shame in that. Everybody makes errors, EVERYBODY is victim of propaganda at one point or another. We're all fooled but we are taught in our society to be embarrassed and ashamed when we are proven wrong - that it's some sort of weakness to admit error. It's a strength to admit error.

Look at our fucking government, they are wrong time and time and time again. They are so wrong, I no longer have any support for them, and I guarantee I'm not the only one. It was lack of confidence in the incompetent USSR that led to its downfall. I mean, what kind of confidence can we have, when this is the son of our "president"?


original link


This REALLY IS clown world. There are plenty of people who think "well, there's nothing wrong with that, really".... REALLY?

https://slaynews.com/news/fbi-blocked-4-criminal-investigations-into-clintons-durham-report-reveals/

According to the bombshell findings in Durham’s report, the FBI’s leaders blocked and shut down four criminal investigations into the Clintons.

You need an explosion for a bomb shell. These are stage lights for gloating for these loathsomes getting away with every depraved treason and subversion in the books.

https://harvardharrispoll.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/HHP_May2023_KeyResults.pdf

Polls are propaganda chaff to confuse and steer your information radar. Fabricating charts and assertion stats is easy. Gathering real information is tortuous, labor intensive, slow and tedious

Ceffer says

Polls are propaganda chaff to confuse and steer your information radar. Fabricating charts and assertion stats is easy. Gathering real information is tortuous, labor intensive, slow and tedious

Yes, it's especially difficult when people don't check sources, don't provide sources, and pass it on anyway without review to make EVERYBODY ELSE do these things.

And then you're battling everybody else that doesn't bother to verify or check, and they pass it on, and then other people pass it on, all the while when 1% are actually doing the work, and by the time that 1% proves it's bullshit, then it's weeks, months, years, even decades to disprove it.

For example, this:



https://twitter.com/politblogme/status/1585943973935185920?ref_src=patrick.net

There's no evidence Raskin said this, although Carlson reported it. I can't find it anywhere. No video of it, no transcript of it. No date, it's 99.9% likely to be false.

And our "news" does this all the fucking time. I'm used to that, what vexes me, is that people do this as well.

I caught it, because it sounded unbelievable to me, and it was. This is probably REAL Russian propaganda, and our "news" just passed it off as fact.

https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/festival-joys-tuesday-june-20-2023?publication_id=463409&post_id=129706419&isFreemail=true

After releasing his blockbuster report widely condemning the weaponized agencies, Durham is scheduled to testify in Congress this week. Specifically, his report delicately concluded that the Justice Department and the FBI had “failed to uphold their mission of strict fidelity to the law” by launching the ‘Russia-Gate’ probe against then President Trump.

Durham’s damning report explained there was “significant reliance on investigative leads provided or funded (directly or indirectly) by Trump’s political opponents,” particularly Hillary Clinton. Even worse, “The Department did not adequately examine or question these materials and the motivations of those providing them, even when at about the same time the Director of the FBI and others learned of significant and potentially contrary intelligence.”

Most observers concluded the Durham report, as carefully worded as it was, exposed political weaponization within the federal law enforcement agencies.

Oh really?