« First « Previous Comments 18 - 57 of 63 Next » Last » Search these comments
SO if they aren't trying to court those laborers, then you have to ask yourself just how underpaid were the illegals, that they can't find the typical day laborers to do those jobs?
I think you're more on the poor people deserve what they get angle though right? Have you factored in how inflation cuts into their pay more than yours due to how much less they make? How ever gas increase, milk increase, egg, taxes, etc pushes them into the red, while you and I are still fine? That's really the point I'm making. Central banking economies are built so that we must trample the bones of the destitute in order to make our way. Not moral, and not the life I want to live.
I'm a quiet introvert ...
while the wealthy, hardworking people will invest the same amount of limited working hours building an asset that will “catch” money for them
What’s the difference between a poor, hardworking person versus a wealthy, hardworking person?
The difference is in HOW they ‘catch’ money.
Of all the females I have known, just a few have any idea what they are doing with money.
I think you're more on the poor people deserve what they get angle though right?
I'm sure it's because women still see men as an asset. Women are the spiders that spin a web to catch men.
.
Eman, what was your major and where did you graduate ? I am guessing electrical engineering and San Jose State University.
So you quit your engineering job to be a full time landlord ?
.
If I were to 'do it' again, I'd get a job with the State of Massachusetts, not to make a fortune but to 'make a living' capped at 40 hrs per week. In other words, unlike much of the corporate world, the standard 45-60+ hr work week isn't required for a State a/o union job.
Then, I'd use the rest of my time to do algorithmic trading and thus, build my wealth w/o needing a corporate job & its so-called retirement perks like restricted stock, etc, while killing myself 5 to 6 days per week.
Rin says
If I were to 'do it' again, I'd get a job with the State of Massachusetts, not to make a fortune but to 'make a living' capped at 40 hrs per week. In other words, unlike much of the corporate world, the standard 45-60+ hr work week isn't required for a State a/o union job.
Then, I'd use the rest of my time to do algorithmic trading and thus, build my wealth w/o needing a corporate job & its so-called retirement perks like restricted stock, etc, while killing myself 5 to 6 days per week.
Rin,
In 2001, I was offered a job to work for the Water District. The guy told me to join him. He was going to retire in 2006 and I would be the principal. I turned it down as I knew I wanted to own my own firm. Fast forward to 2007-2008, there were moments I asked myself what would my life be like had I taken that offer? Now, no regrets.
Life is truly a box of chocolates, ……
Yes, inflation hurts the lower earners more, always has. But in the USA, you can move up through experience, hard work, and yes, earning a practical degree. And the bite of rising prices should provide motivation to do so.
GNL says
I'm sure it's because women still see men as an asset. Women are the spiders that spin a web to catch men.
They really do not have a choice, as they make the babies and human children have a long childhood. There are a few women that do not mind being a single mom, but that is the exception.
NuttBoxer says
I think you're more on the poor people deserve what they get angle though right?
The bias of economic class stasis. Yes, inflation hurts the lower earners more, always has. But in the USA, you can move up through experience, hard work, and yes, earning a practical degree. And the bite of rising prices should provide motivation to do so.
If I were to 'do it' again, I'd get a job with the State of Massachusetts, not to make a fortune but to 'make a living' capped at 40 hrs per week. In other words, unlike much of the corporate world, the standard 45-60+ hr work week isn't required for a State a/o union job.
Then, I'd use the rest of my time to do algorithmic trading and thus, build my wealth w/o needing a corporate job & its so-called retirement perks like restricted stock, etc, while killing myself 5 to 6 days per week.
GNL says
I'm sure it's because women still see men as an asset. Women are the spiders that spin a web to catch men.
They really do not have a choice, as they make the babies and human children have a long childhood. There are a few women that do not mind being a single mom, but that is the exception.
Rin says
If I were to 'do it' again, I'd get a job with the State of Massachusetts, not to make a fortune but to 'make a living' capped at 40 hrs per week. In other words, unlike much of the corporate world, the standard 45-60+ hr work week isn't required for a State a/o union job.
Then, I'd use the rest of my time to do algorithmic trading and thus, build my wealth w/o needing a corporate job & its so-called retirement perks like restricted stock, etc, while killing myself 5 to 6 days per week.
Yep, a good government job is worth it's weight in gold. A no stress, pensioned and 40 hour government job has many benefits. I cannot stand any government worker. Sorry but, imo, they are the blood sucking class.
I graduated from SJSU a BSCE and a MSCE. I designed high rise buildings, bridges, etc… in my previous life.
It’s not that easy to quit my job and be a full-time landlord with nose bleeding expensive real estate in the Bay Area. In fact, it’s practically impossible to many here. I analyzed data for almost a decade to make sense of it, but it never made sense until the housing crash in late 2000’s.
HeadSet says
GNL says
I'm sure it's because women still see men as an asset. Women are the spiders that spin a web to catch men.
They really do not have a choice, as they make the babies and human children have a long childhood. There are a few women that do not mind being a single mom, but that is the exception.
It's just not like that any more. Women (actually the family unit) have become completely exploited. There are very few that can raise a family without 2 incomes. Not only 2 incomes but increasingly 2 GOOD incomes. At least that's what I see around me.
DON'T GO TO COLLEGE
Unless it's Engineering, Nursing, Accounting, etc.
At 17/18, get a trade. With a few years experience, you do side jobs until the side jobs turn into working for yourself, then you have so much work you hire people.
When most 21-22 year olds have $80k in debt and a degree that gets them an extra couple of bucks/hour doing White Collar bullshit, you'll have made $100k easy and long since paid off the $6-15k of trade school debt.
Rin says
If I were to 'do it' again, I'd get a job with the State of Massachusetts, not to make a fortune but to 'make a living' capped at 40 hrs per week. In other words, unlike much of the corporate world, the standard 45-60+ hr work week isn't required for a State a/o union job.
Then, I'd use the rest of my time to do algorithmic trading and thus, build my wealth w/o needing a corporate job & its so-called retirement perks like restricted stock, etc, while killing myself 5 to 6 days per week.
Yep, a good government job is worth it's weight in gold. A no stress, pensioned and 40 hour government job has many benefits. I cannot stand any government worker. Sorry but, imo, they are the blood sucking class.
Someone is using the same trick I used during the housing crash. I had 4 CC at $20-$27k limit each.
Deposited $40k in the joint account. Bought the condo for $150k with 25% down and financed 75% with wife’s credit. I didn’t have a job. Borrowing was extremely difficult for self-employed people back then too.
After 6 months of seasoning, cash-out refinance, payoff the first loan and payoff the CC with the excess proceeds. Rinse and repeat a couple deals each year. Then a Patnet member came into my life, and I was able to do 4-5 deals each year. 50% of something is better than 100% of nothing.
that was a good time to buy. in retrospect once in a lifetime opportunity.
What is the name of this credit card and is this deal still offered?
Haven't seen anything below 4% for months now. Many are 5%. The last 3%er supercheck I cashed in mid last year. During the zirp years there were even a few 0%ers. I doubt you can get am offer with less than 4% fee these days
It would seem like this is a money losing proposition for the Credit Union, unless they see rates going up in the near future.
Got a similar offer from my CU, but it’s only for kids and new accounts. They offered 5.5% interest for the savings.
College used to be a two-fer for guys - get a marketable degree, and wallow in "high quality" coed pussy until you got it out of your system. Nowadays, no pussy, bullshit majors. Yeah, with trades you just get the occasional MILF or random cold approach, unless family business dynamics can elevate your SMV status (e.g. courting the boss's daughter with his permission).
I previously told my son this (he's 15) a few years ago. I think it worked like reverse psychology - now he's busting his ass to get good enough grades for college. Go figure.
mell says
Haven't seen anything below 4% for months now. Many are 5%. The last 3%er supercheck I cashed in mid last year. During the zirp years there were even a few 0%ers. I doubt you can get am offer with less than 4% fee these days
A local Credit Union here has made an offer to convert any CDs on hand to a one year 5% with no penalty for early termination of the converted CDs. That is. if I have a 3.5% CD with them that still has months left on the term, they will close it without early termination penalty and put the proceeds into a new one year 5% CD. It would seem like this is a money losing proposition for the Credit Union, unless they see rates going up in the near future.
« First « Previous Comments 18 - 57 of 63 Next » Last » Search these comments
- Answer to Poor people work hard every day. What's the difference between a poor and a wealthy hardworking person? by Hector Quintanilla
Money is abundant. Money is EVERYWHERE!
The government has money, the banks have money, schools have money, restaurants have money …
You have money, your friends have money!
The rich have money, the poor have money!
Money is EVERYWHERE and always moving. Money is “flying” all around us, ALL the time, 24 hours a day — everyday, 365 days a year!
What’s the difference between a poor, hardworking person versus a wealthy, hardworking person?
The difference is in HOW they ‘catch’ money.
Poor, hardworking people invest their limited working hours ‘chasing’ money, while the wealthy, hardworking people will invest the same amount of limited working hours building an asset that will “catch” money for them.
For example, spiders will NEVER work hard chasing flying insects to make a living. Instead, they will work hard building a spiderweb that will catch abundant flying insects for them.
That’s called an asset. It works 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, catching flying “money” — even while the spider sleeps.
That’s the secret.
Schools won’t tell you this. They will teach you to chase money, which leads to the paycheck formula:
(College degree) x (Time) = Paycheck
Warning: That’s an energy-draining trap!
There’s only one solution: Entrepreneurship.
Stop making excuses and start building your “SPIDERWEB” today!
https://www.quora.com/Poor-people-work-hard-every-day-Whats-the-difference-between-a-poor-and-a-wealthy-hardworking-person/answer/Hector-Quintanilla?ch=15&oid=158123858&share=28755099&srid=hK5Qu5&target_type=answer