7
0

Confronting Shoplifters Ban passed by CA Senate


               
2023 Jun 7, 9:12pm   12,561 views  97 comments

by TheAntiPanicanLearingCenter   follow (9)  

The California State Senate passed a bill last week that would prevent employers from requiring employees to intervene to stop shoplifting — a growing scourge in the state since the enactment of criminal justice reforms.

SB 553, introduced by Silicon Valley’s State Sen. Dave Cortese (D-Cupertino), is described as a bill to prevent and monitor “workplace violence.” But it also includes a provision that “every employer shall establish, implement, and maintain, at all times in all of the employer’s facilities, a workplace violence prevention plan for purposes of protecting employees and other personnel from aggressive and violent behavior at the workplace” that “shall include … [p]rovisions prohibiting the employer from maintaining policies that require employees to confront active shooters or suspected shoplifters.”

As San Francisco Bay Area Fox affiliate KTVU reported, retail associations are furious, believing that the bill will tell potential thieves that they can steal goods at will:

[O]ver 50 organizations, including the California Retailers Association, (CRA) don’t support the bill.

“This bill goes way too far, number one, where I think it will open the doors even wider for people to come in and steal from our stores.”



The CRA says if SB 553 becomes law, it will need to apply to all industries and not just retail. They also say most retailers already prohibit regular employees from approaching anyone about stolen merchandise and have some employees who are trained in theft prevention.

“It says no employee can approach someone who is shoplifting. So even if someone is trained on how to deter someone from doing that, now they’re not allowed to approach someone. So, what does that mean? We are opening up the door to allow people to walk into stores, steal and walk out,” Michelin said.
https://www.breitbart.com/crime/2023/06/07/california-senate-passes-bill-preventing-employers-from-requiring-staff-to-stop-shoplifters/

Comments 1 - 14 of 97       Last »     Search these comments

1   Ceffer   @   2023 Jun 7, 10:26pm  

Otherwise known as the 'Destroy The Remaining Businesses That Haven't Already Bailed Out' Law.
2   clambo   @   2023 Jun 8, 4:55am  

It's absolutely amazing how insane California has become.
The people in the trailer parks and hoods are crazy in Florida, but in California it's the politicians who are crazy.
3   Tenpoundbass   @   2023 Jun 8, 6:00am  

What about the babies out in the burning car while mom is inside shoplifting, do we just let them roast?
4   RayAmerica   @   2023 Jun 8, 6:43am  

What's next? Will the legislators pass a law mandating that retailers post a sign at the front door, reading:

"We Don't Discriminate Against Anyone, Including Shoplifters. All Are Welcome"

No doubt, Gov. Dufus would sign such a bill.
5   RC2006   @   2023 Jun 8, 6:51am  

Does this also effect mom and pop stores? How much more can the system take before it breaks?
6   FuckTheMainstreamMedia   @   2023 Jun 8, 7:00am  

Communism. I now loathe the state I live in.
7   zzyzzx   @   2023 Jun 8, 7:36am  

Every store will convert to something where you can only pick up stuff already ordered and paid for with no access to product to the general public until it's paid for. Of course this will increase labor costs which will be passed on to the consumer.
8   RC2006   @   2023 Jun 8, 8:29am  

zzyzzx says

Every store will convert to something where you can only pick up stuff already ordered and paid for with no access to product to the general public until it's paid for. Of course this will increase labor costs which will be passed on to the consumer.

It will push everything to Amazon and walmart delivery.
9   Onvacation   @   2023 Jun 8, 8:37am  

Can employees steal without being fired now?
10   DhammaStep   @   2023 Jun 8, 8:44am  

I'm not understanding the problem with the general jist of the law. If I work somewhere like Dollar Tree or randomclothes store and my employer tells me I'm REQUIRED to confront armed robbers, I'm going to tell him to fuck off. It just sounds like they're legally protecting employees' agency over their decisions during a robbery situation. Additionally, requiring some training on how to handle those situations is just par for those level jobs, they already have mandatory fire safety and other shit trainings.
11   RC2006   @   2023 Jun 8, 8:48am  

Next law to tell home owners they have to leave instead of confronting burglers. Tell people to comply with robbers directions. Maybe even a certification program for criminals on how to properly commit crimes and give instructions to victims.
12   NDrLoR   @   2023 Jun 8, 8:55am  

DhammaStep says

I'm not understanding the problem with the general jist of the law
There used to be an assumption that most people had a built-in moral compass that prevented things like this, but that has slowly eroded away with the entitlement mentality of the past several decades. Now it's you owe me and by golly I'm going to take it.
14   Karloff   @   2023 Jun 8, 10:19am  

Shopkeepers used to keep a gun under the counter. A couple of cleanups on aisle 7 and neighborhood thugs would learn to knock it off.

But I agree with DhammaStep. You can't force unarmed minimum wage kids to confront violent perps when cops and DAs won't do their job in keeping them off the streets.

Comments 1 - 14 of 97       Last »     Search these comments

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   users   suggestions   gaiste