patrick.net

Meh, I'm not sure what is even meant by 'conservative' anymore but I've always found Anne to be consistent in her views. In this case, she is right. These are serious felonies.

The problem is that I can think of half a dozen other politicians (including the sitting president) that have committed the same felonies - and they were not and are not being prosecuted.

I would say that if I had to judge Trumps' character against Anne Coulters' I would rather be in her orbit than his. She was one of the first national voices on the Trump bandwagon and if he had stayed consistent with what he ran on in 2016 I believe she would still be a fan. I'll remind everyone why he got elected - to close the f'ing border and because he wasn't Hillary Clinton. What we got was no progress on the boarder and was a tax cut that no one asked for.

2016 was a populous uprising at a time when it could have made a real difference in altering the decline of this nation. I still think Trump was the best choice we had (and it wasn't close) but, like Anne, I see him as a massive squandered opportunity and total disappointment.

Still, if I vote again, it will probably be for Trump. Because - who else? RFK Jr.? He'll be gone before the general election.

I don't give a shit what she says about Trump.

If you think Trump is guilty of some crime, I suggest you research the law a little bit first; most people beyond 8th grade have the ability to comprehend written laws.

Read about the Presidential Records Act.

If you want more, read about the decision of District Judge Berman; however now Google will make it difficult if not impossible to read the judge's opinion.

Trump accomplished a lot without help from anyone; recall that Paul Ryan and his ilk prevented Trump from doing things he talked about in his campaign.

stfu says

These are serious felonies.

What are "these"? When Trump was still President (up to the moment before he handed power to Biden), he had the power to declassify any document he had or wanted; after that moment, any document that the Biden administration still allowed Trump access would be either Biden declassifying or someone in his administration violating classification rules. It's not as if Trump downloaded/forwarded his official emails while holding an office other than the POTUS (like Hilary did; Secretary of State had no power to declassify her official classified communications, whereas POTUS had that power) or Trump after leaving the office went back to the archives and stole documents (like Panetta [correction: Berger] did).

Don't forget Sandy Burger (aka, "Sandy Burglar) who sneaked documents out down his pants and was later caught.
He paid a fine, I think it was $50,000.

Insane people, dimwits, and liberals think that the power of the President is superceded by the guy in charge of the Presidential Archives; unfortunately that is incorrect.

As Sec. of State, Hillary Clinton broke Federal Law when she used an unsecured, private server for her OFFICIAL email account. When caught, she not only deleted (bleached) 33,000 of those emails, but destroyed laptops, etc. in order to obstruct justice. What was Hillary's penalty for flagrantly breaking Federal Laws? NOTHING.

Joe Biden, as VP, removed a massive amount of documents (1800 boxes) that he did not have the authority to possess. Not only that, he kept these documents in extremely unsecured areas, such as his personal garage. Biden's penalty for doing much worse than Trump? NOTHING.

While Trump has been arrested and charged with multiple felonies for doing much less than Hillary Clinton and Biden, the FBI sits on blockbuster evidence that documents the Biden Crime Family operation, with direct links to Joe Biden himself.

All totalitarian governments have one thing in common; they have centralized police forces that enforce the law according to their political bent. We have ours in the FBI and the CIA.

The elephant in the room is SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT.

All this is a distraction from Hunter and Pedo Joe's bribery proof.

Not to mention Joe's own collection of documents in his garage.

clambo says

Don't forget Sandy Burger (aka, "Sandy Burglar) who sneaked documents out down his pants and was later caught.
He paid a fine, I think it was $50,000.

Insane people, dimwits, and liberals think that the power of the President is superceded by the guy in charge of the Presidential Archives; unfortunately that is incorrect.

clambo says

Don't forget Sandy Burger (aka, "Sandy Burglar) who sneaked documents out down his pants and was later caught.
He paid a fine, I think it was $50,000.

Insane people, dimwits, and liberals think that the power of the President is superceded by the guy in charge of the Presidential Archives; unfortunately that is incorrect.

clambo says

Don't forget Sandy Burger (aka, "Sandy Burglar) who sneaked documents out down his pants and was later caught.
He paid a fine, I think it was $50,000.

Insane people, dimwits, and liberals think that the power of the President is superceded by the guy in charge of the Presidential Archives; unfortunately that is incorrect.

clambo says

Don't forget Sandy Burger (aka, "Sandy Burglar) who sneaked documents out down his pants and was later caught.
He paid a fine, I think it was $50,000.

Insane people, dimwits, and liberals think that the power of the President is superceded by the guy in charge of the Presidential Archives; unfortunately that is incorrect.

I heard on some radio today that Trump was offered a deal but declined.

It's a choice between the uniparty or what's left of the US. Everything going on just shows all three branches of government are failing.

the usual fucking media. felonies they say, dare not question that opinion you peasants they say. don’t pay attention that president has authority to declassify anything and doesn’t need approval. but yeah, media… gonna invent the crime. russian collusion didn’t work out, onto next. nazi germany is here in full swing.

stfu says

Meh, I'm not sure what is even meant by 'conservative' anymore

You're not alone. That word has suffered the fate of another word - "Nazi": it means anything it needs to mean at the moment.

Eric Holder says

You're not alone. That word has suffered the fate of another word - "Nazi": it means anything it needs to mean at the moment.

Or the fate of another word; 'fascist.' Whenever I hear someone use that term, I try to ask them to define what exactly a fascist is. Their definition usually ends up being some imaginary opposite of whatever political side that they are on.

Anne’s problem is that she still thinks the USA is a nation of laws. I don’t know what distinguishes a “serious” felony vs non-serious in her mind, but she is missing the point.

I don’t argue that Trump didn’t break any laws. He probably did. It’s the double standard and blatant manipulation of the US election that Trump exposes. That is the point.

She wants the wall. That would be great. Trump tried to get it, he wasn’t able to, it’s too bad.

That’s not the point of Trump. Trump exposes the hypocrisy. This indictment will red pill 80% of the US voter base. You can no longer pretend to be the good guy when your party is the one of endless wars while locking up your opponents for “crimes” that they have committed.

pudil says

You can no longer pretend to be the good guy when your party is the one of endless wars while locking up your opponents for “crimes” that they have committed.

Well said. The uniparty wages endless wars. Trump didn’t, so they must destroy him.