15
0

Government should always be minimized


               
2023 Jul 18, 5:56am   28,483 views  313 comments

by Patrick   follow (59)  

https://boriquagato.substack.com/p/setting-the-stage-for-your-own-execution


i’m such a fan of “coyote’s law” coined by longtime gatopal™ warren meyer of coyoteblog fame.

i shall paraphrase:

“before granting any new power or prerogative to the state, first imagine that power wielded by the politician you hate most, because one day it will be.”


« First        Comments 131 - 170 of 313       Last »     Search these comments

131   Patrick   @   2024 Mar 22, 1:38pm  



132   Patrick   @   2024 Mar 24, 8:44am  



133   Patrick   @   2024 Mar 24, 1:32pm  



134   Patrick   @   2024 Mar 25, 9:38am  



137   Patrick   @   2024 Mar 25, 8:27pm  



138   Patrick   @   2024 Mar 26, 7:18pm  



142   Patrick   @   2024 Mar 29, 1:15pm  



143   Patrick   @   2024 Mar 30, 11:27am  

https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/jock-itch-saturday-march-31-2024


Would you agree with an employment law requiring the federal government to hire only the best qualified, cheapest person who applies for any particular federal job? In other words, it would become illegal to use any other criteria for hiring, apart from merit and cost. Maybe the law could even be broader than that. Maybe it could require the government to regularly re-advertise every position, and replace incumbents with better qualified or cheaper alternatives.

Isn’t that just good stewardship of the collective treasury?

The reason I ask is the stable, continuous unelected government workforce used to protect the public from the worst side-effects caused by unqualified or incompetent elected public officials like Mayor Adams or Governor Hochul. But unfortunately, the government workforce has now been diluted or partly replaced, maybe by DEI, with people just as incompetent and unqualified as are the elected officials.

So we are now flying the national airplane without a political parachute.

And why should government hire anyone for any reason besides merit and cost anyway?
144   Patrick   @   2024 Mar 30, 3:49pm  



145   Patrick   @   2024 Mar 30, 3:59pm  



146   BeneTiberCato   @   2024 Mar 30, 9:27pm  

Patrick says

Would you agree with an employment law requiring the federal government to hire only the best qualified, cheapest person who applies for any particular federal job? In other words, it would become illegal to use any other criteria for hiring, apart from merit and cost. Maybe the law could even be broader than that. Maybe it could require the government to regularly re-advertise every position, and replace incumbents with better qualified or cheaper alternatives.

Maybe that's why the wokest parts of NSA which I ever saw were the HR and the Policy departments. I gathered it was the same at every other agency. These are people who cannot perform the purported functions of their respective agencies, but the get to speak for everyone at their agencies, and create the echo chamber effect. Either most people parrot the Party Line, or learn to ignore most internal corporate messaging and just try to concentrate on doing the work of the purported job of their agency. While the wokest get the highest praise and the most promotions.
147   Patrick   @   2024 Apr 1, 10:14am  



148   Patrick   @   2024 Apr 1, 10:30am  



149   fdhfoiehfeoi   @   2024 Apr 1, 1:37pm  

Patrick says

Would you agree with an employment law requiring the federal government to hire only the best qualified, cheapest person who applies for any particular federal job?


Absolutely not! My disagreement starts at allowing government to hire...
150   Patrick   @   2024 Apr 3, 10:28am  



151   Patrick   @   2024 Apr 3, 10:51am  



152   Patrick   @   2024 Apr 4, 8:35am  



153   Patrick   @   2024 Apr 4, 8:35am  



154   Patrick   @   2024 Apr 9, 1:28pm  



155   Patrick   @   2024 Apr 9, 1:29pm  



156   Patrick   @   2024 Apr 9, 1:30pm  



157   HeadSet   @   2024 Apr 9, 4:37pm  

Patrick says





You can drive your car without a license all you want on your own property and private roads. You just need a license to drive on public roads.
158   fdhfoiehfeoi   @   2024 Apr 10, 9:01am  

What the fuck makes a road "public"? Oh yeah, the uniformed armed guards who arrest you if you don't pay their bosses. Isn't that called armed robbery?
159   HeadSet   @   2024 Apr 10, 9:19am  

NuttBoxer says

What the fuck makes a road "public"? Oh yeah, the uniformed armed guards who arrest you if you don't pay their bosses. Isn't that called armed robbery?

What makes it "public" is that the road was build and maintained at taxpayer expense. Licensing is not a big money maker for the government but a method of enforcing competency to drive. Do you really think all roads should be free for alls, driving as fast as one likes, in whatever lane one likes, with traffic control lights and signs as optional? Nobody should get a speeding ticket? Even if all roads were privately owned turnpikes, there would still be rules by the owners. I do not like intrusive government, but a comprehensive road system with easy and cheap driver's licenses is not an example of overbearing government.
161   fdhfoiehfeoi   @   2024 Apr 10, 12:28pm  

HeadSet says

What makes it "public" is that the road was build and maintained at taxpayer expense.


In regards to taxes, I refer you to my previous comment...

HeadSet says

Do you really think all roads should be free for alls, driving as fast as one likes, in whatever lane one likes, with traffic control lights and signs as optional? Nobody should get a speeding ticket?


YES!! Everything you're concerned about is covered in Minority Report. How did it work out in that simulation? Now of course you'll refer to cities where controls like this have the most obvious benefits. I'm still fine without them. I have stated my opinion on cities many times here...

I've also referenced driving in Tijuana many, many times to demonstrate why your argument is bullshit. Look, just because you can't imagine people living responsibly and free doesn't have shit to do with reality.

And on your comment about it not being over-bearing, I'll refer you to the 4th Amendment. Seems again free people disagree with you.
162   Patrick   @   2024 Apr 10, 3:47pm  



163   Patrick   @   2024 Apr 10, 3:54pm  



165   TheAntiPanicanLearingCenter   @   2024 Apr 11, 3:59pm  

Patrick says






Yep. Both IntSoc and NatSoc are socialism, and the "Tell" of a Socialist is them claiming their form of Socialism "Isn't like the other kinds of Socialism, it's better" Another tell is that they deny their atrocities or claim it was absolutely necessary for that government to survive.
167   Patrick   @   2024 Apr 14, 5:10pm  



168   Patrick   @   2024 Apr 14, 5:12pm  



169   Blue   @   2024 Apr 14, 5:58pm  

Patrick says






This is one step better than my 3rd world version that people constantly have to keep proving its their own property as the crooks teaming up with "gov", "judges", "police" generally with a hidden politician at the top to create papers in certain areas with a open secret deals to split the proceeds after occupying and sell the property at best. Murders with the help of folks from neighboring countries are not unusual to send signals to the community to make their next job easy.
170   Patrick   @   2024 Apr 14, 6:18pm  



« First        Comments 131 - 170 of 313       Last »     Search these comments

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   users   suggestions   gaiste