Comments 1 - 40 of 70 Next » Last » Search
This is quite interesting.Gives me a bit more faith that Elon is not completely captured.
@elonmuskAdvertisers avoid controversy, so all that is needed for ADL to crush our US & European ad revenue is to make unfounded accusations. They have much less power in Asia, so our ad revenue there is still strong.This “controversy” causes advertisers to “pause”, but that pause is permanent until ADL gives the green light, which they will not do without us agreeing to secretly suspend or shadowban any account they don’t like.That is the relationship they’ve had with X/Twitter for many years. Presumably, they have that with all western search or social media orgs.4:31 PM · Sep 4, 2023
Basically, the ADL is angry that Substack won’t censor whoever the ADL tells them to censor. They hate anyone in any industry/media who makes substantial money and/or gains substantial influence while flouting their censorship rules.I emailed Father Robinson and asked how he felt about being smeared by the ADL. He provided me with this response. I will let it speak for itself.At first I thought this was unhinged. ADL start their list of 'Antisemitism, False Information and Hate Speech' with me, I am not antisemtitic, I do not spread false information, nor do I engage in hate speech. I then realised this content is worse than unhinged, it is dangerous. The ADL is attempting to paint particular worldviews as intolerable; certain opinions and beliefs as beyond the pale. This is a tactic of totalitarian bigots - it is the methodology of hateful fascists.The examples provided are that I do not believe in gay marriage, I do no believe people can transition gender, race or age, and I believe the natural conclusion of unrestrained liberalism without boundaries is paedophilia and that is not a good thing.Notice I said I believe, because these are my beliefs, informed by my Christian faith. I do not perceive them to be 'hate speech', I perceive them to be truthful statements, as believed by Christians for 2,000 years and Jews for much longer.Marriage in a Christian context is between one man and one woman. The idea is that in a liberal progressive society grown adults cannot do whatever they want as long as they're not causing anybody harm - that is a liberal ideology I do not subscribe to. Two grown men or two grown women may live together as a partnership or a civil union, but as a Christian, I would not recognise that as marriage. It is not 'hate speech' to insist words have meanings. If anything, it is hate speech that the ADL is peddling, by proscribing mainstream Judeo-Christian beliefs as 'EXTREMISM & HATE SPEECH'.I happen to believe God loves us, and he made us in his image. God loved us before we were born, and he made us male and female. Therefore, there are two genders, and whilst they are equal in dignity and worth, they are different in many other ways. Men tend to be faster and stronger, whilst women tend to be more nurturing and emotionally mature. These differences are complimentary, but also biological. Men are born with XY chromosomes, women with XX. Our sex is imprinted in ever strand of our being, in our DNA. Women are born with the ability to bear children, men are not. These are clear and important differences which should be respected. No surgical or chemical mutilation can make a man into a woman or vice-versa. That is not hate speech, that is biological and spiritual truth. If anything, it is hate speech to deny that. Hate against God and science.You'll notice the ADL editorialised my statement in order to suit their political agenda, adding works I did not say. ADL says 'he writes, adding that “the natural conclusion [of a society that accepts trans people] is paedophilia.”' Now, I did not say a society that accepts trans people, my statement was clearly about unrestricted liberalism without boundaries - if someone can transition their sex and their race, why not their age? That is an important question we should be asking, because the results of which could be damaging to young people, whom it is our duty as adults - as it is in any civilised society - to protect.
Intel agency storefront doesn't care that 'genuine defamation' is lost in the bully pulpit subversion of the Constitution, which is the real target, just like feminism's target is destruction of the nuclear family, not women's rights.
I believe the natural conclusion of unrestrained liberalism without boundaries is paedophilia and that is not a good thing.
to use the wealth of the latter to achieve the ends under the guise of concerned Public Interest Groups
It's all about Globalism and Repressive Tolerance. Omidyar is a notorious globalist and anti-Zionist who fired Greenwald from the Organization he founded for not towing the Globaloney line.https://www.jta.org/2017/03/12/united-states/anti-defamation-league-announces-new-silicon-valley-center-to-combat-hate-online https://www.meforum.org/62170/ebay-founder-funds-anti-us-anti-israel-scholars
This “controversy” causes advertisers to “pause”, but that pause is permanent until ADL gives the green light, which they will not do without us agreeing to secretly suspend or shadowban any account they don’t like.
I think what we are on the verge of discovering is that advertisement doesn't actually increase product sales for the most part, that something else is going on.
Whether advertising works, that's an issue - but advertising is the revenue basis for most Social Media.
What I'm suggesting is that advertising isn't about advertising - it's about control.Raytheon and Lockheed Martin doesn't have commercials on television in order to sell airplanes. They place advertisements there to guarantee that the "news" there promotes war.
You’re not confused. The ADL Is Becoming as Bad as You Think.
Pro-Trump Cartoonist Sues ADL for $10 Million for Calling Him Anti-SemiticBY AILA SLISCO ON 7/14/20 AT 7:36 PM EDTThe lawsuit, filed on July 10, seeks $10.35 million in damages. It claims that the ADL caused Garrison "insult, embarrassment, humiliation, mental suffering, anguish, injury to his name and professional reputation, and loss of business" by alleging anti-Semitism in a 2017 cartoon featuring liberal Jewish philanthropist George Soros, a frequent figure of scorn by the far-right.
Thought exercise: say that the Federal Reserve can just increment the bank account of anyone the ADL suggests.
The Intels don't care about credibility, they think they have won, and they only look at cause, effect and mapping of apparent 'success'.
Whatever happened with this lawsuit?
Comments 1 - 40 of 70 Next » Last » Search