« First « Previous Comments 18 - 57 of 101 Next » Last » Search these comments
some anti russia geopolitical chess move
i just know russia backs syria.
ad says
.
Barack Hussein Obama was the first to send troops there. Interestingly it was a few months after Russia took Crimea.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_intervention_in_the_Syrian_civil_war
.
Yes. Note that doesn't answer my question, which is in the present tense.
So you do not think we are still in Syria for the same reasons why Barack Hussein Obama sent US troops there ? Its a protracted geopolitcal conflict.
And the same career civil servants who formulated it sitting in the halls of CIA and NSC are still there, just in higher positions like GS 15 and SES.
ad says
So you do not think we are still in Syria for the same reasons why Barack Hussein Obama sent US troops there ? Its a protracted geopolitcal conflict.
And the same career civil servants who formulated it sitting in the halls of CIA and NSC are still there, just in higher positions like GS 15 and SES.
And that is as good as an answer as any.
Just a damning one. :)
9/11 Troofers constantly say 9/11 was an inside job so America could steal Middle East oil. Where the fuck is it? Our country's strategic oil reserve is lower than ever. Where are all the pipelines and thousands of US oil tankers taking oil back to the US? How much oil would we have to steal just to cover the mobilization costs of bringing thousands of Americans and military gear to Iraq in the first year?
Also, thought all the Globalhomo NWO is all about EV's and getting America off oil? Why would they all be in on this?
Morons want us to believe it was easier to create a MASSIVE conspiracy to kill thousands of Americans at home and thousands more people abroad to get Iraqi oil - as opposed to beating Environmentalists so we can drill for more oil at home? America has more energy reserves then we know what do with.
so that oil price can be kept higher
FortwayeAsFuckJoeBiden says
some anti russia geopolitical chess move
FortwayeAsFuckJoeBiden says
i just know russia backs syria.
Exactly. And Oceana has always been at war with EastAsia! Right Winston?
The banksters' goal is not making oil cheap and more available to Americans, but making oil expensive, so the petro-dollar can be worthwhile. Invasion of Iraq was not to steal their oil (using a puppet local regime is always more cost-effective than having US marines standing over an oil well over there), but to stop / disrupt production/export, so that oil price can be kept higher. 9-11 and invasion of Iraq were planned when oil price was near bottom below $10/bbl and gasoline price around $1/gallon or less.
At least the Turks know how to create a first class vacation destination in Turks and Caicos Islands. (Yes, I know, I am going all AOC).
Amazing, it’s like a blitz of bad State Dept and CIA plans, all hatching simultaneously because they know support is gone come Jan 20th. In one week we have pseudo-Maidan in Georgia, an attempted coup in South Korea, and “Syrian rebels” back in Aleppo. You can’t be cynical enough for these clowns. The theme as ever is to isolate Russia and remove politicians who might be neutral or favorable to Putin. Georgia, Korea, and Syria all have conservative presidents (including the winner of Georgia’s recent election), and border or have strategic interest for Russia.
All warships have left the Russian naval base in Tartus, Syria. According to satellite images from Planet Labs, which were studied by the BBC Russian Service, they were there two days ago.
Usually, warships are moored at the large pier closest to the exit from the bay.
The satellite image from December 3 shows that there is not a single large ship at the pier.
Two days before that, on December 1, three warships were still at the pier. They differ from civilian ships in their gray color and narrower lines.
Earlier, military OSINT analyst H. I. Sutton wrote about Russian ships leaving Tartus. His analysis was published in the online publication Naval News. "One of the vessels [based in Tartus], the support vessel Yelnya, was seen leaving Tartus on the morning of December 2, 2024, and there is information that some or all of the other vessels also left the city," he wrote.
Judging by the silhouettes and sizes, the frigate Admiral Grigorovich, the corvette Mercury, and the frigate Admiral of the Fleet of the Soviet Union Gorshkov may have been moored at the Tartus base pier on December 1.
The Russian Navy's logistics base in Syria is important primarily because it is the only Russian naval facility in the Mediterranean.
Its value increased in 2022 after the Russian invasion of Ukraine began, after which the Russian Navy could not send its ships to the Black Sea because Turkey closed the straits to warships due to the war. Military experts note that the withdrawal of ships and support vessels from Tartus may mean that the Russian command is not confident in the ability to ensure their safety. Another important facility is the Khmeimim air base.
Bonus simple question: what the fuck these fucks were doing in Syria?
How is surrendering a port "creating leverage"? If ships are gone and port is undefended, the leverage goes into the toilet.
I don't care how callous leaders are, ultimately you don't want to see your citizens die.
WookieMan says
I don't care how callous leaders are, ultimately you don't want to see your citizens die.
That never bothered Stalin.
Never bothered Johnson (LBJ) either. Nor Zelinski.
« First « Previous Comments 18 - 57 of 101 Next » Last » Search these comments
I mean...ZILCH!