patrick.net

Lincoln's actions are why we have not had a legitimate Congress of the Republic since 1860. The Papal, Royal and Rothschild financing of both sides of Civil War had the desired result. The foreign occupied foreign City State of Washington DC was sold back to Europe/Britain with the 1871 US Corporation (or its service variants) and has been ever since.

Didn't Lincoln think blacks were incompatible and should be sent to Liberia.

I can agree with that list for the most part.

They all look like douchebags too, except for Lincoln. He looks borderline insane. He did more damage than any of the others and that is saying a lot!

But the worst president is the one who was never truly president. It doesn’t get any worse than Brandon. At least the others were competent to make (bad) decisions. This guy we got now can barely navigate around an ice cream cone. Bidet doesn’t make the decisions and that makes him the worst.

I'm not sure about deportation, but he definitely did not consider them equals.

LBJ was pretty bad, the real normalization and coming to full power of the Deep State. Obama was the worst, and Biden is only less worse because the Obbamination isn't in direct control. Bush was bad.

Wilson was actually a pussy. The Kaiser was paying people to put bombs on US Merchant Ships, blew up Black Tom, attacked US ships in international waters (Int law only allows the capture of vessels running an embargo, NOT their destruction), and paid Mexican bandits to raid over the border and tried to get Mexico and the US to fight. He ignored it for years.

That's the fluff. Wilson's crowning achievement took place in 1913, the year freedom died.

AmericanKulak says

Obama was the worst

By far. We fell off a cliff even if Bush was the cause. We had no where to go but up. That didn't happen for 8 years. And the Dems double down on stupid and try to have Hillary run. There was no chance. 16 years of my adult life was trash between Bush and Obama and wars. Fuck you Rich before you go off. Keep your ponies in the stable on this one.

Alternative views of Lincoln aren't entirely favorable. His family were wealthy colonialists on the side of King George during the Revolution, and lost everything and fled to Kentucky in poverty. Lincoln was a slightly closeted Royalist and Bar attorney, resentful at the American Revolution that divested his family.

The rumor is, he did for Britain at his time what the Globalists and Dems are trying to do now: destroyed the country with division and Civil War so that, devastated and impoverished, we had to turn to the Euro financiers, who have acted like they own the Republic since 1871 with their phony corporation in the foreign occupied foreign city state of Washington DC. What Lincoln did was lay the groundwork for the future Fed and the Babylonian debt slavery scheme.

No way Bush was worse then Obama or Biden!

RC2006 says

Didn't Lincoln think blacks were incompatible and should be sent to Liberia.

Yes, basically.

Lincoln thought that blacks and whites shouldn't and couldn't live among one another. It's said that Lincoln intended to put blacks to work on the construction of the Panama canal. Lincoln didn't free a single slave either, the 13th amendment was passed after his death. In his inaugural speech, he said he would support the Corwin Amendment which would have made slavery permanent and irrevocable in the Constitution for states that had slavery - this is the failed 13th amendment.

States that ratified the Corwin Amendment were Kentucky, Ohio, Rhode Island, Maryland, and Illinois. Maryland was a border state that fought on the side of the Union. Kentucky was a slave holding state, and was officially neutral in the civil war. The South withdrew from the union over taxation through tarrifs, not slavery.

zzyzzx says

No way Bush was worse then Obama or Biden!

He set the course, that's why you can argue he was worst. It's that asshole's administration that put us on the course of endless, purposeless war which is what is really destroying the United States, not transgender queer theory or that bullshit - that's a distraction so that endless, purposeless war, can be carried out. After him, anything other than a Republican could be elected. We nearly got a mass murdering cunt elected in 2016, and NARROWLY escaped that. Bush's father setup the SES, which you could argue is the real president now, they are the ones that had their panties in a wad over Trump being president.

If it wasn't for Bush, we wouldn't have gotten Trump, but if it wasn't for Bush, I don't think we would have needed somebody like Trump.

Yeah, 9/11, DHS, Patriot Act. None of that existed before Bush. But he didn't start the endless war, Nixon and Reagan did, with the War on Us. But root cause, wars are impossible without a central bank, so go back even further to Wilson, and Teddy for splitting the vote(intentional).

NuttBoxer says

I think they missed the most important point on Lincoln. The War Between the States eviscerated states rights, and centralized power in DC, a trend that has just recently started to reverse.

I think that Federal court needs to be overhauled to have 50 jurors. Ones from each State. The Courts in DC has uneducated political motivated idiots, on the jury, that does not represent American people or our values.
Also I think that State Law enforcement from every state, should have a say and police DC. Any State can investigate any corruption in D.C. because it directly or indirectly effects them. So that California or New York can't just prosecute folks like Jim Jordan and Matt Gaetz that is why the jury of 50 would be necessary. They would out number the political motivated Jurors, hand selected by Soros DAs.

Tenpoundbass says

The Courts in DC has uneducated political motivated idiots, on the jury, that does not represent American people or our values.

The foreign occupied foreign city state of Washington DC has its own flag, its own constitution, and operates under a corrupt form of Roman Law as a Lex Fori.

The courts in DC aren't even the courts of the Republic, so reforming them would mean conquest of the foreign occupied foreign city state of Washington DC away from the Fed, the City of London, and the Vatican and returning it to the jurisdiction of the Republic.

Congress has the power to overturn D.C.’s local government authorized by the Home Rule Act of 1973. The Act gave DC its current political make up instead of being administered by the Federal government.

If the Republicans retake all 3 branches of government, I expect this to happen given the massive crime rate, perps that are simply let go, and lenient sentences given for violent crimes in the District.

Obama needs honorable mention.

Misc says

If the Republicans retake all 3 branches of government

Nothing will happen. They are mostly part of Uniparty and old geriatric grifter.

I think our friend here was on vacation during the Bush years when Republicans controlled all three, and we witnessed the greatest curtailment in freedom in US history(up to that point).

Bush was uniparty Trump is not. Trump will hit opposition from republicans to have any sort of real change if they control House and Senate and they will work with dems to stop Trump.

Snowden pardon? Manning pardon? Bankers in his cabinet? Took loans from Rothschild's? Money from NY real estate? Shut down our bases overseas? Stopped droning the Middle East? Stopped the Scamdemic? Audited the Fed?

Every time you guys start with your bullshit, I'll just repeat the same stuff over-and-over until. One more, there's propaganda out there for everyone, for some of you, that propaganda is Trump...