« First « Previous Comments 1,081 - 1,120 of 1,666 Next » Last » Search these comments
Forget the 'list.' The list contains NO EVIDENCE. The VIDEOs are what counts because they contain recorded crimes being perpetrated upon CHILDREN by the powerful elites of business, banking, entertainment, news media and influential politicians.
If you watch the video above, along with that of former U.S. Intelligence Officer Dr. Steve Pieczenik, you will readily see that this all was centered around the crime of PEDOPHILIA .... a universal crime that has been used by 'intelligence' for decades as a means to control the political opposition.
https://celiafarber.substack.com/p/books-on-robert-maxwell-mossad-kgb
https://x.com/BoooW0o/status/1948154930910425114
For all we know, Bill could have been fine with Mossad taping everything he was doing.
Ceffer says
Are these the noises the agitprops make when they try to distract from the Deep State licensing assassinations on Trump? What next? Trump tried to assassinate IHLlary with Russian spies?
Nomo came out of the woodwork for whatever reason. Clearly an agenda. I'll argue, but laugh it off. Never think people can be that dumb.
Exactly. These elitist scumbags didn’t care about “getting caught,” they know who is really in charge and therefore have nothing to fear from the “authorities” or “the law.”

Real EPSTEIN COVER UP Story Too Dangerous For The Public To Hear
Robert Barnes very revealing interview ...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7cEFAjO_vc0
Real EPSTEIN COVER UP Story Too Dangerous For The Public To Hear
Robert Barnes very revealing interview ...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7cEFAjO_vc0

PS: it wasn't a pedophile/political blackmail operation by 'intelligence' after all. The pedophiles didn't even care about getting caught!
I didn’t say it was a blackmail operation. I read it was an intelligence op, and yes, since the elites like gates, Clinton, Andrew of England didn’t care about getting caught on camera it is good evidence that they felt safe in their corruption and other exploitative behaviors. In other words the operation was not set up to trap Gates or Clinton. They were simply reaping “rewards” for their service to the NWO satanic globalists.
You must suspect there’s some game afoot in this Epstein business. Only days ago, it was “fuggeddabowdit . . . nuthin’ there . . . get over it.” But then, only days later, the second-in-command at DOJ, Todd Blanche, formerly the president’s personal lawyer, was down in Tallahassee deposing Jeffrey Epstein’s second-in-command, Ghislaine Maxwell. (Note: a deposition is testimony outside of court, recorded under oath.) The Deputy Attorney General deposed her for two days, Friday and Saturday, a total of nine hours. You can do a lot of talking in nine hours.
And were you shocked to learn — as has been broadly reported — that through all these years of EpsteinEpsteinEpstein, Ms. Maxwell has never been interviewed by any state or federal law enforcement official or government lawyer? How was that possible? By the way, no government official has interviewed billionaire Les Wexner, Epstein’s chief benefactor, over all these years, either? How is that possible? (Follow the money, as they say.)
Meanwhile, down in Florida, as reported by Brian O’Shea of The Daily Clout, it turns out that the federal district judge, Robin Rosenberg, who just ruled against Mr. Trump’s request to unseal the 2005 — 2007 Florida Epstein grand jury transcripts, is married to one Michael McCauliffe, former Palm Beach County State’s Attorney (equivalent of district attorney, DA), who helped negotiate the special 2008 “sweetheart” plea deal that allowed Epstein significant freedoms, such as frequent travel, including to his Little St. James Island, despite being under house arrest. Are you going, “Hmmmmmm. . . ? Any conflict of interest in that ruling? (Note: Current US AG Pam Bondi did not become Florida AG until 2011.)
So, it appears that there will now be two sets of “Epstein files” to sort out: 1) the DOJ’s file curated under AG Merrick Garland, and 2) whatever follows from never-before asked questions put to Ghislaine Maxwell in late July 2025. One thing you might infer: if the Merrick Garland files contained any defamatory “kompromat” about Donald Trump, wouldn’t it have been used during the election of 2024? Mr. Garland went along with every other ploy used to defame and convict Mr. Trump under color of law. But not that? Ergo, fuggeddabowdit.
Where the Epstein business goes now is anybody’s guess, but you have to doubt that it will go nowhere. Ms. Maxwell’s attorney, David O. Markus, stated to reporters that she “answered every single question asked of her” over the two days, emphasizing that she responded “honestly, truthfully, and to the best of her ability” without invoking any privileges or declining to answer. There is chatter on the Internet that Ms. Maxwell’s testimony affords an opportunity for the FBI / DOJ to open an entirely fresh Epstein investigation, untainted by whatever Merrick Garland was sitting on.
I really like how you and Mr. Panicans just keep making up wild theories, all based upon thin air, in order to deflect any and all suspicions away from your little idol state in the Middle East.
Keep doing what you're doing. In these dark days, I look to you & Mr. Panicans for much needed comic relief.
Let's see how this ages.
« First « Previous Comments 1,081 - 1,120 of 1,666 Next » Last » Search these comments
@RudyGiuliani
🚨 BREAKING NEWS: The Jeffrey Epstein Client List is now delayed until at least Jan. 22 after the court grants Jane Doe 107’s request for a 30-day extension claiming a "risk of physical harm in her country."
Yikes. It may never come out. Expect more of this.https://x.com/RudyGiuliani/status/1742380130486321587?s=20
Can't be Gislaine, she's in prison. Who? I'd say Kamala, but she's in DC.