« First « Previous Comments 1,442 - 1,481 of 1,661 Next » Last » Search these comments
Charlie Kirk had publicly called for the release of the Epstein files. In a video posted on September 8, 2025, just two days before his death, Kirk stated:
“The DOJ should immediately move to unseal all the Epstein… Every file should be released to the public”
Massie’s controversial discharge petition is moving closer to the threshold of 218 signatures. If the benchmark is reached, it will trigger a floor vote on the Epstein files.
“Ro Khanna has communicated with them, I believe, and he’s indicated to me that they’ve expressed they’ll sign it. We’ll get to 218. In fact, we have one more person coming in November, so we need two signatures, and three will be here soon enough.” – Massie
The hope is that Massie’s leadership will spur such a vote, emboldening lawmakers on both sides of the aisle to release the Epstein documents.
At the moment, merely one more House vote is necessary to hit 218. It looks like Massie might build momentum toward the threshold later this month.
Two days ago, Bloomberg ran an exclusive story below the headline, “Jeffrey Epstein Email Trove Reveals Ghislaine Maxwell’s Secrets.”
Bloomberg isn’t saying where they got them. But the paper reported it had reviewed “a cache of more than 18,000” emails from a particular Yahoo email account “which haven’t been previously reported.” As you might guess, the emails also apparently included scads of salacious attachments. ...
The article was packed with scandalous and tantalizing new details. For example, Bloomberg cited a “gift spreadsheet” that includes names and lavish spending on big-ticket things from a $35,000 watch for a “former Bill Clinton aide” and a Lexis for his attorney Alan Dershowitz, down to various items of “lingerie” for teenage girls and a series of “Massage for Dummies” books...
Apart from the intriguing buffet of new hints and fascinating details, what must be the article’s biggest news was buried two-thirds of the way through the lengthy story. In over 18,000 emails, Bloomberg only found three references to President Trump.
“Except for three minor instances,” Bloomberg said, “the emails do not mention President Donald Trump.” In a 2006 email, Maxwell asked Epstein to review a list (for an unknown purpose) of 51 “politicians, business executives, and Wall Street powerbrokers.” Epstein responded with two words: “remove Trump.” In a 2007 email —a month before Epstein brokered his non-prosecution agreement— Maxwell told Epstein, “you have to assume they went to donald trump, then gossman, the docs in wpb, paschow etc.”
It’s just three emails, but based on those, one can fairly assume Epstein considered Trump to be a dangerous enemy. ...
Also two days ago (not coincidentally, as it turns out), the UK Guardian ran a story headlined, “Keir Starmer sacks Peter Mandelson over Jeffrey Epstein ties.” (What we really need to figure out is how a notorious pedophile like Jeffrey Epstein managed to infiltrate layers of governments all over the world, but I digress.)
The short version is that one of the most influential, well-entrenched British deep state overlords’ career is finished. He refused to resign, so Prime Minister Kier Starmer was forced to sack him, which in British English means “fired with extreme prejudice.”
Lord Mandelson was most recently appointed as the UK’s top diplomat to the U.S., and was preparing to meet with President Trump next week in London. But before that, he has advised any number of British Prime Ministers. He has dined with the King and consulted with the Queen, probably many times. He’s known as a “political fixer,” and has held dozens of top appointments in the UK government. Including once —ironically, as it turns out— serving as the country’s top prosecutor (like our Attorney General).
I say it was “ironic” because emails and a newly released photo (above) from Epstein’s “birthday book” show Mandelson was, wait for it, close friends with Jeffrey Epstein. One begins to wonder just how many “close friends” the international man of mystery collected, in between all those massages. Thousands, it seems. Anyway, not only did Mandselson call Epstein “my best pal,” he expressed feelings of “grief” over Epstein’s 2007 conviction, strategically advised him how to get out of it, and kept being best pals anyways. ...
The emails that sank Mandelson for good were not part of any government archives. Instead, they came apparently from Epstein’s personal Yahoo account, which was just acquired and vetted by Bloomberg “using established digital investigative journalistic practices.” ...
In another email, not any quid pro quo, perish the thought, Epstein asked Lord Mandelson to seek a pardon for him as to the state charges from Florida’s Governor Charlie Crist, who was visiting the UK at the time. ...
Lord Mandelson is not any bit player. He’s the head of Britain’s deep state, connected to royalty and legions of foreign dignitaries. Whether by blackmail or by animal lust, Epstein controlled him. Now, just over the last two days, previously unseen emails and a brand new birthday book— generously seasoned with Trump derangement— permanently ended the long-time political fixer.
Who gave Bloomberg those emails?
Who gave Bloomberg those emails?
Throwing the likes of Bill Clinton, Prince Andrew, George Mitchell, Jeal Luc Brunel, Bill Richardson, Marvin Minsky, Tom Pritzker and various other John Doe sex addicts under proverbial buses is nothing more than a distraction.
At this stage of the game is the following really a major revelation?:
... The real story that mainstream media refuses to investigate is why federal judges in New York have been allowed to secret away in sealed documents the puzzle pieces to how Epstein’s network of powerful men were able to run a sex trafficking ring for two decades with the “active participation” of the largest federally-insured bank in the United States, JPMorgan Chase; and right under the nose of its Chairman, CEO and media darling, Jamie Dimon.
This is the Big Story that has been left to wilt on the vine by the likes of the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Washington Post and their peers. ...
Many of the individuals listed in Epstein’s little black book – a total of 1,571 – have had important banking relationships with JPMorgan Chase. In a court filing on July 26 of last year by the Attorney General of the U.S. Virgin Islands, which has since settled its Epstein-related case against JPMorgan Chase for $75 million, it listed the following individuals as people Epstein referred as clients to the bank: Microsoft co-founder and billionaire Bill Gates; Google co-founder and billionaire Sergey Brin; the Sultan of Dubai, Sultan Ahmed bin Sulayem; media and real estate billionaire Mort Zuckerman; and numerous others. ...
The lawsuit’s theory of the case was that specific members of the Board of JPMorgan Chase “put their heads in the sand” and ignored that the bank had become a cash conduit for Jeffrey Epstein’s child sex trafficking ring because they were hoping that their own verifiable business ties to Epstein “would go unnoticed.” (We might add an attendant thesis: that Dimon takes very good care of his Board in return for them taking very good care of him.)
Mainstream media ignored the allegations that members of the JPMorgan Chase Board of Directors had business ties with Epstein and Judge Rakoff wasted no time in dismissing the case on technical grounds. (This was not the first time that a major scandal involving JPMorgan Chase received a news blackout by mainstream media.) ...
The real puzzle pieces are the thousands upon thousands of hours of videotape that Epstein recorded across all of his hidden cameras throughout his various homes and getaways. That is the most damning evidence, and it will never be released.
Former US Attorney General Bill Barr conned President Trump, ran cover for the CIA, MOSSAD, MEGA Group, and other entities that worked with Epstein. And then Bill Barr had Epstein suicided, and laughed about it during his MSM interviews.
The fact that Bill Barr’s father, author of a depraved pedo sci-fi novella, hired Epstein as a teacher in a prestigious NYC prep school is also no coincidence.
The fact that JPMorgan Chase, which aided and abetted Epstein’s sex trafficking ring for decades, is one of the owners of the Federal Reserve should give further pause as to why there is a central bank to begin with that is neither Federal nor has any actual reserves, and what deeper global financial scams are afoot leveraging powerful pedophiles.
Nope, that horse ain't dead.
Why are almost all Republicans blocking the full Epstein files from being released?

Opportunism and cowardice by Republicans here.



Patrick says
Opportunism and cowardice by Republicans here.
A fish rots from the head down. The executive branch has all the power necessary to release the files. And seeing how they act even when their authority is uncertain (cough, tariffs, cough) the argument that they suddenly need judges or the Congess to permit the release is insulting everybody's intelligence.
Can Congress Compel the Release of All Epstein Files Held by the FBI?
Yes, Congress has the constitutional authority to compel the release of investigative files held by the FBI (part of the executive branch), but this power is not absolute and faces practical, legal, and political limitations. The executive branch (DOJ/FBI) controls the files initially, but Congress can assert oversight through legislative tools, though full release may require negotiation, court enforcement, or overcoming vetoes. Below, I explain the mechanisms, limits, and Epstein-specific context.Congress's Investigative PowerAuthority: Congress's oversight stems from Article I (legislative powers) and the Necessary and Proper Clause (Art. I, § 8, cl. 18). The Supreme Court has upheld this as essential for legislation and accountability (e.g., McGrain v. Daugherty, 1927; Watkins v. United States, 1957). It includes subpoenas for documents/testimony and public release of non-classified materials.
Tools to Compel Release:Subpoenas: Committees (e.g., House Oversight) can demand files; non-compliance leads to contempt charges or court enforcement.
Legislation: Bills or resolutions (e.g., discharge petitions) can mandate release within deadlines.
Amendments: Attach to must-pass bills (e.g., defense authorizations).
Executive Branch Control and LimitsInitial Custody: The FBI/DOJ holds files and can withhold under executive privilege (e.g., national security, ongoing investigations, victim privacy).
Courts may uphold this if Congress's demand exceeds legislative needs (Trump v. Mazars, 2020).
Veto Power: Presidential veto can block bills, requiring a 2/3 override.
Practical Barriers: Political opposition (e.g., from leadership) or inter-branch negotiation often resolves disputes without full release.
Epstein Files SpecificsIn 2025, bipartisan efforts (e.g., Reps. Massie/R-KY and Khanna/D-CA's discharge petition) aim to compel full DOJ/FBI release within 30 days.
House Oversight released ~33,000 pages in September 2025 via subpoena, but critics say it's incomplete.
Senate votes (e.g., Schumer's amendment) failed, showing executive resistance (e.g., via Trump veto threats).
Congress can compel but may not force immediate, full release without override or court backing.In summary, Congress can compel via subpoenas or laws, but the executive retains leverage through privilege and vetoes, often resolved politically
PATEL: The estate of Epstein has a voluminous amount of information that they have not released
LIEU: Wouldn't it be great if the FBI subpoenaed the estate?
PATEL: The estate is under no obligation to provide that information
LIEU: That's just false. You're the frickin' FBI! You can subpoena information
Moskowitz: You've seen the picture of the woman's body with the president's signature—he says it's not his. Will you open up an investigation into Epstein estate for putting out a fake document?
Patel: On what basis?
Moskowitz: They put out a fake signature—a forgery of his signature.
Patel: Sure, I'll do it.
Kash Patel: "Do you know how court orders work?"
Dan Goldman: "I was a prosecutor. A real prosecutor for ten years. I want to understand what the court order prevents you from releasing witness statements that the FBI took... you are hiding the Epstein files. You are part of the cover-up."
Kash Patel: "Do you know how court orders work?"
Dan Goldman: "I was a prosecutor. A real prosecutor for ten years. I want to understand what the court order prevents you from releasing witness statements that the FBI took... you are hiding the Epstein files. You are part of the cover-up."
RWSGFY says
Kash Patel: "Do you know how court orders work?"
Dan Goldman: "I was a prosecutor. A real prosecutor for ten years. I want to understand what the court order prevents you from releasing witness statements that the FBI took... you are hiding the Epstein files. You are part of the cover-up."
And Kash Patel was a real public defender in South Florida so its not as though he does not understand this. It helps he was a public defender to understand the process on both sides.
.
Public defender is lowest of the low bottom feeders. It's totally possible he does not understand many things because his limited experience never exposed him to them.
Howard Rubin, ex-NYC financier with ties to George Soros, arrested for allegedly sex-trafficking women to ‘sex dungeon’ penthouse: feds
A retired Big Apple financier with past ties to George Soros allegedly “tortured” former Playboy models and other women in a Midtown penthouse-turned-soundproofed BDSM “sex dungeon” for years, federal prosecutors said Friday.
Howard Rubin, 70, was arrested by federal authorities at his home in Fairfield, Ct., Friday morning on charges he sex-trafficked at least 10 women between 2009 and 2019, luring them to swanky New York City hotels and the leased luxury pad near Central Park — where he restrained, beat and electrically shocked them, the Brooklyn US Attorney’s Office charged.
The famed former money manager — known as “Howie” or “H” and worth at least tens of millions of dollars — even appeared to revel in the stomach-turning encounters in text messages with his personal assistant, Jennifer Powers, who is also facing sex-trafficking charges tied to the scheme.
The Democratic National Committee (DNC) is under renewed fire after revelations that it never returned donations from Jeffrey Epstein.
Evidence has emerged showing that the DNC failed to return the money even as the late financier’s sex-trafficking case files continue to rock Washington. ...
Scrutiny over donations tied to controversial figures is standard practice in politics.
The Republican National Committee (RNC), for example, faced calls to return $1.4 million linked to its former finance chair Steve Wynn after he stepped down in 2018 amid multiple sexual misconduct allegations.
The DNC also accepted more than $90,000 from billionaire hedge fund manager Glenn Dubin, a longtime associate of Epstein who faced accusations from Virginia Roberts Giuffre.
Read sickening messages between ex-NYC financier Howard Rubin and his personal assistant as pair celebrate hurting women
Disturbing text messages between accused BDSM-crazed tycoon Howard Rubin and his longtime personal assistant were laid bare Friday as federal prosecutors charged the pair with a decade-long sex-trafficking scheme.
Rubin, 70, brazenly memorialized his twisted sexual deviances in missives exchanged with 45-year-old staffer Jennifer Powers and others — including some of his alleged victims — giddily bragging about his love of hurting women, court papers charged.
Here are some of the sickening messages revealed by Brooklyn federal prosecutors as Rubin and Powers were hit with a 10-count indictment:
In one horrifying exchange in 2015, when the retired financier Rubin allegedly told Powers that he had his way with a woman tied up to a cross.
The dedicated sidekick — who had worked for Rubin since 2011 — sent a sickening reply, the feds charged.
“I can only imagine what you did to her on that cross!!! Did you shock her p—y??” Powers allegedly wrote.
Rubin allegedly replied that he had, but bemoaned the fact that his electrocution device was losing strength, according to court papers.
Tucker and Glenn Greenwald discuss the DOJ’s decisions regarding the Epstein files
Newly discovered emails from Jeffrey Epstein’s personal Yahoo account are exposing disturbing details about how he and his associates lured underage victims.
The cache, spanning more than two decades but concentrated between 2005 and 2008, paints a grim picture of Epstein’s inner circle.
Female associates routinely sent him photos and profiles of young women, including information about their age, jobs, ethnicity, and physical appearance.
One message reviewed by Bloomberg allegedly showed Epstein dismissing a potential victim as “fat and Asian sorry.”
Everyone has been paid off. Maxwell and Epstein were caught trafficking. That's the furthest this goes. These people are rich. Once it broke these people went to their victims because they're rich. Here's life changing money, never talk about this. Hell Epstein probably had a stack of NDA's ready to go. This has been going on since the early 2000's.
« First « Previous Comments 1,442 - 1,481 of 1,661 Next » Last » Search these comments
@RudyGiuliani
🚨 BREAKING NEWS: The Jeffrey Epstein Client List is now delayed until at least Jan. 22 after the court grants Jane Doe 107’s request for a 30-day extension claiming a "risk of physical harm in her country."
Yikes. It may never come out. Expect more of this.https://x.com/RudyGiuliani/status/1742380130486321587?s=20
Can't be Gislaine, she's in prison. Who? I'd say Kamala, but she's in DC.