« First « Previous Comments 38 - 77 of 251 Next » Last » Search these comments
"For all you engineers it is frankly a basic concept. YOU catch issues if under
warranty and call them out."
In science we follow the data WookieMan. In this case the data says that the 737 has very
serious safety problems and needs to be recalled. It is not that complicated.
"What safety problems? Name one that wasn't on airline negligence? Just one.
No one has yet."
"If an employee changes a tire on an aircraft and doesn't do it right and it falls
off, how is that Boeings fault. The logic is not there. It's not scientific. It's retarded."
Your argument is incoherent. Changing a tire is a maintenance issue. Failing to assemble the
fuselage by not bolting it down is a manufacturing issue.
"Lol. They [Alaska Airlines] took control of the aircraft."
"Airlines have mechanics look it over for the 8-9 figure purchase they
just made. You do know this right?"
You seem unable to distinguish between facts from fiction. The US government requires
manufacturers to recall vehicles that have safety-related defects or do not meet Federal
safety standards. What makes you think that Boeing is an exception? No answer.
"I will never fly Lion Air or Ethiopian because they didn't train their pilots
on a basic system for flight controls."
The_Deplorable says
https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/congressman-sold-boeing-stock-hours-doj-probe-was-announced
Trust me: they know exactly what dumpster they dropped his body in.
Training had nothing to do with these disasters. Lion Air and the Ethiopian planes crashed
because the planes were unstable.
Boeing missed things
"How many Southwest pilots crashed a 737 Max? United? American? Delta?"
« First « Previous Comments 38 - 77 of 251 Next » Last » Search these comments
https://x.com/ChuckCallesto/status/1748236371351781726?s=20